Fabien Gaire

Development of automated brightfield double In Situ hybridization (BDISH) application for HER2 gene and chromosome 17 centromere (CEN 17) for breast carcinomas and an assay performance comparison to manual dual color HER2 fluorescence In Situ hybridization (FISH)

BackgroundHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a quantitative assay for selecting breast cancer patients for trastuzumab therapy. However, current HER2 FISH procedures are labor intensive, manual methods that require skilled technologists and specialized fluorescence microscopy. Furthermore, FISH slides cannot be archived for long term storage and review. Our objective was to develop an automated brightfield double in situ hybridization (BDISH) application for HER2 gene and chromosome 17 centromere (CEN 17) and test the assay performance with dual color HER2 FISH evaluated breast carcinomas.MethodsThe BDISH assay was developed with the nick translated dinitrophenyl (DNP)-labeled HER2 DNA probe and DNP-labeled CEN 17 oligoprobe on the Ventana BenchMark® XT slide processing system. Detection of HER2 and CEN 17 signals was accomplished with the silver acetate, hydroquinone, and H2O2 reaction with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and the fast red and naphthol phosphate reaction with alkaline phosphatise (AP), respectively. The BDISH specificity was optimized with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded xenograft tumors, MCF7 (non-amplified HER2 gene) and BT-474 (amplified HER2 gene). Then, the BDISH performance was evaluated with 94 routinely processed breast cancer tissues. Interpretation of HER2 and CEN 17 BDISH slides was conducted by 4 observers using a conventional brightfield microscope without oil immersion objectives.ResultsSequential hybridization and signal detection for HER2 and CEN 17 ISH demonstrated both DNA targets in the same cells. HER2 signals were visualized as discrete black metallic silver dots while CEN 17 signals were detected as slightly larger red dots. Our study demonstrated a high consensus concordance between HER2 FISH and BDISH results of clinical breast carcinoma cases based on the historical scoring method (98.9%, Simple Kappa = 0.9736, 95% CI = 0.9222 – 1.0000) and the ASCO/CAP scoring method with the FISH equivocal cases (95.7%, Simple Kappa = 0.8993%, 95% CI = 0.8068 – 0.9919) and without the FISH equivocal cases (100%, Simple Kappa = 1.0000%, 95% CI = 1.0000 – 1.0000).ConclusionAutomated BDISH applications for HER2 and CEN 17 targets were successfully developed and it might be able to replace manual two-color HER2 FISH methods. The application also has the potential to be used for other gene targets. The use of BDISH technology allows the simultaneous analyses of two DNA targets within the context of tissue morphological observation.

Silver In Situ Hybridization (SISH) For Determination of HER2 Gene Status in Breast Carcinoma Comparison With FISH and Assessment of Interobserver Reproducibility

The importance of HER2 status in breast cancer management has focused attention on the ability of clinical assays to correctly assign HER2 amplification status. There is no consensus as to the best method for assessing HER2 status. Disadvantages of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing include longer time required for staining and scoring slides, requirements for specialized training and fluorescence microscopy, and loss of the signal due to quenching of the fluorescent dye. Silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) is a rapid fully automated assay providing permanently stained slides that are interpreted by conventional bright field microscopy which enables pathologists to evaluate slides within the context of tissue morphology. This study evaluates the concordance between SISH and FISH assays in determining the status of HER2 gene amplification in a cohort of 298 primary invasive breast carcinomas. Furthermore, we assessed in detail the variables contributing to interobserver interpretive reproducibility of HER2 SISH among 10 pathologists. HER2 was quantified using the ratio of HER2 to CHR17 signals using the conventional historical interpretation scale and also by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists reporting scheme. For SISH status determined by consensus among 10 pathologists, overall concordance between SISH and FISH was identified in 288 of 298 cases (96.6%) using the conventional Food and Drug Administration approved criteria. Overall agreement was observed in 282 of 285 cases (98.9%) using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists result reporting scheme (with equivocal cases removed). In conclusion, SISH represents a novel approach for the determination of HER2 status in breast cancer. The overall concordance between SISH and FISH is excellent, and the interpretation of SISH results by pathologists is most reproducible using the HER2/CHR17 ratio.

Increased Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Receptor Protein Expression and Gene Copy Number in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: Identification of new therapies in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is urgently needed. Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) is a tyrosine kinase receptor implicated in the pathogenesis of several malignancies and is potentially an attractive target for anticancer treatment. Knowledge about IGF1R protein expression, gene copy number, and the prognostic relevance of these features in SCLC is limited. Methods: We analyzed IGF1R protein expression and gene copy number in primary tumors from 90 patients with SCLC (67 men and 23 women) who underwent pulmonary resection. IGF1R expression assessed by immunohistochemistry with H scores from 0 to 400 was evaluable in 84 patients and IGF1R gene copy number assessed by silver in situ hybridization technique in 81 patients. Results: Median H score for IGF1R protein expression was 88 (range, 0–400), and the proportion of positive immunostaining using cutoff H score of 10 was 74%. Increased IGF1R gene copy number (an average of four or more copies per cell) was found in 15 cases (18.5%), five of whom (6.2%) showed gene amplification. There was a significant correlation between protein expression and gene copy number (r = 0.49, p < 0.005). IGF1R expression and gene copy number did not associate with clinicopathological factors such as patient age, tumor size, lymph node involvement, stage, and survival. Conclusions: SCLC is characterized by frequent high-IGF1R protein expression, increased gene copy number, and occasional occurrence of true gene amplification. These features may have important implications for future anti-IGF1R therapeutic approaches.

EGFR Protein Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Predicts Response to an EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor - A Novel Antibody for Immunohistochemistry or AQUA Technology

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not recommended for predicting response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) due to conflicting results, all using antibodies detecting EGFR external domain (ED). We tested the predictive value of EGFR protein expression for response to an EGFR TKI with an antibody that detects the intracellular domain (ID) and compared fluorescence-based Automated QUantitative Analysis (AQUA) technology to immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: Specimens from 98 gefitinib-treated NSCLC Japanese patients were evaluated by IHC (n = 98 of 98) and AQUA technology (n = 70 of 98). EGFR ID (5B7)- and ED-specific antibodies (3C6 and 31G7) were compared. Results: EGFR expression evaluated with 5B7 was significantly higher in responders versus nonresponders to gefitinib both with IHC and with AQUA. ED-specific antibodies did not significantly predict response. Using AQUA and ID-specific antibody resulted in the best prediction performance with a positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) for responders of 50% and 87%, respectively. EGFR expression with ID-specific antibody and AQUA also predicted responders in EGFR-mutated patients. Increased EGFR expression with the ID antibody is associated with increased median progression free survival (PFS; 11.7 months vs. 5.0, log rank, P = 0.034) and overall survival (OS; 38.6 vs. 14.9, P = 0.040) from gefitinib therapy. Conclusions: EGFR protein expression using an ID-specific antibody specifically predicts response to gefitinib in NSCLC patients, including in EGFR-mutated patients, and increased PFS/OS from gefitinib. These data suggest that the choice of diagnostic antibody and methodology matters to predict response and outcome to specific therapies. The potential clinical application needs further validation. Clin Cancer Res; 17(24); 7796–807. ©2011 AACR.