Fernando Paiva Araújo
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Fernando Paiva Araújo.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2006
José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves; Giovani Alves Monteiro; João Rosa de Almeida; Roberto Silva Sant'Anna; Rodrigo Machado Saldanha; José Mariano Soares de Moraes; Emerson Salim Nogueira; Fernando Lima Coutinho; Mariana Moraes Pereira das Neves; Fernando Paiva Araújo; Paula Brazilio Nóbrega
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O mecanismo de acao analgesica a2-adrenergico tem sido explorado ha mais de 100 anos. A clonidina aumenta de maneira dose-dependente a duracao dos bloqueios sensitivo e motor e tem propriedades antinociceptivas. O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar se a adicao de clonidina na dose de 15 e 30 µg a raquianestesia, para cesariana, com bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg) e morfina (100 µg), melhora a qualidade da analgesia pos-operatoria. METODO: Foi realizado um estudo prospectivo e aleatorio com 60 pacientes divididas em tres grupos: BM - bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg) e morfina (100 µg), BM15 - bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg), morfina (100 µg) e clonidina (15 µg) e BM30 - bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg), morfina (100 µg) e clonidina (30 µg), administradas separadamente. No peri-operatorio, foram anotados o consumo de efedrina e a avaliacao do recem-nascido pelo indice de Apgar. No pos-operatorio, a dor foi avaliada na 12a h pela Escala Analogica Visual, o tempo para solicitacao de analgesicos e efeitos colaterais pos-operatorios, como prurido, nauseas, vomitos, bradicardia, hipotensao arterial e sedacao. Os valores foram considerados significativos quando p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Os grupos foram homogeneos. O consumo de efedrina e a avaliacao pelo indice de Apgar nao exibiram diferenca estatistica significativa entre os grupos. Os escores de dor e o tempo medio de analgesia mostraram diferenca entre os grupos BM e BM15/BM30 e nao houve diferenca com relacao a incidencia de efeitos colaterais pos-operatorios. CONCLUSOES: A adicao de clonidina na raquianestesia com bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg) e morfina (100 µg) para cesariana, melhorou a qualidade da analgesia pos-operatoria, sem aumentar a incidencia de efeitos colaterais, sendo 15 µg de clonidina a dose sugerida.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The mechanism of action of alpha2-adrenergic analgesia has been explored for more than one hundred years. The increased duration of the sensitive and motor blockades caused by clonidine is dose-dependent and has antinociceptive properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of 15 to 30 microg of clonidine to spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) and morphine (100 microg) improves the quality of postoperative analgesia. METHODS We realized a prospective, randomized study that included 60 patients divided in 3 groups: BM - 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) and morphine (100 microg), BM15 - 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg), morphine (100 microg), and clonidine (15 mg), and BM30 - 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg), morphine (100 microg), and clonidine (30 microg), administered separately. In the perioperative period the use of ephedrine and the newborns Apgar score were recorded. In the postoperative period, the pain was evaluated in the 12th h by the VAS, the length of time it took the patient to ask for analgesics, and the postoperative side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation. The values were considered significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS The groups were homogenous. The use of ephedrine and the evaluation by the Apgar score did not show statistically significant differences among the different groups. The pain scores and the average time to start analgesia showed differences among the groups BM and BM15/BM30, and there were no differences regarding the incidence of postoperative side effects. CONCLUSIONS The addition of clonidine to spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) and morphine (100 microg) for cesarean section improved the quality of the postoperative analgesia without increasing the incidence of side effects. We suggest that the dose of 15 microg of clonidine should be used.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2005
José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves; Vinícius La Rocca Vieira; Rodrigo Machado Saldanha; Francisco de Assis Duarte Vieira; Michele Coutinho Neto; Marcos Gonçalves Magalhães; Mariana Moraes Pereira das Neves; Fernando Paiva Araújo
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A cefaleia pos-puncao da dura-mater e a complicacao mais frequente apos a raquianestesia ou a sua perfuracao acidental durante tentativa de bloqueio peridural. O objetivo deste relato e descrever o uso da hidrocortisona no tratamento e na prevencao da cefaleia pos-puncao da dura-mater (CPPD). RELATO DOS CASOS: Sao relatados tres casos em que a hidrocortisona foi utilizada no tratamento e na prevencao da cefaleia pos-puncao da dura-mater. O primeiro foi de uma paciente obstetrica submetida a cesariana, que apresentou cefaleia no pos-operatorio, nao responsiva a medicacao convencional e ao tratamento com tampao sanguineo peridural (TSP), mas que apresentou remissao completa do quadro com hidrocortisona por via venosa. Outras duas pacientes, em quem ocorreu perfuracao acidental da dura-mater durante a tentativa de localizacao do espaco peridural e que tratadas com hidrocortisona, por via venosa, com fins preventivos, nao desenvolveram quadro de cefaleia. CONCLUSOES: Nos casos observados a hidrocortisona mostrou eficacia no tratamento da CPPD apos falha das medidas conservadoras e do TSP. A utilizacao da hidrocortisona em pacientes com perfuracao acidental da dura-mater pode ser util, pois nao e tecnica invasiva e a incidencia e a gravidade das CPPD nesse grupo de pacientes e elevada. Sao necessarios estudos controlados para estabelecer o real papel da hidrocortisona na prevencao e tratamento da CPPD.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Post-dural puncture headache is the most frequent complication after spinal anesthesia or accidental dural perforation during attempted epidural block. This report aimed at describing the use of hydrocortisone to treat and prevent post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). CASE REPORTS Three cases in which hydrocortisone was used to treat and prevent post-dural puncture headache are reported. The first is an obstetric patient submitted to Cesarean section with postoperative headache not responding to conventional medication and epidural blood patch (EBP), however with total remission after intravenous hydrocortisone. The other two patients, who suffered accidental dural perforation during attempted epidural space location, were preventively treated with intravenous hydrocortisone and have not developed headache. CONCLUSIONS In our cases, hydrocortisone was effective to treat PDPH after failed conservative measures and EBP. Hydrocortisone for accidental dural perforation patients may be useful since it is a noninvasive technique and the incidence of PDPH in this group of patients is high. Controlled studies are needed to determine the actual role of hydrocortisone in preventing and treating PDPH.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2005
José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves; Vinícius La Rocca Vieira; Rodrigo Machado Saldanha; Francisco de Assis Duarte Vieira; Michele Coutinho Neto; Marcos Gonçalves Magalhães; Mariana Moraes Pereira das Neves; Fernando Paiva Araújo
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A cefaleia pos-puncao da dura-mater e a complicacao mais frequente apos a raquianestesia ou a sua perfuracao acidental durante tentativa de bloqueio peridural. O objetivo deste relato e descrever o uso da hidrocortisona no tratamento e na prevencao da cefaleia pos-puncao da dura-mater (CPPD). RELATO DOS CASOS: Sao relatados tres casos em que a hidrocortisona foi utilizada no tratamento e na prevencao da cefaleia pos-puncao da dura-mater. O primeiro foi de uma paciente obstetrica submetida a cesariana, que apresentou cefaleia no pos-operatorio, nao responsiva a medicacao convencional e ao tratamento com tampao sanguineo peridural (TSP), mas que apresentou remissao completa do quadro com hidrocortisona por via venosa. Outras duas pacientes, em quem ocorreu perfuracao acidental da dura-mater durante a tentativa de localizacao do espaco peridural e que tratadas com hidrocortisona, por via venosa, com fins preventivos, nao desenvolveram quadro de cefaleia. CONCLUSOES: Nos casos observados a hidrocortisona mostrou eficacia no tratamento da CPPD apos falha das medidas conservadoras e do TSP. A utilizacao da hidrocortisona em pacientes com perfuracao acidental da dura-mater pode ser util, pois nao e tecnica invasiva e a incidencia e a gravidade das CPPD nesse grupo de pacientes e elevada. Sao necessarios estudos controlados para estabelecer o real papel da hidrocortisona na prevencao e tratamento da CPPD.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Post-dural puncture headache is the most frequent complication after spinal anesthesia or accidental dural perforation during attempted epidural block. This report aimed at describing the use of hydrocortisone to treat and prevent post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). CASE REPORTS Three cases in which hydrocortisone was used to treat and prevent post-dural puncture headache are reported. The first is an obstetric patient submitted to Cesarean section with postoperative headache not responding to conventional medication and epidural blood patch (EBP), however with total remission after intravenous hydrocortisone. The other two patients, who suffered accidental dural perforation during attempted epidural space location, were preventively treated with intravenous hydrocortisone and have not developed headache. CONCLUSIONS In our cases, hydrocortisone was effective to treat PDPH after failed conservative measures and EBP. Hydrocortisone for accidental dural perforation patients may be useful since it is a noninvasive technique and the incidence of PDPH in this group of patients is high. Controlled studies are needed to determine the actual role of hydrocortisone in preventing and treating PDPH.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2010
Marco Antonio Cardoso de Resende; Osvaldo J. M. Nascimento; Anna Amélia Silva Rios; Giseli Quintanilha; Luís Eduardo Sacristan Ceballos; Fernando Paiva Araújo
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Ha poucos textos na literatura a lidar com o exame neurologico do paciente com dor neuropatica (DN). O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o perfil de pacientes com DN atraves de exame clinico neurologico. METODO: Em estudo observacional, uma serie de casos de pacientes com DN foi acompanhada no periodo de um ano. A avaliacao do exame neurologico foi efetuada durante visita ao ambulatorio e atraves de analise prospectiva. Foram incluidos pacientes cuja intensidade da dor era igual ou maior que seis, segundo a Escala Analogica Visual. RESULTADOS: A dor em queimacao predominou como descritor em 54,5% dos pacientes. A polineuropatia foi o padrao clinico-topografico predominante (48%) com padrao distal e simetrico, em oposicao a quadros de neuropatia multifocal (15,15%). As modalidades termoalgesica e tatil do exame de sensibilidade foram as mais comprometidas, logo acompanhadas por alteracoes motoras e reflexos profundos, enquanto modalidades de sensibilidade proprioceptiva vieram a seguir. Apesar de nenhum sinal ou sintoma ser especifico de DN, a queimacao como sintoma costuma ser atribuida ao acometimento de fibras finas, assim como o padrao tipico destas e a alteracao termico-dolorosa. CONCLUSOES: A historia e os achados do exame fisico sao a chave para o diagnostico de DN. O registro das alteracoes encontradas ao exame deve ressaltar o comprometimento observado e assim nortear a abordagem diagnostica e terapeutica, se curativa ou paliativa.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2005
Rodrigo Machado Saldanha; Juliano Rodrigues Gasparini; Letícia Sales Silva; Roberto Rigueti de Carli; Victor Ugo Dorigo de Castilhos; Mariana Moraes Pereira das Neves; Fernando Paiva Araújo; Paulo César de Abreu Sales; José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Este estudo objetiva relatar dois casos de anestesia em pacientes portadores de Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne (DMD), uma doenca rara, progressiva e incapacitante, e discutir sobre a conduta anestesica. O comprometimento das funcoes pulmonar e cardiaca, a possibilidade de ocorrencia de hipertermia maligna, a maior sensibilidade aos bloqueadores neuromusculares e o aumento da morbidade pos-operatoria sao alguns dos desafios enfrentados pelo anestesiologista. RELATO DOS CASOS: O primeiro caso foi o de um paciente pediatrico com diagnostico de DMD e rabdomiossarcoma, agendado para exerese da lesao e esvaziamento cervical ampliado. Na avaliacao pre-anestesica (anamnese, exame clinico e exames complementares) nao foram detectadas alteracoes, exceto pela tumoracao cervical. Optou-se pela tecnica venosa total, com remifentanil em infusao continua e propofol em infusao alvo-controlada, sem a utilizacao de bloqueadores neuromusculares. O procedimento cirurgico teve duracao de 180 minutos, sem intercorrencias. O segundo caso foi de um paciente do sexo masculino, 24 anos, com diagnostico de DMD e colelitiase com indicacao cirurgica, cuja avaliacao pre-operatoria revelou pneumopatia restritiva grave, com diminuicoes da capacidade e da reserva respiratorias, sendo necessario o uso de BIPAP nasal noturno. Neste paciente, optou-se pela intubacao traqueal com sedacao minima e anestesia topica, seguida pela tecnica venosa total com remifentanil em infusao continua e propofol em infusao alvo-controlada, sem a utilizacao de bloqueadores neuromusculares. Ao termino, o paciente foi extubado ainda na sala de operacoes e imediatamente colocado no BIPAP nasal. Encaminhado a UTI, com alta no 2o PO e alta hospitalar no 3o PO. CONCLUSOES: A anestesia venosa total com infusao continua de propofol e remifentanil sem bloqueadores neuromusculares constitui-se em opcao segura e eficiente nos portadores de DMD.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Reporting two cases of anesthesia in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patients, which is an uncommon, progressive and disabling disease, and discussing anesthetic approaches, impairment of pulmonary and cardiac functions, the possibility of malignant hyperthermia, increased sensitivity to neuromuscular blockers and increased postoperative morbidity are some challenges faced by anesthesiologists. CASE REPORTS First case was a pediatric patient with DMD and rhabdomyosarcoma, scheduled for tumor excision and cervical emptying. During preanesthetic evaluation, history, clinical and additional exams, no changes were detected except for the cervical tumor. We decided for total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil administered by continuous infusion and propofol by target-controlled infusion without neuromuscular blockers. Surgery lasted 180 minutes without intercurrences. The second case was a male patient, 24 years old, with DMD and cholelithiasis with surgical indication who, during preoperative evaluation, has revealed severe restrictive pneumopathy with decreased capacity and respiratory reserves and the need for nasal BIPAP at night. For this patient we decided for tracheal intubation with minimum sedation and topic anesthesia, followed by total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil administered by continuous infusion and propofol by target-controlled infusion without neuromuscular blockers. At the end, patient was extubated still in to operating room and nasal BIPAP was immediately placed, being patient referred to the ICU. Patient was discharged from ICU in the 2nd PO day and from hospital in the 3rd PO day. CONCLUSIONS Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil administered by continuous infusion without neuromuscular blockers is a safe and effective option for DMD patients.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2005
Rodrigo Machado Saldanha; Juliano Rodrigues Gasparini; Letícia Sales Silva; Roberto Rigueti de Carli; Victor Ugo Dorigo de Castilhos; Mariana Moraes Pereira das Neves; Fernando Paiva Araújo; Paulo César de Abreu Sales; José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Este estudo objetiva relatar dois casos de anestesia em pacientes portadores de Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne (DMD), uma doenca rara, progressiva e incapacitante, e discutir sobre a conduta anestesica. O comprometimento das funcoes pulmonar e cardiaca, a possibilidade de ocorrencia de hipertermia maligna, a maior sensibilidade aos bloqueadores neuromusculares e o aumento da morbidade pos-operatoria sao alguns dos desafios enfrentados pelo anestesiologista. RELATO DOS CASOS: O primeiro caso foi o de um paciente pediatrico com diagnostico de DMD e rabdomiossarcoma, agendado para exerese da lesao e esvaziamento cervical ampliado. Na avaliacao pre-anestesica (anamnese, exame clinico e exames complementares) nao foram detectadas alteracoes, exceto pela tumoracao cervical. Optou-se pela tecnica venosa total, com remifentanil em infusao continua e propofol em infusao alvo-controlada, sem a utilizacao de bloqueadores neuromusculares. O procedimento cirurgico teve duracao de 180 minutos, sem intercorrencias. O segundo caso foi de um paciente do sexo masculino, 24 anos, com diagnostico de DMD e colelitiase com indicacao cirurgica, cuja avaliacao pre-operatoria revelou pneumopatia restritiva grave, com diminuicoes da capacidade e da reserva respiratorias, sendo necessario o uso de BIPAP nasal noturno. Neste paciente, optou-se pela intubacao traqueal com sedacao minima e anestesia topica, seguida pela tecnica venosa total com remifentanil em infusao continua e propofol em infusao alvo-controlada, sem a utilizacao de bloqueadores neuromusculares. Ao termino, o paciente foi extubado ainda na sala de operacoes e imediatamente colocado no BIPAP nasal. Encaminhado a UTI, com alta no 2o PO e alta hospitalar no 3o PO. CONCLUSOES: A anestesia venosa total com infusao continua de propofol e remifentanil sem bloqueadores neuromusculares constitui-se em opcao segura e eficiente nos portadores de DMD.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Reporting two cases of anesthesia in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patients, which is an uncommon, progressive and disabling disease, and discussing anesthetic approaches, impairment of pulmonary and cardiac functions, the possibility of malignant hyperthermia, increased sensitivity to neuromuscular blockers and increased postoperative morbidity are some challenges faced by anesthesiologists. CASE REPORTS First case was a pediatric patient with DMD and rhabdomyosarcoma, scheduled for tumor excision and cervical emptying. During preanesthetic evaluation, history, clinical and additional exams, no changes were detected except for the cervical tumor. We decided for total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil administered by continuous infusion and propofol by target-controlled infusion without neuromuscular blockers. Surgery lasted 180 minutes without intercurrences. The second case was a male patient, 24 years old, with DMD and cholelithiasis with surgical indication who, during preoperative evaluation, has revealed severe restrictive pneumopathy with decreased capacity and respiratory reserves and the need for nasal BIPAP at night. For this patient we decided for tracheal intubation with minimum sedation and topic anesthesia, followed by total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil administered by continuous infusion and propofol by target-controlled infusion without neuromuscular blockers. At the end, patient was extubated still in to operating room and nasal BIPAP was immediately placed, being patient referred to the ICU. Patient was discharged from ICU in the 2nd PO day and from hospital in the 3rd PO day. CONCLUSIONS Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil administered by continuous infusion without neuromuscular blockers is a safe and effective option for DMD patients.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2006
José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves; Giovani Alves Monteiro; João Rosa de Almeida; Roberto Silva Sant'Anna; Rodrigo Machado Saldanha; José Mariano Soares de Moraes; Emerson Salim Nogueira; Fernando Lima Coutinho; Mariana Moraes Pereira das Neves; Fernando Paiva Araújo; Paula Brazilio Nóbrega
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O mecanismo de acao analgesica a2-adrenergico tem sido explorado ha mais de 100 anos. A clonidina aumenta de maneira dose-dependente a duracao dos bloqueios sensitivo e motor e tem propriedades antinociceptivas. O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar se a adicao de clonidina na dose de 15 e 30 µg a raquianestesia, para cesariana, com bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg) e morfina (100 µg), melhora a qualidade da analgesia pos-operatoria. METODO: Foi realizado um estudo prospectivo e aleatorio com 60 pacientes divididas em tres grupos: BM - bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg) e morfina (100 µg), BM15 - bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg), morfina (100 µg) e clonidina (15 µg) e BM30 - bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg), morfina (100 µg) e clonidina (30 µg), administradas separadamente. No peri-operatorio, foram anotados o consumo de efedrina e a avaliacao do recem-nascido pelo indice de Apgar. No pos-operatorio, a dor foi avaliada na 12a h pela Escala Analogica Visual, o tempo para solicitacao de analgesicos e efeitos colaterais pos-operatorios, como prurido, nauseas, vomitos, bradicardia, hipotensao arterial e sedacao. Os valores foram considerados significativos quando p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Os grupos foram homogeneos. O consumo de efedrina e a avaliacao pelo indice de Apgar nao exibiram diferenca estatistica significativa entre os grupos. Os escores de dor e o tempo medio de analgesia mostraram diferenca entre os grupos BM e BM15/BM30 e nao houve diferenca com relacao a incidencia de efeitos colaterais pos-operatorios. CONCLUSOES: A adicao de clonidina na raquianestesia com bupivacaina hiperbarica a 0,5% (12,5 mg) e morfina (100 µg) para cesariana, melhorou a qualidade da analgesia pos-operatoria, sem aumentar a incidencia de efeitos colaterais, sendo 15 µg de clonidina a dose sugerida.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The mechanism of action of alpha2-adrenergic analgesia has been explored for more than one hundred years. The increased duration of the sensitive and motor blockades caused by clonidine is dose-dependent and has antinociceptive properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of 15 to 30 microg of clonidine to spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) and morphine (100 microg) improves the quality of postoperative analgesia. METHODS We realized a prospective, randomized study that included 60 patients divided in 3 groups: BM - 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) and morphine (100 microg), BM15 - 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg), morphine (100 microg), and clonidine (15 mg), and BM30 - 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg), morphine (100 microg), and clonidine (30 microg), administered separately. In the perioperative period the use of ephedrine and the newborns Apgar score were recorded. In the postoperative period, the pain was evaluated in the 12th h by the VAS, the length of time it took the patient to ask for analgesics, and the postoperative side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation. The values were considered significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS The groups were homogenous. The use of ephedrine and the evaluation by the Apgar score did not show statistically significant differences among the different groups. The pain scores and the average time to start analgesia showed differences among the groups BM and BM15/BM30, and there were no differences regarding the incidence of postoperative side effects. CONCLUSIONS The addition of clonidine to spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (12.5 mg) and morphine (100 microg) for cesarean section improved the quality of the postoperative analgesia without increasing the incidence of side effects. We suggest that the dose of 15 microg of clonidine should be used.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2016
José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves; Mariana Moraes Pereira das Neves Araújo; Fernando Paiva Araújo; Clarice Martins Ferreira; Fabiana Baeta Neves Duarte; Fábio Heleno de Lima Pace; Laura Cotta Ornellas; Todd H. Baron; Lincoln Eduardo Villela Vieira de Castro Ferreira
Colonoscopy is one of the most common procedures. Sedation and analgesia decrease anxiety and discomfort and minimize risks. Therefore, patients prefer to be sedated when undergoing examination, although the best combination of drugs has not been determined. The combination of opioids and benzodiazepines is used to relieve the patients pain and discomfort. More recently, propofol has assumed a prominent position. This randomized prospective study is unique in medical literature that specifically compared the use of propofol and fentanyl with or without midazolam for colonoscopy sedation performed by anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the side effects of sedation, discharge conditions, quality of sedation, and propofol consumption during colonoscopy, with or without midazolam as preanesthetic. The study involved 140 patients who underwent colonoscopy at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I received intravenous midazolam as preanesthetic 5min before sedation, followed by fentanyl and propofol; Group II received intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol. Patients in Group II had a higher incidence of reaction (motor or verbal) to the colonoscope introduction, bradycardia, hypotension, and increased propofol consumption. Patient satisfaction was higher in Group I. According to the methodology used, the combination of midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol for colonoscopy sedation reduces propofol consumption and provides greater patient satisfaction.
Revista Brasileira De Anestesiologia | 2010
Marco Antonio Cardoso de Resende; Osvaldo J. M. Nascimento; Anna Amélia Silva Rios; Giseli Quintanilha; Luís Eduardo Sacristan Ceballos; Fernando Paiva Araújo
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Very few texts in the literature approach the neurologic exam of patients with neuropathic pain (NP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the profile of patients with NP through the neurological exam. METHODS This is an observational study that followed-up patients with NP for one year. The neurologic exam was evaluated at the outpatient clinic and through prospective analysis. Patients whose pain severity was equal or greater than six on the Visual Analogue Scale were included in this study. RESULTS Burning pain predominated, affecting 54.5% of the patients. Unlike multifocal neuropathy (15.15%), distal and symmetrical polyneuropathy was the predominant clinical-topographic pattern (48%). The thermoalgic and tactile modalities of the sensorial exam were affected the most, followed by changes in motor function and deep tendon reflexes, and proprioception. Although NP does not have specific signs and symptoms, burning pain is attributed to the involvement of thin nerve fibers and thermoalgic pain is typical of those changes. CONCLUSIONS History and physical exam findings are key factors in the diagnosis of NP. The log of changes in the physical exam should emphasize the involvement observed, guiding the diagnostic and therapeutic approach, curative or palliative.
Case reports in anesthesiology | 2017
Alberto Vieira Pantoja; Maria Emília Gonçalves Estevez; Bruno Lima Pessoa; Fernando Paiva Araújo; Bruno Mendonça Barcellos; Ciro Augusto Floriani; Marco Antonio Cardoso de Resende
Reports focusing on biomedical principlism and the role of anaesthesiologists in palliative care are rare. We present the case of a newborn with multiple craniofacial anomalies and a diagnosis of ADAM “sequence,” in which surgical removal of placental adhesions to the dura mater and the correction of meningocele was not indicated due to the very short life expectancy. After 48 hours, the odor from the placenta indicted a necrotic process, which prevented the parents from being close to the child and increased his isolation. Urgent surgery was performed, after which the newborn was transported to the ICU and intubated under controlled mechanical ventilation. The patient died a week later. The principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and respect for autonomy are simultaneously an inspiratory and regulatory framework for clinical practice. Although only necessary procedures are defended, which suggests a position contrary to invasive interventions at the end of life, sometimes they are the best palliative measures that can be taken in cases like the one described here.
Collaboration
Dive into the Fernando Paiva Araújo's collaboration.
José Francisco Nunes Pereira das Neves
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
View shared research outputs