Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Faraz Shaikh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Faraz Shaikh.


Epidemiology and Infection | 2015

Combat trauma-associated invasive fungal wound infections: epidemiology and clinical classification

A. C. Weintrob; A. B. Weisbrod; James R. Dunne; Carlos J. Rodriguez; D. Malone; Bradley A. Lloyd; Tyler Warkentien; Justin Wells; Clinton K. Murray; William P. Bradley; Faraz Shaikh; Jinesh Shah; Deepak Aggarwal; M. L. Carson; David R. Tribble

The emergence of invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) in combat casualties led to development of a combat trauma-specific IFI case definition and classification. Prospective data were collected from 1133 US military personnel injured in Afghanistan (June 2009-August 2011). The IFI rates ranged from 0·2% to 11·7% among ward and intensive care unit admissions, respectively (6·8% overall). Seventy-seven IFI cases were classified as proven/probable (n = 54) and possible/unclassifiable (n = 23) and compared in a case-case analysis. There was no difference in clinical characteristics between the proven/probable and possible/unclassifiable cases. Possible IFI cases had shorter time to diagnosis (P = 0·02) and initiation of antifungal therapy (P = 0·05) and fewer operative visits (P = 0·002) compared to proven/probable cases, but clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. Although the trauma-related IFI classification scheme did not provide prognostic information, it is an effective tool for clinical and epidemiological surveillance and research.


Surgical Infections | 2014

Effect of Early Screening for Invasive Fungal Infections in U.S. Service Members with Explosive Blast Injuries

Bradley A. Lloyd; Amy C. Weintrob; Carlos J. Rodriguez; James R. Dunne; Allison B. Weisbrod; Mary Hinkle; Tyler Warkentien; Clinton K. Murray; John S. Oh; Eugene V. Millar; Jinesh Shah; Faraz Shaikh; Stacie Gregg; Gina Lloyd; Julie Stevens; M. Leigh Carson; Deepak Aggarwal; David R. Tribble

BACKGROUND An outbreak of invasive fungal infections (IFI) began in 2009 among United States servicemen who sustained blast injuries in Afghanistan. In response, the military trauma community sought a uniform approach to early diagnosis and treatment. Toward this goal, a local clinical practice guideline (CPG) was implemented at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC) in early 2011 to screen for IFI in high-risk patients using tissue histopathology and fungal cultures. METHODS We compared IFI cases identified after initiation of the CPG (February through August 2011) to cases from a pre-CPG period (June 2009 through January 2011). RESULTS Sixty-one patients were screened in the CPG period, among whom 30 IFI cases were identified and compared with 44 pre-CPG IFI cases. Demographics between the two study periods were similar, although significantly higher transfusion requirements (p<0.05) and non-significant trends in injury severity scores and early lower extremity amputation rates suggested more severe injuries in CPG-period cases. Pre-CPG IFI cases were more likely to be associated with angioinvasion on histopathology than CPG IFI cases (48% versus 17%; p<0.001). Time to IFI diagnosis (three versus nine days) and to initiation of antifungal therapy (seven versus 14 days) were significantly decreased in the CPG period (p<0.001). Additionally, more IFI patients received antifungal agent at LRMC during the CPG period (30%) versus pre-CPG period (5%; p=0.005). The CPG IFI cases were also prescribed more commonly dual antifungal therapy (73% versus 36%; p=0.002). There was no statistical difference in length of stay or mortality between pre-CPG and CPG IFI cases; although a non-significant reduction in crude mortality from 11.4% to 6.7% was observed. CONCLUSIONS Angioinvasive IFI as a percentage of total IFI cases decreased during the CPG period. Earlier diagnosis and commencement of more timely treatment was achieved. Despite these improvements, no difference in clinical outcomes was observed compared with the pre-CPG period.


Military Medicine | 2014

Adherence to published antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines for wounded service members in the ongoing conflicts in Southwest Asia

Bradley A. Lloyd; Amy C. Weintrob; Mary K. Hinkle; Clinton K. Murray; William P. Bradley; Eugene V. Millar; Faraz Shaikh; Kristen Vanderzant; Stacie Gregg; Gina Lloyd; Julie Stevens; M. Leigh Carson; Deepak Aggarwal; David R. Tribble

In 2008, a clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed for the prevention of infections among military personnel with combat-related injuries. Our analysis expands on a prior 6-month evaluation and assesses CPG adherence with respect to antimicrobial prophylaxis for U.S. combat casualties medically evacuated to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center over a 1-year period (June 2009 through May 2010), with an eventual goal of continuously monitoring CPG adherence and measuring outcomes as a function of compliance. We classified adherence to the CPG as receipt of recommended antimicrobials within 48 hours of injury. A total of 1106 military personnel eligible for CPG assessment were identified and 74% received antimicrobial prophylaxis. Overall, CPG compliance within 48 hours of injury was 75%. Lack of antimicrobial prophylaxis contributed 2 to 22% to noncompliance varying by injury category, whereas receipt of antibiotics other than preferred was 11 to 30%. For extremity injuries, antimicrobial prophylaxis adherence was 60 to 83%, whereas it was 80% for closed injuries and 68% for penetrating abdominal injuries. Overall, the results of our analysis suggest an ongoing need to improve adherence, monitor CPG compliance, and assess effectiveness.


Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2016

Early Complications and Outcomes in Combat Injury-Related Invasive Fungal Wound Infections: A Case-Control Analysis.

Louis R. Lewandowski; Amy C. Weintrob; David R. Tribble; Carlos J. Rodriguez; Joseph L. Petfield; Bradley A. Lloyd; Clinton K. Murray; Daniel J. Stinner; Deepak Aggarwal; Faraz Shaikh; Benjamin K. Potter

Objective: Clinicians have anecdotally noted that combat-related invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) lead to residual limb shortening, additional days and operative procedures before initial wound closure, and high early complication rates. We evaluated the validity of these observations and identified risk factors that may impact time to initial wound closure. Design: Retrospective review and case–control analysis. Setting: Military hospitals. Patients/Participants: US military personnel injured during combat operations (2009–2011). The IFI cases were identified based on the presence of recurrent, necrotic extremity wounds with mold growth in culture, and/or histopathologic fungal evidence. Non-IFI controls were matched on injury pattern and severity. In a supplemental matching analysis, non-IFI controls were also matched by blood volume transfused within 24 hours of injury. Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measurements: Amputation revision rate and loss of functional levels. Results: Seventy-one IFI cases (112 fungal–infected extremity wounds) were identified and matched to 160 control patients (315 non-IFI extremity wounds). The IFI wounds resulted in significantly more changes in amputation level (P < 0.001). Additionally, significantly (P < 0.001) higher number of operative procedures and longer duration to initial wound closure were associated with IFI. A shorter duration to initial wound closure was significantly associated with wounds lacking IFIs (Hazard ratio: 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17–2.01). The supplemental matching analysis found similar results. Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that IFIs adversely impact wound healing and patient recovery, requiring more frequent proximal amputation revisions and leading to higher early complication rates. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2014

Clinical relevance of mold culture positivity with and without recurrent wound necrosis following combat-related injuries

Carlos J. Rodriguez; Amy C. Weintrob; James R. Dunne; Allison B. Weisbrod; Bradley A. Lloyd; Tyler Warkentien; Debra L. Malone; Justin Wells; Clinton K. Murray; William P. Bradley; Faraz Shaikh; Jinesh Shah; Michelle Leigh Carson; Deepak Aggarwal; David R. Tribble

BACKGROUND Invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) are a recognized threat for personnel who sustain combat-related blast trauma in Afghanistan. Blast trauma, particularly when dismounted, has wounds contaminated with organic debris and potential for mold infection. Trauma-associated IFI is characterized by recurrent wound necrosis on serial debridement with histologic evidence of invasive molds and/or fungal culture growth. Wounds with mold growth but lacking corresponding recurrent necrosis present a clinical dilemma of whether to initiate antifungal treatment. Our objective was to assess the clinical significance of fungal culture growth without recurrent wound necrosis. METHODS US military personnel wounded during combat in Afghanistan (June 2009 to August 2011) were assessed for growth of mold from wound cultures and/or histopathologic evidence of IFI. Identified patients were stratified based on clinical wound appearance (with/without recurrent necrosis), and the resultant groups were compared for injury characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes. RESULTS A total of 96 patients were identified: 77 with fungal elements on histopathology and/or fungal growth plus recurrent wound necrosis and 19 with fungal growth on culture but no wound necrosis after initial debridements. Injury patterns and severity were similar between the groups. Patients with recurrent necrosis had more frequent fevers and leukocytosis during the first 2 weeks after injury, and the majority received antifungal therapy compared with only three patients (16%) without recurrently necrotic wounds. Overall, patients without recurrent wound necrosis had significantly less operative procedures (p = 0.02), shorter stay in the intensive care unit (p < 0.01), and lower rates of high-level amputations (5% vs. 20%) and deaths (none vs. 8%) despite no or infrequent antifungal use. CONCLUSION The finding of molds on wound culture among patients with blast trauma in the absence of recurrently necrotic wounds on serial debridement does not require systemic antifungal chemotherapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV. Prognosti/epidemiologic study, level III.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 2015

Impact of Mucorales and Other Invasive Molds on Clinical Outcomes of Polymicrobial Traumatic Wound Infections

Tyler Warkentien; Faraz Shaikh; Amy C. Weintrob; Carlos Rodríguez; Clinton K. Murray; Bradley A. Lloyd; Anuradha Ganesan; Deepak Aggarwal; M. Leigh Carson; David R. Tribble

ABSTRACT Combat trauma wounds with invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are often polymicrobial with fungal and bacterial growth, but the impact of the wound microbiology on clinical outcomes is uncertain. Our objectives were to compare the microbiological features between IFI and non-IFI wounds and evaluate whether clinical outcomes differed among IFI wounds based upon mold type. Data from U.S. military personnel injured in Afghanistan with IFI wounds were examined. Controls were matched by the pattern/severity of injury, including blood transfusion requirements. Wound closure timing was compared between IFI and non-IFI control wounds (with/without bacterial infections). IFI wound closure was also assessed according to mold species isolation. Eighty-two IFI wounds and 136 non-IFI wounds (63 with skin and soft tissue infections [SSTIs] and 73 without) were examined. The time to wound closure was longer for the IFI wounds (median, 16 days) than for the non-IFI controls with/without SSTIs (medians, 12 and 9 days, respectively; P < 0.001). The growth of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative rods was reported among 35% and 41% of the IFI and non-IFI wounds with SSTIs, respectively. Among the IFI wounds, times to wound closure were significantly longer for wounds with Mucorales growth than for wounds with non-Mucorales growth (median, 17 days versus 13 days; P < 0.01). When wounds with Mucorales and Aspergillus spp. growth were compared, there was no significant difference in wound closure timing. Trauma wounds with SSTIs were often polymicrobial, yet the presence of invasive molds (predominant types: order Mucorales, Aspergillus spp., and Fusarium spp.) significantly prolonged the time to wound closure. Overall, the times to wound closure were longest for the IFI wounds with Mucorales growth.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2015

Environmental Factors Related to Fungal Wound Contamination after Combat Trauma in Afghanistan, 2009-2011.

David R. Tribble; Carlos Rodríguez; Amy C. Weintrob; Faraz Shaikh; Deepak Aggarwal; M. Leigh Carson; Clinton K. Murray; Penny Masuoka

Environmental characteristics, along with known risk factors, may help predict likelihood of mold contamination after injury.


American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2014

Compliance with Antimalarial Chemoprophylaxis Recommendations for Wounded United States Military Personnel Admitted to a Military Treatment Facility

Elizabeth Rini; Amy C. Weintrob; David R. Tribble; Bradley A. Lloyd; Tyler Warkentien; Faraz Shaikh; Ping Li; Deepak Aggarwal; M. Leigh Carson; Clinton K. Murray

Malaria chemoprophylaxis is used as a preventive measure in military personnel deployed to malaria-endemic countries. However, limited information is available on compliance with chemoprophylaxis among trauma patients during hospitalization and after discharge. Therefore, we assessed antimalarial primary chemoprophylaxis and presumptive antirelapse therapy (primaquine) compliance among wounded United States military personnel after medical evacuation from Afghanistan (June 2009-August 2011) to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Landstuhl, Germany, and then to three U.S. military hospitals. Among admissions at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, 74% of 2,540 patients were prescribed primary chemoprophylaxis and < 1% were prescribed primaquine. After transfer of 1,331 patients to U.S. hospitals, 93% received primary chemoprophylaxis and 33% received primaquine. Of 751 trauma patients with available post-admission data, 42% received primary chemoprophylaxis for four weeks, 33% received primaquine for 14 days, and 17% received both. These antimalarial chemoprophylaxis prescription rates suggest that improved protocols to continue malaria chemoprophylaxis in accordance with force protection guidelines are needed.


Military Medicine | 2017

Variation in Postinjury Antibiotic Prophylaxis Patterns Over Five Years in a Combat Zone

Bradley A. Lloyd; Clinton K. Murray; William P. Bradley; Faraz Shaikh; Deepak Aggarwal; M. Leigh Carson; David R. Tribble

In 2008, a clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed for the prevention of infections among combat casualties and was later revised in 2011. We evaluated utilization of antimicrobials within 48 hours following injury in the combat zone over a 5-year period (June 2009 through May 2014) with regard to number of regimens, type of antimicrobial, and adherence to the 2011 CPG. The study population consisted of 5,196 wounded military personnel. Open fractures and skin and soft-tissue injuries were the most frequent injuries. Closed injuries had the highest overall compliance (83%), whereas open fractures and maxillofacial injuries had significant improvement in compliance from 2009-2010 (34 and 50%, respectively) to 2013-2014 (73 and 76%, respectively; p < 0.05). Part of the improvement with open fractures was a significant reduction of expanded Gram-negative coverage (61% received it in 2009-2010 compared to 7% in 2013-2014; p < 0.001). Use of Gram-negative coverage with maxillofacial injuries also significantly declined (37-12%; p = 0.001). Being injured during 2011-2014 compared to 2009-2010 was associated with CPG compliance (p < 0.001), while high injury severity scores (≥10) and admission to the intensive care unit in Germany were associated with noncompliance (p < 0.001). Our analysis demonstrates an increasing trend toward CPG compliance with significant reduction of expanded Gram-negative coverage.


Military Medicine | 2018

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis with Combat-Related Open Soft-Tissue Injuries

Bradley A. Lloyd; Clinton K. Murray; Faraz Shaikh; M. Leigh Carson; Dana M. Blyth; Elizabeth Schnaubelt; Timothy J. Whitman; David R. Tribble

Introduction All Department of Defense (DoD) guidance documents recommend cefazolin or clindamycin as post-trauma antibiotic prophylaxis for open soft-tissue injuries. Although not advocated, some patients with open soft-tissue injuries also received expanded Gram-negative coverage (EGN) prophylaxis based on the judgment of front-line trauma providers. During the study period, revised guidelines in 2011/2012 re-emphasized recommendations for using cefazolin or clindamycin, and stewardship efforts in the DoD trauma community aimed to reduce the practice of adding EGN to guideline-recommended antibiotic prophylaxis. Our objective was to examine antibiotic utilization among wounded military personnel with open extremity soft-tissue injuries over a 5-yr period and assess the impact on infectious outcomes in patients who received EGN prophylaxis versus guideline-directed prophylaxis. Methods The study population included military personnel with open extremity soft-tissue injuries sustained in Iraq and Afghanistan (2009-2014) who transferred to participating hospitals in the USA following medical evacuation. The analysis was restricted to patients who were hospitalized for at least seven days at a U.S. facility and excluded those who sustained open fractures. Post-trauma antibiotic prophylactic regimens were defined as narrow if they followed recommended guidance (e.g., IV cefazolin or clindamycin) or EGN coverage when the narrow regimen also included fluoroquinolones and/or aminoglycosides. Intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanate, which is commonly used at non-U.S. coalition theater hospitals, was also classified as narrow because it conformed to coalition antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines. This study was approved by the Infectious Disease Institutional Review Board of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. Results A total of 287 wounded personnel with open soft-tissue injuries were assessed, of which 212 (74%) received narrow prophylaxis and 75 (26%) received EGN coverage (p < 0.001). Among patients in the narrow prophylaxis group, 81% were given cefazolin and/or clindamycin, while 19% received amoxicillin-clavulanate. In the EGN group, 88% and 12% received a fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside, respectively. Use of EGN coverage significantly declined during the study period from 39% in 2009-2010 to 11% in 2013-2014 (p < 0.001). Approximately 3% of patients who received a narrow regimen developed an extremity skin and soft-tissue infection, while there were no skin and soft-tissue infections among patients in the EGN coverage group. Nonetheless, this was not a significant difference (p = 0.345). In addition, the proportion of non-extremity infections was not significantly different between narrow and EGN regimen groups (11% and 15%, respectively). There were also no significant differences between the narrow and EGN regimen groups related to duration of hospitalization (median of 19 versus 20 d). Conclusion Use of non-guideline directed EGN-based post-trauma antibiotic prophylaxis does not improve infectious outcomes nor does it shorten hospital stay.

Collaboration


Dive into the Faraz Shaikh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David R. Tribble

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clinton K. Murray

San Antonio Military Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bradley A. Lloyd

Landstuhl Regional Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deepak Aggarwal

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy C. Weintrob

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Leigh Carson

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William P. Bradley

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dana M. Blyth

San Antonio Military Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy J. Whitman

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elizabeth Schnaubelt

Landstuhl Regional Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge