F. M. Kelvin

Classification of small bowel Crohn's subtypes based on multimodality imaging.

This article has reviewed the imaging features that correspond to and support the classification of patients into clinical subtypes of Crohns disease. One study showed that radiologic features on barium studies closely correlated with the Crohns Disease Activity Index, and another study indicated that CT findings changed patient management in up to 29% of cases. Knowledge of the location, severity, and presence of complications assist in providing patients with appropriate treatment options. Reports of radiologic studies in Crohns disease should include the presence or absence of imaging features that support these different subtypes. An additional advantage of the use of a reproducible imaging classification that emphasizes morphologic features would be improved comparison of the results of different investigators and treatment protocols. Whatever method of radiologic investigation is employed, it should be targeted to answer questions relevant to patient management. The imaging modalities used should be able to classify the small bowel Crohns subtypes and should be reflected in the radiologists reports.

Multidetector-row helical CT enteroclysis.

Currently, CT-E is not recommended as the first-line examination in patients when mucosal detail is required. Double-contrast barium air enteroclysis has advantages in demonstrating small mucosal abnormalities. The authors find CT-E of value in the work-up of patients with symptoms of intermittent small bowel obstruction, particularly those with a history of prior abdominal surgery; in the further work-up of selected patients with high-grade obstruction in whom general surgeons prefer initial conservative management (immediate postoperative small bowel obstruction, patients with history of prior abdominal surgery for malignant tumor, history of radiation treatment, and possible internal extraintestinal fistulae); in looking for complications of small bowel Crohns disease; and in the patient with unexplained anemia or gastrointestinal bleeding. In a series of patients who had both abdominal CT and barium enteroclysis done, each examination provided unique and complimentary diagnostic information. Because CT-E combines the advantages of both methods of examination, is it the optimum imaging work-up in the investigation of small bowel disease? Further research and clinical experience will define the precise role of CT-E in the investigation of small bowel disease. Experience with this method of examination is limited to a few institutions, performed by investigators with interest in small bowel diseases. The addition of cross-sectional display and multiplanar reformatting made possible by multidetector-row helical CT to enteral volume change and the use of multifunctional nasointestinal catheters make CT-E an important tool in the investigation of small bowel disease. Experience has shown the increased reliability of any method of examining the small bowel that challenges intestinal wall distensibility by fluid enteral volume infusion.

Current concepts in imaging of small bowel obstruction

The diagnosis and treatment of small bowel obstruction continue to evolve. The imaging approach in the work-up of patients with known or suspected small bowel obstruction and the timing of surgical intervention in this disease have undergone considerable changes over the past two decades. This article examines the current concepts related to the use of imaging technology in the diagnosis and management of patients with small bowel obstruction. The meaning of frequently used but poorly defined terms in describing intestinal obstruction is clarified and illustrated.

Radiology of small bowel obstruction: contemporary approach and controversies

The radiologic workup of patients with known or suspected small bowel obstruction and the timing of surgical intervention in this complex situation have undergone considerable changes over the past two decades. The diagnosis and treatment of small bowel obstruction, a common clinical condition often associated with signs and symptoms similar to those seen in other acute abdominal disorders, continue to evolve. This article examines the changes related to the use of imaging in the diagnosis and management of patients with this potentially dangerous problem and revisits pertinent controversies.

Technical refinements in enteroclysis

As the primary method of investigating the small bowel, enteroclysis remains a technique in evolution. Technical refinements have made the examination faster to perform, better tolerated by patients, and easier to interpret. More recently, its essential principle of volume challenge has been combined with the tremendous advantage of CT cross-sectional imaging with multiplanar reformatting to give rise to the exciting new techniques of CT enteroclysis and MR enteroclysis (see separate reviews in this issue). Through improvements in methodology and advancements in technology, the future of enteroclysis looks bright indeed.

Radiologic management of small bowel obstruction: A practical approach

The value of diagnostic imaging in the assessment of small bowel obstruction lies in its ability to answer questions to improve the clinical management of patients. These questions include: Is the small bowel obstructed? What are the level, cause, and severity of obstruction? Is strangulation likely to be present? Should treatment be operative or nonoperative? In this article, the different methods of contrast examination of the small bowel are reviewed, and recommendations to facilitate selection and performance of barium studies for small bowel obstruction are given. The indications for enteroclysis and computed tomography are discussed. A practical plain film-based approach to the diagnosis and management of small bowel obstruction is presented. Radiology assumes considerable importance and responsibility since it is able to supply relevant answers to many of the questions concerning small bowel obstruction.

Imaging of small bowel Crohn's disease: can abdominal CT replace barium radiography?

Objectives: To analyze imaging features and compare the diagnostic information provided by abdominal computed tomography (CT) and enteroclysis to see whether CT can replace barium examinations in the assessment of patients with small bowel Crohns disease. Methods: The abdominal CT studies and enteroclysis of 33 patients with small bowel Crohns disease who underwent both examinations within a 2-week time period were retrospectively reviewed and scored for the presence and severity of the following features: mural edema, ulceration, small bowel obstruction, stricture, sinus tract formation, fistula, abscess, extraintestinal manifestations, and total number of intestinal sites involved. The statistical significance of the differences for each variable was calculated. Results: A total of 37 case sets were reviewed. CT demonstrated 10 (27 %) abscesses compared to 7 (19 %) shown by enteroclysis. Three extraintestinal sites shown by CT were not demonstrated by enteroclysis. Enteroclysis detected a larger number of intestinal sites of involvement (54 vs. 47) and more cases of ulceration (78 % vs. 19 %), small bowel obstruction (46 % vs. 16 %), stricture (38 % vs. 11 %), fistula formation (24 % vs. 8 %), and sinus tract formation (27 % vs. 5 %). The two modalities were similar in characterizing and grading the severity of mural thickening (CT showed 41 %, enteroclysis 46 %). Conclusion: Abdominal CT and enteroclysis provide unique and complementary diagnostic information in patients with Crohns disease of the small bowel. Both methods may be required for the accurate assessment of the severity and extent of Crohns disease of the small bowel. The choice of initial examination will depend on the clinical issue in question.

Emergency abdominal radiography: Discrepancies of preliminary and final interpretation and management relevance

The purpose of this study was to determine the discrepancy rate between the preliminary interpretation of abdominal radiographs by emergency physicians compared to the final report rendered by gastrointestinal radiologists, and to assess the impact of such discrepancies on patient management.A retrospective analysis was performed on a sample of abdominal plain radiographs obtained in the emergency department of a private urban teaching hospital. Written preliminary interpretations by the emergency physician were compared to the final dictated reports of the gastrointestinal radiologist. An emergency physician determined whether availability of the final interpretation would have changed patient management.There were 387 abdominal plain film studies that satisfied the criteria for inclusion. Of these, 98 discordant interpretations were noted (an interpretive discrepancy rate of 25.3%). In 16 of the 98 cases (16%), the interpretive discrepancy was deemed to have resulted in a difference in patient management, i.e., a management-relevant discrepancy rate of 4.1% of the total study population.This analysis shows a higher interpretive discrepancy rate for emergency department interpretation of abdominal radiographs than has been reported with emergency department interpretations of other types of radiographs. The most common clinically relevant interpretive discrepancies were misinterpretation of intestinal obstruction and unrecognized urinary tract calculi.

The multifaceted role of radiology in small bowel obstruction

Small bowel obstruction is a common clinical condition, often presenting with signs and symptoms similar to those seen in other acute abdominal disorders. The diagnosis and treatment of this dynamic process continues to evolve. The imaging approach in the work-up of patients with known or suspected small bowel obstruction and the timing of surgical intervention in this disease have undergone considerable changes over the past two decades. This article examines the changes related to the use of imaging technology in the diagnosis and management of patients with small bowel obstruction. The meaning of frequently used but poorly defined terms in describing intestinal obstruction is clarified and illustrated.

Pharmacoradiologic disimpaction of esophageal foreign bodies: Review and recommendation

The use of pharmacologic agents to relieve distal esophageal food impaction has been reported with varying degrees of success. This review defines the role of pharmacoradiologic disimpaction and outlines a radiologic strategy of examination and disimpaction. All reports using glucagon and other pharmacologic agents to relieve esophageal food impaction were reviewed, and the reasons for the variability of their results were assessed. Glucagon has a reported success rate of 37–75%. The technique of examination appears to be the most important factor in determining the success of intervention. Performed as outlined in this review, pharmacoradiologic disimpaction of a lower esophageal food bolus is a reasonable, efficient, safe, and inexpensive first line of management.