Fernando D. Borges

The Prostatic Urethral Lift for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Prostate Enlargement Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: The L.I.F.T. Study

PURPOSE We report the first multicenter randomized blinded trial of the prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Men at least 50 years old with AUASI (American Urological Association Symptom Index) 13 or greater, a maximum flow rate 12 ml per second or less and a prostate 30 to 80 cc were randomized 2:1 between prostatic urethral lift and sham. In the prostatic urethral lift group small permanent implants are placed within the prostate to retract encroaching lobes and open the prostatic urethra. Sham entailed rigid cystoscopy with sounds mimicking the prostatic urethral lift. The primary end point was comparison of AUASI reduction at 3 months. The prostatic urethral lift arm subjects were followed to 1 year and assessed for lower urinary tract symptoms, peak urinary flow rate, quality of life and sexual function. RESULTS A total of 206 men were randomized (prostatic urethral lift 140 vs sham 66). The prostatic urethral lift and sham AUASI was reduced by 11.1±7.67 and 5.9±7.66, respectively (p=0.003), thus meeting the primary end point. Prostatic urethral lift subjects experienced AUASI reduction from 22.1 baseline to 18.0, 11.0 and 11.1 at 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months, respectively, p<0.001. Peak urinary flow rate increased 4.4 ml per second at 3 months and was sustained at 4.0 ml per second at 12 months, p<0.001. Adverse events were typically mild and transient. There was no occurrence of de novo ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS The prostatic urethral lift, reliably performed with the patient under local anesthesia, provides rapid and sustained improvement in symptoms and flow, while preserving sexual function.

IMMEDIATE SALVAGE PROCEDURE FOR INFECTED PENILE PROSTHESIS

PURPOSE The most devastating complication after the insertion of a penile prosthesis is the development of infection. The standard approach involves removing the entire device, treating intensively with antibiotics and attempting to reinsert a prosthesis at a later date, often with a suboptimal result. Based on the encouraging results of others, during the last 24 months we have used in 2 separate private urological practices a salvage procedure for treatment of infected inflatable penile prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS The protocol used in 7 men with an infected inflatable penile prosthesis included removal of all device components, a 7-step vigorous intraoperative irrigation with 4 different solutions, including vancomycin, immediate reimplantation of a new inflatable penile prosthesis and postoperative outpatient antibiotics with oral ciprofloxacin or intravenous vancomycin or cefazolin. RESULTS Of the 7 men 6 have experienced excellent results with no infection, minimal morbidity and preservation of penile length. The only failure occurred in a poorly controlled diabetic who required multiple revisions and may have had latent infection for months before it became apparent. CONCLUSIONS We believe that an immediate salvage procedure for an infected inflatable penile prosthesis is an effective treatment for this difficult complication.

Durability of the Prostatic Urethral Lift: 2-Year Results of the L.I.F.T. Study

Introduction: For a therapy to become an important part of a provider armamentarium it must be safer or better than existing therapies and be durable. The prostatic urethral lift offers rapid improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia with minimal side effects. We report 2‐year results of a multicenter, randomized, blinded trial of the prostatic urethral lift. Methods: A total of 206 men 50 years old or older with an AUA‐SI of 13 or greater, a peak flow rate of 12 ml per second or less and a 30 to 80 cc prostate were randomized 2:1 between the prostatic urethral lift and sham treatment. The prostatic urethral lift is performed by placing permanent transprostatic implants to lift apart the prostate lobes and reduce urethral obstruction. Sham treatment entailed rigid cystoscopy, a blinding screen and sounds that mimicked those of the prostatic urethral lift procedure. Patients were assessed for lower urinary tract symptoms, peak flow rate, quality of life and sexual function. Results: The prostatic urethral lift reduced the AUA‐SI 88% more than sham treatment (−11.1 vs −5.9, p = 0.003). Patients with the prostatic urethral lift experienced an AUA‐SI reduction from 22.1 at baseline to 18.0 (−17%), 11.1 (−50%), 11.4 (−48%) and 12.5 (−42%) at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 and 2 years, respectively (p <0.0001). The peak flow rate was increased 4.2 ml per second at 3 months and 2 years (p <0.0001). By 2 years only 7.5% of patients required additional intervention for lower urinary tract symptoms. Adverse events were typically mild and transient. Encrustation did not develop on implants properly placed in the prostate. There was no occurrence of de novo sustained ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction. Conclusions: The prostatic urethral lift preserves sexual function and provides rapid improvement in symptoms, flow and quality of life that are sustained to 2 years.Abbreviations and Acronyms: AUA‐SI: American Urological Association Symptom Index; BPH: benign prostatic hyperplasia; BPHII: BPH Impact Index; FDA: Food and Drug Administration; GEE: general estimating equation; L.I.F.T.: Luminal Improvement Following Prostatic Tissue approximation for the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH; LUTS: lower urinary tract symptoms; MSHQ‐EjD: Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction; PUL: prostatic urethral lift; Qmax: peak urinary flow rate; QOL: quality of life; SHIM: Sexual Health Inventory for Men; TURP: transurethral prostate resection.

Adult UrologyVoiding DysfunctionThe Prostatic Urethral Lift for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Prostate Enlargement Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: The L.I.F.T. Study

PURPOSE We report the first multicenter randomized blinded trial of the prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Men at least 50 years old with AUASI (American Urological Association Symptom Index) 13 or greater, a maximum flow rate 12 ml per second or less and a prostate 30 to 80 cc were randomized 2:1 between prostatic urethral lift and sham. In the prostatic urethral lift group small permanent implants are placed within the prostate to retract encroaching lobes and open the prostatic urethra. Sham entailed rigid cystoscopy with sounds mimicking the prostatic urethral lift. The primary end point was comparison of AUASI reduction at 3 months. The prostatic urethral lift arm subjects were followed to 1 year and assessed for lower urinary tract symptoms, peak urinary flow rate, quality of life and sexual function. RESULTS A total of 206 men were randomized (prostatic urethral lift 140 vs sham 66). The prostatic urethral lift and sham AUASI was reduced by 11.1±7.67 and 5.9±7.66, respectively (p=0.003), thus meeting the primary end point. Prostatic urethral lift subjects experienced AUASI reduction from 22.1 baseline to 18.0, 11.0 and 11.1 at 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months, respectively, p<0.001. Peak urinary flow rate increased 4.4 ml per second at 3 months and was sustained at 4.0 ml per second at 12 months, p<0.001. Adverse events were typically mild and transient. There was no occurrence of de novo ejaculatory or erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS The prostatic urethral lift, reliably performed with the patient under local anesthesia, provides rapid and sustained improvement in symptoms and flow, while preserving sexual function.