Flore Samaran
Centre national de la recherche scientifique
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Flore Samaran.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Flore Samaran; Kathleen M. Stafford; Trevor A. Branch; Jason Gedamke; Jean-Yves Royer; Robert P. Dziak; Christophe Guinet
Understanding the seasonal movements and distribution patterns of migratory species over ocean basin scales is vital for appropriate conservation and management measures. However, assessing populations over remote regions is challenging, particularly if they are rare. Blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus spp) are an endangered species found in the Southern and Indian Oceans. Here two recognized subspecies of blue whales and, based on passive acoustic monitoring, four “acoustic populations” occur. Three of these are pygmy blue whale (B.m. brevicauda) populations while the fourth is the Antarctic blue whale (B.m. intermedia). Past whaling catches have dramatically reduced their numbers but recent acoustic recordings show that these oceans are still important habitat for blue whales. Presently little is known about the seasonal movements and degree of overlap of these four populations, particularly in the central Indian Ocean. We examined the geographic and seasonal occurrence of different blue whale acoustic populations using one year of passive acoustic recording from three sites located at different latitudes in the Indian Ocean. The vocalizations of the different blue whale subspecies and acoustic populations were recorded seasonally in different regions. For some call types and locations, there was spatial and temporal overlap, particularly between Antarctic and different pygmy blue whale acoustic populations. Except on the southernmost hydrophone, all three pygmy blue whale acoustic populations were found at different sites or during different seasons, which further suggests that these populations are generally geographically distinct. This unusual blue whale diversity in sub-Antarctic and sub-tropical waters indicates the importance of the area for blue whales in these former whaling grounds.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2010
Flore Samaran; Christophe Guinet; Olivier Adam; Jean-François Motsch; Yves Cansi
Blue whales produce intense, stereotypic low frequency calls that are particularly well suited for transmission over long distances. Because these calls vary geographically, they can be used to gain insight into subspecies distribution. In the Southwestern Indian Ocean, acoustic data from a triad of calibrated hydrophones maintained by the International Monitoring System provided data on blue whale calls from two subspecies: Antarctic and pygmy blue whales. Using time difference of arrival and least-squares hyperbolic methods, the range and location of calling whales were determined. By using received level of calls and propagation modeling, call source levels of both subspecies were estimated. The average call source level was estimated to 179+/-5 dB re 1 microPa(rms) at 1 m over the 17-30 Hz band for Antarctic blue whale and 174+/-1 dB re 1 microPa(rms) at 1 m over the 17-50 Hz band for pygmy blue whale. According to previous estimates, slight variations in the source level could be due to inter-individual differences, inter-subspecies variations and the calculation method. These are the first reported source level estimations for blue whales in the Indian Ocean. Such data are critical to estimate detection ranges of calling blue whales.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2015
Karolin Thomisch; Olaf Boebel; Daniel P. Zitterbart; Flore Samaran; Sofie Van Parijs; Ilse van Opzeeland
Passive acoustic monitoring is an important tool in marine mammal studies. However, logistics and finances frequently constrain the number and servicing schedules of acoustic recorders, requiring a trade-off between deployment periods and sampling continuity, i.e., the implementation of a subsampling scheme. Optimizing such schemes to each projects specific research questions is desirable. This study investigates the impact of subsampling on the accuracy of two common metrics, acoustic presence and call rate, for different vocalization patterns (regimes) of baleen whales: (1) variable vocal activity, (2) vocalizations organized in song bouts, and (3) vocal activity with diel patterns. To this end, above metrics are compared for continuous and subsampled data subject to different sampling strategies, covering duty cycles between 50% and 2%. The results show that a reduction of the duty cycle impacts negatively on the accuracy of both acoustic presence and call rate estimates. For a given duty cycle, frequent short listening periods improve accuracy of daily acoustic presence estimates over few long listening periods. Overall, subsampling effects are most pronounced for low and/or temporally clustered vocal activity. These findings illustrate the importance of informed decisions when applying subsampling strategies to passive acoustic recordings or analyses for a given target species.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2015
François-Xavier Socheleau; Emmanuelle C. Leroy; Andrés Nicolás Carvallo Pecci; Flore Samaran; Julien Bonnel; Jean-Yves Royer
This paper addresses the problem of automated detection of Z-calls emitted by Antarctic blue whales (B. m. intermedia). The proposed solution is based on a subspace detector of sigmoidal-frequency signals with unknown time-varying amplitude. This detection strategy takes into account frequency variations of blue whale calls as well as the presence of other transient sounds that can interfere with Z-calls (such as airguns or other whale calls). The proposed method has been tested on more than 105 h of acoustic data containing about 2200 Z-calls (as found by an experienced human operator). This method is shown to have a correct-detection rate of up to more than 15% better than the extensible bioacoustic tool package, a spectrogram-based correlation detector commonly used to study blue whales. Because the proposed method relies on subspace detection, it does not suffer from some drawbacks of correlation-based detectors. In particular, it does not require the choice of an a priori fixed and subjective template. The analytic expression of the detection performance is also derived, which provides crucial information for higher level analyses such as animal density estimation from acoustic data. Finally, the detection threshold automatically adapts to the soundscape in order not to violate a user-specified false alarm rate.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Emmanuelle C. Leroy; Flore Samaran; Julien Bonnel; Jean-Yves Royer
Passive acoustic monitoring is an efficient way to provide insights on the ecology of large whales. This approach allows for long-term and species-specific monitoring over large areas. In this study, we examined six years (2010 to 2015) of continuous acoustic recordings at up to seven different locations in the Central and Southern Indian Basin to assess the peak periods of presence, seasonality and migration movements of Antarctic blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus intermedia). An automated method is used to detect the Antarctic blue whale stereotyped call, known as Z-call. Detection results are analyzed in terms of distribution, seasonal presence and diel pattern of emission at each site. Z-calls are detected year-round at each site, except for one located in the equatorial Indian Ocean, and display highly seasonal distribution. This seasonality is stable across years for every site, but varies between sites. Z-calls are mainly detected during autumn and spring at the subantarctic locations, suggesting that these sites are on the Antarctic blue whale migration routes, and mostly during winter at the subtropical sites. In addition to these seasonal trends, there is a significant diel pattern in Z-call emission, with more Z-calls in daytime than in nighttime. This diel pattern may be related to the blue whale feeding ecology.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2017
Emmanuelle C. Leroy; Flore Samaran; Julien Bonnel; Jean-Yves Royer
Since passive acoustic monitoring is widely used, unidentified acoustic signals from marine mammals are commonly reported. The signal characteristics and emission patterns are the main clues to identify the possible sources. In this study, the authors describe two previously unidentified sounds, recorded at up to five widely-spaced sites (30 × 30 degree area) in the southern Indian Ocean, in 2007 and between 2010 and 2015. The first reported signal (M-call) consists of a single tonal unit near 22 Hz and lasting about 10 s, repeated with an interval longer than 2 min. This signal is only detected in 2007. The second signal (P-call) is also a tonal unit of 10 s, repeated every 160 s, but at a frequency near 27 Hz. Its yearly number increased greatly between 2007 and 2010, and moderately since then. Based on their characteristics and seasonal patterns, this study shows that both signals are clearly distinct from any known calls of blue whale subspecies and populations dwelling in the southern Indian Ocean. However, they display similarities with blue whale vocalizations. More particularly, the P-call can be mistaken for the first tonal unit of the Antarctic blue whale Z-call.
Endangered Species Research | 2018
Ec Leroy; Flore Samaran; Kathleen M. Stafford; J Bonnel; Jy Royer
The southern Indian Ocean is believed to be a natural territory for blue and fin whales. However, decades after commercial and illegal whaling decimated these populations, little is known about their current status, seasonal habitat or movements. Recent passive acoustic studies have described the presence of 4 acoustic populations of blue whales (Antarctic and 3 ‘pygmy’ types), but are generally limited temporally and geographically. Here, we examine up to 7 yr of continuous acoustic recordings (2010−2016) from a hydrophone network of 6 widely spaced sites in the southern Indian Ocean, looking for the presence of Antarctic and pygmy blue and fin whales. Power spectral density analyses of characteristic and distinct frequency bands of these species show seasonal and geographic differences among the different populations, and the overall patterns for each display interannual consistencies in timing and occurrence. Antarctic blue and fin whales are recorded across the hydrophone network, mainly from austral autumn to spring, with peak intensity in winter. Pygmy blue whales show spatial variation: Madagascan pygmy blue whales are mainly present in the west of the network, while the Australian call type is heard at the eastern sites. Both populations share a common seasonality, with a presence from January to June. Finally, the Sri Lankan call type is recorded only on a single site in the northeast. These results confirm the importance of the southern Indian Ocean for several populations of endangered large whales and present the first long-term assessment of fin whales in the southern Indian Ocean.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2017
Emmanuelle C. Leroy; Flore Samaran; Julien Bonnel; Jean-Yves Royer
Since passive acoustic is widely used to monitor cetaceans, unidentified signals from biological sources are commonly reported. The signals characteristics and emission patterns could give keys to identify the possible sources. Here, we report two previously unidentified signals found in acoustic records from five widely spread sites in the southern Indian Ocean and spanning seven years (2007, 2010 to 2015). The first reported signal (M-call) consists of a single tonal unit near 22 Hz and lasting about 10 s. The second signal (P-call) is also a tonal unit lasting about 10 s, but at a frequency near 27 Hz. The latter has often been interpreted as an incomplete Antarctic blue whale Z-call (Balaenoptera musculus intermedia). From a systematic analysis of our acoustic database, we show that both signals have similar characteristics as blue whale vocalizations, but with spatial and seasonal patterns that do not resemble any of the known populations dwelling in the southern Indian Ocean. M-calls are recorded o...
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2008
Flore Samaran; Olivier Adam; Jean-François Motsch; Yves Cansi; Gérard Ruzié; Christophe Guinet
Analysis of one year of acoustic signal recordings from the five permanent autonomous hydrophones of the International Monitoring System in the South‐West Indian Ocean reveals low frequency with high intensity calls produced by two blue whale subspecies. The “Antarctic” or “true” blue whale (B. m. intermedia) calls and the “Madagascar‐type” Pygmy blue whale calls (B. m. brevicauda) were automatically detected through the matched filtering method. The potential movements were investigated by using the time difference of arrival (TDOA) of calls to assess the bearing of the sound source. The fully range dependent parabolic equation code (RAM ‐ range‐dependent acoustic model) and the PMCC code (progressive multi‐channel correlation) are applied to estimate the range between our system and the vocalising animals. Our results show that (1) the variation of call number revealed two distinct patterns of seasonal whale occurrences and (2) the distances from the hydrophones to the blue whales reached up to 50 km. Tracking whales is possible when whales are concentrated of the hydrophone array.
Mammal Review | 2007
Trevor A. Branch; Kathleen M. Stafford; D. M. Palacios; C. Allison; J. L. Bannister; C. L. K. Burton; Elsa Cabrera; Carole A. Carlson; B. Galletti Vernazzani; P. C. Gill; Rodrigo Hucke-Gaete; K. C. S. Jenner; M.‐N. M. Jenner; K. Matsuoka; Y. A. Mikhalev; T. Miyashita; M. G. Morrice; S. Nishiwaki; V. J. Sturrock; D. Tormosov; R. C. Anderson; Alan N. Baker; Peter B. Best; P. Borsa; Robert L. Brownell; S. Childerhouse; Ken P. Findlay; T. Gerrodette; A. D. Ilangakoon; M. Joergensen