Folkert H.M. Morsink

Organoid Models of Human and Mouse Ductal Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies due to its late diagnosis and limited response to treatment. Tractable methods to identify and interrogate pathways involved in pancreatic tumorigenesis are urgently needed. We established organoid models from normal and neoplastic murine and human pancreas tissues. Pancreatic organoids can be rapidly generated from resected tumors and biopsies, survive cryopreservation, and exhibit ductal- and disease-stage-specific characteristics. Orthotopically transplanted neoplastic organoids recapitulate the full spectrum of tumor development by forming early-grade neoplasms that progress to locally invasive and metastatic carcinomas. Due to their ability to be genetically manipulated, organoids are a platform to probe genetic cooperation. Comprehensive transcriptional and proteomic analyses of murine pancreatic organoids revealed genes and pathways altered during disease progression. The confirmation of many of these protein changes in human tissues demonstrates that organoids are a facile model system to discover characteristics of this deadly malignancy.

Large genomic deletions of SMAD4, BMPR1A and PTEN in juvenile polyposis

Background/aims: Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterised by multiple gastrointestinal juvenile polyps and an increased risk of colorectal cancer. This syndrome is caused by germline mutation of either SMAD4 or BMPR1A, and possibly ENG. PTEN, originally linked to Cowden syndrome and Bannayan–Riley–Ruvalcaba syndrome, has also been associated with JPS. By direct sequencing, germline mutations are found in only 30–40% of patients with a JPS phenotype. Therefore, alternative ways of inactivation of the known JPS genes, or additional genes predisposing to JPS may be involved. In this study, a comprehensive genetic analysis of SMAD4, BMPR1A, PTEN and ENG is performed through direct sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in JPS patients. Methods: Archival material of 29 patients with JPS from 27 families was collected. Direct sequencing and MLPA analysis were performed to search for germline defects in SMAD4, BMPR1A, PTEN and ENG. Results: A germline defect in SMAD4, BMPR1A or PTEN was found in 13 of 27 (48.1%) unrelated JPS patients. Nine mutations (33.3%) were detected by direct sequencing, including six (22.2%) SMAD4 mutations and three (11.1%) BMPR1A mutations. MLPA identified four additional patients (14.8%) with germline hemizygous large genomic deletions, including one deletion of SMAD4, one deletion of exons 10 and 11 of BMPR1A, and two unrelated patients with deletion of both BMPR1A and PTEN. No ENG gene mutations were found. Conclusion: Large genomic deletions of SMAD4, BMPR1A and PTEN are a common cause of JPS. Using direct sequencing and MLPA, a germline defect was detected in 48.1% of JPS patients. MLPA identified 14.8% (4/27) of these mutations. Since a substantial percentage of JPS patients carry a germline deletion and MLPA is a reliable and user-friendly technique, it is concluded that MLPA is a valuable adjunct in JPS diagnosis.

Effects of processing delay, formalin fixation, and immunohistochemistry on RNA recovery from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections

Contemporary pathology involves an emerging role for molecular diagnostics. Current tissue handling procedures [ie, formalin fixation and paraffin embedment (FFPE)] have their origin in the aim to obtain good tissue morphology and optimal results within immunohistochemistry. Unfortunately, FFPE is notorious for its poor RNA conservation capacities. In this study, we have examined the impact of the individual steps in tissue handling processes on the RNA extractability, quality, and usability for reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. It was found that a prolonged prefixation time (ie, the time between tissue dissection and fixation) has a measurable impact on RNA integrity when analyzed with the Agilent Bioanalyzer. Surprisingly, however, the deteriorated RNA quality hardly had any consequences for reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction yields. Furthermore, we assessed the optimal fixation time for RNA preservation, and we found that an RNA heating step, preceding copy DNA synthesis, significantly increases the RNA template length. Finally, we provide a protocol for RNA isolation from immunohistochemically stained FFPE tissue sections. Thus, by applying alterations to tissue handling procedures, archival FFPE tissues become well suitable for RNA-based molecular diagnostics.

Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and pancreatic tumorigenesis: of mice and men.

CONTEXT Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival of less than 5%. Early detection is at present the only way to improve this outlook. This review focuses on the recent advances in our understanding of pancreatic carcinogenesis, the scientific evidence for a multistaged tumor progression, and the role genetically engineered mouse models can play in recapitulating the natural course and biology of human disease. OBJECTIVES To illustrate the stepwise tumor progression of pancreatic cancer and genetic alterations within the different stages of progression and to review the findings made with genetically engineered mouse models concerning pancreatic carcinogenesis. DATA SOURCES A review of recent literature on pancreatic tumorigenesis and genetically engineered mouse models. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic cancer develops through stepwise tumor progression in which preinvasive stages, called pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, precede invasive pancreatic cancer. Genetic alterations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes underlying pancreatic cancer are also found in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. These mutations accumulate during progression through the consecutive stages of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions. Also in genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, tumorigenesis occurs through stepwise progression via consecutive mouse pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and these models provide important tools for clinical applications. Nevertheless differences between mice and men still remain.

SMAD4 Immunohistochemistry Reflects Genetic Status in Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome

Purpose: Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) can be caused by a germline defect of the SMAD4 gene. Somatic inactivation of SMAD4 occurs in pancreatic and colorectal cancers and is reflected by loss of SMAD4 immunohistochemistry. Here, SMAD4 immunohistochemistry as a marker of SMAD4 gene status and the role of SMAD4 in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence in neoplastic progression in JPS are studied. Experimental Design: Twenty polyps with a SMAD4 germline defect and 38 control polyps were studied by SMAD4 immunohistochemistry. Inactivation of the SMAD4 wild-type allele was studied in dysplastic epithelium and in areas with aberrant SMAD4 expression. APC, β-catenin, p53, and K-ras were studied to evaluate the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Results: Nine of 20 polyps with a SMAD4 germline defect showed loss of epithelial SMAD4 expression. Loss of heterozygosity of SMAD4 was found in five polyps and a somatic stop codon mutation was found in two polyps without loss of heterozygosity. Remarkably, somatic inactivation of epithelial SMAD4 did not always coincide with dysplasia and aberrant p53 staining was found in four of six dysplastic polyps with normal SMAD4 staining. One K-ras mutation was found in nine juvenile polyps with dysplasia. No evidence for Wnt activation was found. Conclusions: SMAD4 immunohistochemistry mirrors genetic status and provides a specific adjunct in the molecular diagnosis of JPS. However, epithelial SMAD4 inactivation is not required for polyp formation and is not obligatory for neoplastic progression in JPS. Instead, different routes to neoplasia in JPS caused by germline SMAD4 mutation seem to be operative, including somatic loss of SMAD4 and p53 inactivation without somatic loss of SMAD4. Clin Cancer Res; 16(16); 4126–34. ©2010 AACR.

Analysis of LKB1 mutations and other molecular alterations in pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma

Acinar cell carcinoma is a rare non-ductal neoplasm of the pancreas with poorly defined molecular genetic features. Recently, biallelic inactivation of LKB1 was described in an acinar cell carcinoma of a Peutz-Jeghers patient carrying a heterozygous germline LKB1 mutation, and inhibition of mTOR signaling resulted in partial remission of the tumor. To explore the potential of mTOR inhibitors in sporadic acinar cell carcinoma, the LKB1 gene was investigated in five sporadic acinar cell carcinomas by sequence analysis, methylation analysis and mRNA expression. In addition, microsatellite instability and methylation of a number of tumor suppressor genes were investigated and KRAS, TP53, CDKN1A, SMAD4 and CTNNB1 were studied by mutation analysis and immunohistochemistry. No mutations, deletions or promoter hypermethylation of LKB1 were found in any of the sporadic acinar cell carcinomas, and mRNA expression of LKB1 was not altered. Amplifications at chromosome 20q and 19p were found in 100 and 80% of the cases, respectively. In addition, hypermethylation of one or more tumor suppressor genes was found in 80% of cases. One case harbored a TP53 mutation, and expression of SMAD4 and CTNNB1 was altered in one case each. No KRAS mutations or microsatellite instability were found. To conclude, no evidence for a role for LKB1 in tumorigenesis of sporadic pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma was found. However, copy number variations and hypermethylation were found in a majority of cases. Molecular pathways involved in acinar cell carcinoma-tumorigenesis differ from those involved in ductal pancreatic neoplasms. Further studies are needed to increase our understanding of molecular pathogenesis of acinar cell carcinoma, which may eventually result in development of new therapeutic targets.

Increased expression of cytoplasmic HuR in familial adenomatous polyposis

Background: HuR is an mRNA stability factor that binds to the AU-rich element-containing 3’ untranslated region of the transcript. HuR overexpression is associated with increased tumor growth. Increased cytoplasmic HuR expression occurs in several cancer types, including colorectal cancer where it may contribute to the increased cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression observed during tumorigenesis. To investigate expression of HuR in the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence, we examined expression of HuR in colorectal mucosa of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and sporadic colorectal cancer with correlation to COX-2 expression. Materials and methods: HuR and COX-2 protein expression were studied by immunohistochemistry of normal colon mucosa (N=20), adenomas (N=112), carcinomas (N=9) from patients with FAP, and 141 sporadic colorectal adenocarcinomas (Dukes B and C). Results: Cytoplasmic HuR staining was found in the epithelium of 10% of normal mucosa, 14.3% of adenomas and 88.9% of adenocarcinomas from FAP patients (p < 0.01) and in 68.8% of sporadic colorectal carcinomas. High epithelial COX-2 immunostaining was observed in 10% of normal, 8% of adenomas and all adenocarcinomas from FAP patients (p < 0.01) and in 69.5% of sporadic colorectal carcinomas. Positive cytoplasmic HuR immunostaining correlated with high COX-2 immunoreactivity in colon mucosa of FAP patients (p < 0.01) and in sporadic colorectal carcinomas. (p = 0.016)Conclusions: HuR is increasingly expressed in the cytoplasmic epithelial compartment in consecutive stages of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence in FAP. Also, COX-2 levels correlate with cytoplasmic expression of HuR in colonic epithelium of FAP patients and in sporadic colorectal cancer specimens. The role of cytoplasmic expression of HuR as a biomarker for progression of adenomas in FAP needs further study.

Ductuloinsular tumors of the pancreas: endocrine tumors with entrapped nonneoplastic ductules.

Rare pancreatic neoplasms have been reported that show both endocrine and exocrine differentiation in the neoplastic components. In addition, pancreatic endocrine tumors may contain small, cytologically bland ductules intimately admixed with the endocrine component. It was recently suggested that these ductules represent an intrinsic part of the tumor, ie, that the ductules are neoplastic, and the term “ductulo-insular tumors of the pancreas” was proposed. In the present study, the nature of the ductular component of 16 cases of ductule-containing pancreatic endocrine tumors was investigated at the molecular level. Molecular genetic changes often present in ductal pancreatic neoplasms were not found by immunohistochemistry for DPC4, p53, and ERBB2 and by sequence analysis of KRAS codon 12. An X-chromosome inactivation clonality assay of one such tumor from a female patient indicated that the neuroendocrine component was monoclonal, contrasting with the ductular component that was polyclonal. The lymph node and liver metastases from three patients only contained the neuroendocrine component, and no ductules were observed. Although certain morphologic features of ductule-containing endocrine tumors are reminiscent of the embryonic development of the human pancreas, none of the tumors expressed PDX-1, a transcription factor essential in pancreatic organ development. Based on our results, it is suggested that the ductular component occasionally found in pancreatic endocrine tumors is the result of entrapment of preexisting nonneoplastic ductules and that the tumors are otherwise not distinctive from conventional pancreatic endocrine tumors. Although the phenomenon is rare, it is important to recognize and to distinguish these tumors from true mixed ductal-endocrine neoplasms, which are generally more clinically aggressive. “Pancreatic endocrine tumors with entrapped ductules” would be the preferred nomenclature since it better reflects the nonneoplastic nature of the ductules.

Histologic Variations in Juvenile Polyp Phenotype Correlate With Genetic Defect Underlying Juvenile Polyposis

Background Juvenile polyps are distinct hamartomatous malformations of the gastrointestinal tract that may occur in the heritable juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) or sporadically. Histologically, juvenile polyps are characterized by a marked increase of the stromal cell compartment, but an epithelial phenotype has also been reported. JPS has an increased risk of colorectal cancer but sporadic juvenile polyps do not. In 50% to 60% of patients with JPS, a germline mutation of the transforming growth factor-&bgr;/bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway genes SMAD4 or BMPR1A is found. This study compares the histologic phenotype of juvenile polyps with a SMAD4 or BMPR1A germline mutation and sporadic juvenile polyps. Methods Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained slides of 65 JPS polyps and 25 sporadic juvenile polyps were reviewed for histologic features and dysplasia. Systematic random crypt and stroma counts were obtained by count stereology, and a crypt-stroma ratio was determined. All polyps were subsequently categorized as type A (crypt-stroma ratio <1.00) or type B (crypt-stroma ratio ≥1.00), the latter referring to the epithelial phenotype. Cell cycle activity was assessed using immunohistochemistry ofthe proliferation marker Ki67, and mutation analysis was carried out for KRAS and APC to determine the involvement of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Results Juvenile polyps with a SMAD4 germline mutation were predominantly type B, whereas type A was more common among juvenile polyps with a BMPR1A germline mutation. However, this distinction could not be ascribed to differences in cell cycle activity. Dysplasia was equally common in JPS polyps with either a SMAD4 or BMPR1A germline mutation, in which the involvement of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence does not seem to play a distinct role. Conclusion Juvenile polyps in the setting of JPS exhibit distinct phenotypes correlating with the underlying genetic defect.

Generation of an inducible colon-specific Cre enzyme mouse line for colon cancer research

Significance A major limitation of current mouse models of colorectal cancer (CRC) is that the cancer that develops is often significantly different from human colon cancer in terms of latency, intestinal location, or molecular signature. Carbonic anhydrase I (Car1) is a gene expressed by colonic epithelial cells. We generated an inducible Car1CreER mouse model with Cre expression in the cecum and proximal colon. Mutations of genes that drive human CRC with our Car1CreER mouse yielded tumors exclusively in the cecum and proximal colon. Differentiated colonic cells in the proximal colon with Apc/Kras mutations initiate tumors supporting a top-down model of intestinal tumorigenesis. The inducible Car1CreER will be a useful model in studying human intestinal cancers originating from the proximal colon. Current mouse models for colorectal cancer often differ significantly from human colon cancer, being largely restricted to the small intestine. Here, we aim to develop a colon-specific inducible mouse model that can faithfully recapitulate human colon cancer initiation and progression. Carbonic anhydrase I (Car1) is a gene expressed uniquely in colonic epithelial cells. We generated a colon-specific inducible Car1CreER knock-in (KI) mouse with broad Cre activity in epithelial cells of the proximal colon and cecum. Deletion of the tumor suppressor gene Apc using the Car1CreER KI caused tumor formation in the cecum but did not yield adenomas in the proximal colon. Mutation of both Apc and Kras yielded microadenomas in both the cecum and the proximal colon, which progressed to macroadenomas with significant morbidity. Aggressive carcinomas with some invasion into lymph nodes developed upon combined induction of oncogenic mutations of Apc, Kras, p53, and Smad4. Importantly, no adenomas were observed in the small intestine. Additionally, we observed tumors from differentiated Car1-expressing cells with Apc/Kras mutations, suggesting that a top-down model of intestinal tumorigenesis can occur with multiple mutations. Our results establish the Car1CreER KI as a valuable mouse model to study colon-specific tumorigenesis and metastasis as well as cancer-cell-of-origin questions.