Fernando Paganelli
Federal University of São Paulo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Fernando Paganelli.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2009
Fernando Paganelli; Jose A. Cardillo; L.A. S. Melo; D. R. Lucena; A.A. Silva; Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira; Ana L. Höfling-Lima; Quan Dong Nguyen; Baruch D. Kuppermann; Rubens Belfort
PURPOSE To compare intraoperative injection of triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin in a controlled-release system (DuoCat) with prednisolone and ciprofloxacin eye drops after cataract surgery. METHODS In this randomized, double-masked, controlled trial, a total of 135 patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups: 67 patients treated after surgery with prednisolone 1% and ciprofloxacin 3% eye drops four times daily (week 1), three times daily (week 2), twice daily (week 3), and once daily (week 4) and 0.3% ciprofloxacin drops four times daily (weeks 1 and 2), and 68 patients treated at the end of surgery with a sub-Tenons injection of 25 mg triamcinolone and 2 mg ciprofloxacin in biodegradable microspheres. The patients were examined on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28. The main outcome measures were postoperative anterior chamber cell and flare, intraocular pressure (IOP), lack of anti-inflammatory response, and presence of infection. RESULTS No significant differences were observed between the groups in anterior chamber cell (P > 0.14) and flare (P > 0.02) at any postoperative visits. The mean (99% confidence interval) differences in IOP between the prednisolone and triamcinolone groups on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 were -0.4 mm Hg (-2.1 to 1.3), 0.0 mm Hg (-1.4 to 1.3), 0.0 mm Hg (-1.1 to 1.1), -0.2 mm Hg (-1.1 to 0.8), and -0.1 mm Hg (-1.1 to 0.9), respectively. No patient had a postoperative infection. CONCLUSIONS One injection of DuoCat had a therapeutic response and ocular tolerance that were equivalent to conventional eye drops in controlling inflammation after cataract surgery. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00431028.).
Archives of Ophthalmology | 2010
Jose A. Cardillo; Fernando Paganelli; L.A. S. Melo; A.A. Silva; Antonio Carlos Pizzolitto; Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of subconjunctival injection of a combination of triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, 2 mg/0.1 mL, in a controlled-release system (DuoCat) with that of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, 0.3%, eyedrops for infection prophylaxis. METHODS Rabbit eyes were injected subconjunctivally with a combination of triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, 2 mg/0.1 mL, or ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, 2 mg/0.1 mL, alone. The aqueous and vitreous humor pharmacokinetic profiles were compared with those of a single drop of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, 0.3%, 6 times daily. In 45 rabbits, Staphylococcus aureus was injected into the anterior chamber: 15 randomly received 1 drop of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, 0.3%, every 4 hours during 24 hours; 15 received drops of balanced salt solution; and 15 received a combination of triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, 2 mg/0.1 mL. After 24 hours, endophthalmitis scores were recorded, aqueous and vitreous humors underwent culture, and histologic analysis was performed. RESULTS The combined triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin treatment allowed higher intraocular levels of ciprofloxacin. The median endophthalmitis clinical scores for the combination of triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin-only eyedrop groups were equivalent (P = .42) and were significantly lower than those of the balanced salt solution group (P < .001). The culture was negative for S aureus in the combined triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin and ciprofloxacin eyedrop regimens. No adverse effects were observed with either route. CONCLUSIONS Ciprofloxacin eyedrops and combined triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin were equally tolerated and efficacious. The combined triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin treatment may eliminate noncompliance issues and may prove to be a valuable clinical tool for surgical prophylaxis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The combined triamcinolone and ciprofloxacin treatment may be a new useful strategy for surgical prophylaxis.
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery | 2010
Fernando Paganelli; Jose A. Cardillo; Alessandro J. Dare; L.A. S. Melo; D. R. Lucena; A.A. Silva; Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira; Antonio Carlos Pizzolitto; Daniel Lavinsky; Mirian Skaf; Acacio A. Souza-Filho; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Quan Dong Nguyen; Baruch D. Kuppermann; Rocío Herrero-Vanrell; Rubens Belfort
Importance of the field: The use of topical agents poses unique and challenging hurdles for drug delivery. Topical steroids effectively control ocular inflammation, but are associated with the well-recognized dilemma of patient compliance. Although administration of topical antimicrobials as prophylaxis is acceptable among ophthalmologists, this common practice has no sound evidence base. Developing a new antimicrobial agent or delivery strategy with enhanced penetration by considering the anatomical and physiological constraints exerted by the barriers of the eye is not a commonly perceived strategy. Exploiting the permeability of the sclera, subconjunctival routes may offer a promising alternative for enhanced drug delivery and tissue targeting. Area covered in this review: Ocular drug delivery strategies were reviewed for ocular inflammation and infections clinically adopted for newer class of antimicrobials, which use a multipronged approach to limit risks of endophthalmitis. What the reader will gain: The analysis substantiates a new transscleral drug delivery therapeutic approach for cataract surgery. Take home message: A new anti-inflammatory and anti-infective paradigm that frees the patient from the nuisance of topical therapeutics is introduced, opening a large investigative avenue for future improved therapies.
Archive | 2013
Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira; Jose A. Cardillo; Fernando Paganelli; Acácio Alves Souza Lima-Filho; Arnóbio Antônio da Silva-Júnior
Anselmo G. De Oliveira1, Jose A. Cardillo2,3, Fernando Paganelli2,3, Acacio A. S. Lima-Filho2 and Arnobio A. Da Silva-Junior4 1State of Sao Paulo University-UNESP, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutics, Araraquara, SP, 2Federal University of Sao Paulo-UNIFESP, Department of Ophthalmology, Sao Paulo, SP, 3Eye Hospital of Araraquara, Rua Padre Duarte, Araraquara, SP, 4Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte-UFRN, Health Sciences Centre, Natal, RN, Brazil
Ophthalmology | 2004
Fernando Paganelli; Jose A. Cardillo; L.A. S. Melo; Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira; Mirian Skaf; Rogério A. Costa
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2006
Jose A. Cardillo; Fernando Paganelli; Rogério A. Costa; A.A. Silva; Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira; A. A. S. Lima Filho; Michel Eid Farah; R. Belfort; B.D. Kuppermann
Ophthalmology | 2005
Fernando Paganelli; Jose A. Cardillo; Rogério A. Costa; L.A. S. Melo; Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Alessandro Dare; Renato Peroni; Fernando Paganelli; Leonardo C Castro
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2011
Fernando Paganelli; Alessandro J. Dare; Jose A. Cardillo; Acacio A. Souza-Filho; Renato Peroni; Ansemo G. Oliveira; Antonio Carlos Pizzolitto; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Rubens Belfort
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2010
R. Peroni; Fernando Paganelli; Alessandro J. Dare; Jose A. Cardillo; A. C. Pizzolito; Anselmo Gomes de Oliveira; A. A. S. Lima Filho; R. Belfort