Felice Valle

Physical activity influences heart rate variability and very-low-frequency components in Holter electrocardiograms

OBJECTIVE A major proportion of RR interval variability in long-term recordings is due to slow (< 0.03 Hz) fluctuations, which seem to be a good predictor of survival after myocardial infarction, whose origin remains unclear. METHODS To study the effect of physical activity we compared by spectral analysis of the RR interval in 10 healthy human subjects (aged 28[s.e. 2] years) during 1-h periods each of rest (no activity), alternating rest and mild exercise (rhythmic activity), and normal spontaneous (random) activity. RESULTS Compared to rest, during both random and rhythmic activities, the RR variance increased significantly (from 5802[1030] to 13388[1448] ms2, P < 0.05, and to 24959[2901], P < 0.001) due to an increase in power below 0.03 Hz (from 3017[467] to 9606[966] ms2, P < 0.01, and to 21 103[2298] ms2, P < 0.001) which explained 55.4, 73.2 and 86.1% of total RR variance, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The amount of RR variability and its slower fluctuations largely depend on physical activity, regardless of its regular or irregular occurrence. Attempts to predict cardiovascular prognosis on the basis of RR fluctuations should therefore take account of the confounding effect of physical activity since healthier subjects would probably be more active.

Demonstrable cardiac reinnervation after human heart transplantation by carotid baroreflex modulation of RR interval.

BACKGROUND After heart transplantation, respiration-synchronous fluctuations (0.18 to 0.35 Hz, high frequency [HF]) in RR interval may result from atrial stretch caused by changes in venous return, but slower fluctuations (0.03 to 0.15 Hz, low frequency [LF]) not due to respiration suggest reinnervation. In normal subjects, sinusoidal neck suction selectively stimulates carotid baroreceptors and causes reflex oscillations of RR interval. METHODS AND RESULTS To evaluate the presence of reinnervation, we measured the power of RR-LF and RR-HF in 26 heart transplant recipients and 16 control subjects before and during sinusoidal neck suction at 0.1 Hz and 0.20 Hz (similar to but distinct from that of controlled respiration, 0.25 Hz) and before and during administration of atropine or beta-blocker (esmolol hydrochloride) by spectral analysis. All transplant recipients showed small respiratory HF fluctuations. Nonrespiratory LF fluctuations were present in 13 of 26 transplant recipients and increased with months since transplantation (r = .53, P < .01). HF neck suction induced a 0.20-Hz component in all 16 control subjects and none of the 26 transplant subjects. LF neck suction increased RR-LF (from 0.73 +/- 0.20 to 1.30 +/- 0.26 ln ms2, P < .001), similar to but less than in control subjects (from 6.12 +/- 0.21 to 8.27 +/- 0.21 ln ms2, P < .001). Atropine reduced all fluctuations in control subjects and blocked the HF increase caused by 0.20-Hz neck suction but not the LF increase during 0.10-Hz stimulation. Neck suction-induced changes in LF fluctuations persisted after administration of atropine in transplant recipients but were attenuated by esmolol hydrochloride, suggesting sympathetic rather than vagal reinnervation. CONCLUSIONS The presence of baroreceptor-induced RR oscillations is evidence of functional, although incomplete, autonomic reinnervation.

Cardiovascular autonomic modulation in essential hypertension. Effect of tilting.

To better understand the role played by the autonomic nervous system in essential hypertension, we used autoregressive power spectrum analysis to study the noncasual oscillations in RR interval, blood pressure, and skin blood flow in 40 subjects with mild to moderate hypertension and in 25 age-matched control subjects at low frequency (index of sympathetic activity to the heart and the peripheral circulation) and high frequency, respiratory related (index of vagal tone to the heart). RR interval, respiration, noninvasive systolic blood pressure, and skin arteriolar blood flow were simultaneously and continuously recorded with subjects in the supine position and immediately after tilting. The low-frequency component was not significantly different in the two groups either at the cardiac level (control versus hypertensive subjects: 39.1 +/- 4.3 versus 39.9 +/- 3.7 normalized units [NU]) or at the vascular level (1.52 +/- 0.17 versus 1.69 +/- 0.13 ln mm Hg2). After head-up tilting, the RR interval fluctuations were less in hypertensive subjects (low-frequency components from 39.9 +/- 3.7 to 48.4 +/- 4.1 NU, P < .05; high-frequency components from 53.9 +/- 3.7 to 44 +/- 4 NU, P < .05) than in control subjects (low-frequency components from 39.1 +/- 4.3 to 64.4 +/- 4.9 NU, P < .001; high-frequency components from 56.0 +/- 4.5 to 31.2 +/- 4.6 NU, P < .001); the low-frequency components in systolic blood pressure increased similarly in hypertensive subjects (to 2.43 +/- 0.17 ln mm Hg2, P < .0001) and in control subjects (to 2.44 +/- 0.21 ln mm Hg2, P < .01), but the low-frequency components in skin blood flow increased only in control subjects (from 5.34 +/- 0.45 to 6.55 +/- 0.53 mm Hg2, P < .01), not in hypertensive subjects (from 5.55 +/- 0.34 to 5.60 +/- 0.35 ln mm Hg2). In hypertensive subjects with left ventricular hypertrophy, the low-frequency components in systolic blood pressure did not increase after tilting (from 1.75 +/- 0.33 to 2.05 +/- 0.41 ln mm Hg2). Baroreflex sensitivity, as assessed by spectrum analysis, was significantly lower in hypertensive than in control subjects (5.17 +/- 0.49 versus 13.18 +/- 2.44 ms/mm Hg, P < .001. Power spectrum analysis did not reveal an increased sympathetic activity or reactivity either at the cardiac or at the vascular level. The decreased baroreceptor sensitivity in hypertensive subjects could explain the reduced change in sympathovagal balance in the tilt position at the cardiac level. In hypertensive subjects without left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiopulmonary reflex deactivation induced by tilting and/or amplification of sympathetic nervous tone by arteriolar structural change could have preserved the sympathetic activation at the vascular level.