Forrest L. Smith

Involvement of PKCα and G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in agonist-selective desensitization of µ-opioid receptors in mature brain neurons

Background and purpose:  The ability of an agonist to induce desensitization of the µ‐opioid receptor (MOR) depends upon the agonist used. Furthermore, previous data suggest that the intracellular mechanisms underlying desensitization may be agonist‐specific. We investigated the mechanisms underlying MOR desensitization, in adult mammalian neurons, caused by morphine (a partial agonist in this system) and DAMGO (a high‐efficacy agonist).

Role of protein kinase C and μ-opioid receptor (MOPr) desensitization in tolerance to morphine in rat locus coeruleus neurons

In morphine tolerance a key question that remains to be answered is whether μ‐opioid receptor (MOPr) desensitization contributes to morphine tolerance, and if so by what cellular mechanisms. Here we demonstrate that MOPr desensitization can be observed in single rat brainstem locus coeruleus (LC) neurons following either prolonged (> 4 h) exposure to morphine in vitro or following treatment of animals with morphine in vivo for 3 days. Analysis of receptor function by an operational model indicated that with either treatment morphine could induce a profound degree (70–80%) of loss of receptor function. Ongoing PKC activity in the MOPr‐expressing neurons themselves, primarily by PKCα, was required to maintain morphine‐induced MOPr desensitization, because exposure to PKC inhibitors for only the last 30–50 min of exposure to morphine reduced the MOPr desensitization that was induced both in vitro and in vivo. The presence of morphine was also required for maintenance of desensitization, as washout of morphine for > 2 h reversed MOPr desensitization. MOPr desensitization was homologous, as there was no change in α2‐adrenoceptor or ORL1 receptor function. These results demonstrate that prolonged morphine treatment induces extensive homologous desensitization of MOPrs in mature neurons, that this desensitization has a significant PKC‐dependent component and that this desensitization underlies the maintenance of morphine tolerance.

The expression of a high level of morphine antinociceptive tolerance in mice involves both PKC and PKA.

We have previously reported that intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of either a PKC or PKA inhibitor completely reversed the expression of 5- to 8-fold morphine antinociceptive tolerance. We developed a model of 45-fold morphine tolerance that included a 75-mg morphine pellet and twice daily morphine injections. PKC inhibitor doses of bisindolylmaleimide I and Gö-7874 that completely reversed 8-fold tolerance only partly reversed the 45-fold level of antinociceptive tolerance. A component of tolerance was resistant to PKC inhibition, since even higher inhibitor doses failed to further reverse the high level of morphine tolerance. In addition, the 45-fold tolerance was only partly reversed by the PKA inhibitor KT-5720 at a dose previously cited by others to reverse 5-fold tolerance. Another PKA inhibitor 4-cyano-3-methylisoquinoline only partly reversed the morphine tolerance as well. In other experiments PKC and PKA inhibitors were co-administered together to determine their effectiveness for completely reversing the 45-fold level of morphine tolerance. Co-administering either bisindolylmaleimide I with KT-5720, or Gö-7874 with KT-5720, completely reversed the high level of tolerance. The high level of morphine tolerance was also completely reversed by co-administering Gö-7874 with 4-cyano-3-methylisoquinoline. Thus, high levels of morphine tolerance may reflect increases in protein phosphorylation by the terminal kinases of both the adenylyl cyclase and phosphatidylinositol cascades in brain and spinal cord areas critical to the expression of antinociception.

Prolonged reversal of morphine tolerance with no reversal of dependence by protein kinase C inhibitors.

The phosphatidylinositol (PI) cascade plays a pivotal role in mediating behavioral tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine. Earlier we reported that antinociceptive tolerance was completely reversed 30 min after the administration of inhibitors of each step in the PI cascade. The aim of this study was to determine whether injection of a single dose of protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor would elicit a prolonged reversal of morphine tolerance for up to 24 h. Three days after implantation of placebo- or 75-mg morphine pellets, mice received intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections of vehicle or PKC inhibitor drug. Morphine challenge doses were then administered 4, 8 and 24 h later to test for tolerance reversal. In non-tolerant mice, Gö-7874 and sangivamycin had no effect on the potency of morphine. However, Gö-7874 and sangivamycin significantly reversed morphine tolerance at 4, 8 and 24 h. In addition, the role of PKC in morphine physical dependence was determined. Gö-7874 and sangivamycin by themselves did not precipitate spontaneous morphine withdrawal. Therefore, experiments were conducted to determine whether the PKC inhibitors would block naloxone-precipitated withdrawal. However, neither a 30-min nor a 24-h pretreatment with Gö-7874 or sangivamycin blocked naloxone withdrawal. Our results along with other publications indicate that PKC is a pivotal kinase essential for maintaining animals in an opioid tolerant state. Finally, the use of persistent PKC inhibitors that lasted for 24 h demonstrated that the neuronal systems in these animals did not adapt by increasing the activity of other protein kinase cascades to re-establish morphine tolerance.

The effect of protein kinase C and G protein-coupled receptor kinase inhibition on tolerance induced by mu-opioid agonists of different efficacy.

Differences in the mechanisms underlying tolerance and μ-opioid receptor desensitization resulting from exposure to opioid agonists of different efficacy have been suggested previously. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of protein kinase C (PKC) and G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) inhibition on antinociceptive tolerance in vivo to opioid agonists of different efficacy. A rapid (8-h) tolerance-induction model was used where each opioid was repeatedly administered to naive mice. Animals were then challenged with the opioid after injection of a kinase inhibitor to determine its effects on the level of tolerance. Tolerance to meperidine, morphine, or fentanyl was fully reversed by the PKC inhibitor 12-(2-cyanoethyl)-6,7,12,13-tetrahydro-13-methyl-5-oxo-5H-indolo(2,3-a)pyrrolo(3,4-c)carbazole (Gö6976). However, in vivo tolerance to [d-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO) was not reversed by PKC inhibition. The novel small-molecule GRK inhibitors β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 inhibitor and 2-(8-[(dimethylamino) methyl]-6,7,8,9-tetrahydropyridol[1,2-a]indol-3-yl)-3-(1-methylindol-3-yl)maleimide (Ro 32-0432) did not reverse the tolerance to meperidine, fentanyl, or morphine but did reverse the tolerance to DAMGO. To correlate GRK-dependent DAMGO-induced tolerance with μ-opioid receptor desensitization, we used in vitro whole-cell patch-clamp recording from mouse locus coeruleus neurons and observed that the GRK inhibitors reduced DAMGO-induced desensitization of μ-opioid receptors, whereas the PKC inhibitor had no effect. These results suggest that tolerance induced by low- and moderate-efficacy μ-opioid receptor agonists is dependent on PKC, whereas tolerance induced by the high-efficacy agonist DAMGO is dependent on GRK.

Pharmacological Characterization of Novel Water-Soluble Cannabinoids

Presently, there are numerous structural classes of cannabinoid receptor agonists, all of which require solubilization for experimental purposes. One strategy for solubilizing water-insoluble tetrahydrocannabinols is conversion of the phenolic hydroxyl to a morpholinobutyryloxy substituent. The hydrochloride salts of these analogs are water-soluble and active in vivo when administered in saline. The present investigation demonstrated that hydrochloride salts of numerous substituted butyryloxy esters are water-soluble and highly potent. The substitutions include piperidine, piperazine, and alkyl-substituted amino moieties. It was also discovered that incorporation of a nitrogenous moiety in the alkyl side chain increased the pharmacological potency of tetrahydrocannabinol. For example, an analog containing a pyrazole in the side chain (O-2545) was found to have high affinity and efficacy at cannabinoid 1 (CB1) and CB2 receptors, and when dissolved in saline, it was highly efficacious when administered either intravenously or intracerebroventricularly to mice. A series of carboxamido and carboxylic acid amide analogs exhibited high pharmacological potency, but their hydrochloride salts were not water-soluble. On the other hand, incorporation of imidazoles into the terminus of the side chain led to water-soluble hydrochloride salts that were highly potent when administered in saline to laboratory animals. It is now possible to conduct cannabinoid research with agonists that are water-soluble and thus obviating the need of solubilizing agents.

Pre-treatment with a PKC or PKA inhibitor prevents the development of morphine tolerance but not physical dependence in mice

We previously demonstrated that intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of protein kinase C (PKC) or protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitors reversed morphine antinociceptive tolerance in 3-day morphine-pelleted mice. The present study aimed at evaluating whether pre-treating mice with a PKC or PKA inhibitor prior to pellet implantation would prevent the development of morphine tolerance and physical dependence. Antinociception was assessed using the warm-water tail immersion test and physical dependence was evaluated by quantifying/scoring naloxone-precipitated withdrawal signs. While drug-naïve mice pelleted with a 75 mg morphine pellet for 3 days developed a 5.8-fold tolerance to morphine antinociception, mice pre-treated i.c.v. with the PKC inhibitors bisindolylmaleimide I, Go-7874 or Go-6976, or with the myristoylated PKA inhibitor, PKI-(14-22)-amide failed to develop any tolerance to morphine antinociception. Experiments were also conducted to determine whether morphine-pelleted mice were physically dependent when pre-treated with PKC or PKA inhibitors. The same inhibitor doses that prevented morphine tolerance were evaluated in other mice injected s.c. with naloxone and tested for precipitated withdrawal. The pre-treatment with PKC or PKA inhibitors failed to attenuate or block the signs of morphine withdrawal including jumping, wet-dog shakes, rearing, forepaw tremor, increased locomotion, grooming, diarrhea, tachypnea and ptosis. These data suggest that elevations in the activity of PKC and PKA in the brain are critical to the development of morphine tolerance. However, it appears that tolerance can be dissociated from physical dependence, indicating a role for PKC and PKA to affect antinociception but not those signs mediated through the complex physiological processes of withdrawal.

Decrease in N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor-NR2B subunit levels by intrathecal short-hairpin RNA blocks group I metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated hyperalgesia.

The present study characterizes the involvement of the N-methyl-d-aspartic acid receptors (NMDARs) in mediating thermal hyperalgesia induced by activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Intrathecal administration of the mGluR1/5 agonist (S)-3,5-DHPG [(S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine] to mice resulted in significant hyperalgesia as assessed by the tail immersion test. The pretreatment of mice i.t. with CGS 19755 (selective antagonist of the NMDAR), CGP 78608 [[(1S)-1-[[(7-bromo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,3-dioxo-5-quinoxalinyl)methyl]amino]ethyl]phosphonic acid] (selective antagonist at the glycine-binding site of the NMDAR), ifenprodil and Ro 25-6981 (selective antagonists of the NR2B subunit of the NMDAR), bisindolylmaleimide I and Go-7874 [12-(2-cyanoethyl)-6,7,12,13-tetrahydro-13-methyl-5-oxo-5H-indolo(2,3-a)pyrrolo(3,4-c)-carbazole] (inhibitors of protein kinase C), or PKI-(14–22)-amide [Myr-N-Gly-Arg-Thr-Gly-Arg-Arg-Asn-Ala-Ile-NH2] (inhibitor of protein kinase A) dose-dependently inhibited the hyperalgesia induced by i.t. administration of the mGluR1/5 receptor agonist (S)-3,5-DHPG. In contrast, i.t. pretreatment of mice with NVP-AAM077 [[(R)-[(S)-1-(4-bromophenyl)-ethylamino]-(2,3-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoxalin-5-yl)-methyl]-phosphonic acid] (selective antagonist of the NR2A subunit of the NMDAR) or DT-3 [H-Arg-Gln-Ile-Lys-Ile-Trp-Phe-Gln-Asn-Arg-Arg-Met-Lys-Trp-Lys-Lys-Leu-Arg-Lys-Lys-Lys-Lys-Lys-His-OH] (inhibitor of protein kinase G) had no effect on (S)-3,5-DHPG-mediated hyperalgesia. We also show for the first time that i.t. injection of pSM2 (pShag Magic version 2)-grin2b (coding for an short-hairpin RNA to the NR2B subunit of the NMDAR) resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the NR2B protein and blockade of hyperalgesia induced by activation of the mGluR1/5 in (S)-3,5-DHPG-treated mice. Taken together, our results suggest the hypothesis that mGluRs are coupled to the NMDAR channels through the NR2B subunit in the spinal cord and that this coupling involves the activation of protein kinase C and protein kinase A.

mGluR5 antagonists that block calcium mobilization in vitro also reverse (S)-3,5-DHPG-induced hyperalgesia and morphine antinociceptive tolerance in vivo.

The present study comparatively evaluated the potency of a series of new phenylethyl[1,2,4]methyltriazines which are analogues of the classical metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) antagonist 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) in blocking hyperalgesia induced by the group I mGlu receptor agonist (S)-3,5-DHPG as well as in reversing morphine antinociceptive tolerance in mice. Hyperalgesia was assessed in mice using the tail immersion test. Intrathecal (i.t.) pre-treatment with the test compounds 5-methyl-3-phenylethynyl-[1,2,4]triazine (RTI-4229-707), 5-methyl-3-(4-phenoxy-phenylethynyl-[1,2,4]triazine (RTI-4229-766), and 3-(3-methylphenylethynyl)-5-methyl-[1,2,4]triazine (RTI-4229-787) resulted in a dose-dependent blockade of (S)-3,5-DHPG-induced hyperalgesia. The inhibitory dose-50 (ID(50)) values were 0.49, 0.72 and 0.44 nmol/mouse, for RTI-4229-707, RTI-4229-766 and RTI-4229-787, respectively, compared to 18.63 nmol/mouse for MPEP. The other two compounds tested 3-(2,5-dimethylphenylethynyl)-5-methyl[1,2,4]triazine (RTI-4229-785) and 3-(2-methylphenylethynyl)-5-methyl[1,2,4]triazine (RTI-4229-828) were totally inactive. Morphine tolerance was induced in mice by implanting a 75 mg morphine pellet and assessing morphine-induced antinociception 72-h later. The morphine-pelleted mice showed a 5.5-fold tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of acute morphine compared to placebo-pelleted mice in the tail immersion test. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of the three active mGluR5 antagonists dose-dependently reversed morphine antinociceptive tolerance. The ID(50) values were 57.7, 25.8 and 64.3 nmol/mouse, for RTI-4229-707, RTI-4229-766 and RTI-4229-787, respectively, compared to 1050 nmol/mouse for MPEP. Similar to the hyperalgesia study, test compounds RTI-4229-785 and RTI-4229-828 were totally inactive in reversing morphine tolerance. These results are in agreement with our previous study in which we demonstrated that the same active mGluR5 antagonists blocked glutamate-mediated mobilization of internal calcium in a selective mGluR5 in vitro efficacy assay.

Alterations in brain Protein Kinase A activity and reversal of morphine tolerance by two fragments of native Protein Kinase A inhibitor peptide (PKI).

Two peptide fragments of native Protein Kinase A inhibitor (PKI), PKI-(6-22)-amide and PKI-(Myr-14-22)-amide, significantly reversed low-level morphine antinociceptive tolerance in mice. The inhibition of Protein Kinase A (PKA) activity by both peptide fragments was then measured in specific brain regions (thalamus, periaqueductal gray (PAG), and medulla) and in lumbar spinal cord (LSC), which in previous studies have been shown to play a role in morphine-induced analgesia. In drug naive animals, cytosolic PKA activity was greater than particulate PKA activity in each region, while cytosolic and particulate PKA activities were greater in thalamus and PAG compared to medulla and LSC. The addition of both peptides to homogenates from each region completely abolished cytosolic and particulate PKA activities in vitro. Following injection into the lateral ventricle of the brain of drug naive mice and morphine-tolerant mice, both peptides inhibited PKA activity in the cytosolic, but not the particulate fraction of LSC. In addition, cytosolic and particulate PKA activities were inhibited by both peptides in thalamus. These results demonstrate that the inhibition of PKA reverses morphine tolerance. Moreover, the inhibition of PKA activity in specific brain regions and LSC from morphine-tolerant mice by PKI analogs administered i.c.v. is evidence that PKA plays a role in morphine tolerance.