F.J. Dryburgh

COMPARISON OF THREE INTRAVENOUS BISPHOSPHONATES IN CANCER-ASSOCIATED HYPERCALCAEMIA

Three intravenous bisphosphonates were compared in the treatment of cancer-associated hypercalcaemia. 48 patients were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups (each with 16 subjects)--30 mg pamidronate or 600 mg clodronate, both as single intravenous infusions; or etidronate as three infusions of 7.5 mg/kg per day for three consecutive days. Patients were rehydrated with normal saline before bisphosphonate treatment. All three bisphosphonates lowered serum calcium by inhibiting bone resorption; pamidronate was the most potent in this respect. By comparison with the other groups, more patients in the pamidronate group became normocalcaemic, and the effect on serum calcium was apparent sooner and lasted longer.

COMPARISON OF AMINOHYDROXYPROPYLIDENE DIPHOSPHONATE, MITHRAMYCIN, AND CORTICOSTEROIDSICALCITONIN IN TREATMENT OF CANCER-ASSOCIATED HYPERCALCAEMIA

Thirty-nine patients with cancer-associated hypercalcaemia were randomly allocated to receive aminohydroxypropylidene diphosphonate (APD), mithramycin, or corticosteroids and salmon calcitonin. Corticosteroids/calcitonin had the fastest calcium-lowering effect, owing mainly to an acute reduction in renal tubular calcium reabsorption; continued therapy over 9 days failed to suppress accelerated bone resorption, however, and most patients remained hypercalcaemic. Mithramycin also substantially reduced serum calcium within 24 h. A further dose on day 2 generally controlled hypercalcaemia until day 6 by reducing both bone resorption and renal tubular calcium reabsorption. By day 9, however, about 50% of the mithramycin-treated patients had started to relapse as bone resorption increased again. With APD serum calcium levels fell more slowly but progressively owing to effective suppression of bone resorption; by day 9 the control of hypercalcaemia was significantly better than in the other treatment groups. Symptoms of hypercalcaemia were greatly relieved, especially by APD.

Immobilization-related hypercalcaemia--a possible novel mechanism and response to pamidronate.

Immobilization-related hypercalcaemia is an uncommon but important condition being associated not infrequently with both urolithiasis and osteoporosis. In this study 5 patients who had been immobilized for a mean of 3 months and had a mean adjusted serum calcium of 3.15 mmol/l were treated with doses of intravenous pamidronate ranging between 10 mg and 45 mg. All patients became normocalcaemic by day 3. Patients 1-3 mobilized shortly after treatment and remained normocalcaemic. In those patients who continued to be immobile hypercalcaemia recurred after an interval of several weeks. Retreatment with pamidronate again resulted in normocalcaemia. No side effects were noted with treatment. All of the patients studied had increased rates of bone resorption as shown by elevated urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratios (median:range) of 0.101:0.045-0.180 (normal less than 0.033) and elevated calcium/creatinine ratios of 2.50:0.69-3.63 (normal less than 0.50). None of the patients in this study had any of the usual risk factors for developing immobilization-related hypercalcaemia though all 5 patients had problems with significant sepsis which we postulate may have lead to cytokine release which in turn contributed to the development of hypercalcaemia. We conclude that pamidronate (at doses as low as 10 mg) is safe and effective in immobilization-related hypercalcaemia and suggest that sepsis should be added to the list of risk factors for development of this syndrome.