F. Lofts

Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) With epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer.

PURPOSE We report the results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) (ECF) with the combination of mitomycin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU (MCF) in previously untreated patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Five hundred eighty patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized to receive either ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks and PVI 5-FU 200 mg/m(2)/d) or MCF (mitomycin 7 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, and PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m(2)/d) and analyzed for survival, response, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS The overall response rate was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37% to 48%) with ECF and 44.1% (95% CI, 38% to 50%) with MCF (P =.692). Toxicity was tolerable, and there were only two toxic deaths. ECF resulted in more grade 3/4 neutropenia and grade 2 alopecia, but MCF caused more thrombocytopenia and plantar-palmar erythema. Median survival was 9.4 months with ECF and 8.7 months with MCF (P =.315); at 1 year, 40.2% (95% CI, 34% to 46%) of ECF and 32.7% (95% CI, 27% to 38%) of MCF patients were alive. Median failure-free survival was 7 months with both regimens. Global QOL scores were better with ECF at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION This study confirms response, survival, and QOL benefits of ECF observed in a previous randomized study. The equivalent efficacy of MCF was demonstrated, but QOL was superior with ECF. ECF remains one of the reference treatments for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus dalteparin thromboprophylaxis in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND Annualised figures show an up to 7-fold higher incidence of vascular thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) compared to other common malignancies. Concurrent VTE has been shown to confer a worse overall prognosis in APC. METHODS One hundred and twenty three APC patients were randomised to receive either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) or the same with weight-adjusted dalteparin (WAD) for 12 weeks. Primary end-point was the reduction of all-type VTE during the study period. NCT00462852, ISRCTN: 76464767. FINDINGS The incidence of all-type VTE during the WAD treatment period (<100 days from randomisation) was reduced from 23% to 3.4% (p = 0.002), with a risk ratio (RR)of 0.145, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.035-0.612) and an 85% risk reduction. All-type VTE throughout the whole follow-up period was reduced from 28% to 12% (p = 0.039), RR = 0.419, 95% CI (0.187-0.935) and a 58% risk reduction. Lethal VTE <100 days was seen only in the control arm, 8.3% compared to 0% (p = 0.057), RR = 0.092, 95% CI (0.005-1.635). INTERPRETATION Weight adjusted dalteparin used as primary prophylaxis for 12 weeks is safe and produces a highly significant reduction of all-type VTE during the prophylaxis period. The benefit is maintained after dalteparin withdrawal although decreases with time.

Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinomas or other biliary tract tumours: a multicentre randomised phase II study - The UK ABC-01 Study.

Background:We assessed the activity of gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (C/G) in patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) (advanced) biliary cancers (ABC) for whom there is no standard chemotherapy.Methods:Patients, aged ⩾18 years, with pathologically confirmed ABC, Karnofsky performance (KP) ⩾60, and adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function were randomised to G 1000 mg m−2 on D1, 8, 15 q28d (Arm A) or C 25 mg m−2 followed by G 1000 mg m−2 D1, 8 q21d (Arm B) for up to 6 months or disease progression.Results:In total, 86 patients (A/B, n=44/42) were randomised between February 2002 and May 2004. Median age (64/62.5 years), KP, primary tumour site, earlier surgery, indwelling biliary stent and disease stage (LA: 25/38%) are comparable between treatment arms. Grade 3–4 toxicity included (A/B, % patients) anaemia (4.5/2.4), leukopenia (6.8/4.8), neutropenia (13.6/14.3), thrombocytopenia (9.1/11.9), lethargy (9.1/28.6), nausea/vomiting (0/7.1) and anorexia (2.3/4.8). Responses (WHO criteria, % of evaluable patients: A n=31 vs B n=36): no CRs; PR 22.6 vs 27.8%; SD 35.5 vs 47.1% for a tumour control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 58.0 vs 75.0%. The median TTP and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) (the primary end point) were greater in the C/G arm (4.0 vs 8.0 months and 45.5 vs 57.1% in arms A and B, respectively).Conclusion:Both regimens seem active in ABC. C/G is associated with an improved tumour control rate, TTP and 6-month PFS. The study has been extended (ABC-02 study) and powered to determine the effect on overall survival and the quality of life.

A phase II study of continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin and epirubicin in inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas respond poorly to most chemotherapy regimens. Recently continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (200 mg m-(2)day-1) with 3 weekly cisplatin (60 mg m-2) and epirubicin (50 mg m-2) (the ECF regimen) has proven to be an active regimen in gastric and breast cancer and consequently worthy of further study in pancreatic cancer. Thirty-five patients were treated with the ECF regimen as above, of whom 29 were evaluable for response and 32 were evaluable for toxicity. The mean age was 59 years (range 37-75). Sixteen patients had locally advanced disease at presentation and 19 had metastases. Objective tumour responses were documented in five (17.3%) patients who achieved a partial response; in 18 (62%) patients there were no change and six (20.7%) patients progressed on therapy. Patients with either stable disease or partial response had a significantly improved overall survival (median = 253 days) compared with patients who progressed (median = 170 days; P = 0.01). Grade 3/4 (WHO) toxicity (all cycles) included alopecia in 18 (56%) patients, nausea/vomiting in eight (25%) stomatitis in three (9%) and diarrhoea in seven (22%) patients, with rhinorrhoea and excessive lacrimation in one patient each. Neutropenic sepsis occurred in 13 cycles in ten patients, and there was one toxic death due to sepsis. There were eight other episodes of non-neutropenic sepsis requiring hospital admission. Fourteen patients (40%) experienced complications with their Hickman lines, including thrombotic episodes (six patients) or their line falling out (five patients). ECF can prolong survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who demonstrate a response or stabilisation of their disease. However, this is associated with considerable toxicity.

Are serial measurements of CA19-9 useful in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas?

Thirty-nine patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied (27 male, 12 female; median age 60 years, range 39-75 years). All patients received chemotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil with intravenous bolus epirubicin followed by cisplatin, repeated every 21 days for a total of six cycles and were evaluable for response. Serum CA19-9 concentrations were obtained at baseline and before each cycle. A rise or fall in the tumour marker was defined as a greater than 15% increase or decrease in the marker on two consecutive occasions 3 weeks apart. A plateau in the tumour marker was defined as a less than 15% decrease or increase on two occasions. Changes in marker expression were compared with serial computerized tomography scanning before treatment and after the third and sixth cycle of chemotherapy. Thirty-five of 39 patients had an elevated CA19-9 (87.9%). Thirteen (36.2%) exhibited a decrease, seven (19.4%) a plateau and 16 (44.4%) patients had a progressive rise in serum CA19-9. The sensitivity of CA19-9 was 67% for predicting a partial response and 86% for progressive disease. The median survival for the 13 patients exhibiting a reduction was 333 days, for the seven patients exhibiting a plateau 253 days and for those who had a progressive rise 185 days. The difference in median survival between the group of patients with > 15% decrease and those with > 15% increase of CA19-9 was significant (P = 0.001). In the cohort of patients who exhibited a reduction in CA19-9, no tumour progression was seen, and the reduction occurred during the first three cycles of treatment. Thus, interval scanning may be avoided in this group of patients.

Bile duct stents: Is there an increased rate of complications in patients receiving chemotherapy?

The aim of this study was to determine whether palliative chemotherapy accelerates the rate of biliary stent occlusion, in patients with a malignant biliary obstruction. Such treatment can induce neutropenia and increase the risk of bacterial sepsis. Overgrowth of bacteria within the bile of patients receiving chemotherapy could accelerate the rate of stent occlusion. Retrospective analysis of treatment records for 80 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma arising from the pancreas, bile ducts or gall bladder was conducted. Two groups were identified, those with a biliary stent in situ (primary stent group: 47/80; 59%) at the time of referral and those without (no stent group: 33/80; 41%). The majority of patients went on to receive chemotherapy, 64% and 70% in the primary stent group and no stent group, respectively. The rate of febrile neutropenia was similar in the two groups (5% versus 7% of all chemotherapy cycles in the primary stent group and no stent group, respectively). The rate of stent occlusion was not significantly different between those exposed to chemotherapy (37%; 95% CI 20-54%) and those unexposed (39%; 95% CI 19-59%). Similarly, the mean duration of patency was not shortened by chemotherapy (105 days in the chemotherapy group versus 119 days in the non-chemotherapy group; P = 0.97, Mann-Whitney U-test). We conclude that there is no evidence of increased rate of bile duct-related complications in patients receiving chemotherapy. In particular, we find no indication for the use of prophylactic antibiotics.

Docetaxel combined with irinotecan or 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: a randomised phase II study

Background:Docetaxel and irinotecan chemotherapy have shown good efficacy in the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. This randomised phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profile of two non-platinum docetaxel-based doublet regimens in advanced oesophago-gastric cancer.Methods:Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer were randomised to receive either 3-weekly DI (docetaxel 60 mg m−2 plus irinotecan 250 mg m−2 (Day 1)) or 3-weekly DF (docetaxel 85 mg m−2 (Day 1) followed by 5-fluorouracil 750 mg m−2 per day as a continuous infusion (Days 1–5)).Results:A total of 85 patients received DI (n=42) or DF (n=43). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). The ORR and time to progression (TTP) in the evaluable population (n=65) were 37.5% (DI) vs 33.3% (DF), and 4.2 months vs 4.4 months, respectively. In the intent-to-treat population, the observed ORR, TTP and median overall survival were similar between the two groups. Grade 3–4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and diarrhoea were more frequent in the DI arm as compared with the DF arm (83.3% vs 69.8%, 40.5% vs 18.6%, and 42.9% vs 16.3%, respectively).Conclusion:Both docetaxel-based doublet regimens show comparable efficacy; however, the DF regimen was associated with a better toxicity profile and is an alternative treatment option for patients in whom platinum-based regimens are unsuitable.

Management of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary with a 5-fluorouracil-cisplatin chemotherapy regimen (CFTam)

BACKGROUND Adenocarcinoma of unknown primary comprises up to 10% of metastatic malignant disease. With few exceptions this diagnosis carries a very poor prognosis of a few months with minimal survival advantage to chemotherapy. However there is the possibility that chemotherapy can improve symptom control and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-four patients with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary received CFTam chemotherapy regimen (5-FU 750 mg/m2/day by protracted infusion for five days, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 once and tamoxifen 20 mg daily on a 21-day cycle). Disease response and toxicity were collected and survival compared to patients who were not treated or who received different chemotherapy regimens. RESULTS Overall response to CFTam was 27% with a median duration of 10 months (range 4-26 months). The chemotherapy was well tolerated with no grade 4 non-haematological toxicity and only three patients (7%) grade 4 neutropaenia with only two (5%) patients developing sepsis. There were no toxic deaths. Performance status was maintained or improved in responders. CONCLUSIONS CFTam is a well tolerated chemotherapy regimen with similar efficacy to other regimens described in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary. In the absence of a significant survival advantage there is a need to conduct randomised trials of chemotherapy versus best supportive care to quantify any improvement in quality of life or symptom control.

Venous thromboembolism at time of diagnosis of ovarian cancer: Survival differs in symptomatic and asymptomatic cases

OBJECTIVES To determine the impact on survival of symptomatic and asymptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) at time of diagnosis of primary ovarian malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The clinical records of 397 consecutive cases of primary ovarian malignancy were studied. Clinical, pathological and survival data were obtained. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Of 397 cases, 19 (4.8%) were found to have VTE at diagnosis, of which 63.2% (n=12) were asymptomatic. VTE was significantly associated with reduced overall median survival (28 vs. 45 months, p=0.004). Decreased survival was associated with symptomatic VTE compared to patients with asymptomatic VTE (21 vs. 36 months, p=0.02) whose survival was similar to that of patients without VTE. Decreased survival remained significant in symptomatic patients after controlling for stage of disease at diagnosis, cytoreductive status and adjuvant chemotherapy use. Overall these data suggest for the first time that symptomatic but not asymptomatic VTE prior to primary treatment of ovarian cancer is an independent adverse prognostic factor.

Longitudinal quality of life (QoL) and quality adjusted survival (QAS) in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing bolus (24 weeks) vs. protracted venous infusion (PVI 12 weeks) 5-FU as adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC)

3625 Background: QoL is infrequently assessed in RCTs of adjuvant therapy for CRC. This analysis aims to assess QoL and QAS in patients receiving adjuvant 5-FU for stage II and III CRC according to treatment arm, age, gender and primary tumour location. METHODS We performed a multicentre RCT in which 801 patients were randomised to 6 months of bolus 5-FU/leucovorin (n=404) or 12 weeks of PVI 5-FU (n=397). QoL was assessed by EORTC QoL core 30 questionnaire before randomisation, during treatment and follow-up to a maximum of 5 years. QAS analysis was performed by integrating the product of the grouped QoL and the survival function. P-values <0.01 were considered significant. RESULTS Between 1993 and 2003, 9,607 questionnaires were returned. There was significant difference in the deterioration of QoL scores at week 2 with bolus 5-FU compared to PVI 5-FU, coinciding with toxicity peak during the first cycle. Following week 12, global QoL recovered to baseline when PVI 5-FU was stopped but this was delayed with bolus 5-FU until completion at week 24. QoL scores significantly improved in both arms during follow-up (p<0.001) and reached a plateau by year 1. Females and rectal cancer patients had significantly worse baseline QoL scores. QoL improved significantly in patients aged <70 during follow-up whereas patients >= 70 only returned to baseline. The changes from baseline QoL by sex, age and primary tumour locations followed the same general trends as treatment arms. There was no significant differences in QAS between treatment arms, although patients with stage III and performance status 1-2 had significantly worse QAS. CONCLUSIONS 12 weeks of adjuvant PVI 5-FU was associated with significantly better QoL during treatment and faster time to recovery compared to bolus 5-FU. [Figure: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.