Felix D. Battistella

A prospective, randomized trial of intravenous fat emulsion administration in trauma victims requiring total parenteral nutrition.

OBJECTIVE Intravenous fat infusions are a standard component of total parenteral nutrition (TPN). We studied the effects of withholding fat infusions in trauma patients requiring TPN. DESIGN Polytrauma patients receiving TPN were randomized to receive a standard fat emulsion dose (L) or to have fat infusions withheld (NL) for the first 10 days of TPN. The two groups received the same amino acid and carbohydrate dose (isonitrogenous, nonisocaloric). MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical outcome parameters were measured. T-cell function was assessed by measuring lymphokine activated killer and natural killer cell activity. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Demographics including Injury Severity Score (27 +/- 8; 30 +/- 9) and APACHE II scores (23 +/- 6; 22 +/- 5) were similar for the L (n = 30) and NL (n = 27) groups, respectively. Differences (p < 0.05) were found in length of hospitalization (L = 39 +/- 24; NL = 27 +/- 16), intensive care unit length of stay (L = 29 +/- 22; NL = 18 +/- 12), and days on mechanical ventilation (L = 27 +/- 21; NL = 15 +/- 12). The L group had a higher number of infections (72 in 30) than the NL group (39 in 27) and T-cell function was depressed in this group. CONCLUSIONS Intravenous fat emulsion infusions during the early postinjury period increased susceptibility to infection, prolonged pulmonary failure, and delayed recovery in critically injured patients. It is not clear whether the improved outcome in the NL group was directly related to withholding the fat infusions or due to the hypocaloric nutritional regimen (underfeeding) these patients received.

Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning

BACKGROUND Performance review using videotapes is a strategy employed to improve future performance. We postulated that videotape review of trauma resuscitations would improve compliance with a treatment algorithm. METHODS Trauma resuscitations were taped and reviewed during a 6-month period. For 3 months, team members were given verbal feedback regarding performance. During the next 3 months, new teams attended videotape reviews of their performance. Data on targeted behaviors were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Behavior did not change after 3 months of verbal feedback; however, behavior improved after 1 month of videotape feedback (P <0.05) and total time to disposition was reduced by 50% (P <0.01). This response was sustained for the remainder of the study. CONCLUSIONS Videotape review can be an important learning tool as it was more effective than verbal feedback in achieving behavioral changes and algorithm compliance. Videotape review can be an important quality assurance adjunct, as improved algorithm compliance should be associated with improved patient care.

Increased use of prophylactic vena cava filters in trauma patients failed to decrease overall incidence of pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND Recent studies have reported that placement of vena cava filters (VCFs) early after injury may decrease the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective review of all trauma patients with placement of VCFs admitted to a single level-1 trauma center between 1989 and 1997. Two cohorts corresponding to years of high or low prophylactic VCF use (PVCF) were compared. RESULTS Records were reviewed for 299 trauma patients identified as having had placement of a VCE Two hundred forty-eight filters were placed before the diagnosis of PE. During years of low PVCF use, the overall PE incidence was 0.31%; during years of high PVCF use, the incidence of PE was higher at 0.48% (p = 0.045, chi-square). CONCLUSIONS Increased use of PVCFs failed to decrease the overall rate of PE in our trauma patient population.

Trauma patients 75 years and older: long-term follow-up results justify aggressive management.

BACKGROUND Long-term survival rate and functional status after trauma for one of the fastest growing segments of the population, patients 75 years and older, is poorly documented. METHODS Trauma patients 75 years and older who were discharged from our Level I trauma center between June 1988 and July 1992 (n = 279) were contacted by mail or phone. Public death records were used to identify patients who had died. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of poor outcome (death within 6 months). Main outcome measures included mortality and self-assessed functional status. RESULTS A minimum 4-year follow-up was obtained for 81% of the 279 study patients. The mean follow-up period was 5.4 +/- 1.1 years. Mean age at time of injury was 81 +/- 5 years (range, 75-101 years); mean Injury Severity Score was 9.4 +/- 7.7. At follow-up, 132 patients (47%) had died, 93 patients (33%) were contacted, and 54 patients (19%) could not be located. Twelve percent of patients survived less than 6 months after discharge. Poor survival was predicted by preexisting diseases (dementia, p = 0.001; hypertension, p = 0.02; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, p = 0.05) and not by age or severity of injury. The mean age of patients still living was 85 +/- 3.9 years (range, 79-99 years), and 77 of 93 patients were living in an independent setting (33 alone, 44 with spouse or family); of these, 57% reported no difficulties in performing 12 of 14 activities of daily living. CONCLUSION Despite higher than expected mortality after discharge, aggressive management of trauma patients 75 years and older is justified by the favorable long-term outcome.

Combined hemorrhagic shock and head injury: Effects of hypertonic saline (7.5%) resuscitation

Hypertonic saline resuscitation was compared to isotonic fluid resuscitation in a large animal model combining hemorrhagic shock with head injury. Sheep were subjected to a freeze injury of one cerebral hemisphere as well as 2 hours of hypotension at a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 mm Hg. Resuscitation was then carried out (MAP = 80 mm Hg) for 1 hour with either lactated Ringers (LR, n = 6) or 7.5% hypertonic saline (HS, n = 6). Hemodynamic parameters and intracranial pressure (ICP) were followed. At the end of resuscitation brain water content was determined in injured and uninjured hemispheres. No differences were detected in cardiovascular parameters; however, ICPs were lower in animals resuscitated with HS (4.2 +/- 1.5 mm Hg) compared to LR (15.2 +/- 2.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.05). Additionally, brain water content (ml H2O/gm dry weight) in uninjured brain hemispheres was lower after HS resuscitation (HS = 3.3 +/- 0.1; LR = 4.0 +/- 0.1; p less than 0.05). No differences were detected in the injured hemispheres. We conclude that hypertonic saline abolishes increases in ICP seen during resuscitation in a model combining hemorrhagic shock with brain injury by dehydrating areas where the blood-brain barrier is still intact. Hypertonic saline may prove useful in the early management of multiple trauma patients.

Trauma and emergency surgery: an evolutionary direction for trauma surgeons.

BACKGROUND The success of nonoperative management of injuries has diminished the operative experience of trauma surgeons. To enhance operative experience, our trauma surgeons began caring for all general surgery emergencies. Our objective was to characterize and compare the experience of our trauma surgeons with that of our general surgeons. METHODS We reviewed records to determine case diversity, complexity, time of operation, need for intensive care unit care, and payor mix for patients treated by the trauma and emergency surgery (TES) surgeons and elective practice general surgery (ELEC) surgeons over a 1-year period. RESULTS TES and ELEC surgeons performed 253 +/- 83 and 234 +/- 40 operations per surgeon, respectively (p = 0.59). TES surgeons admitted more patients and performed more after-hours operations than their ELEC colleagues. Both groups had a mix of cases that was diverse and complex. CONCLUSION Combining the care of patients with trauma and general surgery emergencies resulted in a breadth and scope of practice for TES surgeons that compared well with that of ELEC surgeons.

Appearance of Solid Organ Injury with Contrast-Enhanced Sonography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Preliminary Experience

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the detection rate of injury and characterize imaging findings of contrast-enhanced sonography and non-contrast-enhanced sonography in the setting of confirmed solid organ injury. SUBJECTS AND METHODS This prospective study involved identifying hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries on contrast-enhanced CT. After injury identification, both non-contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography were performed to identify the possible injury and to analyze the appearance of the injury. The sonographic appearance of hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries was then analyzed, and the conspicuity of the injuries was graded on a scale from 0 (nonvisualization) to 3 (high visualization). RESULTS Non-contrast-enhanced sonography revealed 11 (50%) of 22 injuries, whereas contrast-enhanced sonography depicted 20 (91%) of 22 injuries. The average grade for conspicuity of injuries was increased from 0.67 to 2.33 for spleen injuries and from 1.0 to 2.2 for liver injuries comparing non-contrast-enhanced with contrast-enhanced sonography, respectively, on a scale from 0, being nonvisualization, to 3, being high visualization. The splenic injuries appeared hypoechoic with occasional areas of normal enhancing splenic tissue within the laceration with contrast-enhanced sonography. Different patterns were observed in liver injuries including a central hypoechoic region. In some liver injuries there was a surrounding hyperechoic region. CONCLUSION Contrast-enhanced sonography greatly enhances visualization of liver and spleen injuries compared with non-contrast-enhanced sonography. Solid organ injuries usually appeared hypoechoic on contrast-enhanced sonography, but often a hyperechoic region surrounding the injury also was identified with liver injuries.

Femur fractures and lung complications: a prospective randomized study of reaming.

Reaming the intramedullary canal during fixation of femoral shaft fractures may contribute to pulmonary morbidity in patients with trauma. The purpose of our study was to compare acute and late pulmonary complications after reamed or nonreamed nailing of femur fractures. Patients who had femoral shaft fractures were randomized prospectively to a reamed (n = 41) or nonreamed (n = 41) femoral nailing group. Arterial blood gases were measured before and after femur fixation. Ratios of PaO2/FiO2 and alveolar arterial gradients were calculated. Pulmonary complications (acute respiratory distress syndrome) (ARDS), pneumonia, and respiratory failure) were monitored. Age, gender, fracture site, fracture type, time to nailing, length of operation, Injury Severity Score, and Abbreviated Injury Scale-thorax were similar for the two groups. No significant differences were observed in the ratio of PaO2/FiO2 ratios or alveolar arterial (A-a) gradients before and after nailing. The overall incidence of pulmonary complications was 14.6% (eight patients who had reamed nailing and four patients who had nonreamed nailing), and given the sample size, definitive conclusions could not be reached because of inadequate statistical power. We were unable to document differences in pulmonary physiologic response or clinical outcome between patients having reamed and nonreamed femoral nailing. This study may serve as a pilot investigation for other clinical investigations.

Is there a relationship between trauma center volume and mortality

BACKGROUND The guidelines for Level I trauma center verification require 1,200 admissions per year. Several studies looking at the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes after injury have reached conflicting conclusions. The goal of our study was to examine the relationship between patient volume and outcomes (mortality and length of hospital stay) in Californias trauma centers. METHODS Data for patients >or= 18 years old admitted after injury (n = 98,245) to a Level I or II trauma center (n = 38) in 1998 and 1999 were obtained from the Patient Discharge Data of the State of California. Hospital volume was derived from the annual number of admissions per center, and covariates including age, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, and trauma center designation were analyzed. RESULTS Hospital volume was not a significant predictor of death or length of hospital stay. More severely injured patients appeared to have worse outcomes at the highest volume centers. CONCLUSION In our study, hospital volume was not a good proxy for outcome. Low-volume centers appeared to have outcomes that were comparable to centers with higher volumes. Perhaps institutional outcomes rather than volumes should be used as a criterion for trauma center verification.

Practical utility of the D-dimer assay for excluding thromboembolism in severely injured trauma patients.

BACKGROUND We have advocated the use of a D-dimer assay to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in surgical and trauma patients suspected of having these diagnoses. Injury is known to increase D-dimer levels independent of thromboembolism. The purpose of this study was to assess the period after injury over which the D-dimer assay remains positive because of injury exclusive of thromboembolism. METHODS We prospectively sampled the plasma of severely injured patients for D-dimer using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method at admission; at hours 8, 16, 24, and 48; and at days 3, 4, 5, and 6. Patients were then screened for DVT with a routine duplex Doppler at day 7. Patients were followed for PE, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. RESULTS One hundred fifty-four patients (mean Injury Severity Score of 23) underwent a total of 1,230 D-dimer assays. Twenty-six (17%) had thromboembolism. Nine (6%) patients developed DVT, 2 (1%) developed PE, 13 (8%) developed disseminated intravascular coagulation, and 11 (7%) developed severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. None of the trauma patients with thromboembolism had a (false) negative D-dimer at or after the time of their thromboembolic complication. True-negative D-dimer results as a function of time from injury are: 0 hours, 18%; 8 hours, 16%; 16 hours, 17%; 24 hours, 22%; 48 hours, 37%; day 3, 34%; day 4, 32%; day 5, 30%; and day 6, 30%. The negative predictive value of the assay was 100%. D-dimer levels were significantly higher in those who developed a thromboembolic complication than in those who did not (independent of Injury Severity Score). CONCLUSION These data serve to validate D-dimer as a means of excluding thromboembolism, specifically in patients with severe injury (100% negative predictive value). Before 48 hours after injury, however, the vast majority of these patients without thromboembolism had positive D-dimer assays. Because of the high false-positive rate early after severe injury, the D-dimer assay may be of little value before postinjury hour 48.