Felipe Domingos Lisbôa

Ischemic Preconditioning and Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although the amount of evidence demonstrating the beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on exercise performance is increasing, conclusions about its efficacy cannot yet be drawn. Therefore, the purposes of this review were to determine the effect of IPC on exercise performance and identify the effects of different IPC procedures, exercise types, and subject characteristics on exercise performance. The analysis comprised 19 relevant studies from 2000 to 2015, 15 of which were included in the meta-analyses. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated as the standardized mean difference. Overall, IPC had a small beneficial effect on exercise performance (ES = 0.43; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.51). The largest ES were found for aerobic (ES = 0.51; 90% CI, 0.35 to 0.67) and anaerobic (ES = 0.23; 90% CI, -0.12 to 0.58) exercise. In contrast, an unclear effect was observed in power and sprint performance (ES = 0.16; 90% CI, -0.20 to 0.52). In conclusion, IPC can effectively enhance aerobic and anaerobic exercise performance.

The time dependence of the effect of ischemic preconditioning on successive sprint swimming performance

OBJECTIVES The present study aimed to determine the effects of ischemic preconditioning on performance in three successive 50-m swimming trials and to measure stroke rate, stroke length and blood lactate accumulation. DESIGN Counterbalanced, repeated-measures cross-over study. METHODS On two separate days, eleven competitive male swimmers (20±3 years, 182±5cm, 77±5kg) performed three successive 50-m trials in a 50-m swimming pool, preceded by intermittent bilateral cuff inflation (4× 5-min of blood flow restriction+5-min of cuff deflation) at either 220 for thighs and 180mmHg for arms (ischemic preconditioning) or 20mmHg for both limbs (control-treatment). The 50-m trials were conducted 1-, 2-, and 8-h after the procedure. RESULTS While no ergogenic effect of ischemic preconditioning was observed for 1-h (0.4%, 95% confidence limits of ±0.6%, p=0.215), there were clear beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning on 2- and 8-h (1.0% and 1.2%, respectively; 95% confidence limits of ±0.6% in both cases, p≤0.002). Furthermore, ischemic preconditioning increased blood lactate accumulation in 2-(p<0.001) and 8-h (p=0.010) and stroke rate for 2- and 8-h in specific 10-m segments (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest a time-dependent effect of ischemic preconditioning on 50-m swimming performance for competitive athletes, with the time window of the beneficial effect starting after about 2-h and lasting for at least 8-h after ischemic preconditioning. This change in performance was accompanied by an increase in blood lactate accumulation and faster strokes in front crawl.

A Fast-Start Pacing Strategy Speeds Pulmonary Oxygen Uptake Kinetics and Improves Supramaximal Running Performance

The focus of the present study was to investigate the effects of a fast-start pacing strategy on running performance and pulmonary oxygen uptake () kinetics at the upper boundary of the severe-intensity domain. Eleven active male participants (28±10 years, 70±5 kg, 176±6 cm, 57±4 mL/kg/min) visited the laboratory for a series of tests that were performed until exhaustion: 1) an incremental test; 2) three laboratory test sessions performed at 95, 100 and 110% of the maximal aerobic speed; 3) two to four constant speed tests for the determination of the highest constant speed (HS) that still allowed achieving maximal oxygen uptake; and 4) an exercise based on the HS using a higher initial speed followed by a subsequent decrease. To predict equalized performance values for the constant pace, the relationship between time and distance/speed through log-log modelling was used. When a fast-start was utilized, subjects were able to cover a greater distance in a performance of similar duration in comparison with a constant-pace performance (constant pace: 670 m±22%; fast-start: 683 m±22%; P = 0.029); subjects also demonstrated a higher exercise tolerance at a similar average speed when compared with constant-pace performance (constant pace: 114 s±30%; fast-start: 125 s±26%; P = 0.037). Moreover, the mean response time was reduced after a fast start (constant pace: 22.2 s±28%; fast-start: 19.3 s±29%; P = 0.025). In conclusion, middle-distance running performances with a duration of 2–3 min are improved and response time is faster when a fast-start is adopted.

Could small-diameter muscle afferents be responsible for the ergogenic effect of limb ischemic preconditioning?

originally developed with the aim of protecting cardiac muscle fibers from sustained ischemic insults, local or remote acute ischemic preconditioning (IP) consists of a potent endogenous mechanism that has been shown to protect various tissues and organs against ischemia-reperfusion injury ([16][1

A influência de variáveis aeróbias e anaeróbias no teste de “sprints” repetidos

This study aimed to determine the manner and degree to which aerobic and anaerobic variables influence repeated running sprint performance and ability. Twenty four males (sprinters = 8, endurance runners = 8 and physical active subjects = 8) performed in a synthetic track the following tests: 1) incremental test to determine the VO2max and the maximum aerobic velocity (MAV); 2) constant velocity test performed at 110% of MAV to determine the VO2 kinetics and the maximum accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD); 3) repeated sprint test (10 sprints of 35-m interspersed by 20s) to determine sprint total time (TT), best sprint time (BT) and score decrement (Sdec). Between-groups comparisons and the correlations between variables were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with a Tukey post-hoc tests and Pearson correlation, respectively. TT was significantly different among all groups (sprinters = 49.5 ± 0.8 s; endurance = 52.6 ± 3.1 s; active = 55.5 ± 2.6 s) and Sdec was significantly lower in endurance runners as compared with sprinters and physical active subjects (sprinters = 8.9 ± 2.1%; endurance = 4.0 ± 2.0%; active = 8.4 ± 4.4%). TT correlated significantly with BT (r = 0.85, p < 0.01) and MAOD (r = −0.54, p < 0.01). Moreover, Sdec was significantly correlated with aerobic parameters (VO2max, r = −0.58, p < 0.01; MAV, r = −0.59, p < 0.01; time constant tau, r = 0.45, p = 0.03). In conclusion, although the aerobic parameters have an important contribution to RS ability, RS performance is mainly influenced by anaerobic parameters.

The Effects of Different Training Backgrounds on VO2 Responses to All-Out and Supramaximal Constant-Velocity Running Bouts

To investigate the impact of different training backgrounds on pulmonary oxygen uptake (V̇O2) responses during all-out and supramaximal constant-velocity running exercises, nine sprinters (SPRs) and eight endurance runners (ENDs) performed an incremental test for maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) assessment and two supramaximal running exercises (1-min all-out test and constant-velocity exercise). The V̇O2 responses were continuously determined during the tests (K4b2, Cosmed, Italy). A mono-exponential function was used to describe the V̇O2 onset kinetics during constant-velocity test at 110%MAV, while during 1-min all-out test the peak of V̇O2 (V̇O2peak), the time to achieve the V̇O2peak (tV̇O2peak) and the V̇O2 decrease at last of the test was determined to characterize the V̇O2 response. During constant-velocity exercise, ENDs had a faster V̇O2 kinetics than SPRs (12.7 ± 3.0 vs. 19.3 ± 5.6 s; p < 0.001). During the 1-min all-out test, ENDs presented slower tV̇O2peak than SPRs (40.6 ± 6.8 and 28.8 ± 6.4 s, respectively; p = 0.002) and had a similar V̇O2peak relative to the V̇O2max (88 ± 8 and 83 ± 6%, respectively; p = 0.157). Finally, SPRs was the only group that presented a V̇O2 decrease in the last half of the test (-1.8 ± 2.3 and 3.5 ± 2.3 ml.kg-1.min-1, respectively; p < 0.001). In summary, SPRs have a faster V̇O2 response when maximum intensity is required and a high maximum intensity during all-out running exercise seems to lead to a higher decrease in V̇O2 in the last part of the exercise.

Decreasing Power Output Increases Aerobic Contribution During Low-volume Severe-intensity Intermittent Exercise

Abstract Lisbôa, FD, Salvador, AF, Raimundo, JAG, Pereira, KL, de Aguiar, RA, and Caputo, F. Decreasing power output increases aerobic contribution during low-volume severe-intensity intermittent exercise. J Strength Cond Res 29(9): 2434–2440, 2015—High-intensity interval training applied at submaximal, maximal, and supramaximal intensities for exercising at V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (t95V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) has shown similar adaptation to low-volume sprint interval training among active subjects. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate t95V[Combining Dot Above]O2max during 2 different intermittent exercises in the severe-intensity domain (e.g., range of power outputs over which V[Combining Dot Above]O2max can be elicited during constant-load exercise) and to identify an exercise protocol that reduces the time required to promote higher aerobic demand. Eight active men (22 ± 2 years, 72 ± 5 kg, 174 ± 4 cm, 47 ± 8 ml·kg−1·min−1) completed the following protocols on a cycle ergometer: (a) incremental test, (b) determination of critical power (CP), (c) determination of the highest constant intensity (IHIGH) and the lowest exercise duration (TLOW) in which V[Combining Dot Above]O2max is attained, and (d) 2 exercise sessions in a randomized order that consisted of a constant power output (CPO) session at IHIGH and a decreasing power output (DPO) session that applied a decreasing work rate profile from IHIGH to 110% of CP. Time to exhaustion was significantly longer in DPO (371 ± 57 seconds vs. 225 ± 33 seconds). Moreover, t95V[Combining Dot Above]O2max (186 ± 72 seconds vs. 76 ± 49 seconds) and O2 consumed (29 ± 4 L vs. 17 ± 3 L) were higher in DPO when compared with the CPO protocol. In conclusion, data suggest that the application of a DPO protocol during intermittent exercise increases the time spent at high percentages of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max.

Efeito da ingestão de cafeína no desempenho em corrida de 200 metros rasos

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of caffeine ingestion on 200 meters performance (200 m). Seventeen physical education students (21.5 ± 2.15 years; 175.9 ± 5.5 cm; 74.1 ± 10.04 kg) performed on two different days two performances of 200 m. One hour before the performance the participants ingested a gelatin capsule containing either caffeine (6 mg.kg-1) or placebo in a randomized double-blinded manner. Were analyzed the end time of the 200 m race and blood lactate ([La]; rest, pre-warm-up and post-test) Caffeine intake decreased the time to overcome 200 m race compared to placebo intake (27.398 ± 1.626 and 27.596 ± 1.714 s, respectively) and increased blood lactate concentration [La] pre-warm-up (1.236 ± 0.497; 1.064 ± 0.330 mM, respectively) without modification in [La] peak. Thus, we conclude that caffeine intake exert an ergogenic effect on anaerobic performance, however analyzing the [La] peak, this improvement does not seem to be related to increased glycolytic flux.