F. Hidalgo

The perioperative management of new direct oral anticoagulants: a question without answers

New direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOAC) are currently licensed for thromboprophylaxis after hip and knee arthroplasty and for long-term prevention of thromboembolic events in non-valvular atrial fibrillation as well as treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. Some other medical indications are emerging. Thus, anaesthesiologists are increasingly likely to encounter patients on these drugs who need elective or emergency surgery. Due to the lack of experience and data, the management of DOAC in the perioperative period is controversial. In this article, we review available information and recommendations regarding the periprocedural management of the currently most clinically developed DOAC, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. We discuss two trends of managing patients on DOAC for elective surgery. The first is stopping the DOAC 1-5 days before surgery (depending on the drug, patient and bleeding risk) without bridging. The second is stopping the DOAC 5 days preoperatively and bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin. The management of patients on DOAC needing emergency surgery is also reviewed. As no data exist for the use of haemostatic products for the reversal of the anticoagulant effect in these cases, rescue treatment recommendations are proposed.

Totally laparoscopic right-lobe hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation: useful strategies to enhance safety.

The overriding concern in living donor liver transplantation is donor safety. A totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy without middle hepatic vein for adult living donor liver transplantation is presented. The surgical procedure is described in detail, focusing on relevant technical aspects to enhance donor safety, specifically the hanging maneuver and dynamic fluoroscopy‐controlled bile duct division.

Anticlotting drugs and regional anaesthetic and analgesic techniques: comparative update of the safety recommendations

&NA; The wide use of anticlotting drugs by patients scheduled for surgery is a challenge for the anaesthesiologist when considering a regional anaesthesia technique. This practice seems safe if there is an appropriate management based on safety intervals established according to the pharmacology of the drug and the regional technique. Some anaesthesiology societies have published recommendations for the safe practice of regional anaesthesia with the simultaneous use of anticoagulants (heparin, low molecular weight heparins, oral anticoagulants (OA), fondaparinux and others) and antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, argatroban and others). One of the most recent guidelines has been published by the Spanish Society of Anaesthesia and Critical Care. This article reviews these recommendations and compares them with others published in the last years. The recommendations are similar, but some interesting differences can be observed and need to be considered. A European consensus in this setting would probably be necessary.

Effect of early treatment with ivabradine combined with beta-blockers versus beta-blockers alone in patients hospitalised with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (ETHIC-AHF): A randomised study

OBJECTIVES To analyse the effect of the early coadministration of ivabradine and beta-blockers (intervention group) versus beta-blockers alone (control group) in patients hospitalised with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS A comparative, randomised study was performed to compare the treatment strategies of beta-blockers alone versus ivabradine and beta-blockers starting 24hours after hospital admission, for acute HF in patients with an left ventricular ejection fraction (EF)<40%, sinus rhythm, and a heart rate (HR)>70bpm. RESULTS A total of 71 patients were examined, 33 in the intervention group and 38 in the control group. No differences were observed with respect to their baseline characteristics or standard treatment at discharge. HR at 28days (64.3±7.5 vs. 70.3±9.3bpm, p=0.01) and at 4months (60.6±7.5 vs. 67.8±8bpm, p=0.004) after discharge were significantly lower in the intervention group. Significant differences were found with respect to the EF and brain natriuretic peptide levels at 4months. No differences in clinical events (rehospitalisation/death) were reported at 4months. No severe side effects attributable to the early administration of ivabradine were observed. CONCLUSIONS The early coadministration of ivabradine and beta-blockers during hospital admission for acute HFrEF is feasible and safe, and it produces a significant decrease in HR at 28days and at 4months after hospital discharge. It also seemed to improve systolic function and functional and clinical parameters of HF patients at short-term.

Reducción de las necesidades transfusionales en hemorragias adquiridas graves mediante factor VII activo recombinante

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe and persistent bleeding have high mortality rates despite standard therapy, including blood transfusion support. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of rFVIIa in the management of severe bleeding, refractory to other treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All cases with severe bleeding and failure of previous treatments who received rFVIIa (n = 21) at one single center were retrospectively included in the study. RESULTS: A response after the administration of rFVIIa was reported in 16 of 21 patients (76.2%). Hemorrhage was completely halted in 14 cases, and 12 patients (57.1%) were alive 30 days after treatment. The use of rFVIIa was associated with a normalization of coagulation tests, especially the prothrombin time (p = 0.001). A marked reduction in blood requirements, red cell units (p = 0.003), fresh frozen plasma (p = 0.009) and platelets (p = 0.017) was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: rFVIIa may have an important role in the achievement of an adequate hemostasis and reduces blood requirements in patients with severe bleeding, emerging as an alternative to blood transfusion.

Totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation. Analysis of a preliminary experience on 5 consecutive cases.

Background The pure laparoscopic approach in right hepatectomy (LRH) for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a controversial issue. Some authors have reported the procedure to be feasible but surgical outcomes and impact on short and long-term morbidity rates are yet to be determined. The aim of this study is to present the results of a preliminary 5 consecutive cases series of LRH for LDLT and to compare it with a successive cohort of open right hepatectomies (ORH) for LDLT. Methods From May 2013 to October 2015, 5 consecutive donors underwent LRH for LDLT in our center. The previous last 10 ORH for LDLT were selected for comparison. Special care was taken to include all adverse events. Each patients complications were graded with the Clavien-Dindo Classification and scored with the Comprehensive Complication Index. Results All 5 consecutive donors completed a pure laparoscopic procedure. All allografts (open and laparoscopically procured) were successfully transplanted with no primary graft failures. Only 2 Clavien-Dindo Grade-I complications occurred in the LRH donors, while ORH donors had 10 Grade I, 2 Grade II and 1 Grade IIIa complications in the short term (<3 months). In the long term (6–12 months follow-up), LRH donors had a significant lower incidence of complications (Comprehensive Complication Index: 1.74; SD, 3891 vs 15.2 SD; 8.618; P = 0.006). Conclusions In our experience, LRH for LDLT is a feasible procedure. Further comparative series may support our preliminary findings of reduced incidence and severity of complications as compared with the open approach.

Postoperative Costs Associated With Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery With Extracorporeal Circulation: Role of Antithrombin Levels

OBJECTIVE To study the impact on postoperative costs of a patients antithrombin levels associated with outcomes after cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation. DESIGN An analytic decision model was designed to estimate costs and clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery in a typical patient with low antithrombin levels (<63.7%) compared with a patient with normal antithrombin levels (≥63.7%). The data used in the model were obtained from a literature review and subsequently validated by a panel of experts in cardiothoracic anesthesiology. SETTING Multi-institutional (14 Spanish hospitals). PARTICIPANTS Consultant anesthesiologists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS A sensitivity analysis of extreme scenarios was carried out to assess the impact of the major variables in the model results. The average cost per patient was €18,772 for a typical patient with low antithrombin levels and €13,881 for a typical patient with normal antithrombin levels. The difference in cost was due mainly to the longer hospital stay of a patient with low antithrombin levels compared with a patient with normal levels (13 v 10 days, respectively, representing a €4,596 higher cost) rather than to costs related to the management of postoperative complications (€215, mostly owing to transfusions). Sensitivity analysis showed a high variability range of approximately ±55% of the base case cost between the minimum and maximum scenarios, with the hospital stay contributing more significantly to the variation. CONCLUSIONS Based on this analytic decision model, there could be a marked increase in the postoperative costs of patients with low antithrombin activity levels at the end of cardiac surgery, mainly ascribed to a longer hospitalization.

Perioperative and Periprocedural Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: Consensus Document of SEC, SEDAR, SEACV, SECTCV, AEC, SECPRE, SEPD, SEGO, SEHH, SETH, SEMERGEN, SEMFYC, SEMG, SEMICYUC, SEMI, SEMES, SEPAR, SENEC, SEO, SEPA, SERVEI, SECOT and AEU

During the last few years, the number of patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy has increased worldwide. Since this is a chronic treatment, patients receiving it can be expected to need some kind of surgery or intervention during their lifetime that may require treatment discontinuation. The decision to withdraw antithrombotic therapy depends on the patients thrombotic risk versus hemorrhagic risk. Assessment of both factors will show the precise management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in these scenarios. The aim of this consensus document, coordinated by the Cardiovascular Thrombosis Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, and endorsed by most of the Spanish scientific societies of clinical specialities that may play a role in the patient-health care process during the perioperative or periprocedural period, is to recommend some simple and practical guidelines with a view to homogenizing daily clinical practice.

Recomendaciones de uso de los anticoagulantes orales directos en el período perioperatorio

Because of the characteristics of direct oral anticoagulants (DOA), the lack of an antidote to completely reverse their anticoagulant effects, the absence of standardization in monitoring of their effects, and limited experience of their use, specific recommendations for their management in the perioperative period or in emergencies are required. In elective surgery, in patients with normal renal function and low hemorrhagic/ thrombotic risk, DOA should be withdrawn 2 days before the intervention; when the hemorrhagic/ thrombotic risk is higher, bridge therapy with a low molecular weight hepatin beginning 5 days before the intervention is proposed as an alternative. In emergency surgery, systematic administration of hemostatic drugs as prophylaxis is not recommended. In DOA-related acute hemorrhage, administration of prothrombin complex concentrate, fresh plasma or factor VIIa should be evaluated, and general measures to control bleeding should be implemented.

Desmopressin in Cardiac Surgery with Extra-Corporeal Circulation

Patients who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for open heart surgery have an increased susceptibility to postoperative bleeding1. They often require blood component therapy, reoperation for bleeding control is sometimes necessary and occasionally life-threatening hemorrhage occurs during the postoperative period. The majority of patients primarily bleed from the operative site and the excessive bleeding is related to the surgical damage to blood vessels.