F. van Wijck
Glasgow Caledonian University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by F. van Wijck.
Clinical Rehabilitation | 2017
Ailie Turton; P. Cunningham; F. van Wijck; H. J.M. Smartt; Chris A. Rogers; Catherine Sackley; Sue Jowett; Steven L. Wolf; Keith Wheatley; P. Van Vliet
Objective: To determine feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of home-based Reach-to-Grasp training after stroke. Design: single-blind parallel group RCT. Participants: Residual arm deficit less than 12 months post-stroke. Interventions: Reach-to-Grasp training in 14 one-hour therapist’s visits over 6 weeks, plus one hour self-practice per day (total 56 hours). Control: Usual care. Main Measures: Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), pre-randomisation, 7, 12, 24 weeks post-randomisation. Results: Forty-seven participants (Reach-to-Grasp=24, usual care=23) were randomised over 17 months. Reach-to-Grasp participants received a median (IQR) 14 (13,14) visits, and performed 157 (96,211) repetitions per visit; plus 30 minutes (22,45) self-practice per day. Usual care participants received 10.5 (5,14) therapist visits, comprising 38.6 (30,45) minutes of arm therapy with 16 (6,24) repetitions of functional tasks per visit. Median ARAT scores in the reach-to-grasp group were 8.5 (3.0,24.0) at baseline and 14.5 (3.5,26.0) at 24 weeks compared to median of 4 at both time points (IQR: baseline (3.0,14.0), 24 weeks (3.0,30.0)) in the usual-care group. Median WMFT tasks completed at baseline and 24 weeks were 6 (3.0,11.5) and 8.5 (4.5,13.5) respectively in the reach-to-grasp group and 4 (3.0,10.0), 6 (3.0,14.0) in the usual care group. Incidence of arm pain was similar between groups. The study was stopped before 11 patients reached the 24 weeks assessment. Conclusions: An RCT of home-based Reach-to-Grasp training after stroke is feasible and safe. With ARAT being our preferred measure it is estimated that 240 participants will be needed for a future two armed trial.
Clinical Rehabilitation | 2016
Linda Miller; F. van Wijck; L Lamont; J Preston; M Hair
Objective: To explore the feasibility of conducting a Phase III randomized controlled trial evaluating sensory dynamic orthoses for upper limb tremor in multiple sclerosis. Design: Mixed methods: double blind randomized placebo controlled pilot study and semi-structured interviews. Setting: Rehabilitation centre. Subjects: A total of 21 people with multiple sclerosis with upper limb tremor. Interventions: Participants received a sensory dynamic orthosis sleeve or a non-compressive sleeve (placebo) that they wore eight hours a day, for nine weeks. Main measures: Outcomes were completed at baseline and nine weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FAHN) Tremor Rating Scale. Secondary outcome measures included the: Action Research Arm Test, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, Psychological Impact of Assistive Device Scale and the Nine-hole Peg Test. Results: Both sleeves were acceptable, although achieving a good fit was an issue. There were no significant between-group differences for the primary outcome measure. The median ± interquartile range change scores were 0.5 ±6.5 and 2 ±8 for the placebo and treatment group, respectively. The median ± interquartile range Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (performance subscale) demonstrated significant improvements (p = 0.01) for the placebo group (1.1 ±1.65) compared with the treatment group (0 ±1.2). There was no between-group differences in the satisfaction subscale. The primary outcome measure was sensitive to detect change; however the Action Research Arm Test was not responsive in this study population. Conclusion: Undertaking an randomized controlled trial would be feasible and a minimum of 200 participants would be needed for a fully powered, definitive randomized controlled trial.
ieee international conference on rehabilitation robotics | 2013
J. A. Cozens; T. Jackson; K. Henderson; S. Brough; F. van Wijck; Bipin Bhakta; S. G. Makower; Christine Smith
The Synthesising and Interpreting Language for Clinical Kinematics (SILCK) is an informatic framework for developing software to control automated rehabilitation devices. It aids adoption of devices into rehabilitation practice, by bridging the gap between clinical practice and internal device operation. SILCK defines data entities and processes for capturing clinical observations of patients and their rehabilitation goals in formats which can be used to direct the tailoring of device parameters to the individual patients needs.
Journal of Neurology | 2012
Gail Carin-Levy; Gillian Mead; K. Nicol; R. Rush; F. van Wijck
Health & Social Care in The Community | 2012
Catherine Best; F. van Wijck; J. Dennis; M. Smith; Marie Donaghy; H. Fraser; S. Dinan‐Young; Gillian Mead
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine | 2018
R. Da Silva; Helen Rodgers; Lisa Shaw; F. van Wijck; Sarah A. Moore; Daniel Jackson; Richard Francis; L. Sutcliffe; Madeline Balaam; Thomas Ploetz; Lianne Brkic; Christopher Price
Age and Ageing | 2018
Helen J. Bosomworth; Lydia Aird; Natasha Alvarado; Sreeman Andole; D L Cohen; Jesse Dawson; Janet Eyre; Tracy Finch; Gary A Ford; Roger M. Francis; Jennifer Hislop; Steven Hogg; Denise Howel; Niall Hughes; Hermano Igo Krebs; Christopher Price; Lynn Rochester; Lisa Shaw; Elaine Stamp; Laura Ternent; Duncan L. Turner; Luke Vale; F. van Wijck; Scott Wilkes; Helen Rodgers
Physiotherapy | 2015
M. Smith; F. van Wijck
Physiotherapy | 2015
Pei Ling Choo; Helen L. Gallagher; Jacqui Morris; Valerie M. Pomeroy; F. van Wijck
Archive | 2013
Ailie Turton; P. Cunningham; P. Van Vliet; F. van Wijck