Francesca Lavatelli

Identification of Amyloidogenic Light Chains Requires the Combination of Serum-Free Light Chain Assay with Immunofixation of Serum and Urine

BACKGROUND The diagnosis of systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis requires demonstration of amyloid deposits in a tissue biopsy and amyloidogenic monoclonal light chains. The optimal strategy to identify the amyloidogenic clone has not been established. We prospectively assessed the diagnostic sensitivity of the serum free light chain (FLC) kappa/lambda ratio, a commercial serum and urine agarose gel electrophoresis immunofixation (IFE), and the high-resolution agarose gel electrophoresis immunofixation (HR-IFE) developed at our referral center in patients with AL amyloidosis, in whom the amyloidogenic light chain was unequivocally identified in the amyloid deposits. METHODS The amyloidogenic light chain was identified in 121 consecutive patients with AL amyloidosis by immunoelectron microscopy analysis of abdominal fat aspirates and/or organ biopsies. We characterized the monoclonal light chain by using IFE and HR-IFE in serum and urine and the FLC kappa/lambda ratio in serum. We then compared the diagnostic sensitivities of the 3 assays. RESULTS The HR-IFE of serum and urine identified the amyloidogenic light chain in all 115 patients with a monoclonal gammopathy. Six patients with a biclonal gammopathy were omitted from the statistical analysis. The diagnostic sensitivity of commercial serum and urine IFE was greater than that of the FLC kappa/lambda ratio (96% vs 76%). The combination of serum IFE and the FLC assay detected the amyloidogenic light chain in 96% of patients. The combination of IFE of both serum and urine with the FLC kappa/lambda ratio had a 100% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS The identification of amyloidogenic light chains cannot rely on a single test and requires the combination of a commercially available FLC assay with immunofixation of both serum and urine.

Reliable typing of systemic amyloidoses through proteomic analysis of subcutaneous adipose tissue

Considering the important advances in treating specific types of systemic amyloidoses, unequivocal typing of amyloid deposits is now essential. Subcutaneous abdominal fat aspiration is the easiest, most common diagnostic procedure. We developed a novel, automated approach, based on Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology, for typing amyloidosis. Fat aspirates were obtained from patients with the most common systemic amyloidoses (ALλ, ALκ, transthyretin, and reactive amyloidosis), with Congo red score more than or equal to 3+, and nonaffected controls. Peptides from extracted and digested proteins were analyzed by Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology. On semiquantitative differential analysis (patients vs controls) of mass spectrometry data, specific proteins up-represented in patients were identified and used as deposit biomarkers. An algorithm was developed to classify patients according to type and abundance of amyloidogenic proteins in samples; in all cases, proteomic characterization was concordant with fibril identification by immunoelectron microscopy and consistent with clinical presentation. Our approach allows reliable amyloid classification using readily available fat aspirates.

Amyloidogenic and Associated Proteins in Systemic Amyloidosis Proteome of Adipose Tissue

In systemic amyloidoses, widespread deposition of protein as amyloid causes severe organ dysfunction. It is necessary to discriminate among the different forms of amyloid to design an appropriate therapeutic strategy. We developed a proteomics methodology utilizing two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry and peptide mass fingerprinting to directly characterize amyloid deposits in abdominal subcutaneous fat obtained by fine needle aspiration from patients diagnosed as having amyloidoses typed as immunoglobulin light chain or transthyretin. Striking differences in the two-dimensional gel proteomes of adipose tissue were observed between controls and patients and between the two types of patients with distinct, additional spots present in the patient specimens that could be assigned as the amyloidogenic proteins in full-length and truncated forms. In patients heterozygotic for transthyretin mutations, wild-type peptides and peptides containing amyloidogenic transthyretin variants were isolated in roughly equal amounts from the same protein spots, indicative of incorporation of both species into the deposits. Furthermore novel spots unrelated to the amyloidogenic proteins appeared in patient samples; some of these were identified as isoforms of serum amyloid P and apolipoprotein E, proteins that have been described previously to be associated with amyloid deposits. Finally changes in the normal expression pattern of resident adipose proteins, such as down-regulation of αB-crystallin, peroxiredoxin 6, and aldo-keto reductase I, were observed in apparent association with the presence of amyloid, although their levels did not strictly correlate with the grade of amyloid deposition. This proteomics approach not only provides a way to detect and unambiguously type the deposits in abdominal subcutaneous fat aspirates from patients with amyloidoses but it may also have the capability to generate new insights into the mechanism of the diseases by identifying novel proteins or protein post-translational modifications associated with amyloid infiltration.

Susceptibility to AA Amyloidosis in Rheumatic Diseases: A Critical Overview

Introduction Reactive systemic AA amyloidosis is one of the most severe complications of several chronic rheumatic disorders, particularly rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and the hereditary autoinflammatory syndromes. Organ and tissue damage results from the extracellular aggregation of proteolytic fragments of the circulating acute-phase reactant protein serum amyloid A (SAA) as insoluble amyloid fibrils. The kidneys, liver, and spleen are mostly targeted by AA amyloid deposits, and AA amyloidosis becomes clinically overt mainly when renal damage occurs, manifesting either as proteinuria, nephrotic syndrome, or derangement in renal function (1). Due to the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease and possible gastrointestinal and bladder bleeding, the occurrence of AA amyloidosis severely impacts the prognosis of patients with rheumatic disorders (2). In recent studies, amyloidosis has been reported as the cause of death in 5–17% of patients with RA (3). A sustained high concentration of SAA is the prerequisite for AA amyloidogenesis (Figure 1). However, AA amyloidosis actually develops in only a minority of patients with active, longstanding inflammatory diseases, indicating that significant disease-modifying factors might play a role in modulating either the occurrence, the rate of tissue deposition, or the induction of tissue damage in this form of amyloidosis. Here, we review genetic, biologic, and clinical factors underlying susceptibility to the development of AA amyloidosis in patients with chronic rheumatic disorders and provide a critical interpretation that also is supported by the well-characterized mouse model of the disease.

Oral melphalan and dexamethasone grants extended survival with minimal toxicity in AL amyloidosis: long-term results of a risk-adapted approach

The combination of oral melphalan and dexamethasone is considered standard therapy for patients with light-chain amyloidosis ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. However, previous trials reported different rates of response and survival, mainly because of the different proportions of high-risk patients. In the present study, including a total of 259 subjects, we treated 119 patients with full-dose melphalan and dexamethasone (dexamethasone 40 mg days 1–4), and 140 patients with advanced cardiac disease with an attenuated dexamethasone schedule (20 mg). Hematologic response rates were 76% in the full-dose group and 51% in the patients receiving the attenuated schedule; the corresponding complete response rates were 31% and 12%, respectively. The median survival was 7.4 years in the full-dose group and 20 months in the attenuated-dose group. Use of high-dose dexamethasone, amino-terminal pro-natriuretic peptide type-B >1800 ng/L, a difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains of >180 mg/L, troponin I >0.07 ng/mL, and response to therapy were independent prognostic determinants. In relapsed/refractory subjects bortezomib combinations granted high hematologic response rates (79% and 63%, respectively), proving the most effective rescue treatment after melphalan and dexamethasone. In summary, melphalan plus dexamethasone was highly effective with minimal toxicity, confirming its central role in the treatment of AL amyloidosis. Future randomized trials will clarify whether bortezomib is best used in frontline combination with melphalan and dexamethasone or as rescue treatment.

Melphalan and dexamethasone with or without bortezomib in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: a matched case-control study on 174 patients.

Oral melphalan and dexamethasone (MDex) is a standard treatment for patients with AL amyloidosis who are not eligible for stem cell transplantation at many referral centers. However, following encouraging reports on the activity of bortezomib combined with alkylators and dexamethasone, these combinations are being moved to frontline therapy. We compared the outcome of 87 patients treated with bortezomib plus MDex (BMDex) with that of 87 controls treated with MDex. Patients and controls were matched for age, cardiac and renal function and free light chain burden. A higher rate of complete responses was observed with BMDex (42 vs 19%), but this did not result in a survival improvement in the overall population. However, a significant survival advantage for BMDex was observed in patients without severe (New York Heart Association class III or IV) heart failure and with N-terminal pro-natriuretic peptide type-B <8500 ng/l. Patients treated with full-dose dexamethasone had similar response rates and survival whether they received bortezomib or not. Intermediate-risk patients who are not fit enough to receive high-dose dexamethasone are likely to take the greatest advantage from the addition of bortezomib to MDex.

A practical approach to the diagnosis of systemic amyloidoses

Accurate diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis is necessary both for assessing the prognosis and for delineating the appropriate treatment. It is based on histologic evidence of amyloid deposits and characterization of the amyloidogenic protein. We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of immunoelectron microscopy (IEM) of abdominal fat aspirates from 745 consecutive patients with suspected systemic amyloidoses. All cases were extensively investigated with clinical and laboratory data, with a follow-up of at least 18 months. The 423 (56.8%) cases with confirmed systemic forms were used to estimate the diagnostic performance of IEM. Compared with Congo-red-based light microscopy, IEM was equally sensitive (75% to 80%) but significantly more specific (100% vs 80%; P < .001). In amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, κ cases were more difficult to diagnose (sensitivity 71%), whereas the analysis of abdominal aspirate was informative in only 40% of patients with transthyretin amyloidosis. We found a high prevalence (20%) of a monoclonal component in patients with non-AL amyloidosis, highlighting the risk of misdiagnosis and the need for unequivocal amyloid typing. Notably, IEM identified correctly the specific form of amyloidosis in >99% of the cases. IEM of abdominal fat aspirates is an effective tool in the routine diagnosis of systemic amyloidoses.

Best use of cardiac biomarkers in patients with AL amyloidosis and renal failure.

In AL amyloidosis prognosis depends on the severity of heart dysfunction which is best assessed by natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT‐proBNP). However, their clearance relies on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and their concentration increases with renal failure. We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic performance of NT‐proBNP and BNP in 248 patients with AL amyloidosis with different degrees of renal failure. Patients were grouped according to GFR. Group 1 comprised 109 patients with GFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, Group 2, 77 subjects with GFR <60 and ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and Group 3, 62 patients with GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. The ability of natriuretic peptides to detect heart involvement and to predict survival in the three groups was assessed. Decreasing eGFR required higher cutoffs of both NT‐proBNP and BNP for detecting heart involvement and predicting survival. Both natriuretic peptides were independent prognostic markers in Groups 1 and 2, whereas in Group 3 only BNP independently predicted survival. Natriuretic peptides are powerful and useful markers of cardiac dysfunction and prognosis, provided that eGFR is considered in interpreting their clinical meaning. BNP should be preferred in patients with end‐stage renal failure. Am. J. Hematol. 87:465–471, 2012.

The workings of the amyloid diseases

The amyloidoses constitute a large group of diseases caused by an alteration in the conformation and metabolism of several globular proteins which, under particular conditions, deposit in tissues as insoluble fibrillar aggregates. To date, at least 24 different proteins have been recognized as causative agents of amyloid diseases. Despite a high heterogeneity in amino acid sequence, three‐dimensional structure, and biological function, all amyloidogenic proteins share a reduced folding stability, a strong propensity to acquire more than one conformation, and the capacity to form almost indistinguishable amyloid fibrils. In some cases, the generation of an aggregation‐prone state can be triggered or enhanced by the occurrence of mutations, a proteolytic cleavage, or a seeding process. The interaction between the amyloidogenic precursor, some common components of amyloid deposits, and the extra‐cellular environment also plays a role in fibrillogenesis and in particular in the organ tropism of amyloid deposition. The process of amyloid fibril formation exerts a cytotoxic effect, resulting in tissue damage and organ dysfunction. Prefibrillar aggregates are thought to have an active part in this process. Due to the pathogenic complexity of amyloid diseases, the integration of several therapeutic interventions involving different critical levels of the amyloidogenic cascade is envisaged.

A phase II trial of cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in previously treated patients with AL amyloidosis

Immune-modulatory drugs are active in immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis and the addition of alkylating agents can potentiate their action. In this phase II prospective trial we used cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the treatment of 21 patients who were refractory (n=13, 62%) or relapsed (n=8, 38%) after prior treatment including melphalan in all cases, bortezomib in 4 and thalidomide in 6. Median number of cycles administered was 4 (range 2–9 cycles). Severe adverse events were observed in 57% of patients, most common being neutropenia (29%). The hematologic response rate was 62%, with one complete response and 5 very good partial responses. Overall median survival was three years. The achievement of CR/VGPR was associated with a significant survival advantage. The combination of cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide and dexamethasone is an effective treatment for relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis, and good quality hematologic response should be the aim of treatment in this setting. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00607581)