Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Fergus Caskey is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Fergus Caskey.


Hemodialysis International | 2005

International quotidian dialysis registry: Annual report 2009

Gihad Nesrallah; Rita S. Suri; Louise Moist; Meaghan S. Cuerden; Karen E. Groeneweg; Raymond M. Hakim; Norma J. Ofsthun; Stephen P. McDonald; Carmel M. Hawley; Fergus Caskey; Cecile Couchoud; Christian Awaraji; Robert M. Lindsay

The International Quotidian Dialysis Registry (IQDR) is a global initiative designed to study practices and outcomes associated with the use of hemodialysis regimens of increased frequency and/or duration. Several small studies suggest that compared with conventional hemodialysis (HD), short‐daily, nocturnal, and long conventional HD regimens may improve surrogate endpoints and quality of life. However, methodologically robust comparisons on hard outcomes are sorely lacking. The IQDR represents the first‐ever attempt to aggregate long‐term follow‐up data from centers utilizing alternative HD regimens worldwide, and will have adequate statistical power to examine the effects of these regimens on multiple clinical endpoints, including mortality. To date, the IQDR has enrolled patients from Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand, with plans in place to begin linking with additional commercial databases and national registries. This fifth annual report of the IQDR describes (1) a proposed governance structure that will facilitate international collaboration, stakeholder input and funding; (2) data sources and participating registries; (3) recruitment to date and patient baseline characteristics; and (4) an agenda for future research.


American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2015

Understanding by older patients of dialysis and conservative management for chronic kidney failure

Sarah Tonkin-Crine; Ikumi Okamoto; Geraldine Leydon; Fliss Murtagh; Ken Farrington; Fergus Caskey; Hugh Rayner; Paul Roderick

Background Older adults with chronic kidney disease stage 5 may be offered a choice between dialysis and conservative management. Few studies have explored patients’ reasons for choosing conservative management and none have compared the views of those who have chosen different treatments across renal units. Study Design Qualitative study with semistructured interviews. Settings & Participants Patients 75 years or older recruited from 9 renal units. Units were chosen to reflect variation in the scale of delivery of conservative management. Methodology Semistructured interviews audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Analytical Approach Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results 42 interviews were completed, 4 to 6 per renal unit. Patients were sampled from those receiving dialysis, those preparing for dialysis, and those choosing conservative management. 14 patients in each group were interviewed. Patients who had chosen different treatments held varying beliefs about what dialysis could offer. The information that patients reported receiving from clinical staff differed between units. Patients from units with a more established conservative management pathway were more aware of conservative management, less often believed that dialysis would guarantee longevity, and more often had discussed the future with staff. Some patients receiving conservative management reported that they would have dialysis if they became unwell in the future, indicating the conditional nature of their decision. Limitations Recruitment of older adults with frailty and comorbid conditions was difficult and therefore transferability of findings to this population is limited. Conclusions Older adults with chronic kidney disease stage 5 who have chosen different treatment options have contrasting beliefs about the likely outcomes of dialysis for those who are influenced by information provided by renal units. Supporting renal staff in discussing conservative management as a valid alternative to dialysis for a subset of patients will aid informed decision making. There is a need for better evidence about conservative management to support shared decision making for older people with chronic kidney failure.


American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2009

Blood Pressure and Mortality Risk on Peritoneal Dialysis

Udaya Udayaraj; Retha Steenkamp; Fergus Caskey; Chris A. Rogers; Dorothea Nitsch; David Ansell; Charles R.V. Tomson

BACKGROUND The association of baseline blood pressure (BP) and mortality in incident peritoneal dialysis patients has not been adequately studied. STUDY DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS 2,770 patients on PD therapy at 180 days from start of renal replacement therapy in England and Wales between 1997 and 2004. PREDICTORS Systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP) measured in the first 6 months of renal replacement therapy and other baseline demographic and laboratory variables. OUTCOMES All-cause mortality was studied using time-stratified Cox regression models (to account for nonproportionality) dividing follow-up time into 4 intervals: year 1 (days 180 to 365), years 2 to 3, years 4 to 5, and years 6+. Interactions between BP components and transplant waitlist and diabetes status were explored. RESULTS Median follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 0.1 to 9.9 years), and 1,104 deaths were observed. In fully adjusted analyses, greater SBP, DBP, MAP, and PP were associated with decreased mortality in the first year, but greater SBP and PP were associated with increased late mortality (in years 6+). However, in the subgroup of patients placed on the transplant waitlist within 6 months of starting renal replacement therapy, greater SBP, DBP, MAP, and PP were not associated with decreased mortality in the first year. LIMITATIONS Exclusion of 3,086 patients because of missing BP data. No data were available for cardiac function or antihypertensive medication. CONCLUSIONS Although greater SBP, DBP, MAP, and PP appear protective against early mortality in the overall cohort, this effect is not seen in patients registered on the national transplant waiting list within 6 months of starting renal replacement therapy.


Ndt Plus | 2016

Renal replacement therapy in Europe: a summary of the 2013 ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report with a focus on diabetes mellitus

Anneke Kramer; Maria Pippias; Vianda S. Stel; Marjolein Bonthuis; Nikolaos Afentakis; Ramón Alonso de la Torre; Patrice M. Ambühl; Boris Bikbov; Encarnación Bouzas Caamaño; Ivan Bubić; Jadranka Buturovic-Ponikvar; Fergus Caskey; Harijs Cernevskis; Frédéric Collart; Jordi Comas Farnés; Maria de los Ángeles García Bazaga; Johan De Meester; Manuel Ferrer Alamar; Patrik Finne; Liliana Garneata; Eliezer Golan; James G. Heaf; Marc Hemmelder; Kyriakos Ioannou; Nino Kantaria; Mykola Kolesnyk; Reinhard Kramar; Mathilde Lassalle; Visnja Lezaic; František Lopot

Background This article provides a summary of the 2013 European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry Annual Report (available at http://www.era-edta-reg.org), with a focus on patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) as the cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods In 2015, the ERA-EDTA Registry received data on renal replacement therapy (RRT) for ESRD from 49 national or regional renal registries in 34 countries in Europe and bordering the Mediterranean Sea. Individual patient data were provided by 31 registries, while 18 registries provided aggregated data. The total population covered by the participating registries comprised 650 million people. Results In total, 72 933 patients started RRT for ESRD within the countries and regions reporting to the ERA-EDTA Registry, resulting in an overall incidence of 112 per million population (pmp). The overall prevalence on 31 December 2013 was 738 pmp (n = 478 990). Patients with DM as the cause of ESRD comprised 24% of the incident RRT patients (26 pmp) and 17% of the prevalent RRT patients (122 pmp). When compared with the USA, the incidence of patients starting RRT pmp secondary to DM in Europe was five times lower and the incidence of RRT due to other causes of ESRD was two times lower. Overall, 19 426 kidney transplants were performed (30 pmp). The 5-year adjusted survival for all RRT patients was 60.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60.5–61.3] and 50.6% (95% CI 49.9–51.2) for patients with DM as the cause of ESRD.


Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016

Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA Registry over a 20-year period.

Moniek W.M. van de Luijtgaarden; Kitty J. Jager; Mårten Segelmark; Julio Pascual; Frederic Collart; Aline C. Hemke; César Remón; Wendy Metcalfe; Alfonso Miguel; Reinhard Kramar; Knut Aasarød; Ameen Abu Hanna; Raymond T. Krediet; Staffan Schon; Pietro Ravani; Fergus Caskey; Cécile Couchoud; Runolfur Palsson; Christoph Wanner; Patrik Finne; Marlies Noordzij

BACKGROUND Although previous studies suggest similar patient survival for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD), PD use has decreased worldwide. We aimed to study trends in the choice of first dialysis modality and relate these to variation in patient and technique survival and kidney transplant rates in Europe over the last 20 years. METHODS We used data from 196 076 patients within the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 1993 and 2012. Trends in the incidence rate and prevalence on Day 91 after commencing RRT were quantified with Joinpoint regression. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for 5-year dialysis patient and technique survival were calculated using Cox regression. Analyses were repeated using propensity score matching to control for confounding by indication. RESULTS PD prevalence dropped since 2007 and HD prevalence stabilized since 2009. Incidence rates of PD and HD decreased from 2000 and 2009, respectively, while the incidence of kidney transplantation increased from 1993 onwards. Similar 5-year patient survival for PD versus HD patients was found in 1993-97 [adjusted HR: 1.02, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.98-1.06], while survival was higher for PD patients in 2003-07 (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.95). Both PD (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-1.00) and HD technique survival (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.87-0.99) improved in 2003-07 compared with 1993-97. CONCLUSIONS Although initiating RRT on PD was associated with favourable patient survival when compared with starting on HD treatment, PD was often not selected as initial dialysis modality. Over time, we observed a significant decline in PD use and a stabilization in HD use. These observations were explained by the lower incidence rate of PD and HD and the increase in pre-emptive transplantation.


Nephron Clinical Practice | 2009

UK Renal Registry 11th Annual Report (December 2008): Chapter 14 UK Renal Registry and international comparisons

Preetham Boddana; Fergus Caskey; Anna Casula; David Ansell

Background: The aim of this study is to report Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) incidence and prevalence rates, the percentage of incident patients with diabetes mellitus as cause of renal disease, the RRT modality mix and the transplant rate in different countries. The number of national or regional registries collecting and reporting data pertaining to traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in prevalent dialysis patients is also examined. Methods: Data on numbers of incident and prevalent RRT patients in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland for the year 2007 were collected from the UK Renal Registry (UKRR) database and collated to meet the specifications on the US Renal Data System (USRDS) international data collection form. Results: In 2007, the incidence and prevalence of RRT in the UK were 110 and 759 per million of the population (pmp) respectively. Incidence of RRT placed the UK 34th out of the 43 countries reporting to the USRDS in 2006. In the majority of reporting countries, 20–44% have diabetes as the primary cause of end stage renal disease. Only the Finnish, Malaysian and US Renal Registries were found to routinely report attainment of cardiovascular risk standards. Conclusions: A comparison among international renal registries about RRT epidemiology and reporting cardiovascular risk factors in prevalent RRT patients forms an important part of the quality improvement process and often allows for improving standards and performances between reporting countries. Despite the high CV morbidity associated with RRT, few renal registries routinely report data on CV risk management; where data are reported there is little agreement in what represents quality of care, making direct comparison difficult.


Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2009

Towards case-mix-adjusted international renal registry comparisons: how can we improve data collection practice?

Lazarus Karamadoukis; David Ansell; Robert N. Foley; Stephen P. McDonald; Charles R.V. Tomson; Lilyanna Trpeski; Fergus Caskey

1The Richard Bright Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5BW, 2The Renal Association UK Renal Registry, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK, 3United States Renal Data System, 914 South 8th Street, Suite S-406, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 4Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville South 5011, South Australia and 5Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada


Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2010

Socio-economic status, ethnicity and geographical variations in acceptance rates for renal replacement therapy in England and Wales: an ecological study

Udaya Udayaraj; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Paul Roderick; Anna Casula; David Ansell; Charles R.V. Tomson; Fergus Caskey

Background It is not known to what extent the reported regional variations in renal replacement therapy (RRT) acceptance rates in England and Wales are due to differences in the socio-demographic characteristics of the population. Methods The authors calculated age–gender indirectly standardised RRT rates in 2007 for Primary Care Trusts (PCT)/Local Health Boards (LHB) in England and Wales and Government Office Regions (GOR) in England. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to examine the regional variations in the age–gender standardised RRT rates before and after adjustment for area deprivation (Townsend index) and the proportion of non-white people living in an area. Results Increasing deprivation of PCT/LHB was associated with higher RRT acceptance rates. RRT rates were higher in PCTs with a greater proportion of non-white people in England (correlation coefficient 0.60, p<0.001) but not in Wales. There were variations in the age–gender standardised RRT rates between PCT/LHBs in England and Wales. Adjusting for deprivation and the proportion of non-white people attenuated the high RRT rate ratio observed in London and West Midlands, but the RRT acceptance rate ratio (95% CI) remained higher in Wales 1.38 (1.22 to 1.57) and lower in North West England 0.82 (0.74 to 0.93) and Yorkshire and Humberside 0.86 (0.77 to 0.98). Conclusions This study highlights that RRT acceptance rates are positively associated with social deprivation and the proportion of non-white people in a PCT/LHB, but regional variations in RRT acceptance rates still persist despite taking these into account. Further study is required to understand the extent to which these differences reflect variation in underlying need or provision of care.


Ndt Plus | 2015

Translational research in nephrology: chronic kidney disease prevention and public health.

Katharina Brück; Vianda S. Stel; Moniek C.M. de Goeij; Fergus Caskey; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Kitty J. Jager

This narrative review evaluates translational research with respect to five important risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD): physical inactivity, high salt intake, smoking, diabetes and hypertension. We discuss the translational research around prevention of CKD and its complications both at the level of the general population, and at the level of those at high risk, i.e. people at increased risk for CKD or CKD complications. At the population level, all three lifestyle risk factors (physical inactivity, high salt intake and smoking) have been translated into implemented measures and clear population health improvements have been observed. At the ‘high-risk’ level, the lifestyle studies reviewed have tended to focus on the individual impact of specific interventions, and their wider implementation and impact on CKD practice are more difficult to establish. The treatment of both diabetes and hypertension appears to have improved, however the impact on CKD and CKD complications was not always clear. Future studies need to investigate the most effective translational interventions in low and middle income countries.


Ndt Plus | 2017

The European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry Annual Report 2014: a summary.

Maria Pippias; Anneke Kramer; Marlies Noordzij; Nikolaos Afentakis; Ramón Alonso de la Torre; Patrice M. Ambühl; Manuel I. Aparicio Madre; Felipe Arribas Monzón; Anders Åsberg; Marjolein Bonthuis; Encarnación Bouzas Caamaño; Ivan Bubić; Fergus Caskey; Harijs Cernevskis; Maria de los Ángeles García Bazaga; Jean-Marin des Grottes; Raquel Fernández González; Manuel Ferrer-Alamar; Patrik Finne; Liliana Garneata; Eliezer Golan; James G. Heaf; Marc Hemmelder; Alma Idrizi; Kyriakos Ioannou; Faiçal Jarraya; Nino Kantaria; Mykola Kolesnyk; Reinhard Kramar; Mathilde Lassalle

Abstract Background This article summarizes the European Renal Association – European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry’s 2015 Annual Report. It describes the epidemiology of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in 2015 within 36 countries. Methods In 2016 and 2017, the ERA-EDTA Registry received data on patients who were undergoing RRT for ESRD in 2015, from 52 national or regional renal registries. Thirty-two registries provided individual patient-level data and 20 provided aggregated-level data. The incidence, prevalence and survival probabilities of these patients were determined. Results In 2015, 81 373 individuals commenced RRT for ESRD, equating to an overall unadjusted incidence rate of 119 per million population (pmp). The incidence ranged by 10-fold, from 24 pmp in Ukraine to 232 pmp in the Czech Republic. Of the patients commencing RRT, almost two-thirds were men, over half were aged ≥65 years and a quarter had diabetes mellitus as their primary renal diagnosis. Treatment modality at the start of RRT was haemodialysis for 85% of the patients, peritoneal dialysis for 11% and a kidney transplant for 4%. By Day 91 of commencing RRT, 82% of patients were receiving haemodialysis, 13% peritoneal dialysis and 5% had a kidney transplant. On 31 December 2015, 546 783 individuals were receiving RRT for ESRD, corresponding to an unadjusted prevalence of 801 pmp. This ranged throughout Europe by more than 10-fold, from 178 pmp in Ukraine to 1824 pmp in Portugal. In 2015, 21 056 kidney transplantations were performed, equating to an overall unadjusted transplant rate of 31 pmp. This varied from 2 pmp in Ukraine to 94 pmp in the Spanish region of Cantabria. For patients commencing RRT during 2006–10, the 5-year unadjusted patient survival probabilities on all RRT modalities combined was 50.0% (95% confidence interval 49.9–50.1).

Collaboration


Dive into the Fergus Caskey's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kitty J. Jager

Public Health Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Ansell

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Roderick

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hugh Rayner

Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Friedo W. Dekker

Leiden University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maciej Szymczak

Wrocław Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge