Federico Piacentini

Preoperative Chemotherapy Plus Trastuzumab, Lapatinib, or Both in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Operable Breast Cancer: Results of the Randomized Phase II CHER-LOB Study

PURPOSE This is a noncomparative, randomized, phase II trial of preoperative taxane-anthracycline in combination with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or combined trastuzumab plus lapatinib in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive, stage II to IIIA operable breast cancer. The primary aim was to estimate the percentage of pathologic complete response (pCR; no invasive tumor in breast and axillary nodes). PATIENTS AND METHODS In the three arms, chemotherapy consisted of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) for 12 weeks followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide for four courses every 3 weeks. The patients randomly assigned to arm A received a 4-mg loading dose of trastuzumab followed by 2 mg weekly; in arm B patients received lapatinib 1,500 mg orally (PO) daily; and in arm C, patients received trastuzumab and lapatinib 1,000 mg PO daily. RESULTS A total of 121 patients were randomly assigned. Diarrhea and dermatologic and hepatic toxicities were observed more frequently in patients receiving lapatinib. No episodes of congestive heart failure were observed. The rates of breast-conserving surgery were 66.7%, 57.9%, and 68.9% in arms A, B and C, respectively. The pCR rates were 25% (90% CI, 13.1% to 36.9%) in arm A, 26.3% (90% CI, 14.5% to 38.1%) in arm B, and 46.7% (90% CI, 34.4% to 58.9%) in arm C (exploratory P = .019). CONCLUSION The primary end point of the study was met, with a relative increase of 80% in the pCR rate achieved with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and lapatinib compared with chemotherapy plus either trastuzumab or lapatinib. These data add further evidence supporting the superiority of a dual-HER2 inhibition for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.

Comparison of HER-2 and hormone receptor expression in primary breast cancers and asynchronous paired metastases: impact on patient management.

INTRODUCTION The assessment of hormone receptors (HRs) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 is necessary to select patients who are candidates for hormonal and anti-HER-2 therapy. The evaluation of these parameters is generally carried out in primary tumors and it is not clear if reassessment in metastatic lesions might have an impact on patient management. The primary aim of this analysis was to compare HER-2 and HR status in primary tumors versus metastatic sites in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-five patients with available samples from primary tumors and paired metastases were included. HER-2 status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); HR status was assessed by IHC. RESULTS Nineteen percent of primary tumors were HER-2 positive; 77% were HR positive. Sites of biopsied or resected metastases were: locoregional soft tissues (n = 30), liver (n = 20), central nervous system (n = 5), bone (n = 5), pleura (n = 4), distant soft tissues (n = 3), abdomen (stomach, colon, peritoneum) (n = 3), bronchus (n = 3), and bone marrow (n = 2). For paired metastases, the HER-2 status was unchanged in 84% of cases; two patients changed from positive to negative, while 10 patients converted from negative to positive (agreement, 84%; kappa = 0.5681). A change in HR status was observed in 16 cases (21%): nine cases from positive to negative and seven cases from negative to positive (agreement, 78.7%; kappa = 0.4158). CONCLUSIONS Further studies are necessary to better define the level of discordance in HER-2 or HR status between primary tumors and paired metastases. However, a biopsy of metastatic disease can be recommended, if feasible with minimal invasiveness, because treatment options might change for a significant proportion of patients.

Discordance in receptor status between primary and recurrent breast cancer has a prognostic impact: a single-Institution analysis

BACKGROUND Tumor phenotype may change during breast cancer progression. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of receptor discordance between paired primaries and recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred and thirty-nine patients underwent histological sampling of suspected breast cancer recurrence. All the pathology assessments [ER, PgR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] on both primaries and confirmed recurrences were performed at the same laboratory. RESULTS A breast cancer recurrence was confirmed in 119 cases. Rates of discordance were 13.4%, 39% and 11.8% for ER, PgR and HER2, respectively. Ninety-two patients maintained the same tumor phenotype [i.e. the same hormone receptors (HR) and HER2 status], whereas 27 (22.7%) changed during progression. The loss of HR positivity and the loss of HER2 positivity resulted in a worse post-recurrence survival (P=0.01 and P=0.008, respectively) and overall survival (OS; P=0.06 and P=0.0002, respectively), compared with the corresponding concordant-positive cases. Tumor phenotype discordance was associated with worse post-recurrence and OS (P=0.006 and P=0.002, respectively); those cases who turned into triple-negative experienced the poorest outcome, respect to the concordant group (P=0.001, OS). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated for the first time an impact on OS of phenotype discordance between primary breast cancer and relapse. Among discordant cases, receptor loss resulted in the main determinant of poorer outcome.

Achievements and unmet needs in the management of advanced ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynaecological malignancy, and represents the leading cause of gynecologic cancer-related death in Europe and United States. The majority of the cases are in fact diagnosed in advanced stage, with limited chance to be cured. Optimal management of advanced ovarian cancer includes histopathological diagnosis, accurate surgical staging, debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is commonly recognised as the standard regimen because of tolerability and activity. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy provides superior efficacy results, but its use is still controversial because of poor tolerability and compliance. Unfortunately, despite its chemosensitivity, the majority of ovarian cancer patients, including those who achieve a complete response to first-line chemotherapy, will relapse and eventually die. Among the strategies to improve patient outcome, maintenance therapy has failed to show a consistent benefit across clinical trials. Salvage second-line therapy is generally based on rechallenge with platinum in patients with platinum sensitive disease. Patients with platinum resistant/refractory might benefit from liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan. Other active cytotoxics include docetaxel, gemcitabine, etoposide and vinorelbine as well as epothilone derivatives such as patupilone which is still in development. Among targeted agents, the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab seems extremely promising and is actively investigated in combination with first-line chemotherapy. More recently, interesting results have been obtained with the inhibitors of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) in patients with BRCA-mutated tumors.

A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) allows for in vivo testing of treatment effects on tumor and its microenvironment. Aim of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of PCT on tumor biomarker expression and to evaluate the prognostic role of treatment-induced variation of these biomarkers (molecular response). METHODS Two hundred and twenty-one stage II-III breast cancer patients were included. The following parameters were evaluated at baseline and on surgical specimens after PCT: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), Ki-67, p53, human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), and apoptosis. RESULTS A pathological complete response was observed in 8.8% of the patients. PCT induced a significant reduction in the expression of ER, PgR, Ki-67, and apoptosis. As by multivariable model, Ki-67 > or = 15% and nodal positivity after preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) were significant predictors of worse disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 3.79, P < 0.0001 and HR 2.31, P = 0.037, respectively]. Ki-67 > or = 15% after PCT was also a significant predictor of overall survival (HR 3.75, P = 0.013). On the basis of these two parameters, patients were classified into three groups: (i) low risk (negative nodes and Ki-67 <15%), (ii) intermediate risk (nodal positivity or Ki-67 > or = 15%), and (iii) high risk (nodal positivity and Ki-67 > or = 15%). As compared with the low-risk group, the HRs for recurrence were 3.1 and 9.3 for the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively (P = 0.0001); the HRs for death were 2.4 and 6.5 for the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively (P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS Ki-67 and nodal status have been used to generate a simple and easily reproducible prognostic model, able to discriminate patients with worse prognosis among the heterogeneous group of women with residual disease after PCT.

Anti-HER2 neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies in HER2 positive breast cancer

Since the introduction of anti-Her2 agents, the prognosis of HER2 positive breast cancer patients significantly improved. In the adjuvant setting, the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has been evaluated in six randomized trials including more than 10,000 patients. Different modes of administration (concurrent versus sequential), durations (one year, two years or 9 weeks) and different chemotherapy regimens have been evaluated. To date, one year of trastuzumab in combination or after chemotherapy is the standard adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2 overexpressing tumors. Cardiac safety is still a major clinical issue, in particular in the treatment of early breast cancer. Several large randomized trials exploring shorter, and potentially less toxic, regimens are ongoing across several European countries. In the neoadjuvant setting, the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy resulted in a significantly higher activity as compared to chemotherapy alone. Unfortunately, primary and secondary resistance to trastuzumab is observed both in early and advanced disease. Several mechanisms are described as possible determinants of trastuzumab failure, and several new antiHER2 strategies are in development. Lapatinib, the HER1-2 TK inhibitor is currently approved in advanced disease after trastuzumab failure. Lapatinib is under evaluation in a large adjuvant trial, and in several neoadjuvant studies. Other molecules such pertuzumab, which binds the HER2 dimerization domain, or the pan-erbB TK inhibitor neratinib are under evaluation in the (neo)-adjuvant setting.

Afatinib alone or afatinib plus vinorelbine versus investigator's choice of treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer with progressive brain metastases after trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both (LUX-Breast 3): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer frequently develop CNS metastases. The metastases that progress after brain radiotherapy and HER2-targeted systemic therapy are a difficult therapeutic challenge. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib, an irreversible blocker of the ErbB protein family, alone or combined with vinorelbine, compared with treatment of the investigators choice in women with HER2-positive breast cancer with progressive brain metastases during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both. METHODS We did this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial in 40 hospitals in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, South Korea, and the USA. Women older than 18 years with histologically confirmed HER2-overexpressing breast cancer and CNS recurrence or progression as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both, were eligible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) centrally to afatinib 40 mg orally once per day, afatinib 40 mg per day plus intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) once per week, or investigators choice of treatment in cycles of 3 weeks until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment assignment was not masked for clinicians or patients, but the trial team was masked until database lock to reduce bias. The primary endpoint, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, was patient benefit at 12 weeks, defined by an absence of CNS or extra-CNS disease progression, no tumour-related worsening of neurological signs or symptoms, and no increase in corticosteroid dose. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01441596. FINDINGS Between Dec 22, 2011, and Feb 12, 2013, we screened 132 patients, of whom 121 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment: 40 to afatinib alone, 38 to afatinib plus vinorelbine, and 43 to investigators choice. All patients discontinued study treatment before the data collection cutoff on Oct 16, 2014. Patient benefit was achieved in 12 (30·0%; 95% CI 16·6-46·5) patients given afatinib alone (difference vs investigators choice: -11·9% [95% CI -32·9 to 9·7], p=0·37), 13 (34·2%; 19·6-51·4) given afatinib plus vinorelbine (difference vs investigators choice: -7·6% [-28·9 to 14·2], p=0·63), and 18 (41·9%; 27·0-57·9) given investigators choice. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhoea (seven [18%] of 40 patients in the afatinib only group vs nine [24%] of 37 patients in the afatinib plus vinorelbine group vs two [5%] of 42 patients in the investigators choice group) and neutropenia (none vs 14 [38%] vs four [10%]). INTERPRETATION Patient benefit with afatinib-containing treatments was not different from that in patients given investigators choice of treatments; however, adverse events were frequent and afatinib-containing treatments seemed to be less well tolerated. No further development of afatinib for HER2-positive breast cancer is currently planned. FUNDING Boehringer Ingelheim.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Randomized, Phase IIB Neoadjuvant Study of Letrozole-Lapatinib in Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative, Operable Breast Cancer

PURPOSE This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aimed to evaluate the clinical and biologic effects of letrozole plus lapatinib or placebo as neoadjuvant therapy in hormone receptor (HR) -positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative operable breast cancer. METHODS Ninety-two postmenopausal women with stage II to IIIA primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative therapy consisting of 6 months of letrozole 2.5 mg orally daily plus lapatinib 1,500 mg orally daily or placebo. Surgery was performed within 2 weeks from the last study medication. Clinical response was assessed by ultrasonography. Pre- and post-treatment samples were evaluated for selected biomarkers. Fresh-frozen tissue samples were collected for genomic analyses. RESULTS Numerically similar clinical response rates (partial + complete response) were observed (70% for letrozole-lapatinib and 63% for letrozole-placebo). Toxicities were generally mild and manageable. A significant decrease in Ki-67 and pAKT expression from baseline to surgery was observed in both arms. Overall, 34 patients (37%) had a mutation in PIK3CA exon 9 or 20. In the letrozole-lapatinib arm, the probability of achieving a clinical response was significantly higher in the presence of PIK3CA mutation (objective response rate, 93% v 63% in PIK3CA wild type; P = .040). CONCLUSION The combination of letrozole-lapatinib in early breast cancer was feasible, with expected and manageable toxicities. In unselected estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative patients, letrozole-lapatinib and letrozole-placebo resulted in a similar overall clinical response rate and similar effect on Ki-67 and pAKT. Our secondary end point findings of a significant correlation between PIK3CA mutation and response to letrozole-lapatinib in HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer must now be independently confirmed.

Loss of HER2 positivity and prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND Emerging literature data are showing that a change in human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) status adversely affects breast cancer patients prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of HER2 loss in patients with HER2-positive disease treated with neoadjuvant therapy with or without anti-HER2 agents. METHODS One hundred and seven consecutive HER2-positive patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The first cohort includes 40 patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) alone. The second cohort includes 67 patients treated with neoadjuvant CT plus anti-HER2 agents (trastuzumab and/or lapatinib). HER2 expression was evaluated by immunihistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization on pretreatment core biopsy and on surgical specimen after therapy. RESULTS The rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) and breast-conserving surgery were higher in the CT + anti-HER2 cohort. A loss of HER2 expression was observed in 40% of the patients with residual disease after CT alone versus 14.7% of the patients after CT + anti-HER2 agents (P = 0.019). Patients not achieving a pCR have a significant increase in the risk of relapse when compared with those achieving a pCR (hazard ratio [HR] 9.55, P = 0.028). Patients with HER2 loss tended to have a higher risk of relapse as comparing to patients with maintained HER2 positivity (HR 2.41, P = 0.063). CONCLUSION The pCR is confirmed as a powerful predictor of long-term outcome. The rate of HER2 loss is higher in patients receiving neoadjuvant CT without anti-HER2 agents. HER2 status on residual disease after preoperative therapy can be helpful in selecting patients at different risk of relapse, to be included in prospective trial exploring further adjuvant therapy.

Development of hypogammaglobulinemia in patients treated with imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia or gastrointestinal stromal tumor

These data demonstrate that imatinib treatment induces hypogammaglobulinemia which can be severe in 10% of cases, both in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and in those with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as first line treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumorpatients. Although several in vitro and animal studies demonstrated that imatinib affects immune response, few immune alterations are described in humans. We retrospectively studied hematologic and immunological parameters in 72 chronic myeloid leukemia and 15 gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients treated with imatinib at standard dosage and in 20 chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated before the introduction of imatinib in clinical practice. Both chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients developed a significant reduction of gammaglobulin and immunoglobulin serum levels. No significant hypogammaglobulinemia was observed in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in the pre-imatinib era. These data demonstrate that imatinib treatment induces hypogammaglobulinemia that can reach a severe entity in 10% of cases, both in chronic myeloid leukemia and in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate immune humoral alterations and to define the real incidence of infectious events, including viral reactivations.