Fazli Azzali

An investigation of TFRC over AODV and DSR routing protocols

This paper conduct a comprehensive simulation study on the behavior of TCP-friendly Rate Control (TFRC) protocol over Ad-Hoc On Demand Vector (AODV) routing protocol and Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol. The aim are first, to measure the performance of TFRC in terms of throughput, delay and jitter. The second objective is to identify which Mobile Ad-Hoc Network (MANET) routing protocols work well with TFRC. We conduct the experiment by sending multimedia streaming traffic carried by TFRC over AODV and DSR respectively. Random-Waypoint mobility model is used for both experiments. Results obtained shows that in average TFRC over AODV has more throughput and less delay as compared with TFRC over DSR. However, in terms of jitter, TFRC over DSR gives better result.

Comparative Study on the Performance of TFRC over AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols

Nowadays, many researches in Mobile ad hoc network (MANET) focus mainly on the impact of MANET routing protocol to TCP variants, but none have been done on TFRC. In this paper, we present a comprehensive simulation study on the behavior of TCP-friendly Rate Control (TFRC) protocol over Ad-Hoc On Demand Vector (AODV) routing protocol and Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV). The main objective is to measure the TFRC performance in terms of throughput, jitter and delay. In addition, this research also identifies whether or not MANET routing protocols have impact on TFRC. We conduct the experiment by sending multimedia streaming traffic carried by TFRC over AODV and DSDV respectively. Random-Waypoint mobility model is used for both experiments. Results obtained shows that TFRC has better throughput over DSDV. As for delay and jitter, TFRC over AODV has smoother results.