F. Di Costanzo

Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Three Platinum-Based Doublets in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate whether two commonly used newer platinum-based regimens offer any advantage over vinorelbine-cisplatin (reference regimen) in response rate for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 2 every 21 days (GC arm), or paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) (3-hour infusion) then carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL x min), both on day 1 every 21 days (PCb arm), or vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2)/wk for 12 weeks then every other week plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) day 1 every 28 days (VC arm). RESULTS Six hundred twelve patients were randomized to treatment (205 GC, 204 PCb, and 203 VC). Overall response rates for the GC (30%) and PCb (32%) arms were not significantly different from that of the VC arm (30%). There were no differences in overall survival, time to disease progression, or time to treatment failure. Median survival for the GC, PCb, and VC groups was 9.8, 9.9, and 9.5 months, respectively. Neutropenia was significantly higher on the VC arm (GC 17% or PCb 35% v VC 43% of cycles, P <.001), as was thrombocytopenia on the GC arm (GC 16% v VC 0.1% of cycles, P <.001). Alopecia and peripheral neurotoxicity were most common on the PCb arm, as was nausea/vomiting on the VC arm (P <.05). CONCLUSION Efficacy end points were not significantly different between experimental and reference arms, although toxicities showed differences. These findings suggest that chemotherapy in NSCLC has reached a therapeutic plateau.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A randomized phase III study of the Italian Lung Cancer Project.

PURPOSE To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC) chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB (limited to T4 for pleural effusion and N3 for supraclavicular lymph nodes) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The end points were the evaluation of quality of life (QoL), response rates, survival, and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred seven patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 28 days, or mitomycin 6 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 3,000 mg/m(2), and mesna on day 1 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 28 days. The whole-blood cell count was repeated on day 1 in both arms and weekly in the GC arm before each gemcitabine administration. RESULTS No major differences in changes in QoL were observed between the two treatment arms. The objective response rate was 38% in the GC arm compared with 26% in the MIC arm (P =.029). The median survival time was 8.6 months in the GC arm and 9.6 months in the MIC arm (P =.877, log-rank test). Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was significantly worse in the GC arm (64% v 28%, P <.001), whereas grade 3 and 4 alopecia was reported more commonly in the MIC arm (39% v 12%, P <. 001). CONCLUSION We report an increased response rate without changes in QoL and a similar overall survival, time to progression, and time to treatment failure for the GC when compared with the MIC regimen in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Vinorelbine is well tolerated and active in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A two-stage phase II study.

More than 30% of lung cancers arise in patients aged 70 years or more; however, because elderly patients are not considered to tolerate chemotherapy, they are generally excluded from clinical trials and are not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin-based chemotherapy in clinical practice. The aims of the present study were to test tolerability and activity of weekly vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged 70 years or more, and to define whether minimum conditions existed for a randomised comparison with best supportive care. The study was designed as a multicentre two-stage phase II trial according to Simons optimal design: 8 or more responses out of 43 treated patients were expected at the end of the trial. Patients aged 70 years or more were eligible if they had a cytological or histological diagnosis of NSCLC at stage IIIb-IV and a performance status less than or equal to two according to the ECOG scale. Vinorelbine was given intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 30 mg/m2 every week for 12 doses. As planned, 43 patients entered the study; median age was 73 years (range 70-80); 11 patients were older than 75 years. Median dose-intensity (mg/m2/week) of vinorelbine was 21.2 (range 7.5-30) and was not affected by age of patients. Toxicity was generally mild, mainly haematological and never life-threatening. ECOG performance status improved in 26% of patients; cough and pain improved in more than 40% of patients symptomatic at entry, while dyspnoea improved in 28%; approximately half the patients had a stabilisation of their symptoms. 10 patients (23-95% exact confidence interval (CI): 12-39%) obtained a partial response. Median time to progression was 11 weeks (95% CI 8-30) and median survival 36 weeks (95% CI 28-53). One-year estimated progression-free and overall survival rates are 16% and 36%, respectively. In conclusion, vinorelbine was well tolerated and active in the treatment of elderly NSCLC patients. A phase III trial (ELVIS-Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study) comparing best supportive care versus best supportive care plus vinorelbine is now ongoing.

Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin combination versus PELF chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

PURPOSE The combination of cisplatin, epirubicin, and leucovorin preceding fluorouracil (PELF) includes three novel agents compared with the standard combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin (FAM) in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma. We report the results of a prospective randomized comparison of the two combinations in previously untreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred thirty assessable patients were entered onto the trial; 52 received FAM and 85 PELF. A 1:2 unbalanced randomization in favor of the experimental treatment was chosen. Approximately 90% of patients had measurable tumor masses. RESULTS The overall response rates (complete responses [CRs] and partial responses [PRs]) were 15% and 43% for the FAM and the PELF regimens, respectively, with a statistically significant advantage for the experimental treatment (P = .001). Time to progression (median, 2.6 and 4.7 months), duration of response (median, 10.7 and 10.2 months), and survival durations (median, 5.6 and 8.1 months) were not significantly different between the FAM and PELF regimens, respectively. The PELF combination was more toxic compared with FAM, but generally tolerable. CONCLUSION This study showed that the PELF combination is about three times more effective than the FAM combination in inducing objective responses. Due to tolerability, it is not recommended for routine clinical use. However, it should be considered, among other second-generation chemotherapy combinations, in future randomized studies aimed to improve the therapeutic outcome in gastric carcinoma.

Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine: a study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

Despite treatment, emesis remains a major problem with cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy. Reasons for variability in antiemetic response among patients and in subsequent cycles are largely unknown and toxicity is sometimes severe. We have, therefore, carried out a multicenter, double-blind randomized trial comparing a combination of high-dose metoclopramide (MTC) (1 mg/kg x 4) and methylprednisolone (P) (treatment A) with a shorter but higher single-dose schedule of metoclopramide (3 mg/kg x 2) combined with dexamethasone (DEX) and diphenhydramine (DIP) to prevent extrapyramidal reactions (treatment B). Three hundred sixty-seven consecutive patients treated with various chemotherapy combinations containing CDDP were studied. Complete protection from vomiting/nausea was, at first cycle, 72.5%/79.5% with treatment B and 55.8%/65.1% with treatment A, a statistically significant difference (P less than .002/P less than .005). In subsequent cycles, protection from emesis significantly decreased with no difference between the two treatments. Multifactorial analysis shows that women, younger patients, outpatients, and patients who experienced emesis in previous cycles were at higher risk of suffering nausea and/or vomiting. Both regimens were well tolerated, but patients treated with treatment B had significantly less extrapyramidal reactions (1.7%/6.1%, P = .053). Treatment B is preferred due to its greater efficacy and lower incidence of extrapyramidal reactions. Trials on antiemetic therapy should take into account the important variables able to influence the efficacy of treatment. There is still a need for improving prevention of emesis in CDDP-treated patients.

Low-dose aminoglutethimide with and without hydrocortisone replacement as a first-line endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

PURPOSE A randomized study comparing low-dose aminoglutethimide (AG) with and without hydrocortisone (HC) was performed to investigate whether corticosteroid replacement contributes to the therapeutic effects of the drug administered as a front-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Postmenopausal patients who had not had prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease and with estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PgR) status positive or unknown were eligible. AG was administered at a dose of 250 mg twice a day orally (125 mg twice a day during the first month) with or without HC (20 mg twice a day orally). Seventy-nine and 74 patients were assessable for response on the AG plus HC arm and on the AG arm, respectively. The two treatment groups were well balanced and patients were largely untreated. Approximately 60% had not received any adjuvant treatment, and approximately 75% had not received any medical treatment after relapse. RESULTS The overall responses (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) were 44% and 41% for the AG plus HC and the AG arm, respectively, showing no significant difference. Time to progression (median, 8.1 and 6.3 months), duration of response (median, 15.8 and 13.7 months), and duration of survival (median, 34.2 and 36.3 months) were not significantly different between the two treatment arms. Side effects were infrequent and mild in both arms, with no significant differences. CONCLUSION We conclude that half of the conventional daily dose of AG has optimal therapeutic activity as a front-line endocrine treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer and that HC does not significantly contribute to the therapeutic effects.

Biological Characteristics and Medical Treatment of Breast Cancer in Young Women—A Featured Population: Results from the NORA Study

Background. The present paper described the biological characteristics and clinical behavior of young women in the cohort NORA study Patients and Methods. From 2000–2002, patients (N > 3500) were enrolled at 77 Italian hospitals. Women aged ≤50 years (N = 1013) were stratified into age groups (≤35, 36–40, 41–45, and 46–50 years). The relationship between age and patient characteristics, cancer presentation, and treatment was analyzed. Results. Younger women more frequently had tumors with ER/PgR-negative(χ 2 = 7.07; P = .008), HER2 amplification (χ 2 = 5.76; P = .01), and high (≥10%) Ki67 labelling index (χ 2 = 9.53; P = .002). Positive nodal status, large tumors, and elevated Ki67 all associated with the choice for chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive patients (P < .0001). At univariate analysis, ER-ve status, chemotherapy and age resulted as the only statistically significant variables (HR = 2.02, P = .004, and >40 versus ≤40, P < .0001, resp.). At multivariate analysis, after adjustment for significant clinical and pathological factors, age remains a significant prognostic variable (HR = 0.93, P = .0021). Conclusion. This cohort study suggests that age per sè is an important prognostic factor. The restricted role of early diagnosis and the aggressive behavior of cancer in this population make necessary the application of targeted medical strategies crucial.

A feasibility study of gefitinib in association with capecitabine (CAP) and oxaliplatin (OXA) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC)

3748 Background: EGF-receptor (EGF-R) is commonly overexpressed in epithelial tumors including ACRC and has thus become the target of various molecular therapeutic approaches. Gefitinib (Iressa), an EGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated activity in lung and head and neck cancer, but its clinical activity in ACRC is still unknown. We designed this trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Iressa in association with CAP-OXA regimen as first-line treatment in pts affected by metastatic colorectal cancer Methods: From October 2002 21 pts were included in a two steps trial (m:f:12/9, median age 66 yrs (54-73). Actually the twelve pts planned for first safety analysis are evaluable for toxicity and response. CAP was orally administered (1000 mg/m2) twice a day continuously for 15 days and OXA was administered (120 mg/m2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks for six courses. Gefitinib has been given orally, once daily, at 250 mg, continuously from day 1.Pts on response at the end of the treatment continued to receive gefitinib until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS 40 cycles were totally administered. The most common side-effect was Diarrhea (14/40 cycles: one G4, two G3 and five G2).Acneiform skin lesion (NCI-CTC grade 1-2 in four and one pts respectively) was frequent, but often disappeared or decreased under continued therapy with Iressa. Further major side-effects included Nausea/Vomiting G1-2 in 12/40 cycles, thrombocytopenia G1-2 6/40 cycles, neutropenia G2-3 4/40 cycles. 82,5% of cycles were given at full dose, while 17,5 were given at full dose but delayed; no reduction of dose was performed. 12 pts are evaluable for efficacy according to an intent-to-treat analysis: 1 CR, 5 PR, 1 SD, 3 PD and 2 withdrawn for SAE (asthenia, diarrhea, and vomiting). CONCLUSIONS Iressa in combination with Cape and Oxa is a feasible regimen in ACRC with an acceptable toxicity profile and an interesting, although preliminary, activity. Further studies are required to assess the potential of Iressa as treatment option in ACRC. Accrual will continue up to 35 patients as planned. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of single-agent oral vinorelbine in elderly (≥70 years) patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and poor performance status

BACKGROUND Elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with poor performance status (PS) are a special population requiring particular attention. Single-agent oral vinorelbine could be an attractive option. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 43 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of two or more with good functional status were prospectively recruited. Oral vinorelbine was administered at the dose of 60 mg/m(2) on days 1-8 every 3 weeks. Primary end points were response rate and safety. RESULTS Overall response rate was 18.6% with 8 partial responses; 18 of 43 (41.8%) experienced stable disease lasting >12 weeks and 17 of 43 (39.6%) disease progression for an overall clinical benefit of 60.4%. Median time to progression was 4.0 (range 2-22) months and median overall survival 8.0 (range 3-35) months. Treatment was well tolerated. Of 187 cycles, we did not observe any grade 3/4 toxicity with the exception of a single not-febrile G3 neutropenia. Regardless of severity, main toxic effects observed were nausea in 48.1% and vomiting in 22.9% of patients, anemia in 43.2%, fatigue in 32.6% and leukopenia in 23.2%. CONCLUSION Single-agent oral vinorelbine is extremely safe in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of two or more and may represent a valid option in this very special population.

Pemetrexed in combination with oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-institutional phase II study

BACKGROUND This clinical trial assessed the efficacy of pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin (PEMOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-four patients with untreated AGC were enrolled to evaluate response rate (RR). Patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with vitamin supplementation and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for six cycles or until disease progression occurred. RESULTS Median age was 62 years (range 26-76). The majority of patients (93%) had metastatic disease. Sixteen of the 44 patients achieved confirmed response [RR 36%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 52%]; four complete responses and 12 partial responses (complete and partial responses according to the RECIST guidelines are the confirmed-responses observed in the study population). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.3-7.5) and median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 7.7-17.2). A total of 220 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles. Most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia in 41% of patients (19% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia in 11% of patients (4% of cycles). Treatment delays or dose reductions for toxicity occurred in 10% and 5% of cycles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PEMOX is active and well tolerated in AGC. RR, TTP, and survival were comparable to those achieved in studies using different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-oxaliplatin combinations, without the inconvenience of prolonged 5-FU schedules.