F.Y. Moraes

Challenges and opportunities in primary CNS lymphoma: A systematic review

BACKGROUNDnHistorically, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) plus consolidation chemotherapy and/or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the gold standard on Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) management. We sought to examine and summarize the data, on clinical trial (CT) setting, investigating multi-modality treatment to PCNSL.nnnMETHODSnWe performed a systematic review of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database and clinicaltrials.gov) and a manual search to identify original PCNSL phase 2 and phase 3 CT from the last 10years. After a 4stage Prisma based selection process, 32 published (3 Randomized CT and 29 phases 2 CT) studies ultimately were selected for review. Four ongoing clinical trials found on clinicaltrial.gov were reviewed. Two investigators reviewed titles, abstracts, and articles independently. Two investigators abstracted data sequentially and evaluated each study independently.nnnFINDINGSnTreatment of PCNSL requires a multidisciplinary approach. HD-MTX represents the most accepted standard of care induction therapy for newly diagnosed PCNSL. When HD-MTX is given with WBRT for consolidation delayed neurotoxicity can be an important complication, particularly in elderly patients. Studies have suggested that WBRT may be deferred until relapse without compromising survival and deferring WBRT may be the best approach in elderly patients. Results from dose-reduced WBRT and consolidative HD-Ara-C are encouraging. High-dose chemotherapy in combination with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT) as chemotherapy alone has emerged as an important consolidative treatment for selected population. The optimal salvage therapy is still to be defined.nnnCONCLUSIONnWBRT for consolidation is a well-studied modality; however emerging options to selected population such as HDC-ASCT, dose-reduced WBRT or chemotherapy alone are associated with similar survival outcome and less neurotoxicity in selected series. Ongoing and future clinical trials will better define the best approach on this rare disease.

Tromboprofilaxia venosa em pacientes clínicos: análise de sua aplicação

OBJECTIVEnRoutine thromboprophylaxis, despite its well-known effectiveness and the fact that venous thromboembolism is a potentially avoidable condition, is not fully established in clinical practice. The objectives of the present study were to determine how often thromboprophylaxis is used and the presence of thromboembolism risk factors, and to verify the appropriateness of its use in medical inpatients, assuming a long-standing national guideline as a parameter.nnnMETHODSnThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study, involving inpatients with medical conditions in the adult general ward of a university hospital. The review was based on a defined guideline.nnnRESULTSn146 patients were included in the review. At least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism was found in 94.5%. In 130 (89%) patients, prophylactic heparin was indicated, and some kind of heparin was prescribed in 73.3%. Regarding the adequacy of prophylaxis, 53.4% of prescriptions were correct regarding prophylaxis indication and dose; 24% had incorrect dose or frequency of use; 19.2% had no prophylaxis prescription, although it was indicated; and in five cases (3.4%), the drug was prescribed, even though it was not indicated.nnnCONCLUSIONnThromboprophylaxis is underused in this population, and an inappropriate dose was prescribed in 50% of cases. Therefore, future studies and interventions should include an educational program started from the emergency department care, an essential step to bring evidence closer to clinical practice.

An integrated multidisciplinary algorithm for the management of spinal metastases: an International Spine Oncology Consortium report

Spinal metastases are becoming increasingly common because patients with metastatic disease are living longer. The close proximity of the spinal cord to the vertebral column limits many conventional therapeutic options that can otherwise be used to treat cancer. In response to this problem, an innovative multidisciplinary approach has been developed for the management of spinal metastases, leveraging the capabilities of image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery, separation surgery, vertebroplasty, and minimally invasive local ablative approaches. In this Review, we discuss the variables that should be considered during the management of these patients and review the role of each discipline and their respective management options to provide optimal care. This work is synthesised into a practical algorithm to aid clinicians in the management of patients with spinal metastasis.

Trial sponsorship and self-reported conflicts of interest in breast cancer radiation therapy: An analysis of prospective clinical trials

PURPOSEnWe aim to assess any association between study and self-reported conflict of interest (COI) or trial sponsorship in breast cancer radiation clinical trials.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnWe searched PubMed for all clinical trials (CTs) published between 09/2004 and 09/2014 related to breast cancer. We included only radiotherapy CTs with primary clinical endpoints. We classified eligible trials according to the funding source, presence or absence of conflict of interest, study conclusion and impact factor (IF).nnnRESULTSn1,603 CTs were retrieved. 72 randomized clinical trials were included for analysis. For-profit (PO), not for profit organization (nPO), none and not reported sponsorship rates were 9/72 (12.5%), 35/72 (48.6%), 1/72 (1.4%), 27/72 (37.5%), respectively. Present, absent or not reported COI were found in 6/72 (8.3%), 43/72 (59.7%) and 23/72 (32%) of the CTs, respectively. Conclusion was positive, neutral and negative in 57/72 (79.1%), 9/72 (12.5%) and 6/72 (8.4%) of the trials, respectively. Positive conclusion was reported in 33/44 (75%) funded trials (PO and nPO) and 5/6 (83.3%) CTs with reported COI. On univariate analysis no association with funding source (P=0.178), COI (P=0.678) or trial region (P=0.567) and trial positive conclusion was found. Sponsored trials (HR 4.50, 95CI-0.1.23-16.53;P=0.0023) and positive trials (HR 4.78, 95CI- 1.16-19.63;P=0.030) were more likely to be published in higher impact factor journals in the multivariate analysis.nnnCONCLUSIONSnnPO funding was reported in almost 50% of the evaluated CTs. No significant association between study conclusion and funding source, COI or trial region was identified. Sponsored trials and positive trials were more likely to be published in higher impact factor journals.

Improved outcomes with dose escalation in localized prostate cancer treated with precision image-guided radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEnDose-escalated radiotherapy (DE) improves outcomes in localized prostate cancer (PCa). The impact of DE in the context of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) remains unknown. Herein, we determined outcomes of three sequential cohorts treated with progressive DE-IGRT.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnWe analyzed data from 1998 to 2012. Patients treated with radical radiotherapy were included, with three sequential institutional schedules: (A) 75.6Gy, (B) 79.8Gy, (C) 78Gy, with 1.8, 1.9 and 2Gy/fraction, respectively. IGRT consisted of fiducial markers and daily EPID (A, B) or CBCT (C).nnnRESULTSn961 patients were included, with median follow-up of 6.1y. 30.5%, 32.6% and 36.9% were treated in A, B and C, respectively. Risk category distribution was 179 (18.6%) low-, 653 (67.9%) intermediate- and 129 (13.5%) high-risk. PSA, T-category, androgen deprivation use and risk distribution were similar among groups. BCR (biochemical recurrence) was different (p<0.001) between A, B and C with 5-year rates of 23%, 17% and 9%, respectively (HR 2.68 [95% CI 1.87-3.85] and 1.92 [95% CI 1.33-2.78] for A and B compared to C, respectively). Findings were most significant in the intermediate-risk category. Metastasis, cause-specific-death and toxicities were not different between cohorts.nnnCONCLUSIONnOur findings suggest continuous BCR improvement with progressive DE-IGRT. Prospective validation considering further DE with IGRT seems warranted.

Long-term outcomes of dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy alone without androgen deprivation therapy for patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer

Objective The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to conventional radiation therapy improves overall survival (OS) in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. The benefit of ADT to added to dose-escalated radiotherapy is less clear. The aim of this study was to report disease control outcomes and to identify prognostic variables associated with favorable outcomes in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy without ADT. Methods and materials From September 2001 to March 2010, 127 patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer were treated with dose-escalated radiation otherapy without ADT. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), prostate cancer–specific mortality, and OS were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox regression modeling were performed. Results The median follow-up was 6.5 years, and the 5-year estimated bRFS, DMFS, prostate cancer–specific mortality, and OS for all patients was 89%, 96.1%, 98.4%, and 96.9% respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors that predict bRFS include risk group and PSA nadir, and factors that predict DMFS include perineural invasion, risk group, and PSA nadir. Conclusions Patients with favorable intermediate-risk cancer could likely be treated with dose-escalated radiation therapy without ADT. Patients with high-risk and unfavorable intermediate-risk cancer, perineural invasion, and PSA nadir ≥1ng/dL had worse outcomes and likely need distinct therapeutic approaches.

Toxicity of Radiosurgery for Brainstem Metastases

BACKGROUNDnAlthough stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective modality in the treatment of brainstem metastases (BSM), radiation-induced toxicity remains a critical concern. To better understand how severe or life-threatening toxicity is affected by the location of lesions treated in the brainstem, a review of all available studies reporting SRS treatment for BSM was performed.nnnMETHODSnTwenty-nine retrospective studies investigating SRS for BSM were reviewed.nnnRESULTSnThe rates of grade 3 or greater toxicity, based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, varied from 0 to 9.5% (mean 3.4 ± 2.9%). Overall, the median time to toxicity after SRS was 3 months, with 90% of toxicities occurring before 9 months. A total of 1243 cases had toxicity and location data available. Toxicity rates for lesions located in the medulla were 0.8% (1/131), compared with midbrain and pons, respectively, 2.8% (8/288) and 3.0% (24/811).nnnCONCLUSIONSnCurrent data suggest that brainstem substructure location does not predict for toxicity and lesion volume within this cohort with median tumor volumes 0.04-2.8 cc does not predict for toxicity.

Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for small to medium-sized brain metastases are exceptionally dependent upon tumor size and prescribed dose

BACKGROUNDnAt our institution, we have historically treated brain metastasis (BM) ≤2 cm in eloquent brain with a radiosurgery (SRS) lower prescription dose (PD) to reduce the risk of radionecrosis (RN). We sought to evaluate the impact of this practice on outcomes.nnnMETHODSnWe analyzed a prospective registry of BM patients treated with SRS between 2008 and 2017. Incidences of local failure (LF) and RN were determined and Cox regression was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses (MVAs).nnnRESULTSnWe evaluated 1533 BM ≤2 cm. Median radiographic follow-up post SRS was 12.7 months (1.4-100). Overall, the 2-year incidence of LF was lower for BM treated with PD ≥21 Gy (9.3%) compared with PD ≤15 Gy (19.5%) (sub-hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.7; P = 0.0006). The 2-year incidence of RN was not significantly higher for the group treated with PD ≥21 Gy (9.5%) compared with the PD ≤15 Gy group (7.5%) (P = 0.16). MVA demonstrated that PD (≤15 Gy) and tumor size (>1 cm) were significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with higher rates of LF and RN, respectively. For tumors ≤1 cm, when comparing PD ≤15 Gy with ≥21 Gy, the risks of LF and RN are equivalent. However, for lesions >1 cm, PD ≥21 Gy is associated with a lower incidence of LF without significantly increasing the risk of RN.nnnCONCLUSIONnOur results indicate that rates of LF or RN following SRS for BM are strongly correlated with size and PD. Based on our results, we now, depending upon the clinical context, consider increasing PD to 21 Gy for BM in eloquent brain, excluding the brainstem.

Significance of treatment response when managing patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

Abstract The precise role of radiation therapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. We reviewed the records of all patients treated for PCNSL at our center between 2004 and 2015. A total of 103 patients treated with either chemotherapy alone (nu2009=u200930), radiotherapy alone (nu2009=u200936), or combined-modality treatment (nu2009=u200937) were analyzed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 13.9 and 20.9 months, respectively. Of those who received chemotherapy, 52.2% achieved complete response/ unconfirmed complete response (CR/Cru) after induction; a trend for improved PFS was observed for those who received consolidation WBRT (NR vs. 30.1 months, pu2009=u2009.092) but not OS (NR vs. 31.6 months, pu2009=u2009.283). Patients who achieved a partial response with chemotherapy and proceeded with WBRT had a similar long-term survival to those who achieved CR/CRu with chemotherapy without WBRT (PFS 15.2 vs. 30.1 months, pu2009=u2009.888; OS 22.0 vs. 31.6 months, pu2009=u2009.340). Consolidation WBRT improved PFS, but not OS, and this must be balanced against possible risks of neurotoxicity.

The relationship of study and authorship characteristics on trial sponsorship and self-reported conflicts of interest among neuro-oncology clinical trials

ProposeTo examine the association between trial sponsorship sources, self-reported conflicts of interest (COI), and study and author characteristics in central nervous system (CNS) oncology clinical trials (CT).MethodsMEDLINE search was performed for original CT on “Central Nervous System Neoplasms“[Mesh]. The investigators assessed for relationships between funding source (industry, academic or cooperative, none, not described), COI (presented, none, or not reported), CT, and author characteristics.ResultsFrom 2010 to 2015, 319 CT were considered eligible. The majority of the studies involved primary gliomas (55.2%) and were Phase II CT (59.2%). Drug therapy was investigated in 83.0% of the CT. The remaining studies investigated surgery or radiotherapy. A minority of papers were published in journals with impact factor (IF) higher than >u200910 (16%) or in regions other than North America and Europe (20.4%). Overall, 83.1% of studies disclosed funding sources: 32.6% from industry alone, 33.9% from an academic or cooperative group, and 10.7% from a mixed funding model. COI data was reported by 85.9% of trials, of which 56.2% reported no COI and 43.8% reported a related COI. Significant predictors for sponsorship (industry and/or academia) on univariate analysis were study design, type of intervention, journal impact factor, study conclusion, transparency of COI and presence of COI. On multivariate analysis, type of intervention, (Pu2009<u20090.001), journal impact factor (IF) (Pu2009=u20090.003), presence of COI (Pu2009<u20090.001) and study conclusion (Pu2009=u20090.003) remained significant predictors of sponsorship. For predicting COI, significant variables on univariate analysis were disease type, type of intervention, journal IF, funding source, and intervention arm being related to sponsor. On multivariate analysis, disease type (Pu2009=u20090.003), journal IF (Pu2009<u20090.001), type of intervention (Pu2009=u20090.001), and funding source (Pu2009=u20090.008) remained significant.ConclusionsThe majority of CNS CT reported some external funding sources and non-related COI. We identified that drug trials, higher IF, presence of COI, and a neutral or negative study conclusion are associated with external funding. Likewise drug trials, higher IF, and glioma trials are associated with presence of COI.