Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Federico Balagué is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Federico Balagué.


European Spine Journal | 1999

Low back pain in a population of school children

Robert Gunzburg; Federico Balagué; Margareta Nordin; Marek Szpalski; D. Duyck; David Bull; Christian Melot

Abstract A study was undertaken to analyse the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) and confounding factors in primary school children in the city of Antwerp. A total of 392 children aged 9 were included in the study. All children completed a validated three-page questionnaire and they all underwent a specific lumbar spine oriented medical examination during their annual routine medical school control. This examination was performed by the city school doctors. The questionnaire was composed of easy “yes/no” questions and visual analogue scales. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test and chi-squared test at the significance level P < 0.05. The prevalence of LBP was high. No gender difference was found. A total of 142 children (36%) reported having suffered at least one episode of LBP in their lives. Of these, 33 (23%) had sought medical help for LBP from a doctor or physiotherapist. Sixty-four percent of children reporting LBP said that at least one of their parents suffered from or complained of LBP. This was significantly higher than for the children who did not report having suffered LBP. The way in which the school satchel was carried (in the hand, on the back) had no bearing on the incidence of LBP. There was significantly more LBP in children who reported playing video games for more than 2 h per day, but this was not so for television watchers. The visual analogue scales concerning general well-being were all very significantly correlated with self-reported LBP, with children who reported LBP being more tired, less happy, and worse sleepers. Of the 19 clinical parameters taken down during the medical examination, only one was significantly more prevalent in the group of children reporting LBP: pain on palpation at the insertion site on the iliac crest of the ilio-lumbar ligament. From this study we can establish that there are few clinical signs that can help to single out school children with LBP.


Journal of Spinal Disorders | 1994

Non-specific low-back pain among schoolchildren: a field survey with analysis of some associated factors

Federico Balagué; Margareta Nordin; Mary Louise Skovron; Dutoit G; Yee A; Waldburger M

A study population composed of 1,755 children 8-16 years of age were surveyed using a 15-item, self-administered questionnaire. The response rate was 97.7%. The purpose of the survey was to evaluate the possible association between low-back pain and certain social factors and predicaments. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis showed that parental history of treated low-back pain (adjusted odds ratio 2.10; p < 0.001), competitive sports activity (adjusted odds ratio 1.73; p = 0.003), and time spent watching television (adjusted odds ratio 1.23; p = 0.05) significantly increased the risk for low-back pain among children, controlling for the childs age and gender.


Nature Reviews Rheumatology | 2007

Pain measurement in patients with low back pain

Anne F. Mannion; Federico Balagué; Ferran Pellisé; Christine Cedraschi

Pain is a multidimensional experience that is a prominent feature of many musculoskeletal disorders. Despite its subjective nature, pain is a highly relevant complaint; hence, nothing should deter physicians from attempting to formally assess it. This Review summarizes the main aspects of pain measurement from a practical standpoint, with a specific focus on low back pain. On balance, for the assessment of pain intensity, categorical scales with verbal descriptors or numerical rating scales seem to be preferable to traditional visual analogue scales, although no single best measure can be recommended. Pain per se should be assessed, rather than surrogate measures such as analgesic use. Back and leg pain should be evaluated separately in patients in whom these conditions coexist. For assessing change, prospective measurements are preferable to retrospective reports. Pain is not synonymous with function or quality of life, and other tools covering these important outcome dimensions should complement the assessment of pain, especially in patients with chronic symptoms. Clinicians should be aware of the psychometric properties of the tool to be used, including its level of imprecision (random measurement error) and its minimum clinically important difference (score difference indicating meaningful change in clinical status).


Spine | 1993

Cross-sectional study of the isokinetic muscle trunk strength among school children.

Federico Balagué; Damidot P; Margareta Nordin; Mohamad Parnianpour; Waldburger M

Our surveys have shown lifetime prevalence of L.BP. over 30% among schoolchildren. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between back and isokinetic trunk strength, anthropometric parameters, and sports activities. One hundred and seventeen healthy children aged 10-16 years were included. All these volunteers had semi-structured interview, anthropometric and dynamic strength measurements. Lifetime prevalence of back pain was 44.5% and point prevalence was 13%. In this cross-sectional study, anthropometric and strength profiles were significantly related to age and gender. Non specific low back pain was not correlated to trunk muscle strength and/or sports activities.


JAMA Pediatrics | 2009

Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Its Effect on Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents

Ferran Pellisé; Federico Balagué; Luis Rajmil; Christine Cedraschi; Mario Aguirre; Cesar G. Fontecha; Maribel Pasarín; Montse Ferrer

OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in adolescents and the clinical features of LBP in 2 European countries and to evaluate the effect of LBP on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using standardized validated generic and disease-specific instruments. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Secondary schools of Barcelona, Spain, and Fribourg, Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Representative sample of adolescents from the 2 cities. Intervention Selected adolescents completed a questionnaire including a generic HRQOL (KIDSCREEN-52) and 2 LBP-specific instruments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Results of KIDSCREEN-52, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Hanover Functional Ability Questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 1470 adolescents (52.6% male) with a mean (SD) age of 15.05 (1.17) years completed the questionnaires (response rate, 85.1%). Low back pain was reported by 587 adolescents (39.8%): isolated LBP in 250 (42.6%), LBP plus other pain in 271(46.2%), LBP plus whole-body pain in 50 (8.5%, and unclassifiable LBP in 16 (2.7%). Five hundred adolescents (34.7%) reported no pain, and 369 (25.6%) reported other pain without LBP. In those with isolated LBP, the percentage of adolescent boys was higher (54.6%; P < .001) and the LBP was mildest. In those with LBP plus whole-body pain, the percentage of adolescent girls was higher (62%; P < .001) and LBP was most severe. All KIDSCREEN scores in the group with LBP plus whole-body pain were significantly lower than in the other groups (effect size, 0.52-1.24). No differences were found between the groups who reported isolated pain, no pain, or other pain with no LBP. On the LBP-specific instruments, adolescents who reported LBP plus other pain had significantly poorer scores (P < .001) compared with those with isolated LBP but better scores (P < .001) than those with LBP plus whole-body pain. CONCLUSIONS Low back pain in adolescents is a prevalent symptom with overall low associated disability and little effect on health-related quality of life. A subset of adolescents in whom LBP is associated with whole-body pain report significant impairment and deserve more attention.


Spine | 2006

Short-Term Efficacy of Intravenous Pulse Glucocorticoids in Acute Discogenic Sciatica : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Axel Finckh; Pascal Zufferey; Marc-André Schurch; Federico Balagué; Maurice Waldburger; Alexander So

Study Design. Double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Objective. To test the short-term efficacy of a single intravenous (IV) pulse of glucocorticoids on the symptoms of acute discogenic sciatica. Summary of Background Data. The use of glucocorticoids in the treatment of acute discogenic sciatica is controversial. A potential advantage of the IV pulse therapy is the ability to distribute high glucocorticoid concentrations to the area surrounding the prolapsed disc without the risks and inconveniences of an epidural injection. Methods. Patients with acute sciatica (<6-week duration) of radiologically confirmed discogenic origin were randomized to receive either a single IV bolus of 500 mg of methylprednisolone or placebo. Clinical evaluation was performed in a double-blind manner on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 10, and 30. The primary outcome was reduction in sciatic leg pain during the first 3 days following the infusion; secondary outcomes were reduction in low back pain, global pain, functional disability, and signs of radicular irritation. The analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis using a longitudinal regression model for repeated measures. Results. A total of 65 patients were randomized, and 60 completed the treatment and the follow-up assessments. A single IV bolus of glucocorticoids provided significant improvement in sciatic leg pain (P = 0.04) within the first 3 days. However, the effect size was small, and the improvement did not persist. IV glucocorticoids had no effect on functional disability or clinical signs of radicular irritation. Conclusions. Although an IV bolus of glucocorticoids provides a short-term improvement in leg pain in patients with acute discogenic sciatica, its effects are transient and have small magnitude.


Baillière's clinical rheumatology | 1992

Back pain in children and teenagers

Federico Balagué; Margareta Nordin

Controversial opinions have been published concerning the frequency of LBP among children and adolescents. Studies from orthopaedics or neurosurgical departments have reported low figures for prevalence of specific LBP due to serious disorders. Field surveys, on the contrary, have shown that cumulative life prevalence of non-specific LBP in children and teenagers can be comparable to the prevalence data for adult populations. Some specific diagnoses are more common or characteristic of children complaining of LBP. Age, gender, sports activities and family history of LBP have been found to be significantly associated with an increased prevalence in non-specific LBP among children. Low back pain among children and teenagers is common and should be recognized. This chapter provides guidelines for a clinical approach and differential diagnoses. Most back pain in these age groups is benign and should be treated as such.


Baillière's clinical rheumatology | 1992

Back schools in prevention of chronicity

Margareta Nordin; Christine Cedraschi; Federico Balagué; E.B. Roux

This chapter has reviewed the role of back school and educational programmes for the common and non-specific acute and subacute low back pain patient. The following seems to come out of this review. Education is an important part of patient care. However, several questions arise about the content of the education, the selection of patients, the patient compliance to instruction given, how the information is retained, and which outcome measures should be used. It is also important to realize that the back school is a modality or a tool that may be used as an adjunct, but as a sole treatment it seems to have less impact than in combination with other structured or goal-oriented programmes. When a back school is instituted in a hospital or in industry, it requires administrative and budgetary support and a multidisciplinary staff to successfully carry out the programme. The information given must be adapted to the needs of the participants and all members of the team must give the same information to the patient. A poorly structured back school where patients are dumped because the physician or other health care provider has nothing else to offer is a poor solution for the patient, a poor solution for the health care provider, and can only increase the patients discomfort and health care costs.


Joint Bone Spine | 2012

A controlled trial of the benefits of ultrasound-guided steroid injection for shoulder pain

Pascal Zufferey; Sylvie Revaz; Xavier Degailler; Federico Balagué; Alexander So

OBJECTIVES We studied the value of ultrasound (US) to define shoulder pathology and guide local steroid injection in comparison with a standard injection in the management of the acute painful shoulder. METHODS Seventy consecutive patients with acute shoulder pain were assessed clinically and by US. Patients were randomized to receive either a standard subacromial infiltration of 7 mg of betamethasone or a US-guided injection according to the US diagnosis. Follow-up evaluations were performed by an independent assessor who was blinded to the results of the initial US and clinical assessments. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients completed the study. Both groups showed a significant reduction in both daytime and night pain compared to baseline. The US injection group had significantly less pain at rest at 2 and 6 weeks (NRS: 1.6 vs 3.3, P<0.005; 3 vs 4.2, P<0.04). The percentage of good responders was significantly higher in US group at 2 weeks, (81% vs 54%, P<0.005) and 6 weeks (64% vs 38%, P<0.05). At 2 and 6 weeks, responder rate and activity pain scores as well as Constant score were in favour of US, though did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION Local steroid injection for shoulder pain leads to significant improvements in pain and function for up to 12 weeks. An US examination to define the origin of shoulder pain as well as to guide injection provides significant additional benefits for up to 6 weeks. We recommend routine US examination as part of the management of acute shoulder pain.


Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2012

Adalimumab in acute sciatica reduces the long-term need for surgery: a 3-year follow-up of a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Stéphane Genevay; Axel Finckh; Pascal Zufferey; Sebastien Viatte; Federico Balagué; Cem Gabay

Introduction Two subcutaneous injections of adalimumab in severe acute sciatica significantly reduced the number of back operations in a short-term randomised controlled clinical trial. Objective To determine in a 3-year follow-up study whether the short-term benefit of adalimumab in sciatica is sustained over a longer period of time. Methods The primary outcome of this analysis was incident discectomy. Three years after randomisation, information on surgery could be retrieved in 56/61 patients (92%).A multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for potential confounders, was used to determine factors predisposing to surgery. Results Twenty-three (41%) patients had back surgery within 3 years, 8/29 (28%) in the adalimumab group and 15/27 (56%) in the placebo group, p=0.04. Adalimumab injections reduced the need for back surgery by 61% (HR)=0.39 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.92). In a multivariate model, treatment with a tumour necrosis factor-α antagonist remained the strongest protective factor (HR=0.17, p=0.002). Other significant predictors of surgery were a good correlation between symptoms and MRI findings (HR=11.6, p=0.04), baseline intensity of leg pain (HR=1.3, p=0.06), intensity of back pain (HR=1.4, p=0.03) and duration of sickness leave (HR=1.01 per day, p=0.03). Conclusion A short course of adalimumab in patients with severe acute sciatica significantly reduces the need for back surgery.

Collaboration


Dive into the Federico Balagué's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ferran Pellisé

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marek Szpalski

Free University of Brussels

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jean Dudler

University of Lausanne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christian Melot

Université libre de Bruxelles

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Gunzburg

Free University of Brussels

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge