F. Eskens

Prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy

The objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer, who are treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. We analysed the baseline characteristics of 350 patients who were treated in six consecutive prospective trials with one of the following regimens: cisplatin/etoposide, cisplatin/etoposide/5-fluorouracil, cisplatin/paclitaxel (weekly) and cisplatin/paclitaxel (biweekly). Predictive factors in univariate analyses were further evaluated using multivariate analysis (Cox regression). The median survival of all patients was 9 months. The 1, 2 and 5-year survival rates were 33, 12 and 4%, respectively. The main prognostic factors were found to be WHO performance status (0 or 1 vs 2), lactate dehydrogenase (normal vs elevated), extent of disease (limited disease defined as locoregional irresectable disease or lymph node metastases confined to either the supraclavicular or celiac region vs extensively disseminated disease) in addition to the type of treatment (weekly or biweekly cisplatin/paclitaxel regimen vs 4-weekly cisplatin/etoposide with or without 5-fluorouracil). Although weight loss, liver metastases and alkaline phosphatase were significant prognostic factors in univariate analyses, these factors lost their significance in multivariate analyses. The median survival for patients without any risk factors was 12 months, compared to only 4 months in patients with WHO 2 plus elevated LDH and extensive disease. The performance status, extent of disease, LDH and the addition of paclitaxel to cisplatin are independent prognostic factors in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer, who are treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Phase II study of bi-weekly administration of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer

In a phase I study we demonstrated the feasibility of a bi-weekly combination of paclitaxel 180u2009mgu2009m−2 with cisplatin 60u2009mgu2009m−2. In this study we further assessed toxicity and efficacy of this schedule in the treatment of advanced cancer of the oesophagus or the gastro-oesophageal junction. Patients received paclitaxel 180u2009mgu2009m−2 administered over 3u2009h followed by a 3-h infusion of cisplatin 60u2009mgu2009m−2. Patients were retreated every 2 weeks unless granulocytes were <0.75 × 109 or platelets <75 × 109. Patients were evaluated after three and six cycles and responding patients received a maximum of eight cycles. Fifty-one patients were enrolled into the study. The median age was 56 years (range 32–78). WHO performance status were: 0 (19 patients); 1 (29 patients); 2 (three patients). All patients received at least three cycles of chemotherapy and all were evaluable for toxicity and response. Haematological toxicity consisted of uncomplicated neutropenia grade 3 in 39% and grade 4 in 31% of patients. Five patients (10%) were hospitalised, three patients because of treatment related complications and two patients because of infections without neutropenia. Sensory neurotoxicity was the predominant non-haematological toxicity; grade 1 and 2 neurotoxicity was observed in 43 and 20% of patients, respectively. Response evaluation in 51 patients with measurable disease: complete response 4%, partial response 39%, stable disease 43% and progressive disease in 14% of the patients. The median duration of response was 8 months. The median survival for all patients was 9 (range 2–29+) months and the one-year survival rate was 43%. Four patients who received additional local treatment (two patients surgery and two patients radiotherapy) are still disease free after a follow-up of 20–29 months. This bi-weekly treatment of paclitaxel and cisplatin is well tolerated by patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. The toxicity profile of this regimen compares favourable to that of previously used cisplatin- and paclitaxel-based regimens. Trials are underway evaluating this bi-weekly regimen in a neo-adjuvant setting.

Disposition of docetaxel in the presence of P-glycoprotein inhibition by intravenous administration of R101933

Recently, a study of docetaxel in combination with the new orally administered P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitor R101933 showed that this combination was feasible. However, due to the low oral bioavailability of R101933 and high interpatient variability, no further attempts to increase the level of P-gp inhibition were made. Here, we assessed the feasibility of combining docetaxel with intravenously (i.v.) administered R101933, and determined the disposition of docetaxel with and without the P-gp inhibitor. Patients received i.v. R101933 alone at a dose escalated from 250 to 500 mg on day 1 (cycle 0), docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) as a 1-h infusion on day 8 (cycle 1) and the combination every 3 weeks thereafter (cycle 2 and further cycles). 12 patients were entered into the study, of whom 9 received the combination treatment. Single treatment with i.v. R101933 was associated with minimal toxicity consisting of temporary drowsiness and somnolence. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of neutropenic fever was seen in cycles 1 and 2 or in further cycles at both dose levels. The plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not changed by the R101933 regimen at any dose level tested, as indicated by plasma clearance values of 22.5+/-6.2 l/h/m(2) and 24.2+/-7.4 l/h/m(2) (P=0.38) in cycles 1 and 2, respectively. However, the faecal excretion of unchanged docetaxel decreased significantly after the combination treatment from 2.5+/-2.1% to less than 1% of the administered dose of docetaxel, most likely due to inhibition of the intestinal P-gp by R101933. Plasma concentrations of R101933 were not different in cycles 0 or 2 and the concentrations achieved in the first 12-h period after i.v. infusion were capable of inhibiting P-gp in an ex vivo assay. We conclude that the combination of 100 mg/m(2) i.v. docetaxel and 500 mg i.v. R101933 is feasible, lacks pharmacokinetic interaction in plasma, and shows evidence of P-gp inhibition both in an ex vivo assay and in vivo as indicated by the inhibition of intestinal P-gp.

Phase I dose-escalation study of F60008, a novel apoptosis inducer, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Resistance of cancer cells to cytotoxic therapy can be caused by the activation of strong anti-apoptotic effectors, for example NF-kappaB. Therefore, compounds that inhibit NF-kappaB stimulation might overcome chemotherapy resistance. F60008, a semi-synthetic derivate of triptolide, is converted to triptolide in vivo and activates apoptosis in human tumour cells. We performed a phase I and pharmacological study of F60008 given intravenously as a weekly infusion for 2 weeks every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours. Twenty patients were enrolled, and a total of 35 cycles were administered. The most frequent haematological side-effect was mild grade 1-2 anaemia. Non-haematological toxicities included fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation, all grade 1-2. Two lethal events were observed in which an increase in caspase-3 activity and overt apoptosis in monocytes and neutrophils could be seen. Pharmacokinetic studies showed high inter-individual variability and rendered F60008 a far from optimal derivate of triptolide.

The use of bevacizumab in colorectal, lung, breast, renal and ovarian cancer: Where does it fit?

Bevacizumab is approved for the treatment of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and renal cell cancer. Before embracing this expensive agent for many other indications, it remains critical to be aware of the evidence upon which oncologists base their day-to-day clinical practice. In this review, we address the results of clinical studies upon which bevacizumabs current use is based and discuss some future perspectives.

Phase I and pharmacological study of the oral farnesyltransferase inhibitor SCH 66336 given once daily to patients with advanced solid tumours

A single-agent dose-escalating phase I study on the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 was performed to determine the safety profile and recommended dose for phase II studies. Plasma pharmacokinetics were determined as well as the SCH 66336-induced inhibition of farnesyl protein transferase in vivo. SCH 66336 was given orally once daily (OD) without interruption to patients with histologically-confirmed solid tumours. Routine antiemetics were not prescribed. 12 patients were enrolled into the study. Dose levels studied were 300 mg (6 patients) and 400 mg (6 patients) OD. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 and 15. Although at 400 mg OD only 1 patient had a grade 3 diarrhoea, 3 out of 6 patients interrupted treatment early due to a combination of various grade 1-3 toxicities (diarrhoea, uremiacreatinine, asthenia, vomiting, weight loss) indicating that this dose was not tolerable for a prolonged period of time. At 300 mg OD, the same pattern of toxicities was observed, but all were grade 1-2. Therefore, this dose can be recommended for phase II studies. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that peak plasma concentrations as well as the AUCs were dose-related, with increased parameters at day 15 compared with day 1, indicating some accumulation upon multiple dosing. Plasma half-life ranged from 5 to 9 h and appeared to increase with increasing dose. Steady state plasma concentrations were attained by day 14. A large volume of distribution at steady state suggested extensive distribution outside the plasma compartment. There is evidence of inhibition of protein prenylation in some patients after OD oral administration of SCH 66336. SCH 66336 can be safely administered using a continuous oral OD dosing regimen. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this regimen is 300 mg OD.

CYP3A4*22 genotype and systemic exposure affect paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity.

Purpose: Paclitaxel is used for the treatment of several solid tumors and displays a high interindividual variation in exposure and toxicity. Neurotoxicity is one of the most prominent side effects of paclitaxel. This study explores potential predictive pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic determinants for the onset and severity of neurotoxicity. Experimental Design: In an exploratory cohort of patients (n = 261) treated with paclitaxel, neurotoxicity incidence, and severity, pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacogenetic variants were determined. Paclitaxel plasma concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography or liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, and individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from previously developed population pharmacokinetic models by nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Genetic variants of paclitaxel pharmacokinetics tested were CYP3A4*22, CYP2C8*3, CYP2C8*4, and ABCB1 3435 C>T. The association between CYP3A4*22 and neurotoxicity observed in the exploratory cohort was validated in an independent patient cohort (n = 239). Results: Exposure to paclitaxel (logAUC) was correlated with severity of neurotoxicity (P < 0.00001). Female CYP3A4*22 carriers were at increased risk of developing neurotoxicity (P = 0.043) in the exploratory cohort. CYP3A4*22 carrier status itself was not associated with pharmacokinetic parameters (CL, AUC, Cmax, or T>0.05) of paclitaxel in males or females. Other genetic variants displayed no association with neurotoxicity. In the subsequent independent validation cohort, CYP3A4*22 carriers were at risk of developing grade 3 neurotoxicity (OR = 19.1; P = 0.001). Conclusions: Paclitaxel exposure showed a relationship with the severity of paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity. In this study, female CYP3A4*22 carriers had increased risk of developing severe neurotoxicity during paclitaxel therapy. These observations may guide future individualization of paclitaxel treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 19(12); 3316–24. ©2013 AACR.

A Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of CHR-3996, an Oral Class I Selective Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor in Refractory Solid Tumors

Purpose: This clinical trial investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of CHR-3996, a selective class I histone deacetylase inhibitor. Patients and Methods: CHR-3996 was administered orally once a day. This phase I trial used a 3+3 dose-escalation design. PK profiles were analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectroscopic methods and PD studies were conducted using ELISA studying histone H3 acetylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Results: Thirty-nine patients were treated at dose levels of 5 mg (n = 3), 10 mg (n = 4), 20 mg (n = 3), 40 mg (n = 10), 80 mg (n = 10), 120 mg (n = 4), and 160 mg (n = 5) administered orally once daily. The dose-limiting toxicities seen were thrombocytopenia (160 mg), fatigue (80 and 120 mg), plasma creatinine elevation (80 and 120 mg), and atrial fibrillation (40 mg). The area under the curve was proportional to the administered dose and a maximal plasma concentration of 259 ng/mL at a dose of 40 mg exceeded the concentrations required for antitumor efficacy in preclinical models. Target inhibition measured by quantification of histone acetylation was shown at doses of 10 mg/d and was maximal at 40 mg. A partial response was seen in one patient with metastatic acinar pancreatic carcinoma. Conclusions: Taking the toxicity and PK/PD profile into consideration, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is 40 mg/d. At this dose, CHR-3996 has a favorable toxicologic, PK, and PD profile. CHR-3996 has shown preliminary clinical activity and should be evaluated in further clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res; 18(9); 2687–94. ©2012 AACR.

A Phase I, open-label, dose escalation study of afatinib, in a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors

SummaryBackground A Phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of afatinib (BIBW 2992), a novel irreversible ErbB Family Blocker, administered orally once daily in a 3-week-on/1-week-off dosing schedule. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors received single-agent afatinib at 10, 20, 40, 55 or 65xa0mg/day. Safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic modulation of biomarkers were assessed. Results: Forty-three patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in five patients in the dose escalation phase (1/8 at 40xa0mg/day; 1/6 at 55xa0mg/day; 3/6 at 65xa0mg/day). The MTD was established at 55xa0mg/day. In the expansion cohort at the MTD, 6 patients experienced a DLT in the first 28-day treatment period. The most frequent DLT was diarrhea. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, rash, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Overall, the afatinib safety profile in a 3-week-on/1-week-off dose schedule was similar to that of our daily-continuous schedule. Afatinib displayed dose-dependent pharmacokinetics at doses up to and including 55xa0mg/day, with a terminal half-life suitable for once-daily dosing. Signs of clinical antitumor activity were observed. In biopsies taken from clinically normal forearm skin, afatinib caused a reduced proliferation rate, with a concomitant increase in differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes. Conclusion Afatinib in a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule showed a good safety profile. The MTD was 55xa0mg/day, although excess DLTs in the expansion cohort indicated that the 40xa0mg/day dose would have an acceptable safety profile for future studies. Dose cohorts between 40 and 55xa0mg/day were not examined in this study.

First-line treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer: A phase II study

This phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. Fifty-one eligible patients received oxaliplatin 130u2009mgu2009m−2 intravenously on day 1 and capecitabine 1000u2009mgu2009m−2 orally twice daily on days 1 to 14 in a 21-day treatment cycle as first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in one patient and anaemia in another patient. No grade 4 haematological toxicities were observed. Grade 4 non-haematological toxicity (lethargy) occurred in one patient (2%). Grade 3 non-haematological toxicity was seen in 14 (27%) patients (vomiting and polyneuropathy (8%); nausea (6%); lethargy and hand–foot syndrome (4%); and anorexia, diarrhoea, and hyperbilirubinaemia (each in one patient)). In 22% of the patients, toxicity was the reason for stopping the treatment. The overall response rate was 39%. The median overall survival was 8 months; the 1-year survival rate was 26%. In the quality of life (QoL) analysis, the emotional well-being improved during treatment, but the physical functioning scores declined. The fatigue score on the symptom scales increased. Overall, the global QoL score did not change during treatment. In conclusion, the activity of oxaliplatin and capecitabine is comparable with other chemotherapy regimens in advanced oesophageal cancer with a low frequency of grade 3/4 toxicity. Because this treatment can be given on an outpatient basis, it is probably less toxic than cisplatin-based therapy and preserves QoL during treatment, it is a viable treatment option in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.