Fadi H. Mourad

A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation

BACKGROUND Colonoscopy preparation regimens are poorly tolerated, requiring the use of a large volume of an unpalatable solution and diet restriction for adequate cleansing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two regimens of bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a whole dose of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E), with diet restriction vs. a split dose with no diet restriction. METHODS A total of 141 patients (ages 20-84 years, 81 men) were randomly assigned to receive either 4 L PEG-E, along with a liquid diet the day before colonoscopy (Group A) or 2 L PEG-E with a regular diet the day before colonoscopy followed by another 2 L PEG-E on the day of the procedure (Group B). The quality of the preparation was graded by the endoscopist (poor to excellent), who was blinded to the type of preparation. Tolerability of the assigned preparation and adverse effects were recorded by an independent investigator by using a questionnaire administered before colonoscopy. Intra- and interobserver variability was studied by using randomly chosen videotapes of colonoscopies performed as part of the study. RESULTS There were 73 patients in Group A and 68 patients in Group B. The quality of the preparation was significantly better in Group B ( p = 0.011). The tolerability of the preparation regimen was not different overall between study groups in terms of side effects (except for bloating, which was more frequent in Group B, p = 0.039) or willingness to repeat the preparation. There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved adherence to the assigned preparation in favor of Group B ( p = 0.062). Inter- and intraobserver variability analysis showed good to excellent correlation among endoscopists. CONCLUSIONS Colonic preparation with split-dose PEG-E and no dietary restriction provides better quality colon cleansing than whole-dose preparation, with no significant impact on patient tolerability and side effects.

Comparison between desferrioxamine and combined therapy with desferrioxamine and deferiprone in iron overloaded thalassaemia patients

Summary. Desferrioxamine (DFX) alone (40–50 mg/kg/d s.c. over 8–12 h, five times weekly) was compared with combined DFX twice weekly and deferiprone (75 mg/kg/d) over 12 months in previously poorly chelated thalassaemia patients. Serum ferritin fell from 5506 ± 635 µg/l (mean ± SEM) to 3998 ± 604 µg/l (P < 0·001; n = 14) in the DFX group and from 4153 ± 517 µg/l to 2805 ± 327 µg/l in the combined group (P < 0·01; n = 11). Deferiprone plus DFX produced a greater mean urine iron excretion (1·01 mg/kg/24 h) than iron intake from blood transfusion in each patient. Main side‐effects were skin reactions (DFX alone), nausea and arthralgia (combined therapy). As chelation therapy, the combined protocol was as effective as DFX five times weekly.

Abdominal Cocoon in a Man: Preoperative Diagnosis and Literature Review

Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis, or abdominal cocoon, is a relatively rare cause of intestinal obstruction, described mostly in young adolescent girls. It is characterized by a thick fibrotic peritoneum that wraps the bowel in a concertinalike fashion with some adhesions. Because of its peculiar characteristics, this condition presents many difficulties in preoperative diagnosis. Recognition of the entity results in proper management and prevents unnecessary bowel resection. We report a man with intermittent intestinal obstruction and an abdominal cocoon encasing the small bowel that was diagnosed preoperatively by radiology. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the fourth male patient reported in the medical literature to develop this condition. We briefly review the literature and discuss the preoperative diagnosis and management of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis.

A randomized single-blind trial of standard diet versus fiber-free diet with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Colonoscopy preparation usually involves the intake of large volumes of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) in combination with a clear-liquid diet (CLD). Liberalization of the diet might enhance the tolerance to PEG-ES without compromising the quality of the preparation. The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of PEG-ES given with a CLD compared with a fiber-free diet (FFD) for colonoscopy preparation. The incidence of adverse events among patients in the two diet groups was also assessed as a secondary outcome. METHODS This was a single-center randomized, prospective, single-blind study. A total of 200 patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to either CLD or FFD in addition to PEG-ES. RESULTS Patients in the FFD group were able to drink more PEG-ES (mean +/- SD, 3.9 +/- 0.3 L) compared with those in the CLD group (3.3 +/- 0.7 L) ( P < 0.01). The quality of the preparation was significantly better in the FFD group, with more patients having satisfactory preparations than those in the CLD group (81.4 % vs. 52.0 %; P < 0.001). Tolerance to the preparation was higher in the FFD group compared with the CLD group, with significantly more patients adhering to the FFD regimen ( P < 0.001). There were more adverse events experienced in the CLD group, with odds ratios of 1.9 for nausea (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.0 - 3.6), 3.8 for vomiting (95 % CI 1.3 - 11.3), and 3.0 for headache (95 % CI 1.5 - 5.9). CONCLUSION FFD given with PEG-ES on the day before colonoscopy is a more effective regimen than the standard CLD regimen, and is better tolerated by patients.

Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease in Lebanon

Background: The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence and incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a representative Lebanese cohort and to describe practice prevalence trends, disease characteristics, and impact on quality of life (QoL) of IBD patients in Lebanon. Methods: All of a university‐based health programs 2000–2004 computerized records that listed a diagnosis of Crohns disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were reviewed. In addition, data on patients seen in the gastroenterology clinics and data from the IBD registry at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) from the same period were analyzed. Results: Of 15,073 insured individuals, 8 had a diagnosis of CD and 16 of UC, giving an age‐adjusted prevalence of 53.1 per 100,000 people for CD and 106.2 per 100,000 people for UC. The mean age at diagnosis for patients with CD and UC was 28.8 ± 11.1 and 32.0 ± 13.4 years, respectively, and there was a slight female predominance. The mean annual incidence was 4.1 per 100,000 people for UC and 1.4 per 100,000 people for CD (range, 0–6.9/100,000 for both). Of the 10,383 patients seen in the gastroenterology clinic from 2000 to 2004, 251 (2.4%) had IBD (142 UC, 100 CD, and 9 indeterminate), a ratio that trended upward over time (range, 1.8%–2.7%). The median IBD Quality‐of‐Life (IBDQ) questionnaire score was 124.9 ± 30.5, indicating that the disease had a moderately severe impact on QoL. Conclusions: The prevalence of IBD in this representative Lebanese cohort falls in the intermediate range of that reported for white populations in Europe and North America. Future studies are needed to examine local risk factors, disease genotypes and phenotypes, and epidemiologic time trends. The psychosocial burden of IBD in Lebanon appears significant.

A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation

BACKGROUND Problems of compliance, quality, and safety of colon preparation regimens have prompted continued investigation with alternative forms of cleansing. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of tegaserod as an adjunct to a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E), given as a whole dose or split dose, in colonoscopy preparation. DESIGN Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING A single university-based hospital. PATIENTS Patients who were undergoing elective colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS A 4-arm randomization scheme that compared tegaserod with a placebo, each with whole-dose or split-dose PEG-E preparation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Efficacy of colon cleansing was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included adherence, tolerability, adverse effects, and patient perceptions of their preparation quality. RESULTS A total of 382 patients completed the trial. Patients who received the split-dose preparation had significantly better colon cleansing than those who received the whole-dose preparation (88.9% vs 42.6%, P < .001). The addition of tegaserod did not significantly improve the overall colonoscopy preparation quality compared with a placebo. However, there were fewer poor preparations in the whole-dose PEG-E group (12.4% vs 1.1%, P = .002, Bonferroni correction removes significance) and more excellent preparations in the split-dose group (53.3% vs 38.3%, P = .035, Bonferroni correction removes significance) in favor of tegaserod. Interobserver and intraobserver variability analysis showed substantial agreement among endoscopists. Adherence was significantly lower in the whole-dose group versus the split-dose PEG-E group (68.8% vs 91%, P < .001), independent of the use of tegaserod. Adverse effects were not different between study groups. LIMITATIONS A 4-arm randomization and the single-center nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS Tegaserod has a marginal effect on the quality of colonoscopy preparation when used as an adjuvant to PEG-E. The split-dose PEG-E was superior to the whole-dose PEG-E and resulted in better colon cleansing, adherence, and tolerance.

Comparison between deferoxamine and deferiprone (L1) in iron‐loaded thalassemia patients

Abstract: Introduction: Iron‐chelating therapy with deferoxamine in patients with thalassemia major has dramatically improved the prognosis of this disease. However, the limitations of this treatment have stimulated the design of alternative orally active iron chelators. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of, and compliance with, oral deferiprone (L1), and deferoxamine, in thalassemia major patients. Methods: All patients were followed up in one center in Lebanon. Sixteen patients were on L1 (75 mg/kg/d), and 40 patients on subcutaneous deferoxamine (20–50 mg/kg/d). Serum ferritin level, urinary iron excretion (UIE) and side effects were monitored over a two year period. Results: Patients on L1 had an initial serum ferritin concentration of 3663±566 µg/l (mean±SEM), that dropped to 2599±314 at 6 months (p<0.02; paired t‐test), and stabilised at that level over the 24 months follow up. Patients on deferoxamine had an initial mean serum ferritin concentration of 3480±417 (NS compared to the L1 group), which dropped gradually to 3143±417 (p<0.05) and 2819±292 (p<0.02) at 6 and 24 months, respectively. The most common adverse reactions associated with L1 were arthralgia and nausea, but they did not necessitate stopping the drug. Conclusion: L1 had comparable efficacy as deferoxamine with minimal side effects and better compliance. Provided long term side effects are not encountered, L1 seems to be a valuable alternative iron chelator for patients unable or unwilling to use deferoxamine effectively.

Panniculitis and arthritis as the presenting manifestation of chronic pancreatitis.

Although rare, panniculitis and polyarthritis can be the presenting manifestations of pancreatitis. Early recognition of this triad is critical because of the high mortality rate from pancreatic disease when the diagnosis is delayed. We report a patient with chronic alcohol intake whose sole presentation was severe polyarthritis and skin lesions secondary to chronic pancreatitis associated with extra pancreatic pseudocyst. Both arthritis and skin lesions disappeared after partial pancreatectomy and pancreatic stent insertion for a pancreatic duct stricture.

Interplay between Nitric Oxide and Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide in Inducing Fluid Secretion in Rat Jejunum

Nitric oxide (NO) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) interact in the regulation of neuromuscular function in the gut. They are also potent intestinal secretogogues that coexist in the enteric nervous system. The aims of this study were: (1) to investigate the interaction between NO and VIP in inducing fluid secretion in the rat jejunum, and (2) to determine whether the NO effect on intestinal fluid movement is neurally mediated. The single pass perfusion technique was used to study fluid movement in a 25 cm segment of rat jejunum in vivo. A solution containing 20 mml‐arginine, a NO precursor, was perfused into the segment. The effect of the NO synthase inhibitors (l‐NAME and l‐nitroindazole (l‐NI)) and the VIP antagonist ([4Cl‐D‐Phe6,Leu17]VIP (VIPa)) on l‐arginine‐induced changes in fluid movement, expressed as μl min−1 (g dry intestinal weight)−1, was determined. In addition, the effect of neuronal blockade by tetrodotoxin (TTX) and ablation of the myenteric plexus by benzalkonium chloride (BAC) was studied. In parallel groups of rats, the effect of l‐NAME and l‐NI on VIP‐induced intestinal fluid secretion was also examined. Basal fluid absorption in control rats was (median (interquartile range)) 65 (45–78). l‐Arginine induced a significant fluid secretion (−14 (−20 to −5); P < 0.01). This effect was reversed completely by l‐NAME (60 (36–65); P < 0.01) and l‐NI (46 (39–75); P < 0.01) and partially by VIPa (37 (14–47); P < 0.01). TTX and BAC partially inhibited the effect of l‐arginine (22 (15–32) and 15 (10–26), respectively; P < 0.05). The effect of VIP on fluid movement (−23 (−26 to −14)) was partially reversed by l‐NAME (24 (8.4–35.5); P < 0.01) and l‐NI (29 (4–44); P < 0.01). The inhibition of VIP or NO synthase prevented l‐arginine‐ and VIP‐induced intestinal fluid secretion through a neural mechanism. The data suggest that NO enhances the release of VIP from nerve terminals and vice versa. Subsequently, each potentiates the others effect in inducing intestinal fluid secretion.

Efficacy of Two Rabeprazole/Gatifloxacin‐Based Triple Therapies for Helicobacter pylori Infection

Objectives.  To evaluate the efficacy of two novel treatment regimens consisting of gatifloxacin (400 mg daily), amoxicillin (1 g twice daily), and rabeprazole 20 mg once (RAG20) or twice daily (RAG40) given for 7 days in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.