Fabiola Carrara

Performance of Different Prediction Equations for Estimating Renal Function in Kidney Transplantation

Numerous formulas have been developed to estimate renal function from biochemical, demographic and anthropometric data. Here we compared renal function derived from 12 published prediction equations with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement by plasma iohexol clearance as reference method in a group of 81 renal transplant recipients enrolled in the Mycophenolate Mofetil Steroid Sparing (MY.S.S.) trial. Iohexol clearances and prediction equations were carried out in all patients at months 6, 9 and 21 after surgery. All equations showed a tendency toward GFR over‐estimation: Walser and MDRD equations gave the best performance, however not more than 45% of estimated values were within ±10% error. These formulas showed also the lowest bias and the highest precision: 0.5 and 9.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Walser), 2.7 and 10.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (MDRD) in predicting GFR. A significantly higher rate of GFR decline ranging from −5.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (Walser) to −7.4 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (Davis–Chandler) was estimated by all the equations as compared with iohexol clearance (−3.0 mL/min/1.73 m2/year). The 12 prediction equations do not allow a rigorous assessment of renal function in kidney transplant recipients. In clinical trials of kidney transplantation, graft function should be preferably monitored using a reference method of GFR measurement, such as iohexol plasma clearance.

Effect of longacting somatostatin analogue on kidney and cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ALADIN): a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease slowly progresses to end-stage renal disease and has no effective therapy. A pilot study suggested that the somatostatin analogue octreotide longacting release (LAR) could be nephroprotective in this context. We aimed to assess the effect of 3 years of octreotide-LAR treatment on kidney and cyst growth and renal function decline in participants with this disorder. METHODS We did an academic, multicentre, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in five hospitals in Italy. Adult (>18 years) patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 40 mL/min per 1·73 m(2) or higher were randomly assigned (central allocation by phone with a computerised list, 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre, block size four and eight) to 3 year treatment with two 20 mg intramuscular injections of octreotide-LAR (n=40) or 0·9% sodium chloride solution (n=39) every 28 days. Study physicians and nurses were aware of the allocated group; participants and outcome assessors were masked to allocation. The primary endpoint was change in total kidney volume (TKV), measured by MRI, at 1 year and 3 year follow-up. Analyses were by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00309283. FINDINGS Recruitment was between April 27, 2006, and May 12, 2008. 38 patients in the octreotide-LAR group and 37 patients in the placebo group had evaluable MRI scans at 1 year follow-up, at this timepoint, mean TKV increased significantly less in the octreotide-LAR group (46·2 mL, SE 18·2) compared with the placebo group (143·7 mL, 26·0; p=0·032). 35 patients in each group had evaluable MRI scans at 3 year follow-up, at this timepoint, mean TKV increase in the octreotide-LAR group (220·1 mL, 49·1) was numerically smaller than in the placebo group (454·3 mL, 80·8), but the difference was not significant (p=0·25). 37 (92·5%) participants in the octreotide-LAR group and 32 (82·1%) in the placebo group had at least one adverse event (p=0·16). Participants with serious adverse events were similarly distributed in the two treatment groups. However, four cases of cholelithiasis or acute cholecystitis occurred in the octreotide-LAR group and were probably treatment-related. INTERPRETATION These findings provide the background for large randomised controlled trials to test the protective effect of somatostatin analogues against renal function loss and progression to end-stage kidney disease. FUNDING Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation.

Glomerular Hyperfiltration and Renal Disease Progression in Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE To describe the prevalence and determinants of hyperfiltration (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] ≥120 mL/min/1.73 m2), GFR decline, and nephropathy onset or progression in type 2 diabetic patients with normo- or microalbuminuria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We longitudinally studied 600 hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria <200 μg/min and who were retrieved from two randomized trials testing the renal effect of trandolapril and delapril. Target blood pressure (BP) was <120/80 mmHg, and HbA1c was <7%. GFR, albuminuria, and glucose disposal rate (GDR) were centrally measured by iohexol plasma clearance, nephelometry in three consecutive overnight urine collections, and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, respectively. RESULTS Over a median (range) follow-up of 4.0 (1.7–8.1) years, GFR declined by 3.37 (5.71–1.31) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year. GFR change was bimodal over time: a larger reduction at 6 months significantly predicted slower subsequent decline (coefficient: −0.0054; SE: 0.0009), particularly among hyperfiltering patients. A total of 90 subjects (15%) were hyperfiltering at inclusion, and 11 of 47 (23.4%) patients with persistent hyperfiltration progressed to micro- or macroalbuminuria versus 53 (10.6%) of the 502 who had their hyperfiltration ameliorated at 6 months or were nonhyperfiltering since inclusion (hazard ratio 2.16 [95% CI 1.13–4.14]). Amelioration of hyperfiltration was independent of baseline characteristics or ACE inhibition. It was significantly associated with improved BP and metabolic control, amelioration of GDR, and slower long-term GFR decline on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Despite intensified treatment, patients with type 2 diabetes have a fast GFR decline. Hyperfiltration affects a subgroup of patients and may contribute to renal function loss and nephropathy onset or progression. Whether amelioration of hyperfiltration is renoprotective is worth investigating.

The GFR and GFR decline cannot be accurately estimated in type 2 diabetics

There are no adequate studies that have formally tested the performance of different estimating formulas in patients with type 2 diabetes both with and without overt nephropathy. Here we evaluated the agreement between baseline GFRs, GFR changes at month 6, and long-term GFR decline measured by iohexol plasma clearance or estimated by 15 creatinine-based formulas in 600 type 2 diabetics followed for a median of 4.0 years. Ninety patients were hyperfiltering. The number of those identified by estimation formulas ranged from 0 to 24:58 were not identified by any formula. Baseline GFR was significantly underestimated and a 6-month GFR reduction was missed in hyperfiltering patients. Long-term GFR decline was also underestimated by all formulas in the whole study group and in hyper-, normo-, and hypofiltering patients considered separately. Five formulas generated positive slopes in hyperfiltering patients. Baseline concordance correlation coefficients and total deviation indexes ranged from 32.1% to 92.6% and from 0.21 to 0.53, respectively. Concordance correlation coefficients between estimated and measured long-term GFR decline ranged from -0.21 to 0.35. The agreement between estimated and measured values was also poor within each subgroup considered separately. Thus, our study questions the use of any estimation formula to identify hyperfiltering patients and monitor renal disease progression and response to treatment in type 2 diabetics without overt nephropathy.

Analogs of bardoxolone methyl worsen diabetic nephropathy in rats with additional adverse effects

Bardoxolone methyl is an antioxidant inflammation modulator acting through induction of Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Results from a recent phase IIb clinical trial reported that bardoxolone methyl was associated with improvement in the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and Type 2 diabetes. However, increases in albuminuria, serum transaminase, and frequency of adverse events were noted. We studied the effect of 3-mo treatment with RTA 405, a synthetic triterpenoid analog of bardoxolone methyl in Zucker diabetic fatty rats with overt Type 2 diabetes. Rats were treated from 3 mo of age with vehicle, RTA 405, ramipril, or RTA 405 plus ramipril. RTA 405 caused severe changes in food intake and diuresis with decline in body weight, worsening of dyslipidemia, and increase in blood pressure. Early elevation in serum transaminase was followed by liver injury. RTA 405 worsened proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, and tubular damage. Ramipril was renoprotective, but when given with RTA 405 it was not able to limit its worsening effects. These data could be due to degradation products in the drug substance used, as disclosed by the company once the study was concluded. To overcome such a drawback, the company offered to test dh404, a variant of RTA 405, in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. The dh404 did not display beneficial effects on proteinuria, glomerulosclerosis, and interstitial inflammation. Rather, kidneys from three rats receiving dh404 showed the presence of a granulomatous and inflammatory process reminiscent of a pseudotumor. Altogether these data raise serious concerns on the use of bardoxolone analogs in Type 2 diabetic nephropathy.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Sirolimus: Effect of Concomitant Immunosuppressive Therapy and Optimization of Drug Dosing

Sirolimus (SRL) is a new immunosuppressant which shares a common metabolic pathway with several other immunosuppressive agents. This leads to potential pharmacokinetic interactions that might affect SRL blood levels with relevant clinical consequences. As a validated laboratory, 2658 SRL trough samples (corresponding to 495 kidney transplant recipients treated with different immunosuppressive regimens) from more than 40 Italian Transplant Units were analyzed. We found that dose‐normalized SRL trough levels were significantly higher in patients treated with cyclosporine (CsA) and SRL (4.15 ± 2.23 ng/mL/mg SRL), compared with patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and SRL (3.26 ± 1.86 ng/mL/mg SRL; p < 0.01) or with MMF, steroids and SRL (2.52 ± 1.73 ng/mL/mg SRL; p < 0.01). Mean intra‐ and interpatient variabilities were 19% and 47%, respectively. Both parameters are significantly affected by the time postsurgery, with the first week post transplantation being associated with the greatest variability. As additional analysis, a simple dose‐adjustment formula has been proposed as a useful tool to guide SRL dose changes. The proposed equation has been able to predict SRL concentration after a dose change in 73% of the tested samples. These findings suggest that different immunosuppressants significantly interfere with SRL bioavailability. Strategies aimed at reducing variability in SRL exposure may have a positive clinical impact.

Measuring and Estimating GFR and Treatment Effect in ADPKD Patients: Results and Implications of a Longitudinal Cohort Study

Trials failed to demonstrate protective effects of investigational treatments on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD). To assess whether above findings were explained by unreliable GFR estimates, in this academic study we compared GFR values centrally measured by iohexol plasma clearance with corresponding values estimated by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-Epi) and abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (aMDRD) formulas in ADPKD patients retrieved from four clinical trials run by a Clinical Research Center and five Nephrology Units in Italy. Measured baseline GFRs and one-year GFR changes averaged 78.6±26.7 and 8.4±10.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 in 111 and 71 ADPKD patients, respectively. CKD-Epi significantly overestimated and aMDRD underestimated baseline GFRs. Less than half estimates deviated by <10% from measured values. One-year estimated GFR changes did not detect measured changes. Both formulas underestimated GFR changes by 50%. Less than 9% of estimates deviated <10% from measured changes. Extent of deviations even exceeded that of measured one-year GFR changes. In ADPKD, prediction formulas unreliably estimate actual GFR values and fail to detect their changes over time. Direct kidney function measurements by appropriate techniques are needed to adequately evaluate treatment effects in clinics and research.

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Renal Transplantation: The Nephrologist in the Mist.

Background Formulas do not estimate renal function with acceptable precision and accuracy. Methods We compared 51 creatinine-based and/or cystatin c–based formulas with a gold standard (iohexol plasma clearance) in 193 renal transplant recipients using concordance correlation coefficient, total deviation index, coverage probability and the error in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage classification. Results No formula showed a concordance correlation coefficient greater than 0.90 (average for creatinine-based formulas: ∼0.70 and for cystatin c–based formulas: ∼0.85). A wide total deviation index was observed: approximately 70% (creatinine-based) and approximately 50% (cystatin c–based), indicating that 90% of the estimations showed bounds of error of ±70% or ±50%, respectively, compared with the gold standard. No formula included 90% of the estimations within a coverage probability of ±10%. Half the CKD stages classified by creatinine-based formulas were incorrect, mainly due to overestimation of renal function. One of 3 CKD stages diagnosed by cystatin c–based formulas was incorrect, with both overestimation and underestimation. Overall, the formulas showed very low precision and accuracy and a high degree of error in reflecting real renal function. Conclusions In conclusion, formulas do not properly reflect renal function in kidney transplantation, which makes their use in clinical practice unreliable. Moreover, their use in clinical trials should be avoided.

Effects of Rosuvastatin on Glomerular Capillary Size-Selectivity Function in Rats with Renal Mass Ablation

Background: Evidence is accumulating that statins can reduce proteinuria and disease progression in chronic kidney disease. However, some safety concerns have been recently raised on the use of these agents, mainly due to transient episodes of proteinuria observed in patients receiving high doses of rosuvastatin. Methods: We investigated in rats with renal mass ablation (RMR) whether rosuvastatin (5 or 20 mg/day) worsens proteinuria as compared to untreated RMR animals. Moreover, we also examined whether rosuvastatin-induced changes in proteinuria would be due to the effect of the drug on permselective properties of glomerular capillary barrier, measured by the fractional clearance of graded-size Ficoll molecules and/or by proximal tubular mechanisms, by assessing urinary excretion of β2-microglobulin. Results: RMR rats given rosuvastatin for 28 days showed a progressive increase in proteinuria, with values numerically but not significantly higher than those in RMR animals given the vehicle. In RMR rats, rosuvastatin did not significantly affect the fractional clearance of Ficoll as compared to vehicle-treated RMR animals. A significant correlation was found between urinary protein and β2-microglobulin excretion in rats treated with rosuvastatin (r = 0.936, p < 0.001), but not in those given vehicle. Renal function, glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury were comparable in rosuvastatin-treated and untreated RMR rats at the end of the 28-day follow-up. Conclusion: In rats with RMR, rosuvastatin mildly enhances urinary protein excretion rate. This, however, was not the result of further changes in the size-permselective function of glomerular capillary barrier.

Effect of Sirolimus on Disease Progression in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and CKD Stages 3b-4.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The effect of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors has never been tested in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and severe renal insufficiency. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In this academic, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded end point, parallel group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01223755), 41 adults with ADPKD, CKD stage 3b or 4, and proteinuria ≤0.5 g/24 h were randomized between September of 2010 and March of 2012 to sirolimus (3 mg/d; serum target levels of 5-10 ng/ml) added on to conventional therapy (n=21) or conventional treatment alone (n=20). Primary outcome was GFR (iohexol plasma clearance) change at 1 and 3 years versus baseline. RESULTS At the 1-year preplanned interim analysis, GFR fell from 26.7±5.8 to 21.3±6.3 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (P<0.001) and from 29.6±5.6 to 24.9±6.2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (P<0.001) in the sirolimus and conventional treatment groups, respectively. Albuminuria (73.8±81.8 versus 154.9±152.9 μg/min; P=0.02) and proteinuria (0.3±0.2 versus 06±0.4 g/24 h; P<0.01) increased with sirolimus. Seven patients on sirolimus versus one control had de novo proteinuria (P=0.04), ten versus three patients doubled proteinuria (P=0.02), 18 versus 11 patients had peripheral edema (P=0.04), and 14 versus six patients had upper respiratory tract infections (P=0.03). Three patients on sirolimus had angioedema, 14 patients had aphthous stomatitis, and seven patients had acne (P<0.01 for both versus controls). Two patients progressed to ESRD, and two patients withdrew because of worsening of proteinuria. These events were not observed in controls. Thus, the independent data and safety monitoring board recommend early trial termination for safety reasons. At 1 year, total kidney volume (assessed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging) increased by 9.0% from 2857.7±1447.3 to 3094.6±1519.5 ml on sirolimus and 4.3% from 3123.4±1695.3 to 3222.6±1651.4 ml on conventional therapy (P=0.12). On follow-up, 37% and 7% of serum sirolimus levels fell below or exceeded the therapeutic range, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Finding that sirolimus was unsafe and ineffective in patients with ADPKD and renal insufficiency suggests that mTOR inhibitor therapy may be contraindicated in this context.