Fernet Leandre

Community-based approaches to HIV treatment in resource-poor settings

Last year, HIV surpassed other pathogens to become the world’s leading infectious cause of adult death. More than 90% of deaths occur in poor countries, yet new antiretroviral therapies have only led to a drop in AIDS deaths in industrialised countries. The main objections to the use of these agents in less-developed countries have been their high cost and the lack of health infrastructure necessary to use them. We have shown that it is possible to carry out an HIV treatment programme in a poor community in rural Haiti, the poorest country in the western hemisphere. Relying on an already existing tuberculosis-control infrastructure, we have been able to provide directly observed therapy with highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to about 60 patients with advanced HIV disease. Inclusion criteria and clinical follow-up were based on basic laboratory data available in most rural clinics. Serious side-effects have been rare and readily managed by community-health workers and clinic staff. We discuss objections to the widespread use of HAART, and suggest that directly-observed therapy of chronic infectious disease with multidrug regimens can be highly effective in settings of great privation as long as there is sustained commitment to uninterrupted care that is free to the patient. Why AIDS prevention alone is insufficient The dimensions of the global HIV crisis are such that predictions termed alarmist a decade ago are now revealed as sober projections. 1

Scaling-up HIV treatment programmes in resource-limited settings: the rural Haiti experience.

Objective: To scale-up a successful HIV/AIDS treatment project and provide comprehensive care to an entire Département du Centre (population 550 000) in rural Haiti, thereby demonstrating that community-based treatment of HIV is feasible and highly effective in resource-limited settings, and serving as a successful model for others to replicate. Participants: In the Département du Centre of rural Haiti comprehensive HIV and tuberculosis treatment is provided free of charge to anyone who presents for care. All those who meet clinical enrolment criteria are treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Intervention: HAART was provided in the context of a comprehensive programme of HIV, tuberculosis (TB), sexually transmitted disease (STD) of the project, treatment and prevention, and womens health services at four sites in the first year. At each site, the medical facility was renovated, additional staff were hired as needed, and a network of accompagnateurs (community health workers) was established throughout the surrounding villages to serve as a link with the community, and to provide directly observed treatment (DOT). Results: In the first year of programme scale-up, over 8000 patients were followed for HIV, and over 1050 were treated with DOT HAART. Adherence to HAART was very high, and clinical outcomes were excellent: all patients responded with weight gain and improved functional capacity, and fewer than 5% required medication changes due to side effects. Viral load was tested among a subset of patients showing that 86% had undetectable viral loads. Conclusion: Community-based care of AIDS has been highly effective in rural Haiti. With more international financial support for HIV/AIDS treatment in resource-limited settings, there should be no barriers to access to life-saving HAART for those who need it most.

An information system and medical record to support HIV treatment in rural Haiti.

Lack of infrastructure, including information and communication systems, is considered a barrier to successful HIV treatment programmes in resource poor areas. The authors describe how they set up a web based medical record system linking remote areas in rural Haiti and how it is used to track clinical outcomes, laboratory tests, and drug supplies and to create reports for funding agencies

Meeting cholera's challenge to Haiti and the world: a joint statement on cholera prevention and care.

Cholera in Haiti: Acute-on-Chronic Long before the devastating earthquake on January 12, 2010, Haiti struggled beneath the burdens of intractable poverty and ill health. The poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, Haiti also faces some of the highest rates of maternal and infant mortality—widely used indicators of the robustness of a health system—in the world ([S1] in Text S1; [2], [3]). The October 2010 cholera outbreak is the most recent of a long series of affronts to the health of Haitis population; it is yet another acute symptom of the chronic weakness of Haitis health, water, and sanitation systems. Water and sanitation conditions highlight these systemic weaknesses. In 2002, Haiti ranked last out of 147 countries for water security [4], [5]. Before the earthquake struck, only half of the population in the capital, Port-au-Prince, had access to latrines or other forms of modern sanitation, and roughly one-third had no access to tap water [6]. Across the country, access to sanitation and clean water is even more limited: only 17% of Haitians had access to adequate sanitation in 2008, and 12% received treated water [7]. Not surprisingly, diarrheal diseases have long been a significant cause of death and disability, especially among children under 5 years of age [6]. The cholera outbreak began less than a year after a 7.0-magnitude earthquake took the lives of more than 300,000 people and left nearly 1.5 million homeless [6]. Almost 1 million Haitians still live in spontaneous settlements known as internally displaced persons (IDP) camps [8]. While post-earthquake conditions in Haiti were ripe for outbreaks of acute diarrheal illness, cholera was deemed “very unlikely to occur” by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other public health authorities [9]. Cholera had never before been reported in Haiti [S2] [10], [11]; health providers were unprepared for an influx of patients presenting with acute watery diarrhea. The cholera epidemic has been most severe in rural areas and large urban slums. Rural communities were charged with hosting hundreds of thousands of displaced people after the earthquake, placing greater demands on their already-scarce resources, including water. Surface water drawn directly from the source or piped from rivers and streams constitutes the principal supply of drinking water in rural Haiti. The lack of adequate piping, filtration, and water treatment systems (including chlorination) made these rural regions vulnerable to the rapid spread of waterborne disease. While most IDP camps have been supplied with potable water, large urban slums have had to rely on existing water sources—some of them containing Vibrio cholerae—and have therefore been vulnerable to rapid disease spread. Most slums also have poor sanitation infrastructure. Since the first cases were reported in Saint-Marc and Mirebalais, cholera has spread to every department in Haiti, and to other countries, too [S3] [12]–[14]. Public suspicion (ultimately validated by genomic sequence analyses [15]) of the strains link to South Asia, home to a group of United Nations peacekeepers stationed in central Haiti, triggered blame and violence that interfered with response efforts. As we have learned from the global AIDS pandemic and other infectious disease epidemics, cycles of accusation can continue for years, diverting attention and resources from the delivery of care and prevention services [16]. Systemic problems that brought cholera to epidemic levels in Haiti will (unless addressed) continue to facilitate its spread. As a disease of poverty, cholera preys upon the bottom of the social gradient; international trade, migration, and travel—from South Asia or elsewhere—open direct channels for pathogens that follow social fault lines.

Five complementary interventions to slow cholera: Haiti

This year, Haiti might have marked World AIDS Day on Dec 1 with some degree of celebration: as chroniclers of the pandemic have noted, Haiti helped lead the way towards an integrated AIDS prevention and care model that was adopted in many resource-poor settings when funding from new mechanisms became available. The size of Haiti’s AIDS epidemic has been halved over the past 15 years; AIDS-related stigma was reduced when treatment became available; and, in some settings, a signifi cant fraction of HIV funding was steered into strengthening regional and local health systems. In public health jargon, vertical AIDS funding has been used for more horizontal integrated eff orts to support and improve a weak health system. Why, then, did the fi rst cases of the cholera epidemic, now claiming lives by the thousands, appear in a region to which a substantial fraction of this funding for HIV programmes was applied? One answer concerns the mechanism through which a pathogen with no known non-human host was introduced to an island long spared cholera. Speculations on this topic have caused social and political friction within Haiti in recent weeks because a strain endemic in south Asia, an El Tor biotype of Vibrio cholerae serogroup 01, is the culprit strain of the outbreak—and UN peacekeepers from that region are stationed in central Haiti, where the outbreak started. If AIDS and previous pandemics off er lessons, cycles of accusation will continue for years without helping to slow the cholera epidemic. A second answer to the question lies in insuffi cient attention to the stressed rural communities hosting hundreds of thousands of displaced persons after January’s earthquake. Although cholera was considered “extremely unlikely to occur” in Haiti, an outbreak of acute watery diarrhoea was anticipated. Not expected, however, was an outbreak erupting rapidly in a rural area, far from any camp for internally displaced persons. Focusing post-disaster support not just on areas directly aff ected by the earthquake but also on host communities throughout the country would have been a wise investment of aid money. A third answer is less fraught: very little of the money aimed at implementing HIV programmes went into protecting the water supply. That said, in the regions where Partners In Health and its Haitian sister organisation have worked on AIDS, malnutrition, and health-systems strengthening, few of the thousands of AIDS patients on therapy, children in malnutrition programmes, or patients in other vertical programmes have fallen ill with cholera. A little bit of medical care can go a long way. But it cannot go far enough when water security is concerned: although some groups, including our own, continued to put resources into small water projects, no non-governmental organisation should or could replace robust public water supplies. So we joined others to push for largescale water projects across the country. This eff ort failed. Between 2000 and 2004, the USA (and other governments) slowed the fl ow of aid to the Haitian public sector, choosing to route most aid through non-governmental organisations. Some argued that such punitive policies were the prerogative of the donor countries, but blocking access to credit from the region’s largest development bank, a funder of public works throughout Latin America, should not have been the prerogative of the USA or any other government. Partners In Health joined forces with two human rights organisations to explore the ways in which Haitians, especially those living in poverty, were denied the right to clean water and primary health care. A lack of investment by all actors (governmental and non-governmental alike) in long-term and safe distribution programmes for water as a public good Published Online December 10, 2010 DOI:10.1016/S01406736(10)62243-X

Monitoring HIV treatment in developing countries.

Laboratory monitoring of antiretroviral therapy helps limit resistance but is currently not feasible in developing countries. Alternative short term approaches are needed

South-South collaboration in scale up of HIV care: building human capacity for care

Objectives:South–south collaborations in building human resource capacity have been inadequately emphasized globally despite the growing experience among resource-poor countries in scaling up HIV care and the funding to implement programmes. This paper aims to describe one such successful collaboration, in which a model of HIV care was developed in Haiti, adapted and expanded to Lesotho, and allowed the effective scale-up of HIV and other treatment services in a rural African setting. Methods:Institutional experiences and lessons learned over a 10-year period in Haiti and a 3-year period in Lesotho are discussed. Results:The Haiti–Lesotho collaborative model shows that human resource capacity can be built using creative partnerships and exchanges between developing countries, particularly with financial support from the north. The collaboration allows for the sharing of experiences and solutions through perspectives and experiences that are unique to developing countries. Healthcare workers in Haiti and Lesotho have established meaningful and fruitful cross-country working relationships, job satisfaction and retention has been improved and a sense of solidarity developed. The model of care developed in Haiti was successfully adapted, replicated and implemented in Lesotho. Conclusion:South–south collaborations are an important way for countries with established experience managing HIV in resource-poor settings to share their skills in a collaborative fashion with other nations facing similar disease problems and infrastructural challenges. This model for scaling up effective practice should be encouraged and supported by programme funders.

Factors impacting the provision of antiretroviral therapy to people living with HIV: the view from Haiti.

Haiti is the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere and has the highest number of people living with HIV in the Caribbean, the region most impacted by HIV outside of Africa. Despite continuous political, socioeconomic and natural catastrophes, Haiti has mounted a very successful response to the HIV epidemic. Prevention and treatment strategies implemented by the government in collaboration with non-governmental organizations have been instrumental in decreasing the national HIV prevalence from a high of 6.2% in 1993 to 2.2% in 2012. We describe the history and epidemiology of HIV in Haiti and the expansion of antiretroviral therapy (ART) over the past decade, with the achievement of universal access to ART for patients meeting the 2010 World Health Organization guidelines. We also describe effective models of care, successes and challenges of international funding, and current challenges in the provision of ART. We are optimistic that the goal of providing ART for all in need remains in reach.

Identification of chlamydia and gonorrhoea among women in rural Haiti: maximising access to treatment in a resource poor setting

Objective: To develop a risk assessment algorithm that will increase the identification and treatment of women with cervical infection in rural Haiti. Methods: Study participants were randomly selected from new patients who accessed services at a women’s health clinic in rural Haiti between June 1999 and December 2002. This case-control study included women who tested positive for chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea based on the Gen-Probe PACE 2 laboratory test as cases. Controls were women who tested negative for both of these infections. Results: Women from this area of rural Haiti had a limited level of education and lived in impoverished housing conditions. The sensitivity estimates of Haitian Ministry of Health and WHO algorithms for detecting chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea were generally low (ranging from 16.1% to 68.1%) in this population. Risk scores based on logistic regression models of local risk factors for chlamydia and gonorrhoea were developed and sensitivity estimates were higher for algorithms based on these risk scores (up to 98.8%); however, specificity was compromised. Conclusions: A risk assessment algorithm to identify women with chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea is more sensitive and less specific than the syndromic management approach advocated by WHO and adapted by the Haitian Ministry of Health. Using a risk assessment tool with high sensitivity based on local risk factors of cervical infection will maximise access to care, improve outcomes, and decrease morbidity in women who have cervical infection in rural Haiti.

Descriptive epidemiology and short-term outcomes of heart failure hospitalisation in rural Haiti.

Objective There is increasing attention to cardiovascular diseases in low-income countries. However, little is known about heart failure (HF) in rural areas, where most of the populations in low-income countries live. We studied HF epidemiology, care delivery and outcomes in rural Haiti. Methods Among adults admitted with HF to a rural Haitian tertiary care hospital during a 12-month period (2013–2014), we studied the clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes including length of stay, inhospital death and outpatient follow-up rates. Results HF accounted for 392/1049 (37%) admissions involving 311 individuals; over half (60%) were women. Mean age was 58.8 (SD 16.2) years for men and 48.3 (SD 18.8) years for women; 76 (41%) women were <40 years of age. Median length of stay was 10 days (first and second quartiles 7, 17), and inhospital mortality was 12% (n=37). Ninety nine (36%) of the 274 who survived their primary hospitalisation followed-up at the hospitals outpatient clinic, and 18 (6.6%) were readmitted to the same hospital within 30 days postdischarge. Decreased known follow-up (p<0.01) and readmissions (p=0.03) were associated with increased distance between patient residence and hospital. Among the one-quarter (81) patients with echocardiograms, causes of HF included: non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (64%), right HF (12%), hypertensive heart disease (7%) and rheumatic heart disease (5%). One-half of the women with cardiomyopathy by echocardiogram had peripartum cardiomyopathy. Conclusions HF is a common cause of hospitalisation in rural Haiti. Among diagnosed patients, HF is overwhelming due to non-atherosclerotic heart disease and particularly affects young adults. Implementing effective systems to improve HF diagnosis and linkage to essential outpatient care is needed to reduce long-term morbidity and mortality.