Finn Egil Skjeldestad

Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial

BACKGROUND A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled phase II study was done to assess the efficacy of a prophylactic quadrivalent vaccine targeting the human papillomavirus (HPV) types associated with 70% of cervical cancers (types 16 and 18) and with 90% of genital warts (types 6 and 11). METHODS 277 young women (mean age 20.2 years [SD 1.7]) were randomly assigned to quadrivalent HPV (20 microg type 6, 40 microg type 11, 40 microg type 16, and 20 microg type 18) L1 virus-like-particle (VLP) vaccine and 275 (mean age 20.0 years [1.7]) to one of two placebo preparations at day 1, month 2, and month 6. For 36 months, participants underwent regular gynaecological examinations, cervicovaginal sampling for HPV DNA, testing for serum antibodies to HPV, and Pap testing. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of infection with HPV 6, 11, 16, or 18, or cervical or external genital disease (ie, persistent HPV infection, HPV detection at the last recorded visit, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, cervical cancer, or external genital lesions caused by the HPV types in the vaccine). Main analyses were done per protocol. FINDINGS Combined incidence of persistent infection or disease with HPV 6, 11, 16, or 18 fell by 90% (95% CI 71-97, p<0.0001) in those assigned vaccine compared with those assigned placebo. INTERPRETATION A vaccine targeting HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18 could substantially reduce the acquisition of infection and clinical disease caused by common HPV types.

Risk of venous thromboembolism from use of oral contraceptives containing different progestogens and oestrogen doses: Danish cohort study, 2001-9

Objective To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism from use of combined oral contraceptives according to progestogen type and oestrogen dose. Design National historical registry based cohort study. Setting Four registries in Denmark. Participants Non-pregnant Danish women aged 15-49 with no history of thrombotic disease and followed from January 2001 to December 2009. Main outcome measures Relative and absolute risks of first time venous thromboembolism. Results Within 8 010 290 women years of observation, 4307 first ever venous thromboembolic events were recorded and 4246 included, among which 2847 (67%) events were confirmed as certain. Compared with non-users of hormonal contraception, the relative risk of confirmed venous thromboembolism in users of oral contraceptives containing 30-40 µg ethinylestradiol with levonorgestrel was 2.9 (95% confidence interval 2.2 to 3.8), with desogestrel was 6.6 (5.6 to 7.8), with gestodene was 6.2 (5.6 to 7.0), and with drospirenone was 6.4 (5.4 to 7.5). With users of oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel as reference and after adjusting for length of use, the rate ratio of confirmed venous thromboembolism for users of oral contraceptives with desogestrel was 2.2 (1.7 to 3.0), with gestodene was 2.1 (1.6 to 2.8), and with drospirenone was 2.1 (1.6 to 2.8). The risk of confirmed venous thromboembolism was not increased with use of progestogen only pills or hormone releasing intrauterine devices. If oral contraceptives with desogestrel, gestodene, or drospirenone are anticipated to increase the risk of venous thromboembolism sixfold and those with levonorgestrel threefold, and the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism in current users of the former group is on average 10 per 10 000 women years, then 2000 women would need to shift from using oral contraceptives with desogestrel, gestodene, or drospirenone to those with levonorgestrel to prevent one event of venous thromboembolism in one year. Conclusion After adjustment for length of use, users of oral contraceptives with desogestrel, gestodene, or drospirenone were at least at twice the risk of venous thromboembolism compared with users of oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel.

Ante- and postnatal risk factors of venous thrombosis: a hospital-based case–control study

Summary.  Objective: To study ante‐ and postnatal risk factors of venous thrombosis (VT) in pregnancy. Methods: A hospital‐based case–control study. Cases were women with objectively verified VT during pregnancy or postpartum. Two controls were selected for each case. Validated risk factors were analyzed using chi‐square test and logistic regression. Results: In total 559 cases with no prior VT, 268 ante‐ and 291 postnatal cases were identified together with 1229 controls. Risk factors for antenatal VT were assisted reproduction technique (ART), antepartum immobilization, cigarette smoking, and slight weight gain (<7 kg). Conception after ART and multiple pregnancy had an additive effect, whereas antepartum immobilization and high body mass index (BMI) had a multiplicative effect on the risk for antepartum VT. No other interaction was found between risk factors for antepartum VT. Risk factors for postnatal VT were antepartum immobilization, cigarette smoking, intrauterine fetal growth restriction (IUGR), preeclampsia, emergency cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, infection, surgery, and age and parity. Antepartum immobilization, high BMI and reoperation on the indication of bleeding showed multiplicative effects on the risk of postnatal VT. Conclusions: Ante‐ and postpartum risk factors differed markedly. More attention should be paid to pregnant women of high BMI who are immobilized.

Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the pre-operative diagnosis of pelvic masses

Objective To evaluate the ability of a risk of malignancy index (RMI), based on a serum CA125 level, ultrasound findings and menopausal status, to discriminate a benign from a malignant pelvic mass and to discriminate early stage (Figo Stage I) from Stages II, III and IV of ovarian cancer.

Survival and prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE To assess incidence during a 10-year study period and to identify and discuss clinical relevance for prognostic factors of survival within a cohort of Norwegian ovarian cancer patients. METHODS Incidence and prognostic factors of survival within a population-based cohort of ovarian cancer patients from one health region in Norway were examined over the 10-year period 1987 through 1996. A total of 571 histologically verified cases of primary ovarian cancer originally registered either in the Cancer Registry of Norway or in the hospitals discharge registers were included in the study. Pearson χ2 test was used in univariate analyses of cofactors by 5-year survival, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were computed and tested statistically by the log rank test. A multivariable proportional hazard model (Cox) was applied to assess the prognostic significance of the different covariates. RESULTS The incidence and crude 5-year survival remained stable over the 10-year study period. The standardized incidence rate for the time periods 1987–1991 and 1992–1996 was 11.9/100,000 and 12.5/100,000, respectively. The crude 5-year survival rate for the cohort was 39%, whereas median survival was 32 months. Cox multivariable regression analysis showed that the only independent significant prognostic factors were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (P < .001), size of residual tumor at the end of primary surgery (P < .001), and age at diagnosis (P < .01). Variables such as time period, histologic type and grade, treating hospital, comorbidity, or CA 125 were insignificant in predicting 5-year survival. CONCLUSION The results underline the importance of improved surgical management of ovarian cancer, as residual tumor is the only prognostic factor achievable.

The effect of centralization of primary surgery on survival in ovarian cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of centralized surgery on overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer and, in particular, patients with advanced disease (stage III/IV). METHODS In a historical prospective study design, patients referred from community hospitals to a teaching hospital for primary surgery during the 2-year period, 1995–1997, were included as cases. For each referred case, two controls, matched for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and age, were selected among patients who had had primary surgery at the referral hospitals (nonteaching) in the years, 1992–1995. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were computed and tested statistically by the log rank test. Cox proportional hazard model was applied for estimation of prognostic factors of survival. RESULTS There was no difference in postoperative mortality for stage I/II patients by level of care (community hospitals versus teaching hospital). However, for advanced stage disease (III + IV), the controls had significantly shorter crude survival than patients who had been operated on at the teaching hospital (5-year survival: 4% versus 26%; median survival: 12 months versus 21 months) (P = .01). Multivariable analyses showed that completed chemotherapy and size of residual tumor after primary surgery were independent prognostic factors of survival. Patients optimally operated on at the teaching hospital had significantly lower risk of death compared with all other groups, independently of chemotherapy. This indicates that the extent of cytoreductive surgery and the overall management undertaken in the teaching hospital are significant predictors of improved survival. CONCLUSION Centralization of primary ovarian cancer surgery in one health region in Norway has improved survival for patients with advanced disease. Patients with apparent advanced ovarian cancer should be referred to a subspecialty unit for primary surgery, and every effort should be made to attain as complete cytoreduction as possible.

The risk-of-malignancy index to evaluate potential ovarian cancers in local hospitals.

OBJECTIVE To assess the risk-of-malignancy index (a scoring system based on menopausal status, ultrasound features, and serum CA 125) at district hospitals for referral of women with suspected malignant pelvic masses for primary surgery at a central gynecologic oncology unit. METHODS All seven hospitals in Health Region IV, Norway, agreed to refer women with pelvic masses and risk-of-malignancy indices of 200 or more for centralized primary surgery. In total, 365 women 30 years of age or older, admitted consecutively at the local hospitals, were enrolled in the study from February 1, 1995, to January 31, 1997. RESULTS Compliance with the study was satisfactory; 84% (65 of 77) of women with risk-of-malignancy indices of at least 200 were referred for centralized primary surgery. Sensitivity and specificity to malignancy were 71% and 92%, respectively, which is in agreement with previous validation of the risk-of-malignancy index in teaching hospital settings. False negatives were due mainly to stage Ia (18 of 24) ovarian cancer, whereas 27 of 28 stage II-IV ovarian cancer cases were identified correctly. CONCLUSION The risk-of-malignancy index identified women with malignant pelvic masses efficiently. Our study showed the risk-of-malignancy index strategy in a practical setting to be able to centralize primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer from local hospitals to a subspecialty unit. We recommend the risk-of-malignancy index for detection of patients with advanced ovarian cancer for centralized primary surgery.

Infection after primary hip arthroplasty. A comparison of 3 Norwegian health registers

Background and purpose The aim of the present study was to assess incidence of and risk factors for infection after hip arthroplasty in data from 3 national health registries. We investigated differences in risk patterns between surgical site infection (SSI) and revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). Materials and methods This observational study was based on prospective data from 2005–2009 on primary THAs and HAs from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR), the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR), and the Norwegian Surveillance System for Healthcare–Associated Infections (NOIS). The Norwegian Patient Register (NPR) was used for evaluation of case reporting. Cox regression analyses were performed with revision due to infection as endpoint for data from the NAR and the NHFR, and with SSI as the endpoint for data from the NOIS. Results The 1–year incidence of SSI in the NOIS was 3.0% after THA (167/5,540) and 7.3% after HA (103/1,416). The 1–year incidence of revision due to infection was 0.7% for THAs in the NAR (182/24,512) and 1.5% for HAs in the NHFR (128/8,262). Risk factors for SSI after THA were advanced age, ASA class higher than 2, and short duration of surgery. For THA, the risk factors for revision due to infection were male sex, advanced age, ASA class higher than 1, emergency surgery, uncemented fixation, and a National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) risk index of 2 or more. For HAs inserted after fracture, age less than 60 and short duration of surgery were risk factors of revision due to infection. Interpretation The incidences of SSI and revision due to infection after primary hip replacements in Norway are similar to those in other countries. There may be differences in risk pattern between SSI and revision due to infection after arthroplasty. The risk patterns for revision due to infection appear to be different for HA and THA.

Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study.

Objective To compare the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in two time periods, before and after implementing a training programme for improved perineal support aimed at reducing the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. The secondary aim was to study incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in subgroups defined by risk factors for OASIS. Design Population-based cohort study. Setting University hospital setting in Oslo, Norway. Participants Two cohorts of all delivering women in the largest hospital in Norway during two time periods (2003–2005 and 2008–2010) were studied. After excluding caesarean sections and preterm deliveries (< week 32), the study population consisted of 31 709 deliveries, among which 907 women were identified with obstetric anal sphincter injury. Primary and secondary outcome measures Incidence of OASIS in two time periods. Maternal, obstetrical and foetal risk factors for OASIS were collected from the hospital obstetric database. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses, presenting adjusted ODs for OASIS, were performed. Results The OASIS incidence was significantly reduced by 50%, from 4% (591/14787) in the first time period to 1.9% (316/16 922) in the second. This reduction could not be explained by changes in population characteristics or OASIS risk factors during the study years. The reduction of incidence of OASIS between the two study periods was consistent across subgroups of women; regardless of parity, delivery method and infant birth weight. Conclusions A marked reduction in the incidence of OASIS was observed in all studied subgroups of women after implementing the training programme for perineal protection. Further, this reduction could not be explained by the differences in patient characteristics across the study period. These findings indicate that the training programme with improved perineal protection markedly reduced the risk of OASIS.

The outcome of pregnancy after CO2 laser conisation of the cervix

Objective To investigate the effect of laser conisation of the cervix on the outcome of subsequent pregnancy.