Felipe E. Pedroso

Sentinel node biopsy in oral cavity cancer: Correlation with pet scan and immunohistochemistry

Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy (LS/SNB) is a minimally invasive technique that samples first‐echelon lymph nodes to predict the need for more extensive neck dissection.

Soluble CD44 Is a Potential Marker for the Early Detection of Head and Neck Cancer

Introduction: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a devastating and deadly disease, largely because it is diagnosed in late stage. Cure rates, currently at 50%, could increase to >80% with early detection. In this study, we evaluate soluble CD44 (solCD44) as an early detection tool for HNSCC by determining whether it reliably distinguishes HNSCC from benign disease of the upper aerodigestive tract. Methods: We carried out the solCD44 ELISA on oral rinses from 102 patients with HNSCC and 69 control patients with benign diseases of upper aerodigestive tract to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the test for differentiating HNSCC from benign disease. Furthermore, we did a pilot study using methylation-specific PCR primers on oral rinses from 11 HNSCC patients with low solCD44 levels and 10 benign disease controls. Results: Mean salivary solCD44 levels were 24.4 ± 32.0 ng/mL for HNSCC patients (range, 0.99-201 ng/mL) and 9.9 ± 16.1 ng/mL (range, 0.73-124 ng/mL) for the patients with benign disease (P < 0.0001). Depending on cutoff point and HNSCC site, sensitivity ranged from 62% to 70% and specificity ranged from 75% to 88%. Nine of 11 HNSCC and 0 of 10 controls with low solCD44 levels showed hypermethylation of the CD44 promoter. Conclusions: SolCD44 is elevated in the majority of HNSCC and distinguishes cancer from benign disease with high specificity. Whereas the solCD44 test lacks sensitivity by itself, methylation status of the CD44 gene seems to complement the solCD44 test. Our pilot data indicate that, together, these markers will detect HNSCC with very high sensitivity and specificity. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(7):1348–55)

Is surgical resection superior to transplantation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective:To compare outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with either liver resection or transplantation. Methods:A retrospective, single-institution analysis of 413 HCC patients from 1999 to 2009. Results:A total of 413 patients with HCC underwent surgical resection (n = 106) and transplantation (n = 270) or were listed without receiving transplantation (n = 37). Excluding transplanted patients with incidental tumors (n = 50), 257 patients with suspected HCC were listed with the intent to transplant (ITT). The median diameter of the largest tumor by radiography was 6.0 cm in resected, 3.0 cm in transplanted, and 3.4 cm in the listed-but-not-transplanted patients. Median time to transplant was 48 days. Recurrence rates were 19.8% for resection and 12.1% for all ITT patients. Overall, patient survival for resection versus ITT patients was similar (5-year survival of 53.0% vs 52.0%, not significant). However, for HCC patients with model end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores less than 10 and who radiologically met Milan or UCSF (University of California, San Francisco) criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival rates were significantly improved in resected patients. For patients with MELD score less than 10 and who met Milan criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival were 92.0% and 63.0% for resection (n = 26) versus 83.0% and 41.0% for ITT (n = 73, P = 0.036). For those with MELD score less than 10 and met UCSF criteria, 1-year and 5-year survival was 94.0% and 62.0% for resection (n = 33) versus 81.0% and 40.0% for ITT (n = 78, P = 0.027). Conclusions:Among known HCC patients with preserved liver function, resection was associated with superior patient survival versus transplantation. These results suggest that surgical resection should remain the first line therapy for patients with HCC and compensated liver function who are candidates for resection.

Obesity and Weight Loss at Presentation of Lung Cancer are Associated with Opposite Effects on Survival

BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the second most common neoplasm and the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. In cancer, weight loss and obesity are associated with reduced survival. However, the effect of obesity or weight loss at presentation on lung cancer survival has not been well studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using an extensive cancer dataset, we identified 76,086 patients diagnosed with lung cancer during the period of 1998-2002, of which 14,751 patients presented with obesity and/or weight loss. We examined the relationship between survival and weight loss or obesity at diagnosis using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Median survival time (MST) for all lung cancer patients was 8.7 mo. Patients presenting with weight loss (15.8%) had shorter MST versus those who did not (6.4 versus 9.2 mo, P < 0.001) and patients with weight loss had significantly shortened MST for all stages and histologic subtypes. In contrast, obese patients at presentation (5.4%) had longer MST relative to non-obese patients (13.0 versus 8.6 mo, P < 0.001), which was significant across all stages and histologic subtypes. Multivariate analysis revealed that the absence of weight loss was an independent, positive predictor of improved survival (HR = 0.087, P < 0.001), while the absence of obesity was an independent predictor of worsened survival in lung cancer (HR = 1.16, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate an inverse relationship between survival and weight loss at presentation and a potentially protective effect of obesity in lung cancer survival, which could be due to greater physiologic reserves, thereby prolonging life by slowing the progress of cancer cachexia.

Does Surgery or Radiation Therapy Impact Survival for Patients With Extrapulmonary Small Cell Cancers

Extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas (EPSCC) are rare tumors where therapy remains poorly defined. We sought to determine the impact of surgical extirpation and radiation therapy for outcomes of EPSCC.

Primary gastrointestinal tract lymphoma in the pediatric patient: review of 265 patients from the SEER registry.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to determine outcomes of pediatric patients with primary gastrointestinal tract lymphoma (PGTL) and the impact of surgery or radiation on survival. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database was queried from 1973 to 2006 for patients younger than 20 years with PGTL. RESULTS 265 patients with PGTL were identified. Overall 5- and 10-year survivals were 84% and 83%, respectively. Tumors of the stomach (9%) and rectum/anus (2%) had the worst and best 10-year survivals, respectively (59% vs 100%, P = .023). There was no significant difference in 10-year survival for patients younger than 10 years of age who had surgical extirpation (83% vs 85% no surgery, P = .958) or radiotherapy (76% vs 85% no radiotherapy, P = .532). However, there was a significantly decreased 10-year survival in patients 10 years or older who had surgical extirpation (79% vs 100% no surgery, P = .013) or radiotherapy (49% vs 87% no radiotherapy, P = .001). Under multivariate analysis, tumor location was an independent predictor of improved survival (small bowel, HR 0.21, P = .002; large bowel, HR 0.23, P = .004). CONCLUSION We found no significant survival advantage for surgical extirpation or radiotherapy in patients younger than 10 years with PGTL, whereas either treatment modality was associated with lower survival in patients 10 years or older.

Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes for patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer remains undefined. We compared the outcomes for patients treated with surgery alone or with the addition of adjuvant or neaodjuvant treatment. METHODS A single-institution, retrospective evaluation of a prospective database of gastric cancer patients treated from 2000 to 2008 was performed. RESULTS Overall, 173 patients with gastric cancer underwent surgical extirpation. Of the 173 patients, 43% had early-stage disease (less than stage 2) and 57% had late-stage disease (stage 2 or greater; American Joint Committee on Cancer, 2010). The median survival from the date of diagnosis for those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (n = 35), adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 21), adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n = 18), both NAC and adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 11), or surgery alone (n = 88) was 26.3, 17.3, greater than 60, greater than 60, and 50.3 months, respectively. The addition of NAC to surgery was detrimental to survival in those with early-stage disease (P = 0.002) and did not improve survival in those with late-stage disease (P = 0.687). For those with late-stage disease, surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy exhibited the best overall survival compared with surgery alone (P = 0.021) or surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.01). Patients treated with NAC had a greater rate of R0 resection compared with surgery alone (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS NAC for patients with gastric cancer does not significantly improve the overall outcomes for those with late-stage disease and could be detrimental to survival for those with early-stage disease. However, treatment with NAC resulted in an improved rate of R0 resection.