F. Campana

Prognostic factors of breast recurrence in the conservative management of early breast cancer: A 25-year follow-up☆

Between 1960 and 1980, 518 patients with T1, T2, N0, N1a, invasive breast cancer were treated by limited surgery at Institute Curie with (183 patients) or without (335 patients) axillary node dissection, followed by radiation therapy to breast and nodes. Median follow-up was 8.6 years (1.3 to 25 years). Fifty-six breast recurrences occurred, including 49 breast recurrences alone, 3 simultaneous breast and node recurrences, and 4 simultaneous breast recurrences and metastasis. Five-year, 10-year, and 15-year actuarial risks of breast recurrences were 7 +/- 1%, 11 +/- 1.5%, and 18 +/- 3%, respectively. Univariate analysis of 14 clinical and pathological prognostic factors revealed that local control in breast was significantly impaired by young age, premenopausal status, inadequate gross surgical excision, extensive ductal in situ component, and endolymphatic extension. On multivariate analysis with a Cox regression model, the most important contributors to local breast control in order of importance were age (p less than 10(-4), relative risk = 2.44), adequacy of surgery (p = 0.003, relative risk = 2.78), and endolymphatic extension (p = 0.03, relative risk = 2.98). The 5-year actuarial survival rate following breast recurrence was 73%, and was significantly worse when breast recurrence occurred in the first 3 years after treatment: 44% versus 87%, respectively (p less than 0.01). This study confirms the relationship between young age and low breast control rates, and demonstrates the importance of adequate initial surgical procedures. It emphasizes the adverse prognosis of early breast recurrences as compared to the relatively favorable outcome of late recurrences.

Age as prognostic factor in premenopausal breast carcinoma

Whether or not young age at diagnosis is an adverse prognostic factor in breast cancer has long been controversial, in part because much previous work has not taken due account of menopausal status and confounding factors. We have analysed the influence of age on prognosis in a consecutive series of 1703 patients with stage I-III breast cancer. All were premenopausal and all were treated in one centre (Institut Curie, Paris) between 1981 and 1985. Mean age was 44 years (range 23-55) and median follow-up was 82 months. Younger patients had significantly lower survival rates and higher local and distant relapse rates than older patients. The hazard rate of relapse decreased over time in the youngest age group (< or = 33) to reach that of older patients after 5 years. The relation between the hazard of recurrence and age was a continuous one, best fitted by a log-linear function and indicating a 4% decrease in recurrence for every year of age. Multivariate analysis of both survival and disease-free interval demonstrated that the worse prognosis of young age was independent of other factors such as clinical tumour size, clinical node status, histological grade, hormone receptor status, locoregional treatment procedure, and adjuvant systemic therapy. This difference in outlook has yet to be explained biologically but it does suggest the need for a closer look at the natural history of breast cancer in young women.

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumours considered too large for breast conserving surgery: Preliminary results of a randomised trial: S6

The aim of this study was to assess a potential advantage in survival by neoadjuvant as compared to adjuvant chemotherapy. 414 premenopausal patients with T2-T3 N0-N1 M0 breast cancer were randomised to receive either four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil), followed by local-regional treatment (group I) or four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after primary irradiation +/- surgery (group II). Surgery was limited to those patients with a persisting mass after irradiation, and aimed to be as conservative as possible. 390 patients were evaluable. With a median follow-up of 54 months, we observed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.039) in survival in favour of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. A similar trend was seen when the time to metastatic recurrence was evaluated (P = 0.09). At this stage, no difference in disease-free interval or local recurrence between these two groups could be observed. The mean total dose of chemotherapy administered was similar in both groups. On average, group I had more intensive chemotherapy regimes (doxorubicin P = 0.02) but fewer treatment courses (P = 0.008) as compared to the treated patients in group II. Haematological tolerance was reduced when chemotherapy succeeded to exclusive irradiation. Breast conservation was identical for both groups at the end of primary treatment (82 and 77% for groups I and II, respectively). Of the 191 evaluable patients in the neoadjuvant treatment arm, 65% had an objective response (> 50% regression) following four cycles of chemotherapy. The objective response rate to primary irradiation (55 Gy) was 85%. Improved survival figures in the neoadjuvant treatment arm could be the result of the early initiation of chemotherapy, but we cannot exclude that this difference might be attributable to a slightly more aggressive treatment. So far, the trend in favour of decreased metastases was not statistically significant. The local control appeared similar in both subgroups.

Axillary Treatment in Conservative Management of Operable Breast Cancer: Dissection or Radiotherapy? Results of a Randomized Study With 15 Years of Follow-Up

PURPOSE Axillary dissection is the standard management of the axilla in invasive breast carcinoma. This surgery is responsible for functional sequelae and some options are considered, including axillary radiotherapy. In 1992, we published the initial results of a prospective randomized trial comparing lumpectomy plus axillary radiotherapy versus lumpectomy plus axillary dissection. We present an update of this study with a median follow-up of 180 months (range, 12 to 221 months). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1982 and 1987, 658 patients with a breast carcinoma less than 3 cm in diameter and clinically uninvolved lymph nodes were randomly assigned to axillary dissection or axillary radiotherapy. All patients underwent wide excision of the tumor and breast irradiation. RESULTS The two groups were similar for age, tumor-node-metastasis system stage, and presence of hormonal receptors; 21% of the patients in the axillary dissection group were node-positive. Our initial results showed an increased survival rate in the axillary dissection group at 5 years (P =.009). At 10 and 15 years, however, survival rates were identical in both groups (73.8% v 75.5% at 15 years). Recurrences in the axillary node were less frequent in the axillary dissection group at 15 years (1% v 3%; P =.04). There was no difference in recurrence rates in the breast or supraclavicular and distant metastases between the two groups. CONCLUSION In early breast cancers with clinically uninvolved lymph nodes, our findings show that long-term survival does not differ after axillary radiotherapy and axillary dissection. The only difference is a better axillary control in the group with axillary dissection.

Male breast cancer: Results of the treatments and prognostic factors in 397 cases

From 1960 to 1986, 397 cases of non-metastatic male breast cancer (MBC) treated in 14 French regional cancer centres were reviewed. The median age was 64 years (range 25-93). TNM classification (UICC, 1978) showed seven T0, 79 T1, 162 T2, 31 T3, 74 T4 and 44 unclassified tumours (Tx). Clinical positive lymph nodes were found in 31% of the patients. 24 patients received radiotherapy only, and 373 underwent surgery, 247 of these with postoperative irradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy were used in 71 and 68 patients, respectively. There were 382 infiltrating carcinomas and 15 pure ductal carcinoma in situ. Lymph node involvement was found in 56% of infiltrating carcinoma. The oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors were positive in 79% and 77%, respectively, of examined cases. Isolated local and regional recurrence were observed in 8.8% and 4.5% of cases, respectively and 40% of patients developed metastases. The crude survival rates by Kaplan-Meier method were 65% and 38% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and the disease-specific survival rates (without death due to intercurrent disease or second cancer) was 74% at 5 years and 51% at 10 years. The disease-specific survival rate for pN- and pN+ groups were 77% and 39% at 10 years. The prognostic factors were clinical size (T) and histological axillary status (pN-/pN+). The relative risk of death for pN- was 1.0, 2.0 and 3.2 in the T0-T1, T2 and T3-T4 groups, respectively. For pN+, these relative risks increased 1.9, 3.9 and 6.0 in the same groups. The optimal treatment include modified radical mastectomy and irradiation for cases with risk factors of local relapse (nodal invasion, large tumour with cutaneous or muscular involvement). Locoregional failure had unfavourable prognosis. First-line adjuvant treatment seems to be tamoxifen, due to the very high rate of positive hormonal receptors and the old age of the patients, which contraindicate chemotherapy in many cases. The prognosis of patients with breast cancer is the same in male and female patients when disease-specific survival rate, tumour size and axillary involvement are compared.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast. Analysis of 31 cases

From 1970 to 1992, 31 pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the male breast treated in 19 French Regional Cancer Centres were reviewed. They represent 5% of all breast cancers treated in men in the same period. The median age was 58 years, but 6 patients were younger than 40 years. TNM classification (UICC, 1978) showed 12 T0 (discovered only by bloody nipple discharge), 10 T1, 5 T2 and four unclassified tumours (Tx). 11 patients (35.5%) had clinical gynecomastia, and three (10%) had a family history of breast cancer. 6 patients underwent lumpectomy, and 25 mastectomy. Axillary dissection was performed in 19 cases. 6 cases received postoperative irradiation. 15 out of 31 lesions were of the papillary subtype, pure or associated with a cribriform component. The size of the 12 measured lesions varied from 3 to 45 mm. All lymph nodes sampled were negative. With a median follow-up of 83 months, 4 patients (13%) presented a local relapse (LR), respectively, at 12, 27, 36 and 55 months. 3 of these patients had been initially treated by lumpectomy. In one case LR was still in situ, but already infiltrating in the 3 others. Radical salvage surgery was performed in 3 cases, but one patient developed metastases and died 30 months later. The last patient was treated by multiple local excisions and tamoxifen. One 43-year-old patient developed a contralateral DCIS and three others developed a metachronous cancer. The aetiology and risk factors of male breast cancer remain unknown. Gynecomastia, which implies an imbalance between androgen and oestrogen, may be a predisposing factor. As in women, DCIS in the male breast has a good prognosis. Total mastectomy without axillary dissection is the basic treatment. Frequently, the first symptom is a bloody nipple discharge. The age of occurrence is younger than for infiltrating carcinoma, suggesting that DCIS is the first step in the development of breast cancer.

Prognostic factors in inflammatory breast cancer and therapeutic implications

223 inflammatory breast cancer patients were diagnosed at the Institut Curie between 1977 and 1987. Patients received chemotherapy and radiation treatment according to three consecutive randomised trials. Five- and 10- year survival rates were 41 and 32%, respectively. Disease-free interval rates were 25.5% at 5 years and 19% at 10 years. Parameters significantly linked with a pejorative prognosis in a multivariate analysis were: diffuse erythema, lymph node involvement, chest wall adherence, and age above 50 years. When therapeutic response parameters were included in the multivariate analysis, the five most important prognostic factors in order of significance were complete tumour regression after completion of induction treatment (at 8 months), complete regression of inflammatory symptoms after 3 months of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, limited erythema at presentation and, less significantly, complete regression of inflammatory symptoms at 8 months and tumour regression at 3 months. In conclusion, patients who achieved a rapid and complete remission had a better prognosis than patients who had an incomplete response to chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy and reversal or prevention of drug resistance will be evaluated in future trials. Detailed information on the biology of this disease should allow the design of new strategies aiming to improve patient management.

Breast-Conserving Treatment in the Elderly: Long-Term Results of Adjuvant Hypofractionated and Normofractionated Radiotherapy

PURPOSE To evaluate the long-term cause-specific survival (CSS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastases-free survival (MFS) in elderly breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant normofractionated (NF) or hypofractionated (HF) radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1995 and 1999, 367 women aged >or=70 years with nonmetastatic Stage T1 or T2 tumors were treated by breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant RT at the Institut Curie. They underwent wide tumor excision with or without lymph node dissection followed by RT. They received either a NF-RT schedule, which delivered a total dose of 50 Gy (25 fractions, 5 fractions weekly) to the whole breast, followed by a boost to the tumor bed when indicated, or a HF-RT schedule, which delivered a total dose of 32.5 Gy (five fractions of 6.5 Gy, once weekly) with no subsequent boost. The HF-RT schedule was indicated for the more elderly patients. RESULTS A total of 317 patients were in the NF-RT group, with 50 in the HF-RT group. The median follow-up was 93 months (range, 9-140). The 5- and 7-year CSS, LRFS, and MFS rates were similar in both groups. The 5-year NF-RT and HF-RT rate was 96% and 95% for CSS, 95% and 94% for LRFS, and 94% and 95% for MFS, respectively. The 7-year NF-RT and HF-RT rate was 93% and 87% for CSS, 93% and 91% for LRFS, and 92% and 93% for MFS, respectively. CONCLUSION According to the findings from this retrospective study, the HF-RT schedule is an acceptable alternative to NF-RT for elderly patients. However, large-scale prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Simultaneous bilateral breast carcinomas: A retrospective review of 149 cases☆

PURPOSE To evaluate clinical and biological characteristics as well as treatment outcome in simultaneous bilateral breast carcinomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1981 and 1990, 149 patients were diagnosed to have simultaneous bilateral breast carcinoma, defined as tumor arising in both breasts within a maximum of a 6-month interval, in the absence of distant metastases. The median age was 58. Out of a total of 298 tumors, the clinical tumor size was T0-T1 in 40%, T2 in 45%, and T3-T4 in 15% of tumors. The majority of patients (83%) were clinically node negative. Seventy-eight percent of all tumors were classified ductal invasive; 6% were invasive lobular carcinomas; in situ tumors were present in 9%. More than two-thirds of all tumors were well or moderately well differentiated. Tumors were estrogen positive in 86% and progesterone positive in 69% of 62% of patients for whom this information was available in both tumors. Treatment had been by bilateral mastectomy in 43%, by exclusive irradiation in 16%, and by combined surgery and radiation in 41%. RESULTS Median follow-up was 68 months (11-141). A number of positive correlations existed between the tumors in both breasts more often than by chance alone: These were the presence of lobular carcinomas in both breasts (p = 0.06), the same histological grade (p = 0.002), similar ER (p = 0.03) and PR (p = 0.01) status. Five-year rates for survival and disease-free interval were 86% (80-92) and 70% (62-78), respectively. For each patient the stage of the largest tumor at diagnosis was defined as maximum stage. When survival figures were compared between each maximum stage and matched stages of a group of unilateral breast cancer patients treated during the same time interval in our institute, bilateral breast cancer fared not worse than unilateral breast tumors. Treatment related complications occurred in eight patients (5%). CONCLUSION Simultaneous bilateral breast carcinomas have similar biological, but not clinical, features more frequently than would be predicted by chance alone. So far, the number of patients is too small, and the follow-up is too short to determine whether or not the prognosis is equivalent to that of unilateral breast cancer patients of equal stage. Bilateral conservative treatment is feasible with acceptable cosmetic results and toxicity by using carefully designed radiotherapy techniques.

How to Boost the Breast Tumor Bed? A Multidisciplinary Approach in Eight Steps

PURPOSE To describe a new procedure for breast radiotherapy that will improve tumor bed localization and radiotherapy treatment using a multidisciplinary approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS This pilot study was conducted by departments of radiation oncology, surgery, and radiology. A new procedure has been implemented, summarized as eight steps: from pre-surgery contrast CT to surgery, tumor bed planning target volume (PTV) determination, and finally breast and tumor bed irradiation. RESULTS Twenty patients presenting with T1N0M0 tumors were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent lumpectomy with the placement of surgical clips in the tumor bed region. During surgery, 1 to 5 clips were placed in the lumpectomy cavity before the plastic procedure. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative CT scans in the treatment position. The two sets of images were registered with a match-point registration. All volumes were contoured and the results evaluated. The PTV included the clips region, the gross tumor volume, and the surgical scar, with an overall margin of 5-10 mm in all directions, corresponding to localization and setup uncertainties. For each patient the boost PTV was discussed and compared with our standard forward-planned PTV. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate the feasibility of a tumor bed localization and treatment procedure that seems adaptable to routine practice. Our study shows the advantages of a multidisciplinary approach for tumor bed localization and treatment. The use of more than 1 clip associated with pre- to postoperative CT image registration allows better definition of the PTV boost volume.