F. Sperisen
University of Michigan
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by F. Sperisen.
Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366) | 1999
V. A. Anferov; B. B. Blinov; D. A. Crandell; Ya. S. Derbenev; T. Kageya; S.V. Koutin; A. D. Krisch; R. A. Phelps; W. Lorenzon; L. G. Ratner; D. W. Sivers; K. V. Sourkont; V. K. Wong; S. S. Youssof; C. M. Chu; S.Y. Lee; T. Rinckel; P. Schwandt; F. Sperisen; B. von Przewoski; V. N. Grishin; P.A. Semenov; H. Sato
Recent polarized proton beam experiments in the IUCF Cooler Ring found an evidence for a second-order snake depolarizing resonance, when the vertical betatron tune was inadvertently set near a quarter-integer. We have also studied the possibility of spin-flipping the beam polarization in the presence of a full Siberian snake using an RF solenoid. By varying the rf solenoids ramp time and frequency range, we reached a spin-flip efficiency of about 97%.
Physical Review C | 2000
B. Lorentz; W. Haeberli; F. Rathmann; T. Wise; J. Doskow; M. Dzemidzic; H.O. Meyer; R.E. Pollock; B. von Przewoski; T. Rinckel; F. Sperisen; P. V. Pancella
A polarized proton beam with a large longitudinal polarization component of 0.545{+-}0.005 (96% of the total polarization) was prepared in a storage ring (IUCF-Cooler). This was achieved by means of spin precession solenoids in two of the six straight sections of the ring. A polarized hydrogen storage cell target internal to the ring was used to measure the longitudinal spin correlation coefficient A{sub zz} in pp elastic scattering over the laboratory angular range 5.5 degree sign -43.5 degree sign ({theta}{sub c.m.}=11.5 degree sign -90 degree sign ) with statistical errors of typically 0.025. The absolute normalization was determined to an accuracy of 2.0% by use of the identity A{sub yy}-A{sub xx}-A{sub zz}{identical_to}1 at {theta}{sub c.m.}=90 degree sign . The identity also allows a reduction of the scale factor uncertainty of the previously published analyzing powers and spin correlation coefficients. The results are compared to recent pp partial wave analyses and NN potential models. (c) 2000 The American Physical Society.
The 8th International symposium on polarization phenomena in nuclear physics | 1995
T. Wise; W. Haeberli; B. Lorentz; F. Rathmann; M.A. Ross; W.A. Dezarn; J. Doskow; J.G. Hardie; H.O. Meyer; R.E. Pollock; B. von Przewoski; T. Rinckel; F. Sperisen; P. V. Pancella
A polarized internal H gas storage cell target has been successfully operated in the IUCF cooler ring. A target thickness for atomic hydrogen has been measured to be 3.5±0.3×1013/cm2 in a single spin state. Target polarization (0.75±0.01) showed no sign of deterioration after two weeks of operation with an average beam current of 100 μA. Detection of p‐p elastic events at 200 MeV bombarding energy has been demonstrated by use of coincidences between silicon detectors near the beam and a forward detector array. This target is presently being used to measure p‐p elastic scattering spin correlation coefficients at 200 MeV.
Archive | 1991
W.K. Pitts; W. Haeberli; L.D. Knutson; S. Price; H.O. Meyer; P. V. Pancella; S. F. Pate; R.E. Pollock; B. von Przewoski; T. Rinckel; J. Sowinski; F. Sperisen
We report here a measurement of the analyzing power Ay in 185 MeV elastic proton-proton (pp) scattering at forward angles (2.5°–10.5° in the laboratory). In this angular range the Coulomb and nuclear amplitudes are of similar magnitude and measurements of polarization observables allow separation of the real and imaginary components of the nuclear amplitudes by their interference with the known Coulomb amplitude.[1] Precise measurements at such small angles can be difficult due to the presence of beam halo or scattering from target materials other than hydrogen. In the present experiment we have used both a windowless gas jet target and coincident detection of the low energy proton at large angles to eliminate these backgrounds.
Physical Review Letters | 1995
M. Miller; Kisoo Lee; Andrew Smith; J.-O. Hansen; C. Bloch; J. van den Brand; H.J. Bulten; D. DeSchepper; R. Ent; C.D. Goodman; W.W. Jacobs; C. E. Jones; W. Korsch; L. H. Kramer; M. Leuschner; W. Lorenzon; N.C.R. Makins; D. Marchlenski; H.O. Meyer; R. Milner; J. Neal; P. V. Pancella; S. F. Pate; W.K. Pitts; B. von Przewoski; T. Rinckel; G. Savopulos; J. Sowinski; F. Sperisen; E. Sugarbaker
Physical Review Letters | 1996
L. V. Alexeeva; V. A. Anferov; D. A. Crandell; S.-Q. Hu; A. D. Krisch; R. A. Phelps; L.G. Ratner; S. M. Varzar; V. K. Wong; S.Y. Lee; T. Rinckel; P. Schwandt; F. Sperisen; E. J. Stephenson; B. von Przewoski; R. Baiod; P. S. Martin; A. D. Russell; H. Sato; M.G. Minty
Physical Review Letters | 1994
B. B. Blinov; C. M. Chu; E. D. Courant; D. A. Crandell; W. A. Kaufman; A. D. Krisch; T. S. Nurushev; R. A. Phelps; D. B. Raczkowski; L. G. Ratner; V. K. Wong; D.D. Caussyn; Ya. S. Derbenev; T. J. P. Ellison; S. Y. Lee; T. Rinckel; P. Schwandt; F. Sperisen; E. J. Stephenson; B. von Przewoski; R. Baiod; M.G. Minty; C. Ohmori; U. Wienands
arXiv: Nuclear Experiment | 1998
P. Thörngren Engblom; H.O. Meyer; J. Balewski; J. Doskow; R.E. Pollock; B. v. Przewoski; T. Rinckel; F. Sperisen; W. W. Daehnick; Swapan K. Saha; W. Haeberli; B. Lorentz; F. Rathmann; B. Schwartz; T. Wise; P. V. Pancella
Physical Review C | 2000
B. Lorentz; W. Haeberli; Frank Rathmann; T. Wise; J. Doskow; M. Dzemidzic; H.O. Meyer; R. E. Pollock; B. von Przewoski; T. Rinckel; F. Sperisen; P. V. Pancella
Physical Review Letters | 1998
H.O. Meyer; J. Balewski; M. Dzemidzic; J. Doskow; R. E. Pollock; B. von Przewoski; T. Rinckel; F. Sperisen; P. Thoerngren-Engblom; Michal Wolanski; W. Haeberli; B. Lorentz; Frank Rathmann; B. P. Schwartz; T. Wise; W. W. Daehnick; Robert Flammang; Swapan K. Saha; David John Tedeschi; P. V. Pancella