Fanni Gelley

Outcome of liver transplantation based on donor graft quality and recipient status.

BACKGROUND Availability of suitable donor organs has always limited the number of liver transplantations performed. Use of marginal donor organs is an alternative to overcome organ shortage. OBJECTIVE To analyze the effect of various combinations of donor organ quality and recipient status on the outcome of liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 260 whole-liver transplantations performed between January 2003 and September 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. Study groups were established according to donor organ quality (marginal score 0-1 vs 2-5) and recipient status (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] score <17 or >17). In patients at low risk, 102 received optimal grafts (good-to-good group [G/G], and 75 received marginal grafts (bad-to-good group [B/G]. In patients at high risk, 46 received optimal grafts (good-to-bad group [G/B], and 37 received marginal grafts (bad-to-bad group [B/B]. RESULTS No differences were observed in cumulative patient and graft survival rates; however, total survival differed in the early period after transplantation, that is, within 1 year. There was a higher rate of overall postoperative complications including initial poor graft function, bleeding, infection, and kidney failure in group B/B compared with group G/B (25 of 37 patients [67.5%] vs 27 of 46 patients [59.0%]), group B/G (25 of 37 patients [68%] vs 39 of 75 patients [52%], and group G/G (25 of 37 patients [68%] vs 43 of 102 patients [42%]) (P = .04). Patients with a high MELD score (G/B and B/B) demonstrated increased risk of postoperative complications. Use of donor organs with marginal score of 2 or higher in patients with high MELD scores increased early patient mortality. CONCLUSION In summary, patients with a high MELD score (G/B and B/B) are at an increased risk of post-OLT complications. In contrast, use of marginal grafts (B/G and B/B) increased the rate of hepatitis C virus recurrence and decreased the response rate to antiviral therapy. The combination of impaired donor grafts and recipients at high risk should be avoided.

MicroRNA profile before and after antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients for hepatitis C virus cirrhosis

Management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is a major challenge after liver transplantation. Significant dysregulated expression of HCV receptors (i.e. claudin‐1, occludin, tetraspanin CD81, scavenger receptor type B1) has been shown recently during HCV infection. This might facilitate hepatocytic entry and reinfection of HCV. MicroRNAs (miRs) play role in the regulation of gene expression. We aimed to characterize miR expression profiles related to HCV infection and antiviral therapy in adult liver transplant recipients, with special emphasis on miRs predicted to target HCV receptors.

Extended-criteria donors in liver transplantation Part II: reviewing the impact of extended-criteria donors on the complications and outcomes of liver transplantation

ABSTRACT Extended-criteria donors (ECDs) have an impact on early allograft dysfunction (EAD), biliary complications, relapse of hepatitis C virus (HCV), and survivals. Early allograft dysfunction was frequently seen in grafts with moderate and severe steatosis. Donors after cardiac death (DCD) have been associated with higher rates of graft failure and biliary complications compared to donors after brain death. Extended warm ischemia, reperfusion injury and endothelial activation trigger a cascade, leading to microvascular thrombosis, resulting in biliary necrosis, cholangitis, and graft failure. The risk of HCV recurrence increased by donor age, and associated with using moderately and severely steatotic grafts. With the administration of protease inhibitors sustained virological response was achieved in majority of the patients. Donor risk index and EC donor scores (DS) are reported to be useful, to assess the outcome. The 1-year survival rates were 87% and 40% respectively, for donors with a DS of 0 and 3. Graft survival was excellent up to a DS of 2, however a DS >2 should be avoided in higher-risk recipients. The 1, 3 and 5-year survival of DCD recipients was comparable to optimal donors. However ECDs had minor survival means of 85%, 78.6%, and 72.3%. The graft survival of split liver transplantation (SLT) was comparable to that of whole liver orthotopic liver transplantation. SLT was not regarded as an ECD factor in the MELD era any more. Full-right-full-left split liver transplantation has a significant advantage to extend the high quality donor pool. Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion can be applied clinically in DCD liver grafts. Feasibility and safety were confirmed. Reperfusion injury was also rare in machine perfused DCD livers.

Extended criteria donors in liver transplantation Part I: reviewing the impact of determining factors

ABSTRACT The definition and factors of extended criteria donors have already been set; however, details of the various opinions still differ in many respects. In this review, we summarize the impact of these factors and their clinical relevance. Elderly livers must not be allocated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) positives, or patients with acute liver failure. In cases of markedly increased serum transaminases, donor hemodynamics is an essential consideration. A prolonged hypotension of the donor does not always lead to an increase in post-transplantation graft loss if post-OLT care is proper. Hypernatremia of less than 160 mEq/L is not an absolute contraindication to accept a liver graft per se. The presence of steatosis is an independent and determinant risk factor for the outcome. The gold standard of the diagnosis is the biopsy. This is recommended in all doubtful cases. The use of HCV+ grafts for HCV+ recipients is comparable in outcome. The leading risk factor for HCV recurrence is the actual RNA positivity of the donor. The presence of a proper anti-HBs level seems to protect from de novo HBV infection. A favourable outcome can be expected if a donation after cardiac death liver is transplanted in a favourable condition, meaning, a warm ischemia time < 30 minutes, cold ischemia time < 8–10 hours, and donor age 50–60 years. The pathway of organ quality assessment is to obtain the most relevant information (e.g. biopsy), consider the co-existing donor risk factors and the reserve capacity of the recipient, and avoid further technical issues.

Relationship Between Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence and De Novo Diabetes After Liver Transplantation: The Hungarian Experience

De novo diabetes mellitus is a common complication after liver transplantation. It is strongly associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We analyzed the relationship between HCV recurrence and de novo diabetes among the Hungarian liver transplant population. This retrospective study included cases from 1995 to 2009 on 310 whole liver transplantations. De novo diabetes was defined if the patient had a fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL permanently after the third month post liver transplantation, and/or required sustained antidiabetic therapy. De novo diabetes occured in 63 patients (20%). The cumulative patient survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were 95%, 91%, 88%, and 88% in the control group, and 87%, 79%, 79%, and 64% in the de novo group, respectively (P=.011). The majority of the patients in the de novo group were HCV positive (66% vs 23%). Early virus recurrence within 5 months was associated with the development of diabetes (80% vs 20% non-diabetic controls; P=.017). The fibrosis (2.05 ± 1.5 vs 1 ± 1; P=.039) and Knodell scores (3.25 ± 2 vs 1.69 ± 1.2; P=.019) were higher among the de novo group after antiviral therapy. Rapid recurrence, more severe viremia, and fibrosis showed significant roles in the developement of de novo diabetes after liver transplantation.

New-onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation

A de novo diabetes mellitus a majatultetes gyakori szovődmenye. Celkitűzes: A de novo diabetes gyakorisagat, jelentőseget es a kockazati tenyezők szerepet vizsgaltuk. Modszer: 1995 es 2009 kozott 310 majatultetett beteg adatait dolgoztuk fel retrospektiv modszerrel. De novo diabetest allapitottunk meg, ha az ehomi vercukor a 3. posztoperativ honapon tul ismetelten >6,8 mmol/l volt, es/vagy a majatultetes utan tartos, a 3. posztoperativ honapot meghaladoan is fenntartott antidiabetikus terapia indult. Eredmenyek: De novo diabetes a betegek 20%-anal (63 beteg) alakult ki. A de novo es a kontrollcsoport kozott az alabbiakban talaltunk kulonbseget. Donor-testtomegindex (24±3 vs. 22,4±3,6 kg/m 2 , p = 0,003), ferfi nem (58% vs. 33%, p = 0,002). Recipienseletkor (47,6±7,2 vs. 38,3±14,6 ev, p<0,001), -testtomegindex (26,7±3,8 vs. 23,3±5,6 kg/m 2 , p<0,001), ferfi nem (60% vs. 44%, p = 0,031). A de novo diabetesesek csoportjaban a betegek 66%-at HCV talajan kialakult cirrhosis miatt transzplantaltak, a kontrollcs...UNLABELLED New-onset diabetes is a common complication after liver transplantation. AIM We aimed to analyze the incidence and rate of known risk factors and the impact of new-onset diabetes mellitus on postoperative outcome. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the files of 310 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 1995 and 2009. Definition of new-onset diabetes included: repeated fasting serum glucose >6.8 mmol/l and/or sustained antidiabetic therapy that was present 3 months after transplantation. RESULTS New-onset diabetes occurred in 63 patients (20%). Differences between the new-onset and the control group were the donor body mass index (24+/-3 vs. 22.4+/-3.6 kg/m 2 , p = 0.003), donor male gender (58% vs. 33%, p = 0.002), and recipient age (47.6+/-7.2 vs. 38.3+/-14.6 year, p<0.001), body mass index (26.7+/-3.8 vs. 23.3+/-5.6 kg/m 2 , p<0.001), male gender (60% vs. 44%, p = 0.031). The 66% of patients with new-onset diabetes were transplanted with cirrhosis caused by hepatitis C virus infection, while in the control group the rate was 23% (p<0.001). Cumulative patient survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 8 year were 95%, 90.6%, 88% and 88% in the control group, and 87%, 79%, 79% and 64% in the de novo group, respectively (p = 0.011). Cumulative graft survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 8 year in the control group were 92%, 87%, 86% and 79%, in the de novo diabetes group the rates were 87%, 79%, 79%, 65%, respectively (p = NS). In case of early recurrence (in 6 months), majority of patients developed new-onset diabetes (74% vs. control 26%, p = 0.03). More patients had more than 10 times higher increase of the postoperative virus titer correlate to the preoperative titer in the de novo diabetes group (53% vs. 20%, p = 0.028). Mean fibrosis score was higher in new-onset group one year after the beginning of antiviral therapy (2.05+/-1.53 vs. 1.00+/-1.08, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS Risk factors for new-onset diabetes after transplantation are older age, obesity, male gender and cirrhosis due to hepatitis C infection. The early recurrence, viremia and more severe fibrosis after antiviral therapy have an impact on the occurrence of new-onset diabetes in hepatitis C positive patients.

Can a Cutoff Value for Cystatin C in the Operative Setting Be Determined to Predict Kidney Function After Liver Transplantation

Correct assessment and follow-up of kidney function is essential in liver transplant recipients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) represents the functional capacity of the kidney. The GFR is generally determined on the basis of creatinine clearance using several methods. It has been suggested that cystatin C be used rather than GFR. Production of cystatin C is not dependent on the same factors as creatinine. It is filtered and completely metabolized in the glomeruli, and is not secreted by the kidney tubules. The objective of this study was to determine a preoperative cutoff value for cystatin C based on kidney function estimated after liver transplantation. At prefixed times before and after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), serum cystatin C and creatinine concentrations were measured, and GFR was calculated using the Cockroft-Gault equation. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to GFR on postoperative days 1 to 5. Group 1 (healthy recipients) included patients with post-OLT GFR greater than 70 mL/min; and group 2 (kidney-impaired recipients), post-OLT GFR less than 70 mL/min. Group 2 demonstrated greater risk of postoperative complications, abnormal postoperative creatinine concentrations and GFR values, and worse patient and graft survival. Based on the preoperative cystatin C concentration, postoperative kidney function can be assessed. The cutoff value for preoperative cystatin was determined using receiver operating characteristics analysis. When the preoperative cystatin C concentration exceeded 1.28 mg/L, the postoperative GFR was less than 70 mL/min in the first 5 days after OLT. These findings suggest that if the cystatin C concentration exceeds the cutoff point preoperatively, there will be deterioration of kidney function after OLT. Along with other researchers, we suggest that cystatin C is a sensitive marker of post-OLT kidney function.

Evaluation of Histological and non-Invasive Methods for the Detection of Liver Fibrosis: The Values of Histological and Digital Morphometric Analysis, Liver Stiffness Measurement and APRI Score

Prognosis and treatment of liver diseases mainly depend on the precise evaluation of the fibrosis. Comparisons were made between the results of Metavir fibrosis scores and digital morphometric analyses (DMA), liver stiffness (LS) values and aminotransferase-platelet ratio (APRI) scores, respectively. Liver biopsy specimens stained with Sirius red and analysed by morphometry, LS and APRI measurements were taken from 96 patients with chronic liver diseases (56 cases of viral hepatitis, 22 cases of autoimmune- and 18 of mixed origin). The strongest correlation was observed between Metavir score and DMA (r = 0.75 p < 0.05), followed in decreasing order by LS and Metavir (r = 0.61), LS and DMA (r = 0.47) LS and APRI (r = 0.35) and Metavir and APRI (r = 0.24), respectively. DMA is a helpful additional tool for the histopathological evaluation of fibrosis, even when the sample size is small and especially in case of advanced fibrosis. The non-invasive methods showed good correlation with the histopathological methods; LS proved to be more accurate than APRI. The stronger correlation between LS values and Metavir scores, as well as the results of DMA in case of appropriate sample size were remarkable.

Examination of Claudin-1 Expression in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation Owing to Hepatitis C Virus Cirrhosis

The cell adhesion molecule claudin-1 (CLDN-1) is a well known co-factor for the cell entry of hepatitis C virus (HCV). We examined 24 hepatic biopsies from liver transplant patients. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry were performed according to standard procedures. RT-PCR results were shown as relative expression (ΔCT) with beta-actin as the reference gene. Immunohistochemistry results are shown by morphometry. The CLDN-1 mRNS expression rate was significantly lower when the patient displayed favorably with an unsatisfactory to antiviral therapy 0.756 ± 0.249 versus 1.304 ± 0.28 (P=.012). There was also a strong positive correlation between CLDN-1 protein expression and liver fibrosis (Pearson correlation coefficients: r=0.476; P=.034).

The role of marginal donors in liver transplantation. The Hungarian experience

UNLABELLED Availability of suitable donor organs has always limited liver transplantations. Use of marginal donors (Extended Donor Criteria) for liver transplantation is an alternative to overcome the organ shortage. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of organ donation in Hungary with special regard to marginal donors. METHODS We reviewed data from donors and recipients between January 2003 and December 2008 retrospectively. Extended donor criteria were adopted from international recommendations. RESULTS During this period, 1078 donors were reported to the clinic. 835 (77.4%) donors were excluded from liver transplantation and 243 (22.6%) were implanted. From the 243 transplantations 40 recipients (16%) received marginal graft, 203 (84%) received non-marginal graft. Extended Donor Criteria status had no negative impact on the patient and graft survival, postoperative graft dysfunction, and other complications. Recurrence of Hepatitis C occurred earlier in those patients who received marginal graft. CONCLUSION There is an increasing number of patients waiting for liver transplantation in Hungary. There is no significant difference in morbidity and mortality of patients receiving marginal or non-marginal graft. Use of marginal grafts should be avoided in Hepatitis C virus positive recipients. Acceptance of older donors for liver transplantation should be considered.