Faheem W. Guirgis

The Impact of the Sepsis-3 Septic Shock Definition on Previously Defined Septic Shock Patients*

Objective: The Third International Consensus Definitions Task Force (Sepsis-3) recently recommended changes to the definitions of sepsis. The impact of these changes remains unclear. Our objective was to determine the outcomes of patients meeting Sepsis-3 septic shock criteria versus patients meeting the “old” (1991) criteria of septic shock only. Design: Secondary analysis of two clinical trials of early septic shock resuscitation. Setting: Large academic emergency departments in the United States. Patients: Patients with suspected infection, more than or equal to two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, and systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg after fluid resuscitation. Interventions: Patients were further categorized as Sepsis-3 septic shock if they demonstrated hypotension, received vasopressors, and exhibited a lactate greater than 2 mmol/L. We compared in-hospital mortality in patients who met the old definition only with those who met the Sepsis-3 criteria. Measurements and Main Results: Four hundred seventy patients were included in the present analysis. Two hundred (42.5%) met Sepsis-3 criteria, whereas 270 (57.4%) met only the old definition. Patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria demonstrated higher severity of illness by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (9 vs 5; p < 0.001) and mortality (29% vs 14%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of 127 patients meeting only the old definition demonstrated significant mortality benefit following implementation of a quantitative resuscitation protocol (35% vs 10%; p = 0.006). Conclusion: In this analysis, 57% of patients meeting old definition for septic shock did not meet Sepsis-3 criteria. Although Sepsis-3 criteria identified a group of patients with increased organ failure and higher mortality, those patients who met the old criteria and not Sepsis-3 criteria still demonstrated significant organ failure and 14% mortality rate.

Persistent organ dysfunction after severe sepsis: A systematic review☆

OBJECTIVE Sepsis is a prevalent disease with high mortality. Survivors of sepsis often suffer significant resultant morbidity, including organ dysfunction. However, little is known about persistent or long-term organ dysfunction in this patient population. Our objective was to systematically review original research studies evaluating organ-specific outcomes at 28 days or greater in patients surviving severe sepsis. METHODS We performed a systematic review of studies reporting organ-specific outcomes at 28 days or greater in survivors of severe sepsis. RESULTS We identified 1,173 articles and five met our inclusion criteria. No study reported on organ dysfunction at greater than 30 days. Two studies contributed the majority of patients and had consistent rates of 1 month organ dysfunction for adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (8%-9%), renal (7%-8%), hepatic (3%-7%), and central nervous system (2%-5%). Another study reported higher rates of dysfunction for pulmonary (non-ARDS and ARDS), hepatic and renal but similar rates for central nervous system and disseminated intravascular coagulation when compared to the first two studies. The most recent study had the highest rates of dysfunction (>47%) across all organ systems. For organ failure resolution the rates were highly variable. CONCLUSIONS Our review found variable rates of organ dysfunction at 1 month after severe sepsis. Future studies should attempt to characterize organ dysfunction at greater than 1 month after an acute severe sepsis episode to determine the true prevalence long-term organ dysfunction and treatments for prevention. Additionally, standardized objective measures of organ dysfunction are needed so that future studies can be directly compared.

Carotid intima media thickness and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in South Asian immigrants: could dysfunctional HDL be the missing link?

Introduction South Asian immigrants (SAIs) in the US exhibit higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its risk factors compared with other ethnic populations. Conventional CAD risk factors do not explain the excess CAD risk; therefore there is a need to identify other markers that can predict future risk of CAD in high-risk SAIs. The objective of the current study is to assess the presence of sub-clinical CAD using common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT), and its association with metabolic syndrome (MS) and pro-inflammatory/dysfunctional HDL (Dys-HDL). Material and methods A community-based study was conducted on 130 first generation SAIs aged 35–65 years. Dys-HDL was determined using the HDL inflammatory index. Analysis was completed using logistic regression and Fishers exact test. Results Sub-clinical CAD using CCA-IMT ≥ 0.8 mm (as a surrogate marker) was seen in 31.46%. Age and gender adjusted CCA-IMT was significantly associated with type 2 diabetes (p = 0.008), hypertension (p = 0.012), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (p < 0.001) and homocysteine (p = 0.051). Both the presence of MS and Dys-HDL was significantly correlated with CCA-IMT, even after age and gender adjustment. The odds of having Dys-HDL with CCA-IMT were 5 times (95% CI: 1.68, 10.78). Conclusions There is a need to explore and understand non-traditional CAD risk factors with a special focus on Dys-HDL, knowing that SAIs have low HDL levels. This information will not only help to stratify high-risk asymptomatic SAI groups, but will also be useful from a disease management point of view.

Proactive rounding by the rapid response team reduces inpatient cardiac arrests

OBJECTIVE Rapid response teams (RRTs) are frequently employed to respond to deteriorating inpatients. Proactive rounding (PR) consists of the RRT nurse rounding through the inpatient wards identifying high risk patients and intervening preemptively. At our institution, PR began in July of 2007. Our objective was to determine the effect of PR by the RRT at our institution on non-ICU cardiac arrests, code deaths, RRT interventions, and transfers to a higher level of care. Also, to report ICU transfer survival and survival to discharge rates after the start of PR. DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. SETTING A tertiary, academic, level 1 trauma center with 696 beds and a rapid response system. PATIENTS 1253 Non-ICU cardiac arrests from 2005 through June of 2012. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The total study period included 223,267 inpatient admissions (70,129 pre-PR and 153,138 post-PR) and 1,250,814 patient days (391,088 pre-PR and 859,726 post-PR). The quarterly code rate before PR was 66 and the code rate after the institution of PR was 30 (difference=36.8, 95% CI 25.6-48.0, p<.001). Quarterly code deaths decreased from 29 to 7 (difference=21.95, 95% CI 16.3-27.6, p<.001). This decrease in floor codes and code deaths was still present after adjusting for inpatient admission and inpatient days. Average quarterly RRT interventions increased from 141 in the pre-PR period to 690 in the post-PR period (difference=549, 95% CI 360-738, p<.001). Average quarterly transfers to HLC went up from 38 pre-PR to 164 post-PR (difference=126, 95% CI 79-172, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS The institution of proactive rounding at a tertiary care, academic, level 1 trauma center results in reduced floor codes and code deaths as well as increased RRT interventions and transfers to a higher level of care.

The long-term burden of severe sepsis and septic shock: Sepsis recidivism and organ dysfunction.

BACKGROUND Severe sepsis and septic shock mortality has improved; however, rates of persistent (28–90 days) and long-term (>90 day) organ dysfunction in sepsis survivors are unknown. METHODS Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of adult emergency department patients with severe sepsis. RESULTS Of 110 sepsis admissions, we obtained follow-up on 51 of 78 survivors of whom 41% (21 of 51) had persistent organ dysfunction: pulmonary, 18% (9 of 51); renal, 22% (11 of 51); coagulopathy, 10% (5 of 51); cardiovascular, 6% (3 of 51); hepatic, 2% (1 of 51); and neurologic, 3% (3 of 51). We obtained follow-up on 40 of 73 survivors at more than 90 days of whom 38% (15 of 40) had long-term organ dysfunction: pulmonary, 13% (5 of 40); renal, 18% (7 of 40); coagulopathy, 3% (1 of 40); cardiovascular, 5% (2 of 40); hepatic, 0%; and neurologic, 5% (2 of 40). Readmission rate within 90 days was 32% (25 of 78), and recurrent sepsis was the cause of readmission in 52% (13 of 25). Baseline SOFA scores from the index sepsis admission were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and were significantly different in participants with organ dysfunction versus those without organ dysfunction at less than 90 days (z, −2.51; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Readmission with recurrent sepsis and organ dysfunction occurs frequently in sepsis survivors. Baseline SOFA score may be predictive of sepsis recidivism and persistent or recurrent organ dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level IV.

Carotid intima media thickness and low HDL in South Asian immigrants: could dysfunctional HDL be the missing link?

Introduction South Asian immigrants (SAIs) in the US exhibit higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its risk factors compared with other ethnic populations. Conventional CAD risk factors do not explain the excess CAD risk; therefore there is a need to identify other markers that can predict future risk of CAD in high-risk SAIs. The objective of the current study is to assess the presence of sub-clinical CAD using common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT), and its association with metabolic syndrome (MS) and pro-inflammatory/dysfunctional HDL (Dys-HDL). Material and methods A community-based study was conducted on 130 first generation SAIs aged 35–65 years. Dys-HDL was determined using the HDL inflammatory index. Analysis was completed using logistic regression and Fishers exact test. Results Sub-clinical CAD using CCA-IMT ≥ 0.8 mm (as a surrogate marker) was seen in 31.46%. Age and gender adjusted CCA-IMT was significantly associated with type 2 diabetes (p = 0.008), hypertension (p = 0.012), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (p < 0.001) and homocysteine (p = 0.051). Both the presence of MS and Dys-HDL was significantly correlated with CCA-IMT, even after age and gender adjustment. The odds of having Dys-HDL with CCA-IMT were 5 times (95% CI: 1.68, 10.78). Conclusions There is a need to explore and understand non-traditional CAD risk factors with a special focus on Dys-HDL, knowing that SAIs have low HDL levels. This information will not only help to stratify high-risk asymptomatic SAI groups, but will also be useful from a disease management point of view.

The relationship of intravenous fluid chloride content to kidney function in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock

BACKGROUND Previous studies suggest a relationship between chloride-rich intravenous fluids and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship of intravenous fluid chloride content to kidney function in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed to determine (1) quantity and type of bolus intravenous fluids, (2) serum creatinine (Cr) at presentation and upon discharge, and (3) need for emergent hemodialysis (HD) or renal replacement therapy (RRT). Linear regression was used for continuous outcomes, and logistic regression was used for binary outcomes and results were controlled for initial Cr. The primary outcome was change in Cr from admission to discharge. Secondary outcomes were need for HD/RRT, length of stay (LOS), mortality, and organ dysfunction. RESULTS There were 95 patients included in the final analysis; 48% (46) of patients presented with acute kidney injury, 8% (8) required first-time HD or RRT, 61% (58) were culture positive, 55% (52) were in shock, and overall mortality was 20% (19). There was no significant relationship between quantity of chloride administered in the first 24 hours with change in Cr (β = -0.0001, t = -0.86, R(2) = 0.92, P = .39), need for HD or RRT (odds ratio [OR] = 0.999; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.999-1.000; P = .77), LOS >14 days (OR = 1.000; 95% CI, 0.999-1.000; P = .68), mortality (OR = 0.999; 95% CI, 0.999-1.000; P = .88), or any type of organ dysfunction. CONCLUSION Chloride administered in the first 24 hours did not influence kidney function in this cohort with severe sepsis or septic shock.

Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Training Results in Physician-Level Success for Emergency Department Technicians

To report our success and complication rates with emergency department (ED) technician–performed ultrasound (US)‐guided peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter placement and to compare our results to similar studies in the literature.

Development of a Simple Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for Risk Assessment of Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis

Objectives: Sepsis-3 recommends using the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score followed by SOFA score for sepsis evaluation. The SOFA is complex and unfamiliar to most emergency physicians, while qSOFA is insensitive for sepsis screening and may result in missed cases of sepsis. The objective of this study was to devise an easy-to-use simple SOFA score for use in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Retrospective study of ED patients with sepsis with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome. A simple SOFA score was derived and validated and compared with SOFA and qSOFA. Results: A total of 3297 patients with sepsis were included, and in-hospital mortality was 10.1%. Simple SOFA had a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 44% in the derivation set and 93% and 44% in the validation set for in-hospital mortality, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of qSOFA was 38% and 86% and for SOFA was 90% and 50%, respectively. There were 2760 (84%) of 3297 qSOFA-negative (<2) patients. In this group, simple SOFA had a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 48% in the derivation set and 91% and 48% in the validation set, respectively. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was 86% sensitive and 57% specific in qSOFA-negative patients. For all encounters, the areas under the receiver–operator characteristic curves (AUROC) were 0.82 for SOFA, 0.78 (derivation) and 0.82 (validation) for simple SOFA, and 0.68 for qSOFA. In qSOFA-negative patients, the AUROCs were 0.80 for SOFA and 0.76 (derivation) and 0.82 (validation) for simple SOFA. Conclusions: Simple SOFA demonstrates similar predictive ability for in-hospital mortality from sepsis compared to SOFA. External validation of these findings is indicated.

End-tidal carbon dioxide as a goal of early sepsis therapy.

OBJECTIVE To determine the use of end-tidal carbon dioxide (etco2) as an end point of sepsis resuscitation. METHODS This was a prospective, observational, single-center cohort study of emergency department patients receiving treatment for severe sepsis with a quantitative resuscitation protocol. Three etco2 readings were taken during a 1-minute time frame at 0, 3, and 6 hours of treatment. Linear regression was used to characterize the association between etco2 and central venous oxygen saturation (SCVo2) and lactate and also to determine the relationship between their change. Analysis of variance was used to determine the relationship between etco2 and disposition. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were included in our final analysis. For baseline values, linear regression failed to show a relationship between etco2 and SCVo2 (β = -0.04, t(70) = -0.53, P = .60) but showed a nearly significant relationship (β = -0.51, t(70) = -1.90, P = .06) with lactate. There was no significant relationship between etco2 and SCVo2 at 3 hours (β = 0.12, t(70) = 1.43, P = .16) or 6 hours (β = 0.05, t(64) = 0.82, P = .67). There was also no significant relationship between 6-hour change in etco2 and change in SCVo2 (β = 0.04, t(64) = 0.43, P = .67) or lactate (β = 0.04, t(59) = 0.52, P = .60) or disposition (F(4) = 0.78, P = .54). CONCLUSION End-tidal carbon dioxide is unlikely to be a useful clinical end point for sepsis resuscitation, although it may be useful as a triage tool in suspected sepsis because baseline values may reflect initial lactate.