Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Forrest C. Jellison is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Forrest C. Jellison.


Journal of Endourology | 2008

Prospective Comparison of Four Laparoscopic Vessel Ligation Devices

Gregory R. Lamberton; Ryan S. Hsi; Daniel H. Jin; Tekisha U. Lindler; Forrest C. Jellison; D. Duane Baldwin

PURPOSE The merits of laparoscopic sealing devices have been poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to compare two bipolar sealing devices [LigaSure V (LS) and Gyrus PK (GP)], an ultrasonic device [Harmonic Scalpel ACE (HS)] and a novel device using nanotechnology [EnSeal PTC (ES)]. MATERIALS AND METHODS The ability of all four 5 mm devices to seal 5 mm bovine arteries was tested under controlled temperature and humidity in accordance with manufacturer specifications. Study endpoints included lateral thermal spread, time to seal, burst pressure, smoke production and subjective (blinded review of video clips) and objective (measured using an aerosol monitor) effect upon visibility. RESULTS The HS demonstrated the least thermal spread. The LS (10.0 secs) and GP (11.1 secs) had the fastest sealing times (p<0.001 for both) when compared to ES (19.2 sec) and HS (14.3 sec). Mean burst pressure values were: LS 385 mm Hg, GP 290 mm Hg, ES 255 mm Hg and HS 204 mm Hg. The HS had the best subjective visibility score and the lowest objective smoke production (2.88 ppm) compared to the GP (74.1 ppm), ES (21.6 ppm) and LS (12.5 ppm), (p<0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS The LS has the highest burst pressure and fastest sealing time and was the highest rated overall. The HS produced the lowest thermal spread and smoke but had the lowest mean burst pressure. The GP had the highest smoke production, and variable burst pressures. Despite employing nanotechnology, the ES device was the slowest and had variable burst pressures.


The Journal of Urology | 2009

Effect of Low Dose Radiation Computerized Tomography Protocols on Distal Ureteral Calculus Detection

Forrest C. Jellison; Jason C. Smith; Jonathan P. Heldt; Nathan Spengler; Lesli I. Nicolay; Herbert C. Ruckle; Jeffrey L. Koning; William W. Millard; Daniel H. Jin; D. Duane Baldwin

PURPOSE Unenhanced multidetector computerized tomography is the imaging modality of choice for urinary calculi but exposes patients to substantial radiation doses with a subsequent risk of radiation induced secondary malignancy. We compared ultra low dose and conventional computerized tomography protocols for detecting distal ureteral calculi in a cadaveric model. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 85 calcium oxalate stones 3 to 7 mm long were prospectively placed in 14 human cadaveric distal ureters in 56 random configurations. The intact kidneys, ureters and bladders were placed in a human cadaveric vehicle and computerized tomography was performed at 140, 100, 60, 30, 15 and 7.5 mA seconds while keeping other imaging parameters constant. Images were independently reviewed in random order by 2 blinded radiologists to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each mA second setting. RESULTS Overall sensitivity and specificity were 98% and 83%, respectively. Imaging using 140, 100, 60, 30, 15 and 7.5 mA second settings resulted in 98%, 97%, 97%, 96%, 98% and 97% sensitivity, and 83%, 83%, 83%, 86%, 80% and 84% specificity, respectively. Interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa >0.87). There was no significant difference in sensitivity or specificity at any mA second settings. All false-negative results were noted for 3 mm calculi at a similar frequency at each mA second setting. CONCLUSIONS Ultra low dose computerized tomography protocols detected distal ureteral calculi in a fashion similar to that of conventional computerized tomography protocols in a cadaveric model. These protocols may decrease the radiation dose up to 95%, reducing the risk of secondary malignancies.


Journal of Endourology | 2010

Fluoroscopic Organ and Tissue-Specific Radiation Exposure by Sex and Body Mass Index During Ureteroscopy

Nathaniel Krupp; Ryan Bowman; Christopher Tenggardjaja; Forrest C. Jellison; Bryan Hill; Kamyar Ebrahimi; Jason C. Smith; Donald Farley; D. Duane Baldwin

INTRODUCTION Although radiation exposure from CT and plain film imaging has been characterized, the radiation received by patients during modern-era fluoroscopy has not been well described. The purposes of this study were to measure absolute organ and tissue-specific radiation doses during ureteroscopy and to determine the influence of body mass index (BMI) and sex on these doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight cadavers underwent a simulated left ureteroscopy. Using a modern C-arm with automatic exposure control settings, thermoluminescent dosimeters were exposed for a fluoroscopy time of 145 seconds (mean time of clinical ureteroscopies from 2006 to 2008). Total tissue exposures were compared by BMI and between sexes using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test and the Mann-Whitney test with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS Among all cadavers, radiation doses were significantly lower in all contralateral organs excluding the gonad (p < 0.012). Doses were similar bilaterally in the gonad in cadavers with BMI <30, and in all organs in cadavers with BMI >30 (p > 0.05). There were significantly higher mean bilateral gonadal doses in female cadavers (3.4 mGy left and 1.9 mGy right) compared with male cadavers (0.36 mGy left and 0.39 mGy right). The highest cancer risk increase was seen at the posterior skin equivalent to 104 additional cancers per 100,000 patients. CONCLUSION Contralateral doses were lower for all organs except the gonad when the BMI was <30. In contrast, when the BMI was >30, there was no difference in radiation dose delivered to the ipsilateral and contralateral organs. Gonadal doses were significantly higher in female cadavers. Modern-era fluoroscopy remains a significant source of radiation exposure and steps should be taken to minimize exposure during ureteroscopy.


Journal of Endourology | 2011

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Previous Renal Transplantation

Damien Smith; Forrest C. Jellison; Jonathan P. Heldt; Christopher Tenggardjaja; Ryan Bowman; Daniel H. Jin; Joshua Chamberlin; Paul D. Lui; D. Duane Baldwin

PURPOSE To evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients with previous renal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified all patients who had undergone RARP for localized prostate cancer between 2005 and 2008 at a single institution (N=228). Of these, three patients were renal transplant recipients. A four-arm robotic configuration was used in all patients. Port placement was modified in two of the three renal transplant recipients to avoid trauma to the renal allograft. Preoperative demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS RARP was completed successfully in all three renal transplant recipients. As expected, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score (3.3 vs 2.4) and Charlson weighted index of comorbidity (4.7 vs 2.4) were greater in previous transplant patients. There were no major differences in mean age, Gleason score, body mass index, estimated blood loss, operative time, complications, or oncologic outcomes between the two groups. Each of the patients with renal allografts had an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level and was continent (needing no pads) at 13 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS RARP is feasible in patients with a previous renal transplant. Although technically more challenging, RARP can be performed in previous transplant patients with acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes similar to those of other prostate cancer patients.


Journal of Endourology | 2011

A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Traditional Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery with Needlescopic-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in the Porcine Model

Lesli I. Nicolay; Ryan Bowman; Jonathan P. Heldt; Forrest C. Jellison; Neda Mehr; Christopher Tenggardjaja; William W. Millard; Jeffrey L. Koning; D. Duane Baldwin

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery produces virtually no scar but is technically challenging because of the loss of triangulation. The objective of this study is to compare classic transumbilical LESS nephrectomy with needlescopic-assisted laparoscopy (NAL) surgery. In doing so, we evaluated whether the addition of a single 2-mm subcostal port could restore triangulation while not jeopardizing recovery or cosmetic outcome in the porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten female farm pigs were randomized to laparoscopic nephrectomy with either LESS or NAL. In LESS, a TriPort was placed through a single 2.5-cm umbilical incision. In NAL, 5- and 10-mm ports were placed in the umbilicus and a 2-mm port was placed in the midclavicular line. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters were compared. Variables were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and two-tailed Fisher exact test. Cosmesis was evaluated objectively using the Vancouver Scar Scale and subjectively by a blinded dermatologist. A cost analysis was performed. RESULTS Estimated blood loss was minimal in both groups (28.8 mL in LESS and 9.4 mL in NAL). Operative time was significantly shorter in NAL (103 vs 150 min; P<0.001). There was no difference in complications (2 vs 1; P=0.500), objective cosmesis (3.9 vs 3.8; P>0.2), or subjective cosmesis (2 vs 3; P=0.500). The NAL protocol had significantly lower disposable equipment costs (


The Journal of Urology | 2006

A novel single step percutaneous access sheath: the initial human experience.

D. Duane Baldwin; Lincoln J. Maynes; Premal J. Desai; Forrest C. Jellison; Christopher Tsai; Gary R. Barker

363 vs


Journal of Endourology | 2011

Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Are Candidates for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Jonathan P. Heldt; Forrest C. Jellison; Walter Yuen; Christopher Tenggardjaja; Paul D. Lui; Herbert C. Ruckle; Gary R. Barker; D. Duane Baldwin

1696). CONCLUSIONS The addition of a 2-mm subcostal port and the restoration of triangulation in the NAL protocol enable shorter operative times, increased surgeon comfort, improved technical ease, and lower costs while maintaining the scarless cosmesis of the traditional LESS protocol.


Journal of Endourology | 2008

Vessel Length Following Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Impact of Vascular Ligation Technique on Allograft Vessel Length

Forrest C. Jellison; Satyan K. Shah; Joe W. Mashni; Lesli I. Nicolay; Okechukwu K. Ojogho; D. Duane Baldwin

PURPOSE A novel 1-step percutaneous access sheath NS has been developed that allows the insertion of a dilating balloon and renal access sheath in a single step. We present the initial human experience with this sheath. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective chart and database review of the initial 30 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous nephrostolithotomy using the NS. Data collected included patient demographics, operative and recovery parameters, and complications. RESULTS Mean patient age was 50.4 years (range 11 to 81), mean body mass index was 31.63 kg/m(2) (range 17.1 to 65) and mean preoperative stone area was 6.23 cm(2) (range 1 to 14.6). Six and 3 patients had full and partial staghorn calculi, respectively. Access was achieved via the upper pole in 16 patients, middle pole in 7 and lower pole in 7. Mean operative time was 114.8 minutes (range 61 to 237). Mean estimated blood loss was 145.5 cc (range 10 to 500) and mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.89 days (range 2 to 14). A total of 23 patients (76.7%) had no residual calculi on postoperative computerized tomography, 5 (16.7%) had residual fragments 4 mm or less and 2 (6.7%) had residual stone fragments greater than 4 mm. There were no complications related to the NS. CONCLUSIONS The NS is safe, easy to use and has potential advantages compared to currently available renal access sheaths.


Urology | 2011

Ocular Complications After Open and Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

Jeffrey L. Koning; Lesli I. Nicolay; Forrest C. Jellison; Jonathan P. Heldt; Jennifer A. Dunbar; D. Duane Baldwin

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have multiple comorbidities that place them at increased risk for surgical complications. Consequently, patients with both ESRD and prostate cancer (PCa) have rarely been considered candidates for radical prostatectomy. The objective of this study is to compare ESRD patients who are undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with a cohort of patients with no history of dialysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of 430 patients who were undergoing RALP, including 12 receiving dialysis at the time of surgery. Preoperative demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were compared using a two-tailed Student t test and a chi-square test, with significance at P<0.05. RESULTS Patient demographics including body mass index, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value were similar between the two groups. Patients with ESRD had younger age (55.5 vs 62.9 years; P<0.01), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (3.7 vs 2.5; P<0.01), and higher age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (6.2 vs 4.2; P<0.01). Patient outcomes including operative time, estimated blood loss, complication rate, postoperative stay, and positive margins did not differ significantly between groups. No ESRD patients needed pads or had a detectable PSA level using an ultrasensitive assay. CONCLUSIONS This series represents the largest series of patients with ESRD undergoing RALP. These patients experienced similar outcomes compared with patients with no history of dialysis despite greater preoperative comorbidity. RALP produces minimal fluid shifts, low blood loss, and excellent cancer control, making it an ideal treatment option to prepare patients with both ESRD and PCa for renal transplantation.


Journal of Endourology | 2010

Hemostatic Sandwich to Control Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Tract Bleeding

William W. Millard; Forrest C. Jellison; Christopher Tenggardjaja; Kamyar Ebrahimi; D. Duane Baldwin

PURPOSE A variety of techniques have been used to secure the renal artery and vein during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The purpose of this study is to compare the amount of vessel length lost when the artery and vein are secured with four different techniques. METHODS A model was constructed to simulate a left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. In this model vessel length lost was determined when veins were secured using polymer locking (PL) clips, the endo-GIA stapling device, and the endo-TA stapling device. Arterial length lost was determined for the same three techniques, as well as securing the artery with titanium (Ti) clips. RESULTS The mean arterial length lost for the PL clips, Ti clips, endo-TA, and endo-GIA stapling devices was 6.2, 6.3, 9.8, and 10.0 mm, respectively. Both clip types produced less loss of arterial length than both types of stapling devices (P<0.001), and there was no difference between the two types of stapling devices (P=0.73) or clips (P=0.85). The mean venous length lost for the PL clip, endo-GIA, and endo-TA stapling devices was 5.7, 10.1, and 9.4 mm, respectively. The PL clips resulted in significantly less vessel loss compared to both stapling devices (P<0.001), and there was no difference between the two stapling devices (P=0.40). CONCLUSIONS Both types of clips resulted in longer graft arterial lengths compared to both stapling devices. PL clips resulted in longer graft vein length compared to the two stapling devices. The endo-TA stapling device was limited in this model by its inability to articulate.

Collaboration


Dive into the Forrest C. Jellison's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Duane Baldwin

Loma Linda University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lesli I. Nicolay

Loma Linda University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan Bowman

Loma Linda University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan P. Heldt

Loma Linda University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel H. Jin

Loma Linda University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey L. Koning

Loma Linda University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge