Florian Scotte

Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Two Schedules of Docetaxel, Estramustine, and Prednisone Versus Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE Mitoxantrone-corticosteroid is currently the standard palliative treatment in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Recent clinical trials documented the high activity of the docetaxel-estramustine combination. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (primary end point) and safety of two docetaxel-estramustine-prednisone (DEP) regimens and mitoxantrone-prednisone (MP). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred thirty metastatic HRPC patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 2 or 35 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of each 21-day cycle) and estramustine (280 mg p.o. tid on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12) or mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; all patients received prednisone (10 mg daily). RESULTS One hundred twenty-seven patients were assessable for PSA response and safety. A > or = 50% PSA decline was found in a greater percentage of patients in the docetaxel arms (67% and 63%) compared with MP (18%; P = .0001). Median time to PSA progression was five times longer with DEP than with MP (8.8 and 9.3 v 1.7 months, respectively; P = .000001). Overall survival was better in the docetaxel arms (18.6 and 18.4 months) compared with the MP arm (13.4 months), but not significantly so (P = .3). Crossover rates differed significantly among treatment arms (16%, 10%, and 48% in arms A, B, and C, respectively; P = .00001). Treatment-related toxicities were mild and mainly hematologic. CONCLUSION The results of this randomized phase II study showed significantly higher PSA decline < or = 50% and longer times to progression in HRPC patients receiving DEP-based chemotherapy than MP, and that DEP could be proposed in this setting.

Multicenter Study of a Frozen Glove to Prevent Docetaxel-Induced Onycholysis and Cutaneous Toxicity of the Hand

PURPOSE Onycholysis and skin toxicity occur in approximately 30% of patients treated with docetaxel. We investigated the efficacy and safety of an Elasto-Gel (84400 APT Cedex, Akromed, France) frozen glove (FG) for the prevention of docetaxel-induced onycholysis and skin toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients receiving docetaxel 75 mg/m2 alone or in combination chemotherapy were eligible for this case-control study. Each patient wore an FG for a total of 90 minutes on the right hand. The left hand was not protected and acted as the control. Onycholysis and skin toxicity were assessed at each cycle by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and documented by photography. Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank test was used. RESULTS Between August 2002 and September 2003, 45 patients were evaluated. Onycholysis and skin toxicity were significantly lower in the FG-protected hand compared with the control hand (P = .0001). Onycholysis was grade (G) 0 in 89% v 49% and G1 to 2 in 11% v 51% for the FG-protected hand and the control hand, respectively. Skin toxicity was G0 in 73% v 41% and G1 to 2 in 27% v 59% for the FG-protected and the control hand, respectively. Median time to nail and skin toxicity occurrence was not significantly different between the FG-protected and the control hand, respectively (106 v 58 days for nail toxicity; 57 v 58 days for skin toxicity). Five patients (11%) experienced discomfort due to cold intolerance. CONCLUSION FG significantly reduces the nail and skin toxicity associated with docetaxel and provides a new tool in supportive care management to improve a patients quality of life.

Platelet Microparticles: A Potential Predictive Factor of Survival in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND Several studies suggest a causal relationship between platelet activation and cancer metastasis. Activated platelet microparticles (PMPs) release vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which play a major role in angiogenesis. OBJECTIVE We conducted a prospective, nonrandomised, single-centre study in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients to determine the impact of PMPs on the outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Eligible chemonaive and metastatic HRPC patients received docetaxel-based chemotherapy and a low dose of prednisone. INTERVENTION PMPs in whole blood were quantified before the start of chemotherapy through flow cytometry using an anti-CD41a monoclonal antibody, and plasma VEGF and bFGF were determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. MEASUREMENTS The primary end point was to evaluate the impact of the PMPs on overall survival (OS). We also studied the statistical interaction between PMPs and platelets and their relationship with OS. The median PMP value was used to sort patients into two groups. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Data of 43 consecutive HRPC patients treated in a single French centre were analysed. Significant correlations were observed between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), platelets, and PMP level. The median OS was significantly shorter for patients with >6867 PMPs per microl of whole blood than for those with lower values (16.7 vs 26.4 mo, p=0.013). A significant relationship was found between OS and PMPs, whereas a statistical interaction term between PMPs and platelets was significantly associated with OS (p=0.019). No association was found between OS and plasma VEGF and bFGF. In the multivariate analysis, only baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and ECOG PS remained significantly predictive of risk of death. CONCLUSIONS In HRPC patients, PMPs and their interaction with platelets were predictive of outcome. A biologic association between PMPs and the OS of HRPC patients, independent of chemotherapy regimen, should be demonstrated by confirmatory prospective studies.

Matched case‐control phase 2 study to evaluate the use of a frozen sock to prevent docetaxel‐induced onycholysis and cutaneous toxicity of the foot

Onycholysis occurs in approximately 30% of patients treated with docetaxel. The efficacy and safety of an Elasto‐Gel frozen sock (FS) was investigated for the prevention of docetaxel‐induced nail and skin toxicity of the feet.

Everolimus (RAD001): an mTOR inhibitor for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The recent introduction of drugs that inhibit angiogenesis or the mTOR has provided new options for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, a disease which often has a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy and cytokine therapy are largely ineffective. The 5-year survival rate is under 10%. Everolimus, an immunosuppressive drug widely used for the prevention of allograft rejection and an mTOR inhibitor, is one of the latest drugs undergoing clinical trials in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. It has been tested in patients with progressive disease after therapy with tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors (sunitinib, sorafenib or both), which interfere with signaling pathways, such as the VEGF pathway. Clinical efficacy results (progression-free survival) for everolimus are promising and the safety profile is good.

What is the real impact of bone pain on survival in patients with metastatic hormone‐refractory prostate cancer treated with docetaxel?

To determine the benefit of starting early chemotherapy with docetaxel (the recommended first‐line treatment) for patients with asymptomatic metastatic hormone‐refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

Salvage Therapy with Bevacizumab–Sunitinib Combination after Failure of Sunitinib Alone for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Series

We present a case series of seven patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) in combination with sunitinib 25-50 mg as salvage therapy after disease progression under sunitinib monotherapy. Two patients had a partial response, four had stable disease, and one patient had disease progression. After a median follow-up of 17.2 mo, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.5 and 15.1 mo, respectively. Two patients experienced exacerbation of their preexisting hypertension; there were no grade 4 toxicities. The bevacizumab-sunitinib combination in sunitinib-refractory patients seems active and has a tolerable toxicity profile.

Inhibiteurs de l’angiogenèse : revues de l’apport thérapeutique du sorafenib, du sunitinib et du bevacizumab dans le cancer du rein métastatique

Renal cell carcinoma accounts for approximately 3% of all human malignancies. The use of cytokines in metastatic stage of disease has been the standard until last decades, presenting partial and short duration responses. Research on angiogenesis in renal carcinoma has brought important advances to understand tumor biology and to allow us development of new antiangiogenic drugs. Sunitinib (SUTENT), sorafenib (NEXAVAR) and bevacizumab (AVASTIN) are actually three molecules accepted to use in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), with a good tolerability demonstrated in different studies. Clinical evidence shows sunitinib to be reference standard of care for the first-line treatment of mRCC. The use of bevacizumab in combination with interferon alfa (IFN alfa) can also be considered in this setting. Sorafenib is recommended for second-line treatment in cytokine-refractory patients, sunitinib being also accepted in this situation. Other combination of these molecules and their use as neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapy is being evaluated and should change in the short term the management of the disease.

Supportive care organisation in France: an in depth study by the French speaking association for supportive care in cancer (AFSOS).

BACKGROUND Supportive care in cancer (SCC) was further enhanced in the Second National Cancer Act decreed in December 2009. The aim of our study was to assess current SCC efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The French speaking association for supportive care in cancer (AFSOS) conducted an observational study to evaluate practices, organisations and information given to patients. A specific 32 point questionnaire was sent to 1621 French physicians (MDs) caring for cancer patients. RESULTS Three different organisations were evaluated: the individual MDs, the transversal team and its particular structure specialised in global patient care specifically developed at comprehensive cancer centres - CCC. During their disease, 68% of patients received SCC, which was more available during the palliative period (90%) than at the diagnosis (44%). Our results found that 71% of cancer departments had a specific interdisciplinary cross-team to provide SCC, particularly in CCC (62%; p=0.01) while 37% had specific inpatient units. A specific organisation dedicated to home care was greater in CCC than in public or private centres (69%, 45%, 20% respectively; p=0.01). Adverse event information was performed more by an oncologist than other specialists (p=0.01). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the specific SCC organisation could be a useful management tool to improve supportive care for cancer patients.

Rechallenge with mTOR Inhibitors in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Progressed on Previous mTOR Inhibitor Therapy

Objective: To determine if mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (everolimus or temsirolimus) rechallenge in the third- or fourth-line setting after sequential use of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF)-targeted agent and an mTOR inhibitor is a feasible and effective treatment strategy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: Patients who received a VEGF-targeted agent, an mTOR inhibitor and rechallenge with a second mTOR inhibitor at 2 institutions (Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou and Vienna Medical School) between 30 March 2001 and 15 September 2011 were included. Analyses of radiographic images were performed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.0, to determine the objective response rate and treatment duration (TD). Results: Twelve patients met the inclusion criteria. Following 1 or 2 VEGF receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 7 patients firstly received everolimus and 5 patients received temsirolimus. Irrespective of treatment sequence, 6 of 12 patients (50%) responded to everolimus and 4 of 12 patients (33%) responded to temsirolimus; 3 patients (25%) did not respond to either. Median TDs (95% confidence interval) for everolimus → temsirolimus and temsirolimus → everolimus sequences were 10.3 months (8.8-19.2 months) and 5.8 months (2.9-19.3 months), respectively. Conclusions: Despite the limited number of patients, this highlights the feasibility of utilizing mTOR rechallenge as an integral part of sequential treatment strategies in mRCC.