Fatemeh S. Mirnaghi

Optimization of the Coating Procedure for a High-Throughput 96-Blade Solid Phase Microextraction System Coupled with LC–MS/MS for Analysis of Complex Samples

Biocompatible C18-polyacrylonitrile (PAN) coating was used as the extraction phase for an automated 96-blade solid phase microextraction (SPME) system with thin-film geometry. Three different methods of coating preparation (dipping, brush painting, and spraying) were evaluated; the spraying method was optimum in terms of its stability and reusability. The high-throughput sample preparation was achieved by using a robotic autosampler that enabled simultaneous preparation of 96 samples in 96-well-plate format. The increased volume of the extraction phase of the C18-PAN thin film coating resulted in significant enhancement in the extraction recovery when compared with that of the C18-PAN rod fibers. Various factors, such as reusability, reproducibility, pH stability, and reliability of the coating were evaluated. The results showed that the C18-PAN 96-blade SPME coating presented good extraction recovery, long-term reusability, good reproducibility, and biocompatibility. The limits of detection and quantitation were in the ranges of 0.1-0.3 and 0.5-1 ng/mL for all four analytes.

Reusable solid-phase microextraction coating for direct immersion whole-blood analysis and extracted blood spot sampling coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and direct analysis in real time-tandem mass spectrometry.

Three different biocompatible polymers were tested and evaluated in order to improve the whole-blood biocompatibility of previously developed C18-polyacrylonitrile (C18-PAN) thin-film solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coating. Among all methods of modification, UV-dried thin PAN-over C18-PAN provided the best results. This coating presented reusable properties and reproducible extraction efficiency for at least 30 direct extractions of diazepam from whole blood [relative standard deviation (RSD) = 12% using external calibration and 4% using isotope dilution calibration]. The amount of absolute recovery for direct immersion analysis and based on the free concentration of diazepam in blood matrix was about 4.8% (desorption efficiency = 98%). The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for the developed solid-phase microextraction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (SPME-LC-MS/MS) method for direct whole-blood analysis was 0.5 ng/mL. The optimized modification of the coating was then used for an extracted blood spot (EBS) sampling approach, a new sampling method which is introduced to address the limitations of dried blood spot sampling. EBS was evaluated using LC-MS/MS and direct analysis in real time (DART)-MS/MS, where, for a 5 μL blood spot, LOQs of 0.2 and 1 μg/mL, respectively, were achieved for extraction of diazepam.

Sample preparation with solid phase microextraction and exhaustive extraction approaches: Comparison for challenging cases.

In chemical analysis, sample preparation is frequently considered the bottleneck of the entire analytical method. The success of the final method strongly depends on understanding the entire process of analysis of a particular type of analyte in a sample, namely: the physicochemical properties of the analytes (solubility, volatility, polarity etc.), the environmental conditions, and the matrix components of the sample. Various sample preparation strategies have been developed based on exhaustive or non-exhaustive extraction of analytes from matrices. Undoubtedly, amongst all sample preparation approaches, liquid extraction, including liquid-liquid (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE), are the most well-known, widely used, and commonly accepted methods by many international organizations and accredited laboratories. Both methods are well documented and there are many well defined procedures, which make them, at first sight, the methods of choice. However, many challenging tasks, such as complex matrix applications, on-site and in vivo applications, and determination of matrix-bound and free concentrations of analytes, are not easily attainable with these classical approaches for sample preparation. In the last two decades, the introduction of solid phase microextraction (SPME) has brought significant progress in the sample preparation area by facilitating on-site and in vivo applications, time weighted average (TWA) and instantaneous concentration determinations. Recently introduced matrix compatible coatings for SPME facilitate direct extraction from complex matrices and fill the gap in direct sampling from challenging matrices. Following introduction of SPME, numerous other microextraction approaches evolved to address limitations of the above mentioned techniques. There is not a single method that can be considered as a universal solution for sample preparation. This review aims to show the main advantages and limitations of the above mentioned sample preparation approaches and the applicability and capability of each technique for challenging cases such as complex matrices, on-site applications and automation.

Automated determination of phenolic compounds in wine, berry, and grape samples using 96-blade solid phase microextraction system coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

An automated 96-thin-film solid phase microextraction system was optimized for high throughput analysis of phenolic compounds in wine, berry, and grape samples. Liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry methods were optimized and applied for separation and detection of compounds. Evaluation of five different stationary phases showed that polystyrene-divinylbenzene-polyacrylonitrile (PS-DVB-PAN) is the optimum extraction phase for the extraction of phenolic compounds under study. The thin-film PS-DVB-PAN SPME coating provided almost exhaustive extraction recovery for all phenolics compounds under study, except for naringenin with 80% recovery. Extraction efficiency, inter- and intra-day reproducibility, sensitivity, linearity, limit of detection and quantitation, and matrix effect were evaluated. Intra-day and inter-day reproducibility were in the respective range of 4-8 and 7-13% relative standard deviation (RSD) for all eight phenolic compounds. Limits of detection and quantitation of the proposed SPME-LC-MS/MS system for the analysis of analytes under study were found in the range of 0.2-3 and 0.5-10 ng/mL, respectively. Standard addition calibration was applied for the quantitative determination of unknown phenolic compounds from wine, berry, and grape samples. The assessment of matrix effect showed significant reduction of ion suppression/enhancement using SPME method in comparison with that of solvent extraction technique.

Development of coatings for automated 96-blade solid phase microextraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system, capable of extracting a wide polarity range of analytes from biological fluids.

This work presents the development and evaluation of biocompatible polyacrylonitrile-polystyrene-divinylbenzene (PAN-PS-DVB) and polyacrylonitrile-phenylboronic acid (PAN-PBA) coatings for automated 96-blades (thin-film) solid phase microextraction (SPME) system, using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The SPME condition was optimized for 60 min equilibrium extraction and 40 min desorption for PAN-PS-DVB, and 120 min equilibrium extraction and 60 min desorption for PAN-PBA for parallel sample preparation of up to 96 samples. The thin film geometry of the SPME blades provided good extraction efficiency due to the larger surface area of the coating, and simultaneous sample preparation provided fast and accurate analysis. The PAN-PS-DVB and PAN-PBA 96-blade SPME coatings were evaluated for extraction of analytes in a wide range of polarity (log P=2.8 to -3.7), and they demonstrated efficient extraction recovery (3.5-98.9% for PAN-PS-DVB and 4.0-74.1% for PAN-PBA) for both polar and non-polar groups of compounds. Reusability, reproducibility, and reliability of the system were evaluated. The results demonstrated that both coatings presented chemical and mechanical stability and long-lasting extraction efficiency for more than 100 usages in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and human plasma.

Thin-film octadecyl-silica glass coating for automated 96-blade solid-phase microextraction coupled with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for analysis of benzodiazepines

A thin-film octadecyl (C18)-silica glass coating was developed as the extraction phase for an automated 96-blade solid-phase microextraction (SPME) system coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Various factors (e.g., sol-gel composition and aging time, coating preparation speed, coating thickness, and drying conditions) affecting the quality of C18-silica glass thin-film coating were studied and optimized. The results showed that the stability and durability of the coating are functions of the coating thickness and drying conditions. Coating thickness is controlled by sol-gel composition, aging time and the withdrawal speed in the dipping method. Automated sample preparation was achieved using a robotic autosampler that enabled simultaneous preparation of 96 samples in a 96-well plate format. Under the optimum SPME conditions the proposed system requires a total of 140 min for preparation of all 96 samples (i.e., 30 min preconditioning, 40 min equilibrium extraction, 40 min desorption and 30 min carry over step). The performance of the C18-silica glass 96-blade SPME system was evaluated for high-throughput analysis of benzodiazepines from phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) and human plasma, and the reusability, repeatability, and validity of the system were evaluated. When analysing spiked PBS and human plasma, the inter-blade reproducibility for four benzodiazepines was obtained in the ranges of 4-8% and 9-11% RSD (relative standard deviation), respectively, and intra-blade reproducibility were in the ranges of 3-9% and 8-13% RSD, respectively. The limits of detection and quantitation for plasma analysis were in the ranges of 0.4-0.7 ng/mL and 1.5-2.5 ng/mL for all four analytes.

Determination of tranexamic acid concentration by solid phase microextraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: First step to in vivo analysis

A solid phase microextraction (SPME) method followed by LC-MS/MS analysis was developed to determine the concentration of tranexamic acid (TA) in plasma. The use of a new biocompatible C18 coating allowed the direct extraction from complex biological samples without prior sample preparation; no matrix effect was observed. The results revealed that SPME was suitable for the analysis of polar drugs such as TA; such an application was previously inaccessible because of the limited availability of SPME coatings that can extract polar molecules. The proposed method was validated according to the bioanalytical method validation guidelines. LOD and LLOQ were 0.5 and 1.5 μg/ml, respectively. The recovery for the method was 0.19%, and the accuracy and precision of the method were <9 and <11%, respectively, with the exception of LLOQ, where the values were <16 and <13%, respectively. The performance of the proposed method was also compared against that of the standard techniques of protein precipitation and ultrafiltration. A statistical analysis indicated a clinically significant agreement among all assays. Another advantage of SPME over conventional techniques was the easy automation and feasibility of in vivo analysis; this advantage makes it possible to use the proposed method for an on-site analysis in clinical practice.

Application of solid phase microextraction for quantitation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in biological fluids.

Development of a straightforward strategy for simultaneous quantitative analysis of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) species in biofluids is a challenging task because of the extreme complexity of fatty acid distribution in biological matrices. In this study, we present a direct immersion solid phase microextraction method coupled to a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry platform (DI-SPME- HPLC-ESI -MS) for determination of unconjugated fatty acids (FA) in fish and human plasma. The proposed method was fully validated according to bioanalytical method validation guidelines. The LOD and LOQ were in the range of 0.5-2 and 5-12 ng/mL, respectively, with a linear dynamic range of 100 fold for each compound. Absolute and relative matrix effects were comprehensively evaluated and found to be in the acceptable range of 91-116%. The affinity constant (Ka) of individual FAs to protein albumin was determined to be 9.2 × 10(4) to 4.3 × 10(5) M(-1). The plasma protein binding (PPB%) was calculated and found to be in the range of 98.0-99.7% for different polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). The PUFAs under study were found at a high concentration range in fish plasma, whereas only a few were within quantification range in control human plasma. The method was successfully applied for monitoring PUFA changes during the operation in plasma samples obtained from patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The most significant contribution induced by surgery was noticed in the concentration level of α-linolenic acid (18:3, ALA), arachidonic acid (20:4, AA), and docosahexanoic acid (22:6, DHA) soon after administration of CPB in all cases.

Microextraction versus exhaustive extraction approaches for simultaneous analysis of compounds in wide range of polarity.

This article discusses comparison of microextraction versus exhaustive extraction approaches for simultaneous extraction of compounds in wide range of polarity at low and high volumes of sample by comparing solid phase extraction (SPE) and solid phase microextraction (SPME). Here, both systems are discussed theoretically and evaluated based on experimental data. Experimental comparisons were conducted in terms of extraction recovery, sensitivity, and selectivity for the extraction of doping agent compounds (logP: 0.14-4.98), using C18 as the extraction phase. The extraction recovery of both systems was studied at different volumes of phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The distribution constant of SPME in thin-film geometry (i.e., thin-film microextraction/TFME) as well as the retention factor and breakthrough volume for the SPE system were evaluated for the simultaneous extraction of polar and non-polar compounds. Using 1 mL of sample, the extraction recovery and sensitivity of the SPE system (100 mg sorbent) was comparable with that of TFME format of SPME (15 mg sorbent) for all analytes, with the exception of most polar compounds, due to the smaller amount of the extraction phase in SPME. Breakthrough in the SPE system was observed for more polar compounds in a 25 mL sample; however, this situation did not affect the quantitation of TFME, as this technique operates in equilibrium mode. Experimental values for breakthrough volume were in good match with the calculated theoretical values. Results indicate that the microextraction approach is more suitable for untargeted determinations, where the breakthrough volume cannot be determined prior to the experiment. In addition, when both methods are at optimum conditions, findings suggest that, despite the smaller volume of the extraction phase in TFME, the sensitivity of TFME can exceed that of SPE for samples where the target analytes vary substantially in polarity.

Thin-Film Microextraction Coupled with Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Thin-film microextraction (TFME) is a format of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) technique which offers improvement of sensitivity without sacrificing time through the increase of available surface area and extractive phase volume. This technique offers significant advantages which make it attractive for many analytical/bioanalytical applications. This review discusses the fundamental principle of TFME and its benefits versus the rod fiber geometry of SPME, and demonstrates the agreements of the experimental data for the available TFME systems with the theoretical concept. The current configurations, coating chemistries, coating preparation methods, and applications for TFME system are reported.