F. Fracchiolla

Supine craniospinal irradiation in pediatric patients by proton pencil beam scanning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Proton therapy is the emerging treatment modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in pediatric patients. Herein, special methods adopted for CSI at proton Therapy Center of Trento by pencil beam scanning (PBS) are comprehensively described. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve pediatric patients were treated by proton PBS using two/three isocenters. Special methods refer to: (i) patient positioning in supine position on immobilization devices crossed by the beams; (ii) planning field-junctions via the ancillary-beam technique; (iii) achieving lens-sparing by three-beams whole-brain-irradiation; (iv) applying a movable-snout and beam-splitting technique to reduce the lateral penumbra. Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) program was performed using two-dimensional ion chamber array and γ-analysis. Daily kilovoltage alignment was performed. RESULTS PBS allowed to obtain optimal target coverage (mean D98%>98%) with reduced dose to organs-at-risk. Lens sparing was obtained (mean D1∼730cGyE). Reducing lateral penumbra decreased the dose to the kidneys (mean Dmean<600cGyE). After kilovoltage alignment, potential dose deviations in the upper and lower junctions were small (average 0.8% and 1.2% respectively). Due to imperfect modeling of range shifter, QA showed better agreements between measurements and calculations at depths >4cm (mean γ>95%) than at depths<4cm. CONCLUSIONS The reported methods allowed to effectively perform proton PBS CSI.

Dose–response of EBT3 radiochromic films to proton and carbon ion clinical beams

We investigated the dose-response of the external beam therapy 3 (EBT3) films for proton and carbon ion clinical beams, in comparison with conventional radiotherapy beams; we also measured the film response along the energy deposition-curve in water. We performed measurements at three hadrontherapy centres by delivering monoenergetic pencil beams (protons: 63-230 MeV; carbon ions: 115-400 MeV/u), at 0.4-20 Gy dose to water, in the plateau of the depth-dose curve. We also irradiated the films to clinical MV-photon and electron beams. We placed the EBT3 films in water along the whole depth-dose curve for 148.8 MeV protons and 398.9 MeV/u carbon ions, in comparison with measurements provided by a plane-parallel ionization chamber. For protons, the response of EBT3 in the plateau of the depth-dose curve is not different from that of photons, within experimental uncertainties. For carbon ions, we observed an energy dependent under-response of EBT3 film, from 16% to 29% with respect to photon beams. Moreover, we observed an under-response in the Bragg peak region of about 10% for 148.8 MeV protons and of about 42% for 398.9 MeV/u carbon ions. For proton and carbon ion clinical beams, an under-response occurs at the Bragg peak. For carbon ions, we also observed an under-response of the EBT3 in the plateau of the depth-dose curve. This effect is the highest at the lowest initial energy of the clinical beams, a phenomenon related to the corresponding higher LET in the film sensitive layer. This behavior should be properly modeled when using EBT3 films for accurate 3D dosimetry.

Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm

A commercial Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm (RayStation version 6.0.024) for the treatment of brain tumors with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy is validated and compared via measurements and analytical calculations in clinically realistic scenarios. For the measurements a 2D ion chamber array detector (MatriXX PT) was placed underneath the following targets: (1) an anthropomorphic head phantom (with two different thicknesses) and (2) a biological sample (i.e. half a lambs head). In addition, we compared the MC dose engine versus the RayStation pencil beam (PB) algorithm clinically implemented so far, in critical conditions such as superficial targets (i.e. in need of a range shifter (RS)), different air gaps, and gantry angles to simulate both orthogonal and tangential beam arrangements. For every plan the PB and MC dose calculations were compared to measurements using a gamma analysis metrics (3%, 3 mm). For the head phantom the gamma passing rate (GPR) was always  >96% and on average  >99% for the MC algorithm; the PB algorithm had a GPR of  ⩽90% for all the delivery configurations with a single slab (apart 95% GPR from the gantry of 0° and small air gap) and in the case of two slabs of the head phantom the GPR was  >95% only in the case of small air gaps for all three (0°, 45°, and 70°) simulated beam gantry angles. Overall the PB algorithm tends to overestimate the dose to the target (up to 25%) and underestimate the dose to the organ at risk (up to 30%). We found similar results (but a bit worse for the PB algorithm) for the two targets of the lambs head where only two beam gantry angles were simulated. Our results suggest that in PBS proton therapy a range shifter (RS) needs to be used with caution when planning a treatment with an analytical algorithm due to potentially great discrepancies between the planned dose and the dose delivered to the patient, including in the case of brain tumors where this issue could be underestimated. Our results also suggest that a MC evaluation of the dose has to be performed every time the RS is used and, mostly, when it is used with large air gaps and beam directions tangential to the patient surface.

Clinical Pencil Beam Scanning: Present and Future Practices

Pencil beam scanning (PBS) is the most advanced beam delivery technology in particle therapy nowadays. After a pioneering phase, PBS is rapidly becoming available on a larger scale worlwide, and is expected to be the standard beam delivery technique in the future to come. The characterization of a PBS isocentric gantry involves a number of validation tests both at the hardware level (e.g. mechanical isocentricity of gantry and patient positioning system) and at the beam geometry level (e.g. spot size, shape and positional accuracy as a function of gantry angle and energy). A beam model is then generated in the treatment planning systems (TPS), and an extensive validation is needed, from simple geometries to heterogenous phantoms mimicking a patient. Last but not least, planning techniques ensuring plan robustness with respect to setup error and range uncertainties should be implemented in order to minimize the difference between planned and delivered dose distribution.

Zero field PDD and TMR data for unflattened beams in conventional linacs: A tool for independent dose calculations

PURPOSE To investigate the applicability of the formalism described in BJR supplement n.25 for Flattening Filter Free (FFF) beams in determining the zero-field tissue maximum ratio (TMR) for an independent calculation method of Percentage Depth Doses (PDDs) and relative dose factors (RDFs) at different experimental setups. METHODS Experimental PDDs for field size from 40×40cm2 to 2×2cm2 with Source Surface Distance (SSD) 100cm were acquired. The normalized peak scatter factor for each square field was obtained by fitting experimental RDFs in water and collimator factors (CFs) in air. Maximum log-likelihood methods were used to extract fit parameters in competing models and the Bayesian Information Criterion was used to select the best one. In different experimental setups additional RDFs and TPR1020s for field sizes other than reference field were measured and Monte Carlo simulations of PDDs at SSD 80cm were carried out to validate the results. PDD agreements were evaluated by gamma analysis. RESULTS The BJR formalism allowed to predict the PDDs obtained with MC within 2%/2mm at SSD 80cm from 100% down to 50% of the maximum dose. The agreement between experimental TPR1020s and RDFs values at SSD=90cm and BJR calculations were within 1% for field sizes greater than 5×5cm2 while it was within 3% for fields down to 2×2cm2. CONCLUSIONS BJR formalism can be used for FFF beams to predict PDD and RDF at different SSDs and can be used for independent MU calculations.