Fioralba Pindozzi

Role of CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundLaparoscopic surgery, despite its well-known advantages and continuous technological innovations, still has limitations such as the lack of tactile sensation and reduced view of the operative field. These limitations are particularly evident when performing laparoscopic colorectal resection due to the variability of the number and course of mesenteric vessels. Today, the patient’s vascular anatomy can be mapped using computed tomography (CT) angiography and processing of the images with rendering software to reconstruct a three-dimensional model of the mesenteric vessels. To assess how prior knowledge of the patient’s mesenteric vascular anatomy represents an advantage when performing laparoscopic colorectal resections, we conducted a randomized, parallel, single-blinded controlled trial.MethodsFrom January 2010 to January 2012, all patients with surgical indication to undergo standardized right or left hemicolectomy and anterior rectal resections were randomly assigned to two groups and subjected to CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels. In the first group the surgeon was able to view the 3D reconstruction before and during surgery, while in the second group the surgeon was only able to view the 3D reconstruction after surgery.ResultsEvaluation of data from 112 patients shows statistically significantly lower operative time, episodes of difficult identification of right anatomy, and incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complication related to difficult or erroneous identification of mesenteric vessels in the group in which the surgeon was able to view the 3D reconstruction before and during surgery compared with the control group.ConclusionThis study shows that prior knowledge of the patient’s mesenteric vascular anatomy represents an advantage when performing laparoscopic colorectal resection. Registration number NCT01540448 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Feasibility and safety study of day-case Transtar™ procedure.

BACKGROUND Short hospitalization surgery is cost effective and convenient for both patients and healthcare system. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) conducted with the new curved device, Contour Transtar, has proved an effective and safe procedure for treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of STARR, performed as a day-case procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective review was performed of all STARR performed as day-case surgery between September 2009 and February 2011. The entire study (intervention, data collection and data analysis) was conducted at the One-day Surgery Unit of the St. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy. All patients with surgical indication to STARR for the presence of an obstructed defecation syndrome were included in the study. We excluded from day-case protocol, patients over 65 years old, with an ASA score of III-IV or with a BMI over 35. The surgical technique reflects the original technique proposed by Antonio Longo with the exception of the longitudinal prolapse opening, which was created with the use of an electric scalpel between two Kocher clamps and not by an application of Transtar stapler. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing this procedure with short hospitalization, we investigated the presence and the time of presentation of post-operative complications. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients underwent STARR as a day-case regimen, and none presented major complications or required an extension of hospital stay or readmission. CONCLUSIONS STARR performed with Contour Transtar, in selected patients, is safe and feasible in day-case regimen if performed by expert surgeons and in a structure that allows the physician to keep the patient hospitalized or to re-admit and promptly treat those patients who present major surgical complication.

Intraoperative bronchial stump air leak control by Progel® application after pulmonary lobectomy

Diffuse tracheobronchial calcification is a physiological condition associated with advanced age, especially in women. A calcified bronchus can be fractured during major lung resections (lobectomy, bilobectomy, and pneumonectomy), exposing patients to intraoperative air leakage and broncho-pleural fistula (BPF) occurrence. We retrospectively evaluated the use of Progel® application on the suture line of bronchial stump after pulmonary lobectomy analysing the intraoperative air leak and BPF occurrence. Between January 2014 and December 2014, Progel® was applied in 11 patients who presented intraoperative bronchial fractures after suture resection by mechanical staplers and air leak from bronchial stump, in order to treat air leakage. Patients were 7 men and 4 women, aged between 56 and 81 years (mean age 71.2 ± 12.1 years). Surgical procedures included 6 upper lobectomies (4 right, 2 left), 1 bilobectomy and 4 lower lobectomies (3 right, 1 left). Mean hospital stay was 4.5 ± 2.6 days (2-8 days). None of the patients had postoperative air leakage. No Progel® application-related complications occurred. No other major complications occurred. No mortality occurred. Progel® proved to be useful in treating intraoperative air leakage during major lung resections, particularly those occurring as a result of fracture of the bronchus from a mechanical stapler.

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography: a new ERAS item

ERAS protocol and indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) represent the new surgical revolution minimizing complications and shortening recovery time in colorectal surgery. As of today, no studies have been published in the literature evaluating the impact of the ICG-FA in the ERAS protocol for the patients suitable for colorectal surgery. The aim of our study was to assess whether the systematic evaluation of intestinal perfusion by ICG-FA could improve patients outcomes when managed with ERAS perioperative protocol, thus reducing surgical complication rate. This is a retrospective case–control study. From March 2014 to April 2017, 182 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for benign and malignant diseases. All the patients were enrolled in ERAS protocol. Two groups were created: Group A comprehended 107 patients managed within the ERAS pathway only and Group B comprehended 75 patients managed as well as with ERAS pathway plus the intraoperative assessment of intestinal perfusion with ICG-FA. Two board-certified laparoscopic colorectal surgeons jointly performed all procedures. Six (5.6%) clinically relevant anastomotic leakages (AL) occurred in Group A, while there was none in Group B, demonstrating that ICG-FA integrated in the ERAS protocol can lead to a statistically significant reduction of the AL. Mean operative time between the two groups was not statistically significant. In five cases (6.6%), the demarcation line set by the fluorescence made the surgeon change the resection line previously marked. The prevalence of all other complications did not differ statistically between the two groups. Our study confirms that combination between ICG and ERAS protocol is feasible and safe and reduces the anastomotic leakage, possibly leading to consider ICG-FA as a new ERAS item.