Fabiana Lucà

Minimally invasive surgical treatment of lone atrial fibrillation: Early results of hybrid versus standard minimally invasive approach employing radiofrequency sources

BACKGROUND We compared short-term results of a hybrid versus a standard surgical bilateral thoracoscopic approach employing radiofrequency (RF) sources in the surgical treatment of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF). METHODS Between January 2008 and July 2010 sixty-three consecutive patients with LAF underwent minimally invasive surgery. Thirty-five (55.5%) underwent surgery with the hybrid approach whereas 28 (45.5%) underwent bilateral thoracoscopic standard procedure (no-hybrid group). All patients underwent continuous 7-day Holter Monitoring (HM) at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS At 1 year, 91.4% and 82.1% (time-related prevalence 5.2% vs.6.0% [p=0.56]) of the patients were free of AF and AAD. The hybrid group yielded better results in long standing persistent AF (8.2% [time related prevalence 81.8% vs. 44.4%, p=0.001] vs.14.9%, p=0.04). One-year success rates were 87.5% vs. 100% (p=0.04) in persistent [time related prevalence 3.8% vs. 0%, p<0.001] and 87.5% vs. 100% (p=0.04) in paroxysmal AF [time related prevalence 3.2% vs. 0%, p<0.001] in the two groups. One-year prevalence of Warfarin use was significantly higher in the hybrid group (29.0% [26.2-33.1] and 13.4% [9.9-16.3]) with no difference by AF type. LA reverse remodeling occurred in 81.7% (n=30) of hybrid patients and 67.8% (n=19) of no-hybrid patients at latest control (p=0.02). Left atrial emptying fraction increased in both groups (50 ± 14%, p<0.001 and 52 ± 12%, p=0.004 in hybrid and no-hybrid, respectively) without differences between groups (p=0.6). CONCLUSIONS The hybrid procedure yielded excellent results in long-standing persistent AF. Our findings need to be confirmed by further larger studies.

Minimal invasive surgery for atrial fibrillation: an updated review

AIMS Despite its proven efficacy, the Cox-Maze III procedure did not gain widespread acceptance for the treatment of stand-alone atrial fibrillation (SA-AF) because of its complexity and technical difficulty. Surgical ablation for SA-AF can now be successfully performed utilizing minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study provides an overview of state-of-the-art MIS for the treatment of SA-AF. METHODS AND RESULTS Studies selected for this review were identified on PUBMED and exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied to select the publication to be screened. Twenty-eight studies were included; 27 (96.4%) were observational in nature whereas 1 was prospective non-randomized. The total number of patients was 1051 (range 14-114). Mean age ranged from 45.3 to 67.1 years. Suboptimal results were obtained when employing microwave and high focused ultrasound energies. In contrast, MIS ablation of SA-AF achieved satisfactory 1-year results when the bipolar radiofrequency was employed as energy source, with antiarrhythmic drug-free success rate comparable to percutaneous catheter ablation (PCA). The success rate in paroxysmal was even higher than in PCA. In contrast, ganglionated plexi ablation and left atrial appendage removal seem not to influence the recurrence of AF and the occurrence of postoperative thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive surgery ablation of SA-AF achieved satisfactory 1-year results when the bipolar radiofrequency was employed. Nevertheless, the relatively high complication rate reported suggest that such techniques require further refinement. Finally, the preliminary results of the hybrid approach are promising but they need to be confirmed.

The hybrid approach for the surgical treatment of lone atrial fibrillation: One-year results employing a monopolar radiofrequency source

BackgroundThe hybrid technique combines a mono or bilateral epicardial approach with a percutaneous endocardial ablation in a single-step procedure. We present our early results with this technique employing a monopolar radiofrequency source through a right thoracoscopy in patients with lone atrial fibrillation (LAF).MethodsBetween June 2009 and December 2010 nineteen consecutive patients (mean 60.8 ± 8.6 years, 84.2% male) underwent right unilateral minimally invasive hybrid procedure for LAF at our Institution. Ten patients (52.6.6%) had long-standing persistent AF while four (21.1%) had persistent and five (26.3%) paroxysmal AF. All patients were followed-up according the Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (HRS/EHRA/ECA) and Society of Thoracic Surgeon (STS) guidelines.ResultsThere were neither early nor late deaths. It was possible to complete all the procedures as planned without any conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass. No patient died during the follow up. At one year, 7/19 (36.8%) patients were in sinus rhythm with no episode of AF and off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD). Time-related prevalence of postoperative AF peaked at 44.4% (41.3–47.4) at two weeks, was 30.4% (27.3–34.9) at three months, fell to 14.2% (11.6–18.1) by 6 months and was 13.3% (11.0–17.4) at 12 months Among patients with long-standing persistent (LSP) AF, 20% (2/10) were in Sinus rythm and off AAD. One-year success rates were 50% (2/4) in persistent and 60% (3/5) in paroxysmal AF. At 12 months estimated prevalence of antyarrhythmic drugs and Warfarin use were 26% (22.4–33.1) and 48% (37.2–53.2), respectively.ConclusionsOne year results combining the percutaneous endocardial with the right thoracoscopic epicardial technique were, in our experience, not satisfactory, particularly in patients with LSP and persistent AF. Our findings need to be confirmed by larger studies.

Effectiveness and safety of simultaneous hybrid thoracoscopic and endocardial catheter ablation of lone atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the hybrid thoracoscopic endocardial epicardial technique for the treatment of lone atrial fibrillation. METHODS Between 2009 and 2012, a cohort of 78 consecutive patients (median age 60.5 years, 77% male) underwent ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) as a stand-alone procedure using a thoracoscopic, hybrid epicardial-endocardial technique. All patients underwent continuous 7-day Holter monitoring at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter. All patients reached 1-year follow-up. Median follow-up was 24 months [interquartile range 12-36]. RESULTS No death or conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass occurred. No patient demonstrated paralysis of the phrenic nerve. Overall, the incidence of perioperative complications was 8% (n=6). At the end of follow-up, sixty-eight patients (87%) were in sinus rhythm (SR) with no episode of AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia lasting longer than 30 seconds and off antiarrhythmic drugs (ADD). Among patients with long-standing persistent AF, 15 (100%) were in SR and off AAD. Success rates were 82% (n=28) in persistent and 76% (n=22) in paroxysmal AF (P=0.08). No patient died and no thromboembolic/bleeding events or procedure-related complications occurred during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Thoracoscopic hybrid epicardial endocardial technique proved to be effective and safe in the treatment of LAF and to represent an important new suitable option to treat stand-alone AF. Our findings need to be confirmed by further larger studies.

Treatment of lone atrial fibrillation: a look at the past, a view of the present and a glance at the future.

Despite its proven efficacy, the Cox-Maze III procedure did not gain widespread acceptance for the treatment of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF) because of its complexity and technical difficulty. Surgical ablation for LAF can now be successfully performed utilizing minimally invasive techniques. This article provides an overview of the current state of the art in the surgical treatment of LAF. A brief review of pathophysiology, pharmacological treatment as well as catheter ablation is also provided. The most widely employed minimally invasive approach to LAF has been the video-assisted bilateral mini-thoracotomy or thoracoscopic pulmonary vein island creation and left atrial appendage removal or exclusion, usually with ganglionic plexi evaluation and destruction. Recently, a hybrid approach has been introduced, which combines a mono or bilateral epicardial approach with a percutaneous endocardial ablation in a single-step procedure to limit the shortcomings of both techniques. Suboptimal results of both catheter ablation and surgery suggest that success in the treatment of LAF will probably rely on a close collaboration between the surgeon and the electrophysiologist. Further studies are warranted to determine whether the hybrid approach is effective, especially in patients with long-standing persistent and persistent LAF.

Minimally invasive thoracoscopic hybrid treatment of lone atrial fibrillation: early results of monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency source

We compare results of a hybrid monopolar vs. a hybrid bipolar thoracoscopic approach employing radiofrequency (RF) sources for the surgical treatment of lone atrial fibrillation (LAF). From January 2008 to June 2010, 19 patients (35.1%) underwent RF monopolar/monolateral RF ablation, whereas 35 (64.9%) had RF bipolar/bilateral thoracoscopic ablation. One-year time-related prevalence of postoperative AF was 13.3 (11.0-17.4) and 5.2% (4.2-6.7), in monopolar and bipolar groups, respectively (P < 0.001). It was 21.1 (17.6-24.9) vs. 8.2% (5.1-11.6) in long standing persistent (P < 0.001), 13.2 (10.6-17.8) vs. 3.8% (1.4-6.9) in persistent (P < 0.001) and 5.6 (2.8-8.3) vs. 3.2% (1.0-6.5) in paroxysmal AF (P = 0.64). At 12 months, estimated prevalence of anti-arrhythmic drugs was 26 (22.4-30.1) and 18.0% (15.5-21.7, P = 0.04), whereas prevalence of warfarin use was 48.2 (44.2-52.2) and 29.0% (26.2-33.1, P < 0.001) in the monopolar and bipolar groups, respectively. Left atrial (LA) reverse remodelling occurred in 47.3% of monopolar patients (n = 9) and in 77.1% of bipolar patients (P = 0.03). The hybrid bilateral approach with a bipolar device for the treatment of LAF showed a good 1-year success rate independently of the AF type and seems to be the better choice for longstanding persistent and persistent LAF.

Emergency Surgery for Native Mitral Valve Endocarditis: The Impact of Septic and Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND Limited information exists about the real impact of the etiology of shock on early and late outcome after emergency surgery in acute native mitral valve endocarditis (ANMVE). This multicenter study analyzed the impact of the etiology of shock on early and late outcome in patients with ANMVE. METHODS Data were collected in eight institutions. Three hundred-seventy-nine ANMVE patients undergoing surgery on an emergency basis between May 1991 and December 2009 were eligible for the study. According to current criteria used for the differential diagnosis of shock, patients were retrospectively assigned to one of three groups: group 1, no shock (n=154), group 2, cardiogenic shock (CS [n=118]), and group 3, septic shock (SS [n=107]). Median follow-up was 69.8 months. RESULTS Early mortality was significantly higher in patients with SS (p<0.001). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, compared with patients with CS, patients with SS had more than 3.8 times higher risk of death. That rose to more than 4 times versus patients without shock. In addition, patients with SS had 4.2 times and 4.3 times higher risk of complications compared with patients with CS and without shock, respectively. Sepsis was also an independent predictor of prolonged artificial ventilation (p=0.04) and stroke (p=0.003) whereas CS was associated with a higher postoperative occurrence of low output syndrome and myocardial infarction (p<0.001). No difference was detected between groups in 18-year survival, freedom from endocarditis, and freedom from reoperation. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that emergency surgery for ANMVE in patients with CS achieved satisfactory early and late results. In contrast, the presence of SS was linked to dismal early prognosis. Our findings need to be confirmed by further larger studies.

Cost and cost-effectiveness of cardiac surgery in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE Cost-effectiveness of heart surgery for elderly patients is still poorly defined. We evaluated outcome, quality of life (QoL), cost, and cost-effectiveness of octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS One thousand six hundred forty octogenarians undergoing various cardiac surgical procedures were prospectively studied between January 1998 and January 2009 and compared with similar patients aged 70 to 79 years. Several questionnaires were used to assess QoL. Six hundred age- and sex- matched healthy octogenarians and three hundred forty patients older than 80 years with medically treated valvular or coronary artery disease were healthy and unoperated control groups, respectively. In-hospital costs were obtained from the hospitals financial accounting department and cost-effectiveness was estimated and expressed as cost/QoL-adjusted life year (QALY) and cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS Significant improvements occurred in elderly patients in Role Physical (P < .001), Bodily Pain (P < .001), General Health (P = .004), Social Functioning (P < .001), and Role Emotional (P < .001), whereas Physical Functioning, Vitality, and Mental Health did not change (difference not signficant). Total direct costs were

Refractory Spasm of Coronary Arteries and Grafted Conduits After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

5293 higher in the octogenarian group. Cost-effectiveness was

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated With Faster Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Valve Results From a Propensity Score–Matched Italian Multicenter Study

1391/QALY for elderly surgical patients,