Fabrizio Nelli

Up-front chemotherapy and radiation treatment in newly diagnosed nonsmall cell lung cancer with brain metastases : Survey by outcome research network for evaluation of treatment results in oncology

For patients with stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who present with brain metastasis (BMs), standard platinum‐based chemotherapy regimens have challenged the role of up‐front whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

A 3-week schedule of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as induction chemotherapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND Our aim was to explore the activity and feasibility of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in patients with Stage IIIA N(2) and selected IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS From September 1997 to July 2000, 70 chemonaive patients with Stage III NSCLC, median age of 64 years, World Health Organization performance status 0, 1, or 2, and the ability to tolerate a pneumonectomy entered the study and received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 3 weeks. After three cycles of induction chemotherapy, patients underwent resection or radiotherapy. RESULTS Responses were seen in 40 of the 69 assessable patients, for an intent-to treat overall response rate of 57.1% (95% confidence interval, 45-62%), with 4.2% complete response. Response rates were 68 and 35% in patients with Stage IIIA and IIIB disease, respectively. The overall pathological CR rate after induction chemotherapy was 3%, with an overall pathological downstaging rate of 20%. Median survival for all patients was 14.5 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 67% (95% CI, 54.3-79.5%). The estimated time to treatment failure was 12.6 months. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was the main hematologic toxicity, occurring in 26% of patients, but was not associated with life-threatening bleeding. Febrile neutropenia was rare and other severe non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS The 3-week schedule of gemcitabine plus cisplatin is highly active as induction chemotherapy in Stage IIIA N(2) unresectable NSCLC. This suggests a need for a multimodality approach upfront, such as concurrent chemoradiation therapy, particularly in patients with Stage IIIB disease.

Single colon metastasis from breast cancer: a clinical case report.

Metastatic involvement of the extrahepatic digestive system is rare. We here report the case of a 62-year-old woman who presented with a bowel obstruction related to a metastasis of breast cancer occurring 12 years after a mastectomy for lobular carcinoma. No other distant metastases were detected except for two nodules of 20 and 5 mm on the right chest wall. Biopsy of the larger nodule showed a lobular carcinoma. The patient underwent a right hemicolectomy and then received chemotherapy combined with letrozole, resulting in a partial response. The literature revealed only a few cases of breast cancer metastatic to the colon. Patients with known breast cancer, particularly of the lobular histological type, who present with specific or less specific abdominal symptoms or signs such a microcytic anemia, should be endoscopically explored in order to detect possible metastases of the primary breast tumor.

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact of Comorbidities on Safety and Efficacy Outcome

Abstract The aim of the study was to describe in detail the impact of aging and comorbidities on safety and efficacy of gemcitabine-cisplatin in the subset of elderly with advanced NSCLC. We report the results of our study which enrolled patients aged over 65 years or older. This study included 46 patients consecutively admitted to our Department. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 2, of a 21-day cycle. The Charlson score method was chosen to evaluate the conditions of comorbidity. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 44 for activity. A total of 128 courses were administered, with a median of 3 courses per patient and a dose-intensity of 93% and 88% for gemcitabine and cisplatin, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia (22% of patients) and grade 3 asthenia (4.5%), emesis (4.5%) and nephrotoxicity (4.5%) were the most severe adverse events. Univariate analysis of toxicity did not show any significant difference among all groups. The overall response rate was 45.6% (95% CI, 31.3-60). At a median follow up of 13 months, the median and progression-free survival were 15 and 8 months, respectively. The multivariate analysis resulted in objective response and disease control being predictive of longer survival. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appears to be an effective and tolerated regimen for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, regardless of aging and condition of comorbidities. Prospective randomized trials based on specific geriatric assessment are required to obtain compelling information for the optimal management of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of gemcitabine–cisplatin–paclitaxel triplet as induction chemotherapy in inoperable, locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE Our objective was to determine the activity in terms of response rate, surgical resectability, and the tolerability of the new three-drug combination gemcitabine-cisplatin-paclitaxel (GCP) in unresectable stage IIIA(N2) and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENT AND METHODS Forty-two chemo-naive patients with stage IIIA(N2)-IIIB NSCLC, median age of 59 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and the ability to tolerate pneumectomy, received gemcitabine (Gem) 1000 mg/m(2) IV days 1 and 8, cisplatin (CDDP) 50 mg/m(2) IV days 1 and 8, paclitaxel 125 mg/m(2) 1h infusion IV days 1 and 8, every 21 days for 3 cycles. After induction chemotherapy, patients were evaluated for surgery or definitive radiotherapy. RESULTS Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, occurring in 28% of patients. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in only 11% of cases. No neutropenic fever or bleeding episodes were recorded. Severe non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon. Thirty (71%, 95% CI: 57.2-84.7%) of the 42 eligible patients had objective responses (1 complete and 29 partial responses). After induction chemotherapy, 21 patients (50%) went to surgery. Complete resection was obtained in 16 patients (38%). Viable tumor was present in 18 of 21 resection specimens. In three cases only necrotic tumor cells were identified, for a pathological complete response of 7%. With a median follow-up of 13.9 months, median time to progression was 17.4 months, median survival 21.7 months and estimated 1-year survival 92%. CONCLUSIONS GCP combination is active and well tolerated in locally-advanced, non-resectable NSCLC. The activity profile, in terms of response and surgical resection rate, is comparable to that obtained with standard doublets.

Weekly vinorelbine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for pretreated non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase I-II trial

Abstract Docetaxel was proven to be effective as second-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC after failure of platinum-based front-line chemotherapy. We designed this phase I/II study to define the Maximum Tolerated Dose of weekly docetaxel combined with weekly vinorelbine, and subsequently evaluate tolerability and activity of this schedule in NSCLC patients who were progressive after treatment with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or carboplatin and paclitaxel regimens. To be eligible for the study, patients were required to have a WHO performance status ≤2, failure after at least two cycles of first platinum-based chemotherapy, and no prior treatment with docetaxel and vinorelbine. A total of 27 patients were enrolled in this phase I/II study. A weekly docetaxel dose of 25 mg/m2 was recommended in combination with fixed vinorelbine dose of 20 mg/m2, and 24 patients were treated at this dose level. Severe neutropenia (62%) and febrile neutropenia (29%) were the most frequent toxicities, with 83% of patients requiring dose modification or delay. In the phase II study, 5 (21%) patients obtained a partial response, 8 (33%) patients had stable disease, whereas 10 (42%) patients progressed. After a median follow-up of 18.7 months, median survival was 8 months, with 30% surviving at 1 year. Regardless of the use of weekly docetaxel schedule, this regimen was highly myelosuppressive, and did not seem to improve response rate and survival compared to single-agent docetaxel. No further developments of this schedule are warranted.

Phase I/II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin and etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE The objectives of this phase I/II study were to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and activity of cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine (PEG) in the treatment of previously untreated patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemonaive patients received fixed doses of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (70 mg/m(2) on day 2) and escalating doses of etoposide (starting dose of 50 mg/m(2) on days 3, 4, and 5) every 3 weeks. No prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used. RESULTS From September 1998 to April 2000, 56 patients with limited- or extensive-stage SCLC were enrolled and received a total of 235 cycles. Two different etoposide doses were tested in eight patients. At the second level (75 mg/m(2)), two out of two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) and no further dose-escalation was attempted, thus an etoposide dose of 50 mg/m(2) was defined as the MTD. In the subsequent phase II evaluation, 48 additional patients were enrolled, for a total of 54 patients treated at the MTD. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 66.7 and 53.7% of patients, respectively. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild, with grade 3 diarrhea and fatigue as the main side effects. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis (one at 75 mg/m(2) and the other at 50 mg/m(2) etoposide). Ten complete and 29 partial responses were reported, for an overall response rate of 72.2% (95% confidence interval, 56.6-85.0%). The median duration of response and median survival were 8.0 and 10 months, respectively, with a 1-year survival probability of 37.5%. CONCLUSIONS The combination of PEG is feasible and well tolerated as front-line chemotherapy in SCLC. A randomized comparison of this triplet is underway.

A Phase II Study of Cetuximab/Irinotecan in Patients with Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Predictive Value of Early Specific Toxicities

BACKGROUND This study was designed to evaluate the predictive value of early specific toxicities on efficacy of weekly irinotecan/cetuximab administered as salvage therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) refractory to oxaliplatin and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy patients received a regimen composed of weekly irinotecan 125 mg/m2 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 infused over 2 hours as the initial dose and 250 mg/m2 infused over 1 hour for subsequent administrations. A single treatment cycle was composed of 4 weekly irinotecan infusions followed by 2 weeks of rest. The predictive value of adverse events (AEs) attributable to cetuximab (rash) and major toxicities attributable to irinotecan (gastrointestinal [GI] and hematologic) were observed after the first cycle of treatment and, therefore, correlated to activity and efficacy of cetuximab and weekly irinotecan. RESULTS Sixty-six of 70 patients received >or= 1 cycle of chemotherapy and were therefore evaluable for response. Overall, toxicity observed was generally mild and manageable. According to an intent-to-treat analysis, a partial response was exhibited in 15.7% of patients, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival time of 4 months and 9 months, respectively. As expected, PFS (P = .01) and median survival (P = .04) correlated strongly with the presence and severity of the rash. Surprisingly, the presence of at least moderate hematologic and GI toxicity was associated with improved PFS (P = .03). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that irinotecan-induced AEs might predict a better outcome in advanced CRC. This finding would identify a different subset of patients-those likely to benefit from a renewed sensitivity to irinotecan induced by cetuximab.

Developing innovative strategies for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

Several improvements in the treatment of advanced transitional cell malignancies have been provided by clinical trials in the past 10 years. Nonetheless, there are conflicting results regarding the effect of perioperative chemotherapy of muscle-invasive disease and new cytotoxic agents in the metastatic setting. The authors will discuss the results of major clinical trials and examine developing targeted-oriented treatment strategies.

Cisplatin-based first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Joint analysis of MILES-3 and MILES-4 phase III trials

Purpose To test the efficacy of adding cisplatin to first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within a combined analysis of two parallel phase III trials, MILES-3 and MILES-4. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC who were older than age 70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 were randomly assigned to gemcitabine or pemetrexed, without or with cisplatin. In each trial, 382 events were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of death of 0.75, with 80% power and two-tailed α of .05. Trials were closed prematurely because of slow accrual, but the joint database allowed us to analyze the efficacy of cisplatin on the basis of intention-to-treat and adjusted by trial, histotype, non-platinum companion drug, stage, performance status, sex, age, and size of the study center. Results From March 2011 to August 2016, 531 patients (MILES-3, 299; MILES-4, 232) were assigned to gemcitabine or pemetrexed without (n = 268) or with cisplatin (n = 263). Median age was 75 years, 79% were male, and 70% had nonsquamous histology. At a median 2-year follow-up, 384 deaths and 448 progression-free survival events were recorded. Overall survival was not significantly prolonged with cisplatin (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .14) and global health status score of quality of life was not improved, whereas progression-free survival (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.92; P = .005) and objective response rate (15.5% v 8.5%; P = .02) were significantly better. Significantly more severe hematologic toxicity, fatigue, and anorexia were found with cisplatin. Conclusion The addition of cisplatin to single-agent chemotherapy does not significantly prolong overall survival, and it does not improve global health status score of quality of life in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.