F. H. Schuurman

Long-term effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on left ventricular mass and diastolic function in elderly, previously untreated hypertensive patients : the ELVERA trial

Objective To compare the effects of a calcium antagonist (amlodipine) and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril) on left ventricular mass and diastolic function in elderly, previously untreated hypertensives. Design A double-blind randomized parallel group trial. Effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on left ventricular mass and diastolic function (E/A Ratio) (The ELVERA trial). Setting Rural northern Netherlands: population screening new diagnosed hypertensive subjects. Patients The study population comprised 166 newly diagnosed hypertensive (aged 60–75) with diastolic blood pressure between 95–115 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure between 160–220 mmHg. Intervention Patients were randomly allocated to receive 5–10 mg amlodipine or 10–20 mg lisinopril for 2 years. Main outcome measures Prior and after 1 and 2 years of treatment left ventricular mass, indexed by body surface (LVMI) was estimated by 2-D mode echocardiography according to Devereux with use of Penn convention. Early to atrial filling ratio (E/A) was assessed by transmitral flow. Change from baseline of LVMI and E/A ratio was evaluated by repeated measurement analysis of the treatment effect in an intention-to-treat analysis. Results Both amlodipine and lisinopril led to equivalent reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. At the end of the study the amlodipine group led to LVMI decrease by 21.8 g/m ⩽ [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.3–25.3] and E/A ratio increased by 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05–0.11). In the lisinopril group LVMI decreased by 22.4 g/m ⩽ (95%, CI, 19.0–25.8) and E/A ratio increased by 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04–0.10). No statistically significant differences were found in changes in LVMI and E/A ratio between amlodipine and lisinopril. Conclusion A long-term study, the ELVERA trial proves that amlodipine and lisinopril reduce left ventricular mass and improve diastolic function to a similar extent in elderly newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.

High Prevalence of Concentric Remodeling in Elderly Individuals With Isolated Systolic Hypertension From a Population Survey

Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass index (LVMI) is shown to be valuable in the assessment of cardiovascular risk. Determination of left ventricular geometry, including concentric remodeling, provides additional prognostic information. In isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), the few echocardiographic studies available show an increased LVMI, but criteria and patient populations differ. No comparison with diastolic hypertension (DH) has been made, nor has left ventricular geometry (with concentric remodeling) been evaluated. We compared both LVMI and left ventricular geometry of newly diagnosed ISH subjects with normotensive and DH subjects, all previously untreated and from the same population. The echocardiographic LVMI of 97 previously untreated ISH subjects (4 x systolic pressure > or = 160 mm Hg, diastolic pressure < 95 mm Hg) was clearly elevated compared with values in age- and sex-matched normotensive subjects (98 and 71 g/m2, respectively; P < .001). The geometric pattern was abnormal in most ISH subjects, with a high prevalence (43%) of concentric remodeling. Both LVMI and left ventricular geometry of ISH subjects did not differ significantly from values in DH subjects (LVMI, 92 g/m2; concentric remodeling, 56%). Sex differences in LV geometry in ISH were present only with the Framingham criteria, not with the Koren criteria. This study shows a high prevalence of concentric remodeling in elderly individuals with previously untreated ISH. The increase of LVMI and abnormality in left ventricular geometry are comparable with those in DH subjects, further defining the place of ISH as a cardiovascular risk factor in the elderly. Whether there are sex differences in cardiac adaptation in ISH and whether the geometric classification can be used to adjust treatment remain to be investigated.

Effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on left ventricular mass and diastolic function in previously untreated patients with mild to moderate diastolic hypertension

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of two long-acting antihypertensive agents, the calcium-antagonist amlodipine and the ACE inhibitor lisinopril, on left ventricular mass and diastolic filling in patients with mild to moderate diastolic hypertension from primary care centres. It is a 1-year prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, comparative study. Patients between 25 and 75 years of age with untreated hypertension with elevated diastolic blood pressure (> or = 95 mmHg) on three occasions (twice on the first visit and once only on the second and third visits) were recruited from a population survey. After 4 weeks placebo run-in 71 patients were randomized to dosages of amlodipine 5-10 mg or lisinopril 10-20 mg, which were titrated on the basis of the effects on blood pressure. Fifty-nine patients completed the study period. Primary endpoints were left ventricular mass index and early to atrial peak filling velocity. Office and ambulatory blood pressure and other echocardiographic measurements were considered secondary. Decrease in blood pressure was equal for both treatment regimens. A statistically significant decrease in left ventricular mass index in both treatment groups was observed: -11.0 g/m2 (95% CI: -6.0, -16.1) in the amlodipine group and -12.6 g/m2 (95% CI: -8.2, -17.0) in the lisinopril group. The higher the baseline value of left ventricular mass before treatment, the more the decrease after treatment. Early to atrial peak filling velocity did not change significantly within the treatment groups: +0.07 (95% CI: -0.01, +0.15) in the amlodipine group and +0.01 (95% CI: -0.06, +0.08) in the lisinopril group. However, analysis of time measurements of the early peak showed significant changes for both treatment groups. No significant differences in primary and secondary endpoints between treatment groups were found. Twelve patients did not complete the study, seven in amlodipine and five in lisinopril, basically due to adverse events. The effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on left ventricular mass and early to atrial filling peak velocity after 1 year of treatment in patients with previously untreated mild to moderate hypertension are similar. Further studies are recommended, particularly with a larger sample size and a follow-up of longer duration.

Reversal of pathophysiologic changes with long-term lisinopril treatment in isolated systolic hypertension

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study the effect of long-term (2-year) lisinopril treatment on cardiovascular end-organ damage in patients with previously untreated isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). All patients with ISH were derived from a population screening program. End-organ damage measurements, done initially and after 6 and 24 months of treatment, included measurements of aortic distensibility and echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and diastolic function. Blood pressure was measured by office and ambulatory measurements. Of the 97 subjects with ISH selected from the screening, 62 (30 lisinopril) completed the study according to protocol. Office blood pressure decreased in both groups, but ambulatory results significantly decreased with lisinopril-treatment only. Aortic distensibility increased significantly with lisinopril, as opposed to a decrease in placebo-treated subjects. The main effect of increased distensibility occurred between 6 and 24 months, whereas ambulatory blood pressure changed mainly in the first 6 months of treatment. LVMI decreased in both treatment groups, with a significantly higher reduction in lisinopril-treated subjects. Left ventricular diastolic function showed no significant changes in either group. The vascular pathophysiologic alterations of ISH—a decreased aortic distensibility—can be improved with long-term lisinopril treatment, whereas values deteriorate further in placebo-treated subjects. These results, in one of the first studies including subjects with previously untreated ISH only, indicate that lisinopril treatment might favorably influence the cardiovascular risk of ISH.

Silent ST depression and cardiovascular end-organ damage in newly found, older hypertensives

In hypertension, both reduced vascular supply and increased cardiac demand contribute to the development of (silent) myocardial ischemia. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of ST-segment depression and to analyze contributing factors in asymptomatic, previously untreated, older hypertensives. From a population survey, in 184 patients with mild hypertension (4 times systolic blood pressure >/=160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure >/=95 mm Hg), 60 to 75 years of age, cardiovascular end-organ damage was measured. Episodes of ST-segment depression were measured by 48-hour ambulatory Holter monitoring and were observed in 21 hypertensives (12%). They showed a significantly higher combined far-wall intima-media thickness of carotid and femoral arteries and more arterial plaques as measured by B-mode ultrasound compared with hypertensives without ST depression (0.00098+/-0.00021 versus 0.00088+/-0.00016 mm and 5.2+/-3.7 versus 3.7+/-2.8 plaques, P<0.05, respectively), whereas left ventricular mass index was not different (111+/-18 versus 104+/-24 g/m(2); P=0.18, respectively). In hypertensives with transient ST-segment depression, a significant relation was found between left ventricular mass and ischemic burden (r=0.51, P=0.02). Approximately 1 of 8 unselected and previously untreated older hypertensives show asymptomatic ST-segment depression, suggestive of silent myocardial ischemia. These data suggest that vascular factors mainly determine the occurrence of ischemic ST-segment depression and cardiac factors determine the ischemic burden in older hypertensives.

Effect of quinapril and triamterene/hydrochlorothiazide on cardiac and vascular end-organ damage in isolated systolic hypertension

We compared, in a prospective double-blind randomized study, the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor quinapril (QUI) with that of triamterene/hydrochlorothiazide (THCT) treatment on cardiovascular end-organ damage in subjects with untreated isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). End-organ damage measurements, performed initially and after 6 and 26 weeks of treatment, included echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and of diastolic function and measurement of aortic distensibility and peripheral vascular resistance. Blood pressure was significantly reduced in the 44 subjects (21 QUI, 23 THCT) completing the study. Both LVMI and aortic distensibility had changed at 6 weeks, with comparable improvements in both groups. LV diastolic function showed overall no significant changes, although patterns of early filling did differ between the two drug groups. Peripheral vascular resistance appeared to increase between 6 and 26 weeks in THCT subjects only, along with a decreased aortic distensibility. Blood pressure and LV mass were rapidly and markedly reduced in both treatment groups of ISH subjects, paralleled by an improvement of aortic distensibility. In interpreting these results, the pathophysiologic alterations in ISH need to be taken into account, because these differ strongly from those in diastolic hypertension. Results of LV diastolic function and peripheral vascular resistance were less clear but appear to show less favorable changes in the THCT subjects treatment group.

Predictive value of ambulatory blood pressure shortly after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in primary care patients.

Abstract Objective: To determine whether ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive medication is a more sensitive measure than seated blood pressure to predict blood pressure in the long term. Design: Patients with previously untreated diastolic hypertension were treated with antihypertensive drugs for one year; these were withdrawn in patients with well controlled blood pressure, who were then followed for one year. Setting: Primary care. Subjects: 29 patients fulfilling the criteria for withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of seated and ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs. Results: Eight weeks after withdrawal of medication, mean diastolic blood pressure returned to the pretreatment level on ambulatory measurements but not on seated measurements. One year after withdrawal of medication, mean diastolic blood pressure had returned to the pretreatment level both for seated and ambulatory blood pressure. For ambulatory blood pressure, the sensitivity and the positive predictive value eight weeks after withdrawal of medication were superior to those for seated blood pressure; specificity and negative predictive value were comparable for both types of measurement. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the results were not dependent on the cut off values that were used. Conclusion: Ambulatory blood pressure eight weeks after withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs predicts long term blood pressure better than measurements made when the patient is seated. Key messages Ambulatory measurements showed that the mean blood pressure returned to the pretreatment level within eight weeks after withdrawal of medication Eight weeks after drugs were withdrawn, ambulatory blood pressure was a good predictor of blood pressure in the long term, whereas seated blood pressure was not Restarting antihypertensive drugs at this time would be justified on the basis of early ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

COMPARISON OF HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE AND ATENOLOL AS INITIAL TREATMENT IN UNCOMPLICATED HYPERTENSION

SummaryAfter screening a local population in the northern part of The Netherlands for hypertension, 119 patients with a diastolic pressure (DP) between 95 and 120 mmHg were randomised and treated either with 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide (n=59) or 100 mg atenolol (n=60). After 1 month of treatment 6 patients in the hydrochlorothiazide group and 24 patients in the atenolol group had reached a DP⩽90 mmHg (p<0.001). 43 of the 50 non-responders to hydrochlorothiazide were switched to atenolol and 30 of the 35 non-responders to atenolol were changed to hydrochlorothiazide. One month after the switch 19 patients in the atenolol group and 2 patients in the hydrochlorothiazide group had reached a DP⩽90 mmHg (p<0.001). After 6 months of treatment 32 of the 43 atenolol responders and 7 of the 8 hydrochlorothiazide responders were still receiving the same medication, as their DP was still⩽90 mmHg. Non-responders to either medication were given the combination (n=46). 21 patients now became normotensive as did a further 10 after increasing the dose of atenolol to 200 mg. Thus, in all 70 patients had a blood pressure ⩽90 mmHg after treatment for 4 months. Both drugs induced a significant reduction in the total of number of complaints after 1 month of treatment. They did not differ from each other. The reduction was seen both in responders and non-responders and persisted during treatment for 6 months. It is concluded that in terms of short-term efficacy the cardioselective, hydrophilic beta adrenoceptor-blocking drug atenolol is preferable to hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension.