Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Floreliz Mendoza is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Floreliz Mendoza.


Science | 2013

Protection Against Malaria by Intravenous Immunization with a Nonreplicating Sporozoite Vaccine

Robert A. Seder; Lee Jah Chang; Mary E. Enama; Kathryn L. Zephir; Uzma N. Sarwar; Ingelise J. Gordon; LaSonji A. Holman; Eric R. James; Peter F. Billingsley; Anusha Gunasekera; Adam Richman; Sumana Chakravarty; Anita Manoj; Soundarapandian Velmurugan; Minglin Li; Adam Ruben; Tao Li; Abraham G. Eappen; Richard E. Stafford; Sarah Plummer; Cynthia S. Hendel; Laura Novik; Pamela Costner; Floreliz Mendoza; Jamie G. Saunders; Martha Nason; Jason H. Richardson; Jittawadee Murphy; Silas A. Davidson; Thomas L. Richie

Malaria Sporozoite Vaccine Each year, hundreds of millions of people are infected with Plasmodium falciparum, the mosquito-borne parasite that causes malaria. A preventative vaccine is greatly needed. Seder et al. (p. 1359, published online 8 August; see the Perspective by Good) now report the results from a phase I clinical trial where subjects were immunized intravenously with a whole, attenuated sporozoite vaccine. Three of 9 subjects who received four doses and zero of 6 subjects who received five doses of the vaccine went on to develop malaria after controlled malaria infection. Both antibody titers and cellular immune responses correlated positively with the dose of vaccine received, suggesting that both arms of the adaptive immune response may have participated in the observed protection. Intravenous immunization with an attenuated whole malaria sporozoite vaccine protected volunteers in a phase I clinical trial. [Also see Perspective by Good] Consistent, high-level, vaccine-induced protection against human malaria has only been achieved by inoculation of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) sporozoites (SPZ) by mosquito bites. We report that the PfSPZ Vaccine—composed of attenuated, aseptic, purified, cryopreserved PfSPZ—was safe and wel-tolerated when administered four to six times intravenously (IV) to 40 adults. Zero of six subjects receiving five doses and three of nine subjects receiving four doses of 1.35 × 105 PfSPZ Vaccine and five of six nonvaccinated controls developed malaria after controlled human malaria infection (P = 0.015 in the five-dose group and P = 0.028 for overall, both versus controls). PfSPZ-specific antibody and T cell responses were dose-dependent. These data indicate that there is a dose-dependent immunological threshold for establishing high-level protection against malaria that can be achieved with IV administration of a vaccine that is safe and meets regulatory standards.


The Lancet | 2014

Safety and tolerability of chikungunya virus-like particle vaccine in healthy adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial

Lee Jah Chang; Kimberly A. Dowd; Floreliz Mendoza; Jamie G. Saunders; Sandra Sitar; Sarah Plummer; Galina Yamshchikov; Uzma N. Sarwar; Zonghui Hu; Mary E. Enama; Robert T. Bailer; Richard A. Koup; Richard M. Schwartz; Wataru Akahata; Gary J. Nabel; John R. Mascola; Theodore C. Pierson; Barney S. Graham; Julie E. Ledgerwood

BACKGROUND Chikungunya virus--a mosquito-borne alphavirus--is endemic in Africa and south and southeast Asia and has recently emerged in the Caribbean. No drugs or vaccines are available for treatment or prevention. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a new candidate vaccine. METHODS VRC 311 was a phase 1, dose-escalation, open-label clinical trial of a virus-like particle (VLP) chikungunya virus vaccine, VRC-CHKVLP059-00-VP, in healthy adults aged 18-50 years who were enrolled at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (Bethesda, MD, USA). Participants were assigned to sequential dose level groups to receive vaccinations at 10 μg, 20 μg, or 40 μg on weeks 0, 4, and 20, with follow-up for 44 weeks after enrolment. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of the vaccine. Secondary endpoints were chikungunya virus-specific immune responses assessed by ELISA and neutralising antibody assays. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01489358. FINDINGS 25 participants were enrolled from Dec 12, 2011, to March 22, 2012, into the three dosage groups: 10 μg (n=5), 20 μg (n=10), and 40 μg (n=10). The protocol was completed by all five participants at the 10 μg dose, all ten participants at the 20 μg dose, and eight of ten participants at the 40 μg dose; non-completions were for personal circumstances unrelated to adverse events. 73 vaccinations were administered. All injections were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported. Neutralising antibodies were detected in all dose groups after the second vaccination (geometric mean titres of the half maximum inhibitory concentration: 2688 in the 10 μg group, 1775 in the 20 μg group, and 7246 in the 40 μg group), and a significant boost occurred after the third vaccination in all dose groups (10 μg group p=0·0197, 20 μg group p<0·0001, and 40 μg group p<0·0001). 4 weeks after the third vaccination, the geometric mean titres of the half maximum inhibitory concentration were 8745 for the 10 μg group, 4525 for the 20 μg group, and 5390 for the 40 μg group. INTERPRETATION The chikungunya VLP vaccine was immunogenic, safe, and well tolerated. This study represents an important step in vaccine development to combat this rapidly emerging pathogen. Further studies should be done in a larger number of participants and in more diverse populations. FUNDING Intramural Research Program of the Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and National Institutes of Health.


Nature Medicine | 2016

Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination

Andrew S. Ishizuka; Kirsten E. Lyke; Adam DeZure; Andrea A. Berry; Thomas L. Richie; Floreliz Mendoza; Mary E. Enama; Ingelise J. Gordon; Lee-Jah Chang; Uzma N Sarwar; Kathryn L. Zephir; LaSonji A. Holman; Eric R. James; Peter F. Billingsley; Anusha Gunasekera; Sumana Chakravarty; Anita Manoj; Minglin Li; Adam Ruben; Tao Li; Abraham G. Eappen; Richard E. Stafford; Natasha K C; Tooba Murshedkar; Hope DeCederfelt; Sarah Plummer; Cynthia S. Hendel; Laura Novik; Pamela Costner; Jamie G. Saunders

An attenuated Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) sporozoite (SPZ) vaccine, PfSPZ Vaccine, is highly protective against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) 3 weeks after immunization, but the durability of protection is unknown. We assessed how vaccine dosage, regimen, and route of administration affected durable protection in malaria-naive adults. After four intravenous immunizations with 2.7 × 105 PfSPZ, 6/11 (55%) vaccinated subjects remained without parasitemia following CHMI 21 weeks after immunization. Five non-parasitemic subjects from this dosage group underwent repeat CHMI at 59 weeks, and none developed parasitemia. Although Pf-specific serum antibody levels correlated with protection up to 21–25 weeks after immunization, antibody levels waned substantially by 59 weeks. Pf-specific T cell responses also declined in blood by 59 weeks. To determine whether T cell responses in blood reflected responses in liver, we vaccinated nonhuman primates with PfSPZ Vaccine. Pf-specific interferon-γ-producing CD8 T cells were present at ∼100-fold higher frequencies in liver than in blood. Our findings suggest that PfSPZ Vaccine conferred durable protection to malaria through long-lived tissue-resident T cells and that administration of higher doses may further enhance protection.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2014

DNA Vaccines Encoding Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus Wild Type Glycoproteins are Safe and Immunogenic in a Phase I Clinical Trial

Uzma N. Sarwar; Pamela Costner; Mary E. Enama; Nina M. Berkowitz; Zonghui Hu; Cynthia S. Hendel; Sandra Sitar; Sarah Plummer; Sabue Mulangu; Robert T. Bailer; Richard A. Koup; John R. Mascola; Gary J. Nabel; Nancy J. Sullivan; Barney S. Graham; Julie E. Ledgerwood; Ingelise J. Gordon; LaSonji A. Holman; Floreliz Mendoza; Laura Novik; Jamie G. Saunders; Kathy Zephir; Niraj Desai; Sheryl Young; Joseph P. Casazza; Brenda D. Larkin; Galina Yamshchikov; Olga Vasilenko; Phillip L. Gomez; Charla Andrews

Background Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus cause severe hemorrhagic fever with high mortality and are potential bioterrorism agents. There are no available vaccines or therapeutic agents. Previous clinical trials evaluated transmembrane-deleted and point-mutation Ebolavirus glycoproteins (GPs) in candidate vaccines. Constructs evaluated in this trial encode wild-type (WT) GP from Ebolavirus Zaire and Sudan species and the Marburgvirus Angola strain expressed in a DNA vaccine. Methods The VRC 206 study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of these DNA vaccines (4 mg administered intramuscularly by Biojector) at weeks 0, 4, and 8, with a homologous boost at or after week 32. Safety evaluations included solicited reactogenicity and coagulation parameters. Primary immune assessment was done by means of GP-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results The vaccines were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events; 80% of subjects had positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results (≥30) at week 12. The fourth DNA vaccination boosted the immune responses. Conclusions The investigational Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus WT GP DNA vaccines were safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in this phase I study. These results will further inform filovirus vaccine research toward a goal of inducing protective immunity by using WT GP antigens in candidate vaccine regimens. Clinical Trials Registration NCT00605514.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2017

Attenuated PfSPZ Vaccine induces strain-transcending T cells and durable protection against heterologous controlled human malaria infection

Kirsten E. Lyke; Andrew S. Ishizuka; Andrea A. Berry; Sumana Chakravarty; Adam DeZure; Mary E. Enama; Eric R. James; Peter F. Billingsley; Anusha Gunasekera; Anita Manoj; Minglin Li; Adam Ruben; Tao Li; Abraham G. Eappen; Richard E. Stafford; Natasha Kc; Tooba Murshedkar; Floreliz Mendoza; Ingelise J. Gordon; Kathryn L. Zephir; LaSonji A. Holman; Sarah Plummer; Cynthia S. Hendel; Laura Novik; Pamela Costner; Jamie G. Saunders; Nina M. Berkowitz; Barbara J. Flynn; Martha Nason; Lindsay S. Garver

Significance A highly effective malaria vaccine capable of long-term protection against genetically diverse strains is urgently needed. Here, we demonstrate that a three-dose regimen of a live attenuated whole-parasite malaria vaccine conferred durable sterile protection through 33 weeks in ∼50% of subjects against a controlled human malaria infection strain that is heterologous to the vaccine strain. Prior studies by others and us have shown that T cells are critical to mediating sterile protection after live-attenuated malaria vaccination. Here, we provide evidence that this Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite vaccine (PfSPZ Vaccine) induces antigen-specific IFN-γ-producing CD8 and CD4 T cells that recognize both the homologous and the heterologous Pf strain. A live-attenuated malaria vaccine, Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite vaccine (PfSPZ Vaccine), confers sterile protection against controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) parasites homologous to the vaccine strain up to 14 mo after final vaccination. No injectable malaria vaccine has demonstrated long-term protection against CHMI using Pf parasites heterologous to the vaccine strain. Here, we conducted an open-label trial with PfSPZ Vaccine at a dose of 9.0 × 105 PfSPZ administered i.v. three times at 8-wk intervals to 15 malaria-naive adults. After CHMI with homologous Pf parasites 19 wk after final immunization, nine (64%) of 14 (95% CI, 35–87%) vaccinated volunteers remained without parasitemia compared with none of six nonvaccinated controls (P = 0.012). Of the nine nonparasitemic subjects, six underwent repeat CHMI with heterologous Pf7G8 parasites 33 wk after final immunization. Five (83%) of six (95% CI, 36–99%) remained without parasitemia compared with none of six nonvaccinated controls. PfSPZ-specific T-cell and antibody responses were detected in all vaccine recipients. Cytokine production by T cells from vaccinated subjects after in vitro stimulation with homologous (NF54) or heterologous (7G8) PfSPZ were highly correlated. Interestingly, PfSPZ-specific T-cell responses in the blood peaked after the first immunization and were not enhanced by subsequent immunizations. Collectively, these data suggest durable protection against homologous and heterologous Pf parasites can be achieved with PfSPZ Vaccine. Ongoing studies will determine whether protective efficacy can be enhanced by additional alterations in the vaccine dose and number of immunizations.


The Lancet | 2017

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of two Zika virus DNA vaccine candidates in healthy adults: randomised, open-label, phase 1 clinical trials

Martin R. Gaudinski; Katherine V. Houser; Kaitlyn M. Morabito; Zonghui Hu; Galina Yamshchikov; Ro Shauna Rothwell; Nina M. Berkowitz; Floreliz Mendoza; Jamie G. Saunders; Laura Novik; Cynthia S. Hendel; LaSonji A. Holman; Ingelise J. Gordon; Josephine H. Cox; Srilatha Edupuganti; Monica A. McArthur; Nadine Rouphael; Kirsten E. Lyke; Ginny E. Cummings; Sandra Sitar; Robert T. Bailer; Bryant M. Foreman; Katherine Burgomaster; Rebecca S. Pelc; David N. Gordon; Christina R. DeMaso; Kimberly A. Dowd; Carolyn M. Laurencot; Richard M. Schwartz; John R. Mascola

Summary Background The Zika virus epidemic and associated congenital infections have prompted rapid vaccine development. We assessed two new DNA vaccines expressing premembrane and envelope Zika virus structural proteins. Methods We did two phase 1, randomised, open-label trials involving healthy adult volunteers. The VRC 319 trial, done in three centres, assessed plasmid VRC5288 (Zika virus and Japanese encephalitis virus chimera), and the VRC 320, done in one centre, assessed plasmid VRC5283 (wild-type Zika virus). Eligible participants were aged 18–35 years in VRC19 and 18–50 years in VRC 320. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 by a computer-generated randomisation schedule prepared by the study statistician. All participants received intramuscular injection of 4 mg vaccine. In VRC 319 participants were assigned to receive vaccinations via needle and syringe at 0 and 8 weeks, 0 and 12 weeks, 0, 4, and 8 weeks, or 0, 4, and 20 weeks. In VRC 320 participants were assigned to receive vaccinations at 0, 4, and 8 weeks via single-dose needle and syringe injection in one deltoid or split-dose needle and syringe or needle-free injection with the Stratis device (Pharmajet, Golden, CO, USA) in each deltoid. Both trials followed up volunteers for 24 months for the primary endpoint of safety, assessed as local and systemic reactogenicity in the 7 days after each vaccination and all adverse events in the 28 days after each vaccination. The secondary endpoint in both trials was immunogenicity 4 weeks after last vaccination. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02840487 and NCT02996461. Findings VRC 319 enrolled 80 participants (20 in each group), and VRC 320 enrolled 45 participants (15 in each group). One participant in VRC 319 and two in VRC 320 withdrew after one dose of vaccine, but were included in the safety analyses. Both vaccines were safe and well tolerated. All local and systemic symptoms were mild to moderate. In both studies, pain and tenderness at the injection site was the most frequent local symptoms (37 [46%] of 80 participants in VRC 319 and 36 [80%] of 45 in VRC 320) and malaise and headache were the most frequent systemic symptoms (22 [27%] and 18 [22%], respectively, in VRC 319 and 17 [38%] and 15 [33%], respectively, in VRC 320). For VRC5283, 14 of 14 (100%) participants who received split-dose vaccinations by needle-free injection had detectable positive antibody responses, and the geometric mean titre of 304 was the highest across all groups in both trials. Interpretation VRC5283 was well tolerated and has advanced to phase 2 efficacy testing. Funding Intramural Research Program of the Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.


Contemporary Clinical Trials | 2015

Phase I clinical evaluation of seasonal influenza hemagglutinin (HA) DNA vaccine prime followed by trivalent influenza inactivated vaccine (IIV3) boost

Julie E. Ledgerwood; Zonghui Hu; Pamela Costner; Galina Yamshchikov; Mary E. Enama; Sarah Plummer; Cynthia S. Hendel; LaSonji A. Holman; Brenda D. Larkin; Ingelise J. Gordon; Robert T. Bailer; Donald M. Poretz; Uzma N. Sarwar; Alisha Kabadi; Richard A. Koup; John R. Mascola; Barney S. Graham; Laura Novik; Floreliz Mendoza; Jamie G. Saunders; Kathryn L. Zephir; Diane Johnson; Sandra Sitar; Olga Vasilenko; Joseph P. Casazza; Sheryl Young; Charla Andrews; Michelle Conan-Cibotti; Richard Jones; Hope Decederfelt

Annual influenza vaccination reduces the risks of influenza when the vaccines are well matched to circulating strains, but development of an approach that induces broader and more durable immune responses would be beneficial. We conducted two companion Phase 1 studies, VRC 307 and VRC 309, over sequential seasons (2008-2009 and 2009-2010) in which only the influenza B strain component of the vaccines differed. Objectives were safety and immunogenicity of prime-boost vaccination schedules. A schedule of DNA vaccine encoding for seasonal influenza hemagglutinins (HA) prime followed by seasonal trivalent influenza inactivated vaccine (IIV3) boost (HA DNA-IIV3) was compared to placebo (PBS)-IIV3 or IIV3-IIV3. Cumulatively, 111 adults were randomized to HA DNA-IIV3 (n=66), PBS-IIV3 (n=25) or IIV3-IIV3 (n=20). Safety was assessed by clinical observations, laboratory parameters and 7-day solicited reactogenicity. The seasonal HA DNA prime-IIV3 boost regimen was evaluated as safe and well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events. The local and systemic reactogenicity for HA DNA, IIV and placebo were reported predominantly as none or mild within the first 5days post-vaccination. There was no significant difference in immunogenicity detected between the treatment groups as evaluated by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. The studies demonstrated the safety and immunogenicity of seasonal HA DNA-IIV3 regimen, but the 3-4week prime-boost interval was suboptimal for improving influenza-specific immune responses. This is consistent with observations in avian H5 DNA vaccine prime-boost studies in which a long interval, but not a short interval, was associated with improved immunogenicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT00858611 for VRC 307 and NCT00995982 for VRC 309.


Nature Medicine | 2016

Corrigendum: Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination

Andrew S. Ishizuka; Kirsten E. Lyke; Adam DeZure; Andrea A. Berry; Thomas L. Richie; Floreliz Mendoza; Mary E. Enama; Ingelise J. Gordon; Lee-Jah Chang; Uzma N Sarwar; Kathryn L. Zephir; LaSonji A. Holman; Eric R. James; Peter F. Billingsley; Anusha Gunasekera; Sumana Chakravarty; Anita Manoj; Minglin Li; Adam Ruben; Tao Li; Abraham G. Eappen; Richard E. Stafford; Natasha K C; Tooba Murshedkar; Hope DeCederfelt; Sarah Plummer; Cynthia S. Hendel; Laura Novik; Pamela Costner; Jamie G. Saunders

Nat. Med.; 10.1038/nm.4110; corrected online 18 May 2016 In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted a funding source, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Investment ID: 24922). The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.


Nature Medicine | 2016

Erratum: Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination (Nature Medicine (2016) DOI: 10.1038/nm.4110))

Andrew S. Ishizuka; Kirsten E. Lyke; Adam DeZure; Andrea A. Berry; Thomas L. Richie; Floreliz Mendoza; Mary E. Enama; Ingelise J. Gordon; Lee Jah Chang; Uzma N Sarwar; Kathryn L. Zephir; La Sonji A Holman; Eric R. James; Peter F. Billingsley; Anusha Gunasekera; Sumana Chakravarty; Anita Manoj; Ming Lin Li; Adam Ruben; Tao Li; Abraham G. Eappen; Richard E. Stafford; K. C. Natasha; Tooba Murshedkar; Hope DeCederfelt; Sarah Plummer; Cynthia S. Hendel; Laura Novik; Pamela Costner; Jamie G. Saunders

Nat. Med.; 10.1038/nm.4110; corrected online 18 May 2016 In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted a funding source, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Investment ID: 24922). The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.


Nature Medicine | 2016

Erratum: Corrigendum: Protection against malaria at 1 year and immune correlates following PfSPZ vaccination

Andrew S. Ishizuka; Kirsten E. Lyke; Adam DeZure; Andrea A. Berry; Thomas L. Richie; Floreliz Mendoza; Mary E. Enama; Ingelise J. Gordon; Lee-Jah Chang; Uzma N Sarwar; Kathryn L. Zephir; LaSonji A. Holman; Eric R. James; Peter F. Billingsley; Anusha Gunasekera; Sumana Chakravarty; Anita Manoj; Minglin Li; Adam Ruben; Tao Li; Abraham G. Eappen; Richard E. Stafford; Natasha K C; Tooba Murshedkar; Hope DeCederfelt; Sarah Plummer; Cynthia S. Hendel; Laura Novik; Pamela Costner; Jamie G. Saunders

Nat. Med.; 10.1038/nm.4110; corrected online 18 May 2016 In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted a funding source, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Investment ID: 24922). The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

Collaboration


Dive into the Floreliz Mendoza's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jamie G. Saunders

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah Plummer

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cynthia S. Hendel

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ingelise J. Gordon

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura Novik

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary E. Enama

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

LaSonji A. Holman

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pamela Costner

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathryn L. Zephir

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge