Farsad Eskandary

Complement component C3 activation: the leading cause of the prozone phenomenon affecting HLA antibody detection on single-antigen beads.

Background Luminex-based anti-HLA IgG detection on single-antigen flow beads (SAFB) represents a valuable tool for characterization of allosensitization patterns. Assay interpretation, however, may be impeded by false-low test results caused by the prozone effect. Recent experimental data have related this artifact to direct blockade of IgG detection by complement component C1 as a possible candidate mechanism. Methods To dissect a causative role of C1 complex formation and subsequent steps of classical complement activation, native or modified sera obtained from transplant candidates with HLA class I sensitization were evaluated applying SAFB-based IgG, IgM, C1q, C1r, C1s, or C4 and C3 split product detection, respectively. Results Evaluating a total of 1,164 single-antigen reactions, serum dilution (1:10) revealed an 11% incidence of the prozone effect as defined by a greater than 100% increase in IgG mean fluorescence intensity. Prozoning was found to be related to the amount of antibody-triggered C1q, C4 or C3 split product deposition, and was eliminated by serum modifications affecting the integrity of the C1 complex (dithiotreitol, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, heat inactivation). Remarkably, the same effect was achieved without C1 disintegration, either by serum treatment with methylamine to block C4 and C3 split product binding or by cobra venom factor to trigger C3 consumption. Conclusions Our results reinforce a central role of C1 as a trigger of prozoning. However, we provide evidence that C1 may exert its effects only indirectly, namely via inducing C3 fragment deposition, which by coating of the bead surface may block the binding of IgG detection reagents.

Diagnostic Contribution of Donor-specific Antibody Characteristics to Uncover Late Silent Antibody-mediated Rejection—results of a Cross-sectional Screening Study

Background Circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA) detected on bead arrays may not inevitably indicate ongoing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Here, we investigated whether detection of complement-fixation, in parallel to IgG mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), allows for improved prediction of AMR. Methods Our study included 86 DSA+ kidney transplant recipients subjected to protocol biopsy, who were identified upon cross-sectional antibody screening of 741 recipients with stable graft function at 6 months or longer after transplantation. IgG MFI was analyzed after elimination of prozone effect, and complement-fixation was determined using C1q, C4d, or C3d assays. Results Among DSA+ study patients, 44 recipients (51%) had AMR, 24 of them showing C4d-positive rejection. Although DSA number or HLA class specificity were not different, patients with AMR or C4d + AMR showed significantly higher IgG, C1q, and C3d DSA MFI than nonrejecting or C4d-negative patients, respectively. Overall, the predictive value of DSA characteristics was moderate, whereby the highest accuracy was computed for peak IgG MFI (AMR, 0.73; C4d + AMR, 0.71). Combined analysis of antibody characteristics in multivariate models did not improve AMR prediction. Conclusions We estimate a 50% prevalence of silent AMR in DSA+ long-term recipients and conclude that assessment of IgG MFI may add predictive accuracy, without an independent diagnostic advantage of detecting complement-fixation.

ABO antibody and complement depletion by immunoadsorption combined with membrane filtration—a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial

BACKGROUND Potent antibody depletion techniques have paved the way to successful ABO-incompatible transplantation. Considering its efficiency regarding IgG removal, the use of non-antigen-specific semi-selective immunoadsorption (IA) has been advocated. One attractive strategy to overcome the caveat of incomplete IgM depletion and to interfere with complement activation could be the adjunctive use of membrane filtration (MF) to enhance the removal of macromolecules. METHODS To investigate the depletion efficiency of semi-selective IA plus MF, we conducted a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial including patients on regular IA treatment for indications outside recipient desensitization. According to the results of sample size calculation, 14 subjects were enrolled. Two treatment sequences, a single session of IA plus MF followed by IA alone after ≥7 days (and vice versa), were analysed. RESULTS IA plus MF markedly enhanced the median per cent reduction of ABO-specific IgM determined by flow cytometry (primary end point; 59 versus 23%, P < 0.001) and haemagglutination (2 versus 1 titre steps, P < 0.001), respectively. Combined treatment also substantially lowered C1q concentrations (86 versus 58% reduction, P < 0.001) and the functionality of classical complement as reflected by impaired in vitro C3 activation capability. IgG was strongly reduced without any additional effect of MF. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that the innovative strategy of combining MF with semi-selective IA may substantially increase IgM elimination and affect classical complement activation. Our findings suggest that this new treatment concept could be an efficient strategy for recipient desensitization in ABO- and HLA-incompatible transplantation.

Real Time Central Assessment of Kidney Transplant Indication Biopsies by Microarrays: The INTERCOMEX Study

The authors conducted a prospective trial to assess the feasibility of real time central molecular assessment of kidney transplant biopsy samples from 10 North American or European centers. Biopsy samples taken 1 day to 34 years posttransplantation were stabilized in RNAlater, sent via courier overnight at ambient temperature to the central laboratory, and processed (29 h workflow) using microarrays to assess T cell– and antibody‐mediated rejection (TCMR and ABMR, respectively). Of 538 biopsy samples submitted, 519 (96%) were sufficient for microarray analysis (average length, 3 mm). Automated reports were generated without knowledge of histology and HLA antibody, with diagnoses assigned based on Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) classifier algorithms and signed out by one observer. Agreement between MMDx and histology (balanced accuracy) was 77% for TCMR, 77% for ABMR, and 76% for no rejection. A classification tree derived to provide automated sign‐outs predicted the observer sign‐outs with >90% accuracy. In 451 biopsy samples where feedback was obtained, clinicians indicated that MMDx more frequently agreed with clinical judgment (87%) than did histology (80%) (p = 0.0042). In 81% of feedback forms, clinicians reported that MMDx increased confidence in management compared with conventional assessment alone. The authors conclude that real time central molecular assessment is feasible and offers a useful new dimension in biopsy interpretation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT#01299168.

Deceased donor kidney transplantation across donor-specific antibody barriers: predictors of antibody-mediated rejection

BACKGROUND Apheresis-based desensitization allows for successful transplantation across major immunological barriers. For donor-specific antibody (DSA)- and/or crossmatch-positive transplantation, however, it has been shown that even intense immunomodulation may not completely prevent antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). METHODS In this study, we evaluated transplant outcomes in 101 DSA+ deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (transplantation between 2009 and 2013; median follow-up: 24 months) who were subjected to immunoadsorption (IA)-based desensitization. Treatment included a single pre-transplant IA session, followed by anti-lymphocyte antibody and serial post-transplant IA. In 27 cases, a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) was rendered negative immediately before transplantation. Seventy-four of the DSA+ recipients had a negative CDCXM already before IA. RESULTS Three-year death-censored graft survival in DSA+ patients was significantly worse than in 513 DSA- recipients transplanted during the same period (79 versus 88%, P = 0.008). Thirty-three DSA+ recipients (33%) had ABMR. While a positive baseline CDCXM showed only a trend towards higher ABMR rates (41 versus 30% in CDCXM- recipients, P = 0.2), DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in single bead assays significantly associated with rejection, showing 20 versus 71% ABMR rates at <5000 versus >15 000 peak DSA MFI. The predictive value of MFI was moderate, with the highest accuracy at a median of 13 300 MFI (after cross-validation: 0.72). Other baseline variables, including CDC assay results, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, prior transplantation or type of induction treatment, did not add independent predictive information. CONCLUSIONS IA-based desensitization failed to prevent ABMR in a considerable number of DSA+ recipients. Assessing DSA MFI may help stratify risk of rejection, supporting its use as a guide to organ allocation and individualized treatment.

Torque Teno Virus Load - Inverse Association with Antibody-Mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation.

BackgroundAntibody-mediated rejection (AMR) represents one of the cardinal causes of late allograft loss after kidney transplantation, and there is great need for noninvasive tools improving early diagnosis of this rejection type. One promising strategy might be the quantification of peripheral blood DNA levels of the highly prevalent and apathogenic Torque Teno virus (TTV), which might mirror the overall level of immunosuppression and thus help determine the risk of alloimmune response. MethodsTo assess the association between TTV load in the peripheral blood and AMR, 715 kidney transplant recipients (median, 6.3 years posttransplantation) were subjected to a systematical cross-sectional AMR screening and, in parallel, TTV quantification. ResultsEighty-six of these recipients had donor-specific antibodies and underwent protocol biopsy, AMR-positive patients (n = 46) showed only 25% of the TTV levels measured in patients without AMR (P = 0.003). In a generalized linear model, higher TTV levels were associated with a decreased risk for AMR after adjustment for potential confounders (risk ratio 0.94 per TTV log level; 95% confidence interval 0.90-0.99; P = 0.02). ConclusionsFuture studies will have to clarify whether longitudinal assessment of TTV load might predict AMR risk and help guide the type and intensity of immunosuppression to prevent antibody-mediated graft injury.

A Randomized Trial of Bortezomib in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection

Late antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of kidney allograft failure. Uncontrolled studies have suggested efficacy of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, but no systematic trial has been undertaken to support its use in ABMR. In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial (the Bortezomib in Late Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection [BORTEJECT] Trial), we investigated whether two cycles of bortezomib (each cycle: 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) prevent GFR decline by halting the progression of late donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive ABMR. Forty-four DSA-positive kidney transplant recipients with characteristic ABMR morphology (median time after transplant, 5.0 years; pretransplant DSA documented in 19 recipients), who were identified on cross-sectional screening of 741 patients, were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib (n=21) or placebo (n=23). The 0.5-ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year (95% confidence interval, -4.8 to 5.8) difference detected between bortezomib and placebo in eGFR slope (primary end point) was not significant (P=0.86). We detected no significant differences between bortezomib- and placebo-treated groups in median measured GFR at 24 months (33 versus 42 ml/min per 1.73 m2; P=0.31), 2-year graft survival (81% versus 96%; P=0.12), urinary protein concentration, DSA levels, or morphologic or molecular rejection phenotypes in 24-month follow-up biopsy specimens. Bortezomib, however, associated with gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity. In conclusion, our trial failed to show that bortezomib prevents GFR loss, improves histologic or molecular disease features, or reduces DSA, despite significant toxicity. Our results reinforce the need for systematic trials to dissect the efficiency and safety of new treatments for late ABMR.

Complement inhibition as potential new therapy for antibody-mediated rejection.

Antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of kidney allograft failure. While the exact mechanisms contributing to donor‐specific antibody (DSA)‐triggered tissue injury are still incompletely understood, complement activation via the classical pathway is believed to be one of the key players. There is now growing interest in complement blockade as an antirejection treatment. One attractive strategy may be inhibition of terminal complex formation using anti‐C5 antibody eculizumab. Anecdotal reports, case series, and a unique cohort of flow crossmatch‐positive live donor kidney transplant recipients subjected to eculizumab‐based desensitization have demonstrated successful prevention and reversal of acute clinical ABMR. Nevertheless, maybe due to complement activation steps proximal of C5 or even complement‐independent mechanisms, subclinical rejection processes that might culminate in chronic injury were found to escape inhibition. Larger studies designed to clarify the actual clinical value of terminal complement inhibition as an antirejection treatment are currently underway. In addition, alternative concepts, such as therapies that target key component C1, are currently under development, and we will see in the near future whether new strategies in the pipeline will have the potential to beneficially impact clinical practice.

Detection of alloantibody-mediated complement activation: A diagnostic advance in monitoring kidney transplant rejection?

OBJECTIVE Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is an important cause of kidney allograft injury. In the last two decades, detection of complement split product C4d along transplant capillaries, a footprint of antibody-mediated classical complement activation, has evolved as a useful diagnostic marker of ABMR. While it was recognized that ABMR may occur also in the absence of C4d, numerous studies have shown that C4d deposition may indicate a more severe rejection phenotype associated with poor graft survival. Such studies suggest a possible diagnostic benefit of ex vivo monitoring the complement-activating capability of circulating alloantibodies. DESIGN AND METHODS We reviewed the literature between 1993 and 2015, focusing on in vivo (biopsy work-up) and in vitro detection (modified bead array technology) of HLA antibody-triggered classical complement activation in kidney transplantation. RESULTS Precise HLA antibody detection methods, in particular Luminex-based single antigen bead (SAB) assays, have provided a valuable basis for the design of techniques for in vitro detection of HLA antibody-triggered complement activation reflected by C1q, C4 or C3 split product deposition to the bead surface. Establishing such assays it was recognized that deposition of complement products to SAB, which critically depends on antibody binding strength, may be a cardinal trigger of the prozone effect, a troublesome in vitro artifact caused by a steric interference with IgG detection reagents. False-low IgG results, especially on SAB with extensive antibody binding, have to be considered when interpreting studies analyzing the diagnostic value of complement in relation to standard IgG detection. Levels of complement-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were shown to correlate with the results of standard crossmatch tests, suggesting potential application for crossmatch prediction. Moreover, while the utility of pre-transplant complement detection, at least in crossmatch-negative transplant recipients, is controversially discussed, a series of studies have shown that the appearance of post-transplant complement-fixing DSA may be associated with C4d deposition in transplant capillaries and a particular risk of graft failure. CONCLUSIONS The independent value of modified single antigen bead assays, as compared to a careful analysis of standard IgG detection, which may be affected considerably by complement dependent artifacts, needs to be clarified. Whether they have the potential to improve the predictive accuracy of our current diagnostic repertoire warrants further study.

Strategies to overcome the ABO barrier in kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation across the ABO blood group barrier was long considered a contraindication for transplantation, but in an effort to increase donor pools, specific regimens for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation have been developed. These regimens are now widely used as an integral part of the available treatment options. Various desensitization protocols, commonly based on transient depletion of preformed anti-A and/or anti-B antibodies and modulation of B-cell immunity, enable excellent transplant outcomes, even in the long-term. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms behind transplant acceptance facilitated by a short course of anti-humoral treatment are still incompletely understood. With the evolution of efficient clinical programmes, tailoring of recipient preconditioning based on individual donor–recipient blood type combinations and the levels of pretransplant anti-A/B antibodies has become possible. In the context of low antibody titres and/or donor A2 phenotype, immunomodulation and/or apheresis might be dispensable. A concern still exists, however, that ABOi kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of surgical and infectious complications, partly owing to the effects of extracorporeal treatment and intensified immunosuppression. Nevertheless, a continuous improvement in desensitization strategies, with the aim of minimizing the immunosuppressive burden, might pave the way to clinical outcomes that are comparable to those achieved in ABO-compatible transplantation.