First Mr

Merkel's cell carcinoma in organ recipients: report of 41 cases.

In the general population Merkels cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. More than 600 cases have been reported. MCC seems to be common in transplant recipients, with 41 cases being reported to the Cincinnati Transplant Tumor Registry, and another 11 in the transplant literature. In the general population, it is a disease of older adults, with only 51% of cases occurring below the age of 50 years. In transplant patients, the mean age at diagnosis was 53 (range 33-78) years, and 29% of recipients were <50 years old. The tumor appeared from 5 to 286 (mean 91.5) months after the transplant. Of 44 lesions that occurred in 41 patients, the distribution was similar to that seen in the general population, with 36% occurring on the head and neck, 32% on the upper extremities, 16% on the trunk, 9% at unknown sites, and 7% on the lower extremities. Twenty of the patients (49%) had 22 other malignancies, the great majority of which (91%) were other skin cancers. Treatment depended on the stage of the disease and included wide surgical excision, radical lymph node dissection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. In transplant patients, MCC probably proved to be more aggressive than in the general population in that 68% of patients developed lymph node metastases and 56% died of their malignancies. Furthermore, one third of surviving patients still have active cancers from which they may die. Also, follow-up of survivors has been relatively short, with a mean of only 18 (range 0-135) months.

Lack of effect of pregnancy on renal allograft survival or function.

To determine whether pregnancy had a long-term influence on the survival or function of renal allografts, a case-control study was conducted. Patients were selected from a pool of 915 patients transplanted at the University of Cincinnati from 1967 to 1990. The pregnancy group consisted of 18 women who became pregnant 3 months to 17 years after transplantation and who elected to continue pregnancy. There were 26 nonpregnant female controls, and 23 male control renal transplant recipients. Matching criteria were cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), donor source, age at transplantation, calendar year of transplantation, time from transplantation to pregnancy, and serum creatinine concentration at the time corresponding to conception. Matching was performed by one investigator, who had no knowledge of long-term outcome in any of the patients. The three groups were well-matched with regard to these criteria. Male controls had higher baseline creatinine clearances than pregnancy cases or female controls. During pregnancy, serum creatinine levels fell by 20%, and creatinine clearance rose by 53%. Immediately after pregnancy, these values returned to baseline. Graft survival, with a mean posttransplant follow-up of 11-12 years, was 77.8% in the pregnancy cases, 69.2% in the female controls, and 69.6% in the male controls. By life-table analysis, none of these differences was significant. Among surviving grafts, serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearances remained stable throughout the follow-up period. In this study, using well-matched male and nonpregnant female cohorts for comparison, pregnancy did not have an adverse long-term effect on renal allograft function or survival.

CYCLOSPORINE DOSE REDUCTION BY KETOCONAZOLE ADMINISTRATION IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS

Cyclosporine metabolism occurs in the liver via hepatic cytochrome P-450 microsomal enzymes. Ketoconazole, an imidazole derivative, has been shown to inhibit the cytochrome P-450 enzyme system. Thirty-six renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine as part of a triple immunosuppressive drug regimen were started on 200 mg/day of oral ketoconazole. The dose of cyclosporine was reduced by 70% at the start of ketoconazole; this dose reduction was based on our previous experience with concomitant cyclosporine-ketoconazole therapy. Ketoconazole was started in patients who had been on cyclosporine for between 10 days and 74 months. The mean cyclosporine dose was 420 mg/day (5.9 mg/kg/day) before starting ketoconazole and 66 mg/day (0.9 mg/kg/day) one year after the addition of ketoconazole; this represents a cyclosporine dose reduction of 84.7% (P less than 0.0001). The mean trough whole-blood cyclosporine concentrations measured by HPLC, were 130 ng/mL preketoconazole and 149 ng/mL after 1 year of combination therapy. Mean serum creatinine and BUN levels were unchanged before and during ketoconazole administration, and no changes in liver function tests were noted. Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics were performed before and after at least three weeks of ketoconazole. Hourly whole-blood samples were measured by HPLC (parent cyclosporine only) and TDX (parent + metabolites). Combination therapy resulted in decreases in the maximum blood concentration and the steady-state volume of distribution divided by the fractional absorption, and increases in mean residence time and the parent-to-parent plus metabolite ratio (calculated by dividing the HPLC by the TDX value). The addition of ketoconazole to cyclosporine-treated patients resulted in a significant inhibition of cyclosporine metabolism and decrease in the dosage. There was minimal nephrotoxicity, and only four rejection episodes occurred on combined therapy. The concomitant administration of the two drugs was well tolerated, and there was no deleterious effect on the immunosuppressive activity of cyclosporine. This drug interaction provides a significant reduction in the costs associated with organ transplantation.

Acute interstitial nephritis: A clinical and pathologic study based on renal biopsies

To define interstitial nephritis without preselection bias, 25 consecutive renal biopsy specimens from patients with tubular damage, interstitial damage and interstitial inflammation were analyzed in detail. In four patients (all with acute renal failure), tubulitis, and interstitial eosinophil and lymphocyte infiltration were found, but no glomerular abnormalities. In four others, the findings were similar but some glomerular abnormalities were noted. Two patients had probable healed interstitial nephritis. The clinical presentation varied from transient renal insufficincy to oliguric renal failure. Three of the patients with glomerular abnormalities had significant proteinuria. When the 10 patients with interstitial nephritis were compared with the other 15 serving as controls, striking features in the former group were skin rash, eosinophilia, the absence of hypertension and the frequency of administration of penicillin and its analogs. Serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were elevated in three of the patients. The striking eosinophilia, interstitial eosinophil infiltration and increased IgE levels suggest that allergen-reaginic complexes may be involved in the pathogenesis of the lesion.

Antimurine antibody formation following OKT3 therapy

OKT3 is an IgG2a murine monoclonal antibody directed against the CD3 antigen receptor of human T lymphocytes. A major concern with OKT3 treatment in solid organ transplant recipients is the development of antimouse antibody, which may preclude retreatment with this agent. We have administered OKT3 on 215 occasions (150 renal, 34 hepatic, 26 cardiac, 5 pancreatic) in 179 patients between April 1982 and December 1988. The mean duration of treatment was 10.5 days (range, 2-22 days). Antimouse antibody data were analyzed on the most recent 133 treatment courses where the antibody status was available pretreatment. Determination of antimouse antibody production was elicited by ELISA technology at days 0, 7, 14, and 28 of OKT3 treatment. Patients were categorized according to the antibody response as follows: (a) absence of antibody; (b) low titer (1:100); or (c) high titer (greater than or equal to 1:1000). Our earlier experience has demonstrated that retreatment with OKT3 is successful in groups a and b. The development of antimurine antibodies was analyzed with regard to the following parameters: (1) The duration of OKT3 treatment; (2) treatment type (prophylactic, primary, or secondary); (3) primary treatment or retreatment; (4) concomitant immunosuppressive regimen (double or triple therapy); (5) dosage of concomitant immunosuppressive drugs; and (6) transplant organ type. The following results were obtained. (1) Duration of treatment had no effect on antibody production (11.0 days in antibody negative and 10.0 days in antibody positive). (2) There was no difference in antibody formation rates for the first treatment of OKT3 when it was used as prophylaxis (26%), primary (19%), or secondary (27%) therapy. (3) Antibody formation rate with first treatment was 29%; with retreatment, patients who were antibody negative following first treatment became positive in 28% of cases, and retreated patients who were low titer positive following first treatment converted to high titer in 57% of cases. (4) Antibody formation was higher in patients receiving double immunosuppressive therapy (36%) than in those receiving triple immunosuppressive therapy (21%) during OKT3 treatment. (5) Concomitant immunosuppression was lower in the antibody-positive group during OKT3 therapy: steroids, 61 mg/day vs. 52 mg/day; azathioprine, 89 mg/day vs. 66 mg/day; CsA, 317 mg/day vs. 186 mg/day. (6) Antibody formation rates were lower in non-renal transplants following first treatment with OKT3 (liver 17%, heart 17%, kidney 28%); this reflects the higher doses of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy used in nonrenal transplants.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The efficacy of OKT3 in vascular rejection.

Sixty-six consecutive biopsies of renal allograft recipients treated with OKT3 monoclonal antibody were reviewed and placed into one of two groups. Group I (29 patients) had evidence of acute vascular and cellular rejection, while group II (32 patients) had cellular rejection but no vascular rejection. In 5 cases, the sample was inadequate to determine if vascular rejection was present or not. The severity of the cellular rejection was graded histologically as mild, moderate, or severe. The severity was equivalent when comparing group I with group II (mild, 17% vs. 10%; moderate, 52% vs. 59%; and severe, 31% vs. 31%). There was no difference in the rejection reversal rate between the two groups (86% vs. 91%). However, at 6 and 12 months there was a higher graft loss in the group with vascular rejection (graft survival 64% vs. 81%, P = 0.13, and 58% vs. 75%, P = 0.08, respectively). The poorest outcome was in those patients with both severe acute cellular rejection and acute vascular rejection (4/9, or 44%). The serum creatinine level was higher both pre- and post-OKT3 therapy and at 1, 6, and 12 months in the group with vascular rejection. In conclusion, OKT3 was equally successful in reversing acute cellular rejection and acute vascular rejection. However, increased graft loss occurred at 6 and 12 months in the group with vascular rejection.

The Effect Of Oral Metoclopramide On The Absorption Of Cyclosporine

This study was performed to determine the effect of coadministered oral metoclopramide on the absorption of oral cyclosporine in 14 kidney transplant patients. The study was conducted on two consecutive days. Ten patients were studied twice, and 4 patients once, giving 24 studies. The total dosage of metoclopramide was 20 mg. The day on which metoclopramide was administered was chosen randomly. Whole-blood cyclosporine levels were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Coadministration of cyclosporine with metoclopramide resulted in a significant increase in mean maximum blood concentration (567 ng/ml versus 388 ng/ml) and mean area under the blood-concentration-versus-time curve (4120 ng X hr/ml versus 3370 ng X hr/ml); and a significant decrease in mean time to reach maximum concentration. The mean increase in area under the blood-concentration-versus-time curve was 29%. No significant changes were observed in the elimination of cyclosporine when it was coadministered with metoclopramide. These observations suggest that coadministered metoclopramide increased the total absorption of cyclosporine. Metoclopramide has been shown to hasten gastric emptying; since cyclosporine is absorbed predominantly in the small intestine, coadministration of metoclopramide resulted in increased bioavailability of cyclosporine.

The evaluation of the safety and tolerability of two formulations of cyclosporine: neoral and sandimmune. A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Neoral, a microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine, was approved for use in the United States in 1995. Many studies comparing Neoral and Sandimmune have been conducted, and although most state that Neoral is the superior cyclosporine formulation, results have failed to conclusively demonstrate this claim. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of Neoral and Sandimmune. METHODS Publications comparing the use of Neoral and Sandimmune were reviewed for demographic variables, adverse events, rejection incidence, graft losses, and serum creatinine. Neoral and Sandimmune were compared in all patients and in the following subgroups: (1) age (adult or pediatric), (2) transplant type (kidney, liver, or heart), (3) indication (de novo or stable), and (4) study design (randomized prospective trials versus nonrandomized, blinded versus open-labeled studies). RESULTS The rate of graft loss was similar when comparing Neoral and Sandimmune in all analyses. The incidence of rejection was lower in Neoral-treated de novo renal, liver, and cardiac transplants (P<0.05). There were significantly more adverse events in Sandimmune-treated de novo liver transplants than Neoral-treated de novo liver transplants (P<0.00001). When considering only randomized prospective trials, the incidence of rejection was lower in Neoral-treated de novo and stable patients (P<0.05). However, there were more adverse events in Neoral-treated stable patients (P<0.00001). When considering only blinded studies, there were more adverse events in Neoral-treated patients (P<0.05), whereas in open-labeled studies there was no difference in adverse events comparing Neoral and Sandimmune (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS Considering all published trials, the data seem to indicate that Neoral therapy is preferred because of a lower rejection incidence, with a trend toward less adverse events. However, when limiting the analysis to only randomized prospective trials, and specifically assessing blinded studies, the data become less clear. Neoral use was associated with more adverse events in blinded studies, and Sandimmune use was associated with more adverse events in open-labeled studies. Careful individual consideration must be given in choosing the best possible cyclosporine formulation.

Utility of standardized histological classification in the management of acute rejection

BACKGROUND Standardized histological grading of transplant kidney biopsies has become a primary criterion for diagnosis of rejection in immunosuppression clinical trials. METHODS A consortium of 19 transplant centers from North America, Europe, and Australia convened in 1995 to examine kidney transplant rejection. Data from the 1995 Efficacy Endpoints Conference were examined for frequency of adoption of Banff schema. Biopsy grading was correlated with clinical parameters of rejection and therapy response. RESULTS Histological confirmation of rejection episodes occurred in 73% of 953 cases, with Banff criteria adoption increasing in frequency between 1992 and 1995. Banff grading significantly correlated with clinical rejection severity (rejection creatinine: grade I, 2.8+/-0.2 mg/dl; grade II, 3.5+/-0.2 mg/dl; grade III, 4.1+/-0.3 mg/dl; P < 0.001), although nadir creatinines were similar. Response rates of Banff grades I and II to steroid therapy were not different, but only 42% of grade III rejections responded to steroids (P < 0.003. Banff grading also correlated with postrejection creatinine, day 15: grade I, 2.2+/-0.2 mg/dl; grade II, 3.0+/-0.2 mg/dl; grade III, 3.8+/-0.4 mg/dl (P < 0.001), and day 30: grade I, 2.1+/-0.1 mg/dl; grade II, 2.2+/-0.2 mg/dl; grade III, 2.7+/-0.2 mg/dl (P < 0.06). Banff grade III correlated with reduced graft survival at 1 year: grade I, 86%; grade II, 88%; grade III, 70% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This multicenter review of rejection severity confirms that standardized histologic classifications such as the Banff schema provide a reliable means for stratifying patient risk of treatment success or failure. These data support the use of Banff criteria in clinical trial design.

The late adverse effect of splenectomy on patient survival following cadaveric renal transplantation.

Kidney and patient survival of 351 consecutive patients undergoing first cadaveric renal transplants since 1968 were reviewed to determine the effects of splenectomy on outcome. Special emphasis was given to analysis of 106 splenectomized and 102 nonsplenectomized patients treated since 1975. During the first two years after transplant, kidney survival was better in the splenectomized patients, with no adverse effect on patient survival. However, after the first two years, patient survival became significantly worse in splenectomized patients (35.5% vs. 60.5% at 84 months). Of the deaths, infection was the cause in 26.7% of nonsplenectomized patients compared with 50% of splenectomized patients (P<0.07). Of patients alive at one year posttransplant, death rates were not different in patients splenectomized before 1975 or after 1975. Timing of splenectomy (prior vs. concurrent) had no effect on outcome. The adverse effect of splenectomy on mortality appeared to be more pronounced in younger (≤45 year-old) than in older (>45 year-old) patients. Splenectomy should not be performed routinely in preparation for a cadaveric transplant because of an unacceptably high late mortality that is primarily from sepsis.