Félix Prado

Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription-associated recombination

Homologous recombination safeguards genome integrity, but it can also cause genome instability of important consequences for cell proliferation and organism development. Transcription induces recombination, as shown in prokaryotes and eukaryotes for both spontaneous and developmentally regulated events such as those responsible for immunoglobulin class switching. Deciphering the molecular basis of transcription‐associated recombination (TAR) is important in understanding genome instability. Using novel plasmid‐borne recombination constructs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we show that RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription induces recombination by impairing replication fork progression. RNAPII transcription concomitant to head‐on oncoming replication causes a replication fork pause (RFP) that is linked to a significant increase in recombination. However, transcription that is codirectional with replication has little effect on replication fork progression and recombination. Transcription occurring in the absence of replication does not affect either recombination or replication fork progression. The Rrm3 helicase, which is required for replication fork progression through nucleoprotein complexes, facilitates replication through the transcription‐dependent RFP site and reduces recombination. Therefore, our work provides evidence that one mechanism responsible for TAR is RNAP‐mediated replication impairment.

Replication Fork Progression Is Impaired by Transcription in Hyperrecombinant Yeast Cells Lacking a Functional THO Complex

ABSTRACT THO/TREX is a conserved, eukaryotic protein complex operating at the interface between transcription and messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) metabolism. THO mutations impair transcription and lead to increased transcription-associated recombination (TAR). These phenotypes are dependent on the nascent mRNA; however, the molecular mechanism by which impaired mRNP biogenesis triggers recombination in THO/TREX mutants is unknown. In this study, we provide evidence that deficient mRNP biogenesis causes slowdown or pausing of the replication fork in hpr1Δ mutants. Impaired replication appears to depend on sequence-specific features since it was observed upon activation of lacZ but not leu2 transcription. Replication fork progression could be partially restored by hammerhead ribozyme-guided self-cleavage of the nascent mRNA. Additionally, hpr1Δ increased the number of S-phase but not G2-dependent TAR events as well as the number of budded cells containing Rad52 repair foci. Our results link transcription-dependent genomic instability in THO mutants with impaired replication fork progression, suggesting a molecular basis for a connection between inefficient mRNP biogenesis and genetic instability.

Hpr1 is preferentially required for transcription of either long or G+C-rich DNA sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

ABSTRACT Hpr1 forms, together with Tho2, Mft1, and Thp2, the THO complex, which controls transcription elongation and genome stability inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutations in genes encoding the THO complex confer strong transcription-impairment and hyperrecombination phenotypes in the bacterial lacZgene. In this work we demonstrate that Hpr1 is a factor required for transcription of long as well as G+C-rich DNA sequences. Using different lacZ segments fused to the GAL1promoter, we show that the negative effect of lacZsequences on transcription depends on their distance from the promoter. In parallel, we show that transcription of either a longLYS2 fragment or the S. cerevisiae YAT1G+C-rich open reading frame fused to the GAL1 promoter is severely impaired in hpr1 mutants, whereas transcription of LAC4, the Kluyveromyces lactis ortholog of lacZ but with a lower G+C content, is only slightly affected. The hyperrecombination behavior of the DNA sequences studied is consistent with the transcriptional defects observed in hpr1 cells. These results indicate that both length and G+C content are important elements influencing transcription in vivo. We discuss their relevance for the understanding of the functional role of Hpr1 and, by extension, the THO complex.

The absence of the yeast chromatin assembly factor Asf1 increases genomic instability and sister chromatid exchange

Histone chaperone Asf1 participates in heterochromatin silencing, DNA repair and regulation of gene expression, and promotes the assembly of DNA into chromatin in vitro. To determine the influence of Asf1 on genetic stability, we have analysed the effect of asf1Δ on homologous recombination. In accordance with a defect in nucleosome assembly, asf1Δ leads to a loss of negative supercoiling in plasmids. Importantly, asf1Δ increases spontaneous recombination between inverted DNA sequences. This increase correlates with an accumulation of double‐strand breaks (DSBs) as determined by immunodetection of phosphorylated histone H2A and fluorescent detection of Rad52–YFP foci during S and G2/M phases. In addition, asf1Δ shows high levels of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and is proficient in DSB‐induced SCE as determined by physical analysis. Our results suggest that defective chromatin assembly caused by asf1Δ leads to DSBs that can be repaired by SCE, affecting genetic stability.

Mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Abstract. Mitotic homologous recombination (HR) is an important mechanism for the repair of double-strand breaks and errors occurring during DNA replication. It is likely that the recombinational repair of DNA lesions occurs preferentially by sister chromatid exchanges that have no genetic consequences. However, most genetically detectable HR events occur between homologous DNA sequences located at allelic positions in homologous chromosomes, or between DNA repeats located at ectopic positions in either the same, homologous or heterologous chromosomes. Mitotic recombination may occur by multiple mechanisms, including double-strand break repair, synthesis-dependent strand annealing, break-induced replication and single-strand annealing. The occurrence of one recombination mechanism versus another depends on different elements, including the position of the homologous partner, the initiation event, the length of homology of the recombinant molecules and the genotype. The genetics and molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have proved essential for the understanding of mitotic recombination mechanisms in eukaryotes. Here, we review recent genetic yeast data that contribute to our understanding of the different mechanisms of mitotic recombination and the in vivo role of the recombination proteins.

Recombination between DNA repeats in yeast hpr1delta cells is linked to transcription elongation.

The induction of recombination by transcription activation has been documented in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Unwinding of the DNA duplex, disruption of chromatin structure or changes in local supercoiling associated with transcription can be indirectly responsible for the stimulation of recombination. Here we provide genetic and molecular evidence for a specific mechanism of stimulation of recombination by transcription. We show that the induction of deletions between repeats in hpr1Δ cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is linked to transcription elongation. Molecular analysis of different direct repeat constructs reveals that deletions induced by hpr1Δ are specific for repeat constructs in which transcription initiating at an external promoter traverses particular regions of the DNA flanked by the repeats. Transcription becomes HPR1 dependent when elongating through such regions. Both the induction of deletions and the HPR1 dependence of transcription were abolished when a strong terminator was used to prevent transcription from proceeding through the DNA region flanked by the repeats. In contrast to previously reported cases of transcription‐induced recombination, there was no correlation between high levels of transcripts and high levels of recombination. Our study provides evidence that direct repeat recombination can be induced by transcriptional elongation.

The SWR1 Histone Replacement Complex Causes Genetic Instability and Genome-Wide Transcription Misregulation in the Absence of H2A.Z

The SWR1 complex replaces the canonical histone H2A with the variant H2A.Z (Htz1 in yeast) at specific chromatin regions. This dynamic alteration in nucleosome structure provides a molecular mechanism to regulate transcription, gene silencing, chromosome segregation and DNA repair. Here we show that genetic instability, sensitivity to drugs impairing different cellular processes and genome-wide transcriptional misregulation in htz1Δ can be partially or totally suppressed if SWR1 is not formed (swr1Δ), if it forms but cannot bind to chromatin (swc2Δ) or if it binds to chromatin but lacks histone replacement activity (swc5Δ and the ATPase-dead swr1-K727G). These results suggest that in htz1Δ the nucleosome remodelling activity of SWR1 affects chromatin integrity because of an attempt to replace H2A with Htz1 in the absence of the latter. This would impair transcription and, either directly or indirectly, other cellular processes. Specifically, we show that in htz1Δ, the SWR1 complex causes an accumulation of recombinogenic DNA damage by a mechanism dependent on phosphorylation of H2A at Ser129, a modification that occurs in response to DNA damage, suggesting that the SWR1 complex impairs the repair of spontaneous DNA damage in htz1Δ. In addition, SWR1 causes DSBs sensitivity in htz1Δ; consistently, in the absence of Htz1 the SWR1 complex bound near an endonuclease HO-induced DSB at the mating-type (MAT) locus impairs DSB-induced checkpoint activation. Our results support a stepwise mechanism for the replacement of H2A with Htz1 and demonstrate that a tight control of this mechanism is essential to regulate chromatin dynamics but also to prevent the deleterious consequences of an incomplete nucleosome remodelling.

Partial Depletion of Histone H4 Increases Homologous Recombination-Mediated Genetic Instability

ABSTRACT DNA replication can be a source of genetic instability. Given the tight connection between DNA replication and nucleosome assembly, we analyzed the effect of a partial depletion of histone H4 on genetic instability mediated by homologous recombination. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain was constructed in which the expression of histone H4 was driven by the regulated tet promoter. In agreement with defective nucleosome assembly, partial depletion of histone H4 led to subtle changes in plasmid superhelical density and chromatin sensitivity to micrococcal nuclease. Under these conditions, homologous recombination between ectopic DNA sequences was increased 20-fold above the wild-type levels. This hyperrecombination was not associated with either defective repair or transcription but with an accumulation of recombinogenic DNA lesions during the S and G2/M phases, as determined by an increase in the proportion of budded cells containing Rad52-yellow fluorescent protein foci. Consistently, partial depletion of histone H4 caused a delay during the S and G2/M phases. Our results suggest that histone deposition defects lead to the formation of recombinogenic DNA structures during replication that increase genomic instability.

Histone H3K56 Acetylation, CAF1, and Rtt106 Coordinate Nucleosome Assembly and Stability of Advancing Replication Forks

Chromatin assembly mutants accumulate recombinogenic DNA damage and are sensitive to genotoxic agents. Here we have analyzed why impairment of the H3K56 acetylation-dependent CAF1 and Rtt106 chromatin assembly pathways, which have redundant roles in H3/H4 deposition during DNA replication, leads to genetic instability. We show that the absence of H3K56 acetylation or the simultaneous knock out of CAF1 and Rtt106 increases homologous recombination by affecting the integrity of advancing replication forks, while they have a minor effect on stalled replication fork stability in response to the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea. This defect in replication fork integrity is not due to defective checkpoints. In contrast, H3K56 acetylation protects against replicative DNA damaging agents by DNA repair/tolerance mechanisms that do not require CAF1/Rtt106 and are likely subsequent to the process of replication-coupled nucleosome deposition. We propose that the tight connection between DNA synthesis and histone deposition during DNA replication mediated by H3K56ac/CAF1/Rtt106 provides a mechanism for the stabilization of advancing replication forks and the maintenance of genome integrity, while H3K56 acetylation has an additional, CAF1/Rtt106-independent function in the response to replicative DNA damage.

Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance

Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for genome integrity. Recombination proteins participate in tolerating DNA lesions that interfere with DNA replication, but can also generate toxic recombination intermediates and genetic instability when they are not properly regulated. Here, we have studied the role of the recombination proteins Rad51 and Rad52 at replication forks and replicative DNA lesions. We show that Rad52 loads Rad51 onto unperturbed replication forks, where they facilitate replication of alkylated DNA by non‐repair functions. The recruitment of Rad52 and Rad51 to chromatin during DNA replication is a prerequisite for the repair of the non‐DSB DNA lesions, presumably single‐stranded DNA gaps, which are generated during the replication of alkylated DNA. We also show that the repair of these lesions requires CDK1 and is not coupled to the fork but rather restricted to G2/M by the replicative checkpoint. We propose a new scenario for HR where Rad52 and Rad51 are recruited to the fork to promote DNA damage tolerance by distinct and cell cycle‐regulated replicative and repair functions.