Félix Martínez
Spanish National Research Council
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Félix Martínez.
Environmental Pollution | 2009
Jesús A. Lemus; Guillermo Blanco; Bernardo Arroyo; Félix Martínez; Juan Manuel Grande
Stabled livestock reared in housed conditions are often subjected to intensive treatments with veterinary drug, which residues may be present in livestock meat ingested by scavengers, but nothing is known about their presence in eggs of wild birds and their potential detrimental effects on breeding success. We searched for residues of veterinary drugs and other toxicants in infertile and embryonated unhatched eggs of griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus) and red kites (Milvus milvus), two threatened avian scavengers. Quinolones (ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin) were found in most unhatched eggs of both scavenger species clearly associated with severe alterations in the development of embryo cartilage and bones that could preclude embryo movements and subsequently normal development, pre-hatch position and successful hatching. The detrimental effects on developing eggs of veterinary drugs from livestock operations may help to explain reduced breeding success of avian scavengers.
Journal of Wildlife Diseases | 1998
Guillermo Blanco; Alvaro Gajón; Guillermo Doval; Félix Martínez
Hematozoan parasites were not found on blood smears fron any of 82 Griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus) examined from Spain. These vultures represented samples of diverse temporal and spatial origin, and there was a great disparity in host ages (nestlings to >5-yr-old adults) and physiological condition (growing, food-stressed, injured, and healthy birds).
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2012
Guillermo Blanco; Fabrizio Sergio; José A. Sánchez-Zapata; Juan Manuel Pérez-García; Francisco Botella; Félix Martínez; Iñigo Zuberogoitia; Oscar Frías; Federico Roviralta; José Enrique Martínez; Fernando Hiraldo
Ecologists and conservation biologists seem increasingly attracted to sophisticated modelling approaches, sometimes at the expense of attention to data quality and appropriateness of fieldwork design. This dissociation may lead to a loss of perspective promoting biological unrealities as conclusions, which may be used in conservation applications. We illustrate this concern by focusing on recent attempts to estimate population size of breeding birds at large scales without any explicit testing of the reliability of the predictions through comparison with direct counts. Disconnection of analysts from “nature” can lead to cases of biological unrealities such as that used here to illustrate such trends. To counter this risk, we encourage investment in well-rounded scientists or more collaborative, multi-disciplinary teams capable of integrating sophisticated analyses with in-depth knowledge of the natural history of their study subjects.
Bird Study | 2014
Guillermo Blanco; Óscar Frías; Jesús A. Cuevas; José L. González; Félix Martínez
Capsule The hypothesized regional population size of a common species in Spain was found to be unreliable when compared with a complete and simultaneous single-species direct census. Aims To provide a regional census of Eurasian Jackdaws Corvus monedula as an example to highlight the crucial importance of baseline knowledge of actual population size of common species for validation and calibration of population size predictions derived from extrapolation. Methods Population size was measured by means of simultaneous counts of winter communal roosts after determining the best census date and other relevant information on flock routines, foraging areas and potential sources of count variability. Results A large discrepancy between hypothesized (∼330 000 individuals) and directly censused population size (∼15 000 individuals) was recorded. Conclusion Programmes aimed at establishing population size of wildlife by statistical inference should attempt to explicitly test their predictions by comparison with directly censused population sizes of particular species in control areas.
The American Naturalist | 2018
Juan A. Fargallo; Félix Martínez; Kazumasa Wakamatsu; David Serrano; Guillermo Blanco
To understand whether early phenotypes are adaptive, knowledge of the environmental factors involved in their variation and the derived benefits from their expression is needed. Temperature and sunlight are considered two major selective forces influencing phenotypic coloration of birds at a global scale. However, within-population color adaptations in response to sunlight temperature variation have been scarcely investigated, and their acclimatization capacity is currently unknown. In addition, the sexes differ in their sensitivity to environmental factors during growth. This study evaluates how melanin plumage coloration varies in relation to sex and sunlight exposure in developing griffon vultures Gyps fulvus and how this correlates with survival. The results show that individuals grown in nests more exposed to sunlight developed paler plumages, as predicted by the thermal melanism hypothesis. In addition, paler males—but not females—have lower survival probability. Finally, a significant sexual dichromatism in fledgling plumage was observed, with females being paler than males. These results reveal within-population color variation related to sunlight temperature conditions, probably as a capacity for local acclimatization through color plasticity, and also provide evidence of sex differences in fitness optima for this trait under ecological pressures.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Óscar Frías; Luis M. Bautista; Francisco V. Dénes; Jesús A. Cuevas; Félix Martínez; Guillermo Blanco
Knowledge about the population size and trends of common bird species is crucial for setting conservation priorities and management actions. Multi-species large-scale monitoring schemes have often provided such estimates relying on extrapolation of relative abundances in particular habitats to large-scale areas. Here we show an alternative to inference-rich predictive models, proposing methods to deal with caveats of population size estimations in habitat-specialist species, reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus and Acrocephalus arundinaceus). Reed warblers were only found in pure reedbeds within riparian woodlands or in riparian vegetation scattered within or around reedbed patches, as expected according to their habitat specialization. The proportion of individuals located in reedbed associated with lotic and lentic waters differed between species, and no reed warbler was recorded in reedbed located along dry streams. This indicates that microhabitat features or their effects on reedbed structure and other factors made a proportion of the apparently available habitat unsuitable for both warbler species. Most warblers detected were males performing territorial singing (females seldom sing and do not perform elaborate territorial song, and are undistinguishable from males by plumage). The regional population sizes of the warbler species (~4000 individuals of A. scirpaceus and ~ 1000 individuals of A. arundinaceus) were much smaller than those estimated for the same area by transforming relative abundance obtained at a national scale to population size through extrapolation by habitat at a regional scale. These results highlight the importance of considering the habitat actually used and its suitability, the manner of sex-related detection, population sex-ratio and their interactions in population estimates. Ideally, the value of predictive methods to estimate population size of common species should be tested before conducting large-scale monitoring, rather than a posteriori. Although logistically challenging, this can be achieved by designing monitoring programs including an intensive sampling of abundance in ad hoc reference areas of variable size.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Jesús A. Lemus; Guillermo Blanco; Javier Grande; Bernardo Arroyo; Marino García-Montijano; Félix Martínez
The authors wish to retract the PLOS ONE article ”Antibiotics threaten wildlife: circulating quinolone residues and disease in avian scavengers”. The Ethics Committee of the Spanish Superior Council of Scientific Research (CSIC) has carried out a formal investigation in relation to concerns about potential scientific misconduct by Jesus A. Lemus, one of the authors of this article. The investigation has questioned the validity of the laboratory analyses conducted by Dr. Lemus; concerns were also raised about the existence of co-author Javier Grande. Given the ephemeral nature of the material used (fresh plasma, swabs and tissues), we are unable to repeat these analyses with the same samples in order to verify the presence of veterinary drugs and pathogens. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience to the readership of PLOS ONE.
PLOS ONE | 2008
Jesús A. Lemus; Guillermo Blanco; Javier Grande; Bernardo Arroyo; Marino García-Montijano; Félix Martínez
Animal Conservation | 2009
Guillermo Blanco; Jesús A. Lemus; Félix Martínez; Bernardo Arroyo; M. García‐Montijano; Juan Manuel Grande
Journal of Raptor Research | 1997
Guillermo Blanco; J M Traverso; J Marchamalo; Félix Martínez