Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Federico M. Asch is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Federico M. Asch.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2011

Myocardial Viability and Survival in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Robert O. Bonow; Gerald Maurer; Kerry L. Lee; Thomas A. Holly; Philip F. Binkley; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Jarosław Drożdż; Pedro S. Farsky; Arthur M. Feldman; Torsten Doenst; Robert E. Michler; Daniel S. Berman; José Carlos Nicolau; Patricia A. Pellikka; Krzysztof Wrobel; Nasri Alotti; Federico M. Asch; Liliana E. Favaloro; Lilin She; Eric J. Velazquez; Roger Jones; Julio A. Panza

BACKGROUND The assessment of myocardial viability has been used to identify patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction in whom coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) will provide a survival benefit. However, the efficacy of this approach is uncertain. METHODS In a substudy of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who were enrolled in a randomized trial of medical therapy with or without CABG, we used single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), dobutamine echocardiography, or both to assess myocardial viability on the basis of prespecified thresholds. RESULTS Among the 1212 patients enrolled in the randomized trial, 601 underwent assessment of myocardial viability. Of these patients, we randomly assigned 298 to receive medical therapy plus CABG and 303 to receive medical therapy alone. A total of 178 of 487 patients with viable myocardium (37%) and 58 of 114 patients without viable myocardium (51%) died (hazard ratio for death among patients with viable myocardium, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 0.86; P=0.003). However, after adjustment for other baseline variables, this association with mortality was not significant (P=0.21). There was no significant interaction between viability status and treatment assignment with respect to mortality (P=0.53). CONCLUSIONS The presence of viable myocardium was associated with a greater likelihood of survival in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, but this relationship was not significant after adjustment for other baseline variables. The assessment of myocardial viability did not identify patients with a differential survival benefit from CABG, as compared with medical therapy alone. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; STICH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023595.).


Journal of The American Society of Echocardiography | 2015

Multimodality Imaging of Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta in Adults: From the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Steven A. Goldstein; Arturo Evangelista; Suhny Abbara; Andrew E. Arai; Federico M. Asch; Luigi P. Badano; Michael A. Bolen; Heidi M. Connolly; Hug Cuéllar-Calàbria; Martin Czerny; Richard B. Devereux; Raimund Erbel; Rossella Fattori; Eric M. Isselbacher; Joseph M. Lindsay; Marti McCulloch; Hector I. Michelena; Christoph Nienaber; Jae K. Oh; Mauro Pepi; Allen J. Taylor; Jonathan W. Weinsaft; Jose Luis Zamorano; Harry C. Dietz; Kim A. Eagle; John A. Elefteriades; Guillaume Jondeau; Hervé Rousseau; Marc A.A.M. Schepens

Steven A. Goldstein, MD, Co-Chair, Arturo Evangelista, MD, FESC, Co-Chair, Suhny Abbara, MD, Andrew Arai, MD, Federico M. Asch, MD, FASE, Luigi P. Badano, MD, PhD, FESC, Michael A. Bolen, MD, Heidi M. Connolly, MD, Hug Cu ellar-Cal abria, MD, Martin Czerny, MD, Richard B. Devereux, MD, Raimund A. Erbel, MD, FASE, FESC, Rossella Fattori, MD, Eric M. Isselbacher, MD, Joseph M. Lindsay, MD, Marti McCulloch, MBA, RDCS, FASE, Hector I. Michelena, MD, FASE, Christoph A. Nienaber, MD, FESC, Jae K. Oh, MD, FASE, Mauro Pepi, MD, FESC, Allen J. Taylor, MD, Jonathan W. Weinsaft, MD, Jose Luis Zamorano, MD, FESC, FASE, Contributing Editors: Harry Dietz, MD, Kim Eagle, MD, John Elefteriades, MD, Guillaume Jondeau, MD, PhD, FESC, Herv e Rousseau, MD, PhD, and Marc Schepens, MD, Washington, District of Columbia; Barcelona and Madrid, Spain; Dallas and Houston, Texas; Bethesda and Baltimore, Maryland; Padua, Pesaro, and Milan, Italy; Cleveland, Ohio; Rochester, Minnesota; Zurich, Switzerland; New York, New York; Essen and Rostock, Germany; Boston, Massachusetts; Ann Arbor, Michigan; New Haven, Connecticut; Paris and Toulouse, France; and Brugge, Belgium


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2013

Inducible myocardial ischemia and outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

Julio A. Panza; Thomas A. Holly; Federico M. Asch; Lilin She; Patricia A. Pellikka; Eric J. Velazquez; Kerry L. Lee; Salvador Borges-Neto; Pedro S. Farsky; Roger Jones; Daniel S. Berman; Robert O. Bonow

OBJECTIVES The study objectives were to test the hypotheses that ischemia during stress testing has prognostic value and identifies those patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction who derive the greatest benefit from coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with medical therapy. BACKGROUND The clinical significance of stress-induced ischemia in patients with CAD and moderately to severely reduced LV ejection fraction (EF) is largely unknown. METHODS The STICH (Surgical Treatment for IsChemic Heart Failure) trial randomized patients with CAD and EF ≤35% to CABG or medical therapy. In the current study, we assessed the outcomes of those STICH patients who underwent a radionuclide (RN) stress test or a dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE). A test was considered positive for ischemia by RN testing if the summed difference score (difference in tracer activity between stress and rest) was ≥4 or if ≥2 of 16 segments were ischemic during DSE. Clinical endpoints were assessed by intention to treat during a median follow-up of 56 months. RESULTS Of the 399 study patients (51 women, mean EF 26 ± 8%), 197 were randomized to CABG and 202 were randomized to medical therapy. Myocardial ischemia was induced during stress testing in 256 patients (64% of the study population). Patients with and without ischemia were similar in age, multivessel CAD, previous myocardial infarction, LV EF, LV volumes, and treatment allocation (all p = NS). There was no difference between patients with and without ischemia in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.77 to 1.50; p = 0.66), cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality plus cardiovascular hospitalization. There was no interaction between ischemia and treatment for any clinical endpoint. CONCLUSIONS In CAD with severe LV dysfunction, inducible myocardial ischemia does not identify patients with worse prognosis or those with greater benefit from CABG over optimal medical therapy. (Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment for Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease [STICH]; NCT00023595).


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2014

Clinical performance of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: Five-year results of the 3f Enable long-term follow-up study

Lars Englberger; Thierry Carrel; Mirko Doss; Jerzy Sadowski; Krzysztof Bartus; Friedrich F. Eckstein; Federico M. Asch; Sven Martens

OBJECTIVE Sutureless valves are designed to facilitate surgical implantation, including less-invasive techniques in aortic valve replacement, by maintaining surgical precision of implantation compared with transcatheter techniques. Long-term clinical experience with sutureless valves is lacking. We report the 5-year follow-up results of an international, prospective, multicenter study evaluating the clinical performance and safety of the 3f Enable valve (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn). METHODS Between March 2007 and December 2009, 141 patients (54 male; mean age, 76.1±5.7 years) undergoing aortic valve replacement with the 3f Enable valve were enrolled in 10 European sites. The mean follow-up was 2.76 years (range, 2 days to 5.1 years; total, 388.7 patient-years). Echocardiographic valvular hemodynamic and morphologic analyses were performed by an independent core laboratory. RESULTS The mean systolic gradient was 10.4±4.4 mm Hg at discharge and 7.7±4.1 mm Hg at 5 years. The mean effective orifice area was 1.7±0.5 cm2 at discharge and 1.6±0.2 cm2 at 5 years. Freedom from all-cause and valve-related mortality was 87.6%±2.9% and 96.8%±1.6% at 1 year (113 patients at risk) and 77.0%±7.5% and 93.8%±4.8% at 5 years (24 patients at risk), respectively. Six patients underwent reoperation (4 because of major paravalvular leakage and 2 because of endocarditis). Freedom from reoperation was 95.4%±1.9% at 1 year and 95.4%±6.1% at 5 years. No structural valve deterioration occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS The sutureless 3f Enable valve represents a safe and effective treatment for aortic valve stenosis, providing an excellent hemodynamic profile. This study represents the longest follow-up study for a sutureless bioprosthesis. Sutureless valves may become an option for all patients with indicated biological aortic valve replacement.


Jacc-cardiovascular Imaging | 2016

The Need for Standardized Methods for Measuring the Aorta Multimodality Core Lab Experience from the GenTAC Registry

Federico M. Asch; Eugene Yuriditsky; Siddharth K. Prakash; Mary J. Roman; Jonathan W. Weinsaft; Gaby Weissman; Wm. Guy Weigold; Shaine A. Morris; William Ravekes; Kathryn W. Holmes; Michael Silberbach; Rita K. Milewski; Barbara L. Kroner; Ryan Whitworth; Kim A. Eagle; Richard B. Devereux; Neil J. Weissman; GenTAC Registry Investigators

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate variability in aortic measurements with multiple imaging modalities in clinical centers by comparing with a standardized measuring protocol implemented in a core laboratory. BACKGROUND In patients with aortic disease, imaging of thoracic aorta plays a major role in risk stratifying individuals for life-threatening complications and in determining timing of surgical intervention. However, standardization of the procedures for performance of aortic measurements is lacking. METHODS To characterize the diversity of methods used in clinical practice, we compared aortic measurements performed by echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the 6 GenTAC (National Registry of Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Cardiovascular Conditions) clinical centers to those performed at the imaging core laboratory in 965 studies. Each center acquired and analyzed their images according to local protocols. The same images were subsequently analyzed blindly by the core laboratory, on the basis of a standardized protocol for all imaging modalities. Paired measurements from clinical centers and core laboratory were compared by mean of differences and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS For all segments of the ascending aorta, echocardiography showed a higher ICC (0.84 to 0.93) than CT (0.84) and MRI (0.82 to 0.90), with smaller mean of differences. MRI showed higher ICC for the arch and descending aorta (0.91 and 0.93). In a mixed adjusted model, the different imaging modalities and clinical centers were identified as sources of variability between clinical and core laboratory measurements, whereas age groups or diagnosis at enrollment were not. CONCLUSIONS By comparing core laboratory with measurements from clinical centers, our study identified important sources of variability in aortic measurements. Furthermore, our findings with regard to CT and MRI suggest a need for imaging societies to work toward the development of unifying acquisition protocols and common measuring methods.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2014

Myocardial viability and impact of surgical ventricular reconstruction on outcomes of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: Results of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure trial

Thomas A. Holly; Robert O. Bonow; J. Malcolm O. Arnold; Jae K. Oh; Padmini Varadarajan; Gerald M. Pohost; Haissam Haddad; Roger Jones; Eric J. Velazquez; Bozena Birkenfeld; Federico M. Asch; Marcin Malinowski; Rodrigo Barretto; Renato A. K. Kalil; Daniel S. Berman; Jie Lena Sun; Kerry L. Lee; Julio A. Panza

OBJECTIVES In the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure trial, surgical ventricular reconstruction plus coronary artery bypass surgery was not associated with a reduction in the rate of death or cardiac hospitalization compared with bypass alone. We hypothesized that the absence of viable myocardium identifies patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction who have a greater benefit with coronary artery bypass graft surgery and surgical ventricular reconstruction compared with bypass alone. METHODS Myocardial viability was assessed by single photon computed tomography in 267 of the 1000 patients randomized to bypass or bypass plus surgical ventricular reconstruction in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure. Myocardial viability was assessed on a per patient basis and regionally according to prespecified criteria. RESULTS At 3 years, there was no difference in mortality or the combined outcome of death or cardiac hospitalization between those with and without viability, and there was no significant interaction between the type of surgery and the global viability status with respect to mortality or death plus cardiac hospitalization. Furthermore, there was no difference in mortality or death plus cardiac hospitalization between those with and without anterior wall or apical scar, and no significant interaction between the presence of scar in these regions and the type of surgery with respect to mortality. CONCLUSIONS In patients with coronary artery disease and severe regional left ventricular dysfunction, assessment of myocardial viability does not identify patients who will derive a mortality benefit from adding surgical ventricular reconstruction to coronary artery bypass graft surgery.


American Journal of Cardiology | 2013

Mechanisms of Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Determined by Transesophageal Echocardiography (from the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure Trial)

Krzysztof S. Golba; Krzysztof Mokrzycki; Jarosław Drożdż; Alexander Cherniavsky; Krzysztof Wrobel; Bradley J. Roberts; Haissam Haddad; Gerald Maurer; Michael Yii; Federico M. Asch; Mark D. Handschumacher; Thomas A. Holly; Roman Przybylski; Irving L. Kron; Hartzell V. Schaff; Susan Aston; John Horton; Kerry L. Lee; Eric J. Velazquez; Paul A. Grayburn

The mechanisms underlying functional mitral regurgitation (MR) and the relation between mechanism and severity of MR have not been evaluated in a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed in 215 patients at 17 centers in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial. Both 2-dimensional (n = 215) and 3-dimensional (n = 81) TEEs were used to assess multiple quantitative measurements of the mechanism and severity of MR. By 2-dimensional TEE, leaflet tenting area, anterior and posterior leaflet angles, mitral annulus diameter, left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume index, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and sphericity index (p <0.05 for all) were significantly different across MR grades. By 3-dimensional TEE, mitral annulus area, leaflet tenting area, LV end-systolic volume index, LVEF, and sphericity index (p <0.05 for all) were significantly different across MR grades. A multivariate analysis showed a trend for annulus area (p = 0.069) and LV end-systolic volume index (p = 0.071) to predict effective regurgitant orifice area and for annulus area (p = 0.018) and LV end-systolic volume index (p = 0.073) to predict vena contracta area. In the STICH trial, multiple quantitative parameters of the mechanism of functional MR are related to MR severity. The mechanism of functional MR in ischemic cardiomyopathy is heterogeneous, but no single variable stands out as a strong predictor of quantitative severity of MR.


Circulation-cardiovascular Genetics | 2017

Associations of age and sex with marfan phenotype: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute GenTAC (Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Cardiovascular Conditions) registry

Mary J. Roman; Richard B. Devereux; Liliana Preiss; Federico M. Asch; Kim A. Eagle; Kathryn W. Holmes; Scott A. LeMaire; Cheryl L. Maslen; Dianna M. Milewicz; Shaine A. Morris; Siddharth K. Prakash; Reed E. Pyeritz; William Ravekes; Ralph V. Shohet; Howard K. Song; Jonathan W. Weinsaft

Background— The associations of age and sex with phenotypic features of Marfan syndrome have not been systematically examined in a large cohort of both children and adults. Methods and Results— We evaluated 789 Marfan patients enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute GenTAC (Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Cardiovascular Conditions) Registry (53% male; mean age 31 [range: 1–86 years]). Females aged ≥15 and males aged ≥16 years were considered adults based on average age of skeletal maturity. Adults (n=606) were more likely than children (n=183) likely to have spontaneous pneumothorax, scoliosis, and striae but were comparable in revised Ghent systemic score, ectopia lentis, and most phenotypic features, including prevalence of aortic root dilatation. Prophylactic aortic root replacement and mitral valve surgery were rare during childhood versus adulthood (2% versus 35% and 1% versus 9%, respectively, both P<0.0001). Adult males were more likely than females to have aortic root dilatation (92% versus 84%), aortic regurgitation (55% versus 36%), and to have undergone prophylactic aortic root replacement (47% versus 24%), all P<0.001. Prevalence of previous aortic dissection tended to be higher in males than females (25% versus 18%, P=0.06); 44% of dissections were type B. Type B dissection was strongly associated with previous prophylactic aortic root replacement. Conclusions— Pulmonary, skeletal, and aortic complications, but not other phenotypic features, are more prevalent in adults than children in Marfan syndrome. Aortic aneurysms and prophylactic aortic surgery are more common in men. Aortic dissection, commonly type B, occurs in an appreciable proportion of Marfan patients, especially in men and after previous prophylactic aortic root replacement.


Circulation | 2009

Overview of the 2008 Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committee on Safety Considerations in the Development of Ultrasound Contrast Agents

Federico M. Asch; Neil J. Weissman

Perflutren-based ultrasound contrast agents have been in clinical use in the United States for >10 years. Since their approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Optison in 1995, Definity in 2001), >2 million doses have been used for left ventricular (LV) opacification and endocardial border definition in technically difficult patients and for other off-label uses (detailed in Table 1). Despite the widespread use of contrast echocardiography, recent concerns have prompted an FDA box warning and the convening of an advisory panel. A box warning (or black box warning) is a method used by the FDA to highlight adverse reactions so serious in proportion to the potential benefit from the drug that it is essential that they be considered by the prescriber. Contraindications, warnings, or precautions can be included. Within the matter of a year, regulations on ultrasound contrast agents underwent several changes. Initially, a new box warning was required (October 2007) in response to isolated reports of serious adverse events. Then, in May 2008, after review of additional safety reports on larger cohorts of patients, the box warning was modified. At approximately the same time as the black box modification, an FDA advisory panel was organized and convened to provide guidance for the agency to delineate what further actions are necessary to further evaluate the safety of ultrasound contrast agents. This review summarizes the proceedings of the FDA advisory panel meeting, which took place on June 24, 2008, in which all of these issues were addressed. View this table: Table 1. Common Uses of Contrast Agents in Echocardiography On October 10, 2007, after reviewing spontaneously reported serious adverse events, the FDA issued a box warning for the use of intravenous perflutren-based microbubble contrast agents in echocardiography. The requirement for the warning was based primarily on the report of 4 cases of …


Oncologist | 2017

SAFE‐HEaRt: Rationale and Design of a Pilot Study Investigating Cardiac Safety of HER2 Targeted Therapy in Patients with HER2‐Positive Breast Cancer and Reduced Left Ventricular Function

Filipa Lynce; Ana Barac; Ming Tan; Federico M. Asch; Karen L. Smith; Chau Dang; Claudine Isaacs; Sandra M. Swain

BACKGROUND Human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapies have survival benefit in adjuvant and metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer but are associated with cardiac dysfunction. Current U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations limit the use of HER2 targeted agents to patients with normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function. METHODS The objective of the SAFE-HEaRt study is to evaluate the cardiac safety of HER2 targeted therapy in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with optimized cardiac therapy. Thirty patients with histologically confirmed HER2 positive breast cancer (stage I-IV) and reduced LVEF (40% to 49%) who plan to receive HER2 targeted therapy for ≥3 months will be enrolled. Prior to initiation on study, optimization of heart function with beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors will be initiated. Patients will be followed by serial echocardiograms and cardiac visits during and 6 months after completion of HER2 targeted therapy. Myocardial strain and blood biomarkers, including cardiac troponin I and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, will be examined at baseline and during the study. DISCUSSION LV dysfunction in patients with breast cancer poses cardiac and oncological challenges and limits the use of HER2 targeted therapies and its oncological benefits. Strategies to prevent cardiac dysfunction associated with HER2 targeted therapy have been limited to patients with normal LVEF, thus excluding patients who may receive the highest benefit from those strategies. SAFE-HEaRt is the first prospective pilot study of HER2 targeted therapies in patients with reduced LV function while on optimized cardiac treatment that can provide the basis for clinical practice changes. The Oncologist 2017;22:518-525 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapies have survival benefit in adjuvant and metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer but are associated with cardiac dysfunction. To our knowledge, SAFE-HEaRt is the first clinical trial that prospectively tests the hypothesis that HER2 targeted therapies may be safely administered in patients with mildly reduced cardiac function in the setting of ongoing cardiac treatment and monitoring. The results of this study will provide cardiac safety data and inform consideration of clinical practice changes in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer and reduced cardiac function, as well as provide information regarding cardiovascular monitoring and treatment in this population.

Collaboration


Dive into the Federico M. Asch's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julio A. Panza

New York Medical College

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rebecca Torguson

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ron Waksman

Washington Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lowell F. Satler

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Augusto D. Pichard

MedStar Washington Hospital Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel S. Berman

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge