Fernando Valle-Inclán

Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task

When an irrelevant ‘accessory’ stimulus is presented at about the same time as the imperative signal in a choice reaction time-task, the latency of the voluntary response is markedly reduced. The most prominent cognitive theories agree that this effect is attributable to a brief surge in arousal (‘automatic alerting’), but they disagree over whether the facilitation is localized to a late, low-level motoric process or to an earlier stage, the process of orienting to and then perceptually categorizing the reaction stimulus,. To test these alternative hypotheses, we used the onset of the lateralized readiness potential (a movement-related brain potential) as a temporal landmark to partition mean reaction time into two time segments. The first segment included the time required to perceive the visual stimulus and decide which hand to react with; the second included only motoric processes. Presentation of an irrelevant acoustic stimulus shortened the first interval but had no effect on the second. We therefore rejected the motoric hypothesis.

Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal

This article reviews psychophysiological and behavioral studies that attempt to identify which stages of processing are speeded by a neutral warning signal (WS), that is to say, one that conveys no information about the nature of the imperative stimulus or the required response. Experiments involving the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) provide evidence against the widely held view that warning effects on reaction time (RT) are due to facilitation of low-level motor processes. Studies of modality-specific evoked potentials similarly rule out a locus within sensory-perceptual processing. It is concluded that the speeding of RT by a neutral WS is most likely due to nonspecific motor priming within an early phase of response selection. In addition, fast-guess responses, in which subjects choose a response without fully analyzing the stimulus, are assumed to contribute to warning effects.

On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect.

The effects on performance of unattended stimulus-response spatial relationships in choice reaction time tasks (i.e., the Simon effect) have been attributed to automatic activation of the response ipsilateral to stimulus location. We tested this assumption using the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). The response key labels changed randomly from trial to trial and were presented either 400 ms before (immediate-reaction trials) or 400 ms after (delayed-reaction trials) stimulus. The critical test for the automatic activation hypothesis was on delayed-reaction trials, in which LRP deflections were expected in the interval between stimulus and response-key labels. Contrary to this prediction, there were no LRP signs of response activation within that interval.

Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information

Given that Parkinsons disease broadly affects frontostriatal circuitry, it is not surprising that the disorder is associated with a reduction of working memory. We tested whether this reduction is due to diminished storage capacity or impaired ability to exclude task-irrelevant items. Twenty-one medication-withdrawn patients and 28 age-matched control subjects performed a visuospatial memory task while their electroencephalograms were recorded. The task required them to remember the orientations of red rectangles within the half of the screen that was cued while ignoring all green rectangles. Behavioural and electroencephalogram measures indicated that patients with Parkinsons disease were impaired at filtering out distracters, and that they were able to hold fewer items in memory than control subjects. The results support recent suggestions that the basal ganglia help control access to working memory.

Accessory Stimulus Effects on Response Selection: Does Arousal Speed Decision Making?

When an intense but task-irrelevant accessory stimulus accompanies the imperative stimulus in a choice reaction task, reaction times (RTs) are facilitated. In a similar previous study (Hackley & Valle-Incln, 1998), we showed that this effect is not due to a reduction of the interval from onset of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) until movement onset. In the present study, the RT task was modified to move a portion of the response selection stage into this time interval. The interval remained invariant, indicating that this late phase of the response selection process is not speeded by accessory stimulation. However, we observed amplitude modulation of the LRP on no-go trials in a condition with three alternative responses. This finding suggests that an earlier phase of response selection is influenced by accessory stimulation. In addition, a novel dependent measure was introduced to event-related potential researchthe latency of spontaneous, posttrial blinking.

Psychophysiological evidence for impaired reward anticipation in Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE According to a widely held view, mesencephalic dopamine neurons mediate feedback-based learning by broadcasting an error signal that indexes the difference between anticipated and actual response-contingent reward. The present experiment tested whether impaired learning of a probabilistic classification task by individuals with Parkinsons disease (PD) is associated with abnormal reward expectation. METHODS The stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), a brain potential known to reflect anticipation of motivationally significant events, was compared for blocks in which subjects anticipated high or low monetary rewards and punishments. RESULTS The SPN was reduced in amplitude in patients relative to controls in the high monetary incentive condition. Furthermore, whereas the SPN varied in size as a function of cue complexity for control subjects, it did not for patients. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that anticipatory processes within cortical portions of the reward system are impaired by PD. SIGNIFICANCE These data support previous claims that the SPN offers an electrophysiological index of activity within cortical portions of the reward pathway, and that reinforcement-based learning is impaired in PD.

Reciprocal modulation of eye-blink and pinna-flexion components of startle during reward anticipation.

Because expectancies play a central role in current theories of dopaminergic neuron function, it is important to develop measures of reward anticipation processes. In the present study, reflexogenic bursts of white noise were presented to 39 healthy young adults as they awaited rewards and punishments in a gambling-like task. The rewards were small pieces of chocolate; the punishments, segments of bitter-tasting banana peel. Consistent with prior research on affective valence, postauricular reflexes were larger prior to rewards than punishments, whereas the reverse was true for acoustic blink reflexes. We theorized that potentiation of the postauricular reflex prior to consuming appetizing food is related to the priming of ear-retraction musculature during nursing in our remote ancestors.

Modulation of eyeblink and postauricular reflexes during the anticipation and viewing of food images

One of the goals of neuroscience research on the reward system is to fractionate its functions into meaningful subcomponents. To this end, the present study examined emotional modulation of the eyeblink and postauricular components of startle in 60 young adults during anticipation and viewing of food images. Appetitive and disgusting photos served as rewards and punishments in a guessing game. Reflexes evoked during anticipation were not influenced by valence, consistent with the prevailing view that startle modulation indexes hedonic impact (liking) rather than incentive salience (wanting). During the slide-viewing period, postauricular reflexes were larger for correct than incorrect feedback, whereas the reverse was true for blink reflexes. Probes were delivered in brief trains, but only the first response exhibited this pattern. The specificity of affective startle modification makes it a valuable tool for studying the reward system.

The nursing hypothesis: an evolutionary account of emotional modulation of the postauricular reflex.

The postauricular reflex (PAR) is anomalous because it seems to be potentiated during positive emotions and inhibited during negative states, unlike eyeblink and other components of the startle reflex. Two evolutionary explanations based on simian facial emotion expressions were tested. Reflexes were elicited while 47 young adult volunteers made lip pursing or grimacing poses and viewed neutral, intimidating, or appetitive photos. The PAR was enhanced during appetitive slides, but only as subjects carried out the lip-pursing maneuver. These results support the nursing hypothesis, which assumes that infant mammals instinctively retract their pinnae while nursing in order to comfortably position the head. Appetitive emotions prime the ear-retraction musculature, even in higher primates whose postauricular muscles are vestigial.

Compatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location

Responses to stimuli are faster when the stimulus location spatially corresponds to the required response (standard Simon effect). Recently, a similar effect has been observed with monocular stimuli. Responses were faster when the response location and the stimulated eye corresponded (monocular Simon effect). It has been suggested that distinct mechanisms may underlie these two Simon effects. Here, we attempted to study these two mechanisms simultaneously. For mean reaction time, a finding of perfect additivity was obtained. These behavioral data coupled with surface electrophysiological measures support the view that two different mechanisms contribute independently to the monocular and standard Simon effect.