Francine Acher

The metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure, activation mechanism and pharmacology.

The metabotropic glutamate receptors are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) involved in the regulation of many synapses, including most glutamatergic fast excitatory synapses. Eight subtypes have been identified that can be classified into three groups. The molecular characterization of these receptors revealed proteins much more complex than any other GPCRs. They are composed of a Venus Flytrap (VFT) module where glutamate binds, connected to a heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein coupling. Recent data including the structure of the VFT module determined with and without glutamate, indicate that these receptors function as dimers. Moreover a number of intracellular proteins can regulate their targeting and transduction mechanism. Such structural features of mGlu receptors offer multiple possibilities for synthetic compounds to modulate their activity. In addition to agonists and competitive antagonists acting at the glutamate binding site, a number of non-competitive antagonists with inverse agonist activity, and positive allosteric modulators have been discovered. These later compounds share specific properties that make them good candidates for therapeutic applications. First, their non-amino acid structure makes them pass more easily the blood brain barrier. Second, they are much more selective than any other compound identified so far, being the first subtype selective molecules. Third, for the negative modulators, their non competitive mechanism of action makes them relatively unaffected by high concentrations of glutamate that may be present in disease states (e.g. stroke, epilepsy, neuropathic pain, etc.). Fourth, like the benzodiazepines acting at the GABA(A) receptors, the positive modulators offer a new way to increase the activity of these receptors in vivo, with a low risk of inducing their desensitization. The present review article focuses on the specific structural features of these receptors and highlights the various possibilities these offer for drug development.

Heptahelical domain of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 behaves like rhodopsin-like receptors

Although agonists bind directly in the heptahelical domain (HD) of most class-I rhodopsin-like G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), class-III agonists bind in the extracellular domain of their receptors. Indeed, the latter possess a large extracellular domain composed of a cysteine-rich domain and a Venus flytrap module. Both the low sequence homology and the structural organization of class-III GPCRs raised the question of whether or not the HD of these receptors functions the same way as rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Here, we show that the HD of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5) displays the same agonist-independent constitutive activity as the wild-type receptor. Moreover, we show that the noncompetitive antagonist MPEP [2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine hydrochloride] and the positive allosteric modulator DFB (3,3′-difluorobenzaldazine) act as inverse agonist and full agonist, respectively, on the mGlu5 HD in the absence of the extracellular domain. This finding illustrates that, like rhodopsin-like receptors, the HD of mGluRs can constitutively couple to G proteins and be negatively and positively regulated by ligands. These data show that the HD of mGluRs behave like any other class-I GPCRs in terms of G protein coupling and regulation by various types of ligands.

New perspectives for the development of selective metabotropic glutamate receptor ligands

The metabotropic glutamate receptors are GTP-binding-protein (G-protein) coupled receptors that play important roles in regulating the activity of many synapses in the central nervous system. As such, these receptors are involved in a wide number of physiological and pathological processes. Within the last few years, new potent and selective agonists and antagonists as well as radioligands acting on these receptors have been developed. Molecular modeling studies revealed the structural features of the glutamate binding site, and will be useful for the design of more selective and potent ligands. More interestingly, recent data revealed new regulatory sites on the receptor protein, able either to decrease or potentiate the action of the endogenous ligand. No doubt that in the near future a multitude of new tools to modulate the activity of these receptors will be discovered, enabling the identification of the possible therapeutic applications for these new neuroactive molecules.

Closure of the Venus flytrap module of mGlu8 receptor and the activation process: Insights from mutations converting antagonists into agonists

Ca2+, pheromones, sweet taste compounds, and the main neurotransmitters glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that constitute the GPCR family 3. These receptors are dimers, and each subunit has a large extracellular domain called a Venus flytrap module (VFTM), where agonists bind. This module is connected to a heptahelical domain that activates G proteins. Recently, the structure of the dimer of mGlu1 VFTMs revealed two important conformational changes resulting from glutamate binding. First, agonists can stabilize a closed state of at least one VFTM in the dimer. Second, the relative orientation of the two VFTMs in the dimer is different in the presence of glutamate, such that their C-terminal ends (which are connected to the G protein-activating heptahelical domain) become closer by more than 20 Å. This latter change in orientation has been proposed to play a key role in receptor activation. To elucidate the respective role of VFTM closure and the change in orientation of the VFTMs in family 3 GPCR activation, we analyzed the mechanism of action of the mGlu8 receptor antagonists ACPT-II and MAP4. Molecular modeling studies suggest that these two compounds prevent the closure of the mGlu8 VFTM because of ionic and steric hindrance, respectively. We show here that the replacement of the residues responsible for these hindrances (Asp-309 and Tyr-227, respectively) by Ala allows ACPT-II or MAP4 to fully activate the receptors. These data are consistent with the requirement of the VFTM closure for family 3 GPCR activation.

Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence that modulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 with a new agonist reverses experimental parkinsonism

Developing nondopaminergic palliative treatments for Parkinsons disease represents a major challenge to avoid the debilitating side effects produced by l‐DOPA therapy. Increasing interest is addressed to the selective targeting of group III metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors that inhibit transmitter release at presumably overactive synapses in the basal ganglia. Here we characterize the functional action of a new orthosteric group III mGlu agonist, LSP1–2111, with a preferential affinity for mGlu4 receptor. In mouse brain slices, LSP1– 2111 inhibits striatopallidal GABAergic transmission by selectively activating the mGlu4 receptor but has no effect at a synapse modulated solely by the mGlu7 and mGlu8 receptors. Intrapallidal LSP1–2111 infusion reverses the akinesia produced by nigrostriatal dopamine depletion in a reaction time task, whereas an mGlu8–receptor agonist has no effect. Finally, systemic administration of LSP1–2111 counteracts haloperidol‐induced catalepsy, opening promising perspectives for the development of antiparkinsonian therapeutic strategies focused on orthosteric mGlu4–receptor agonists.—Beurrier, C., Lopez, S., Révy, D., Selvam, C., Goudet, C., Lhérondel, M., Gubellini, P., Kerkerian‐LeGoff, L., Acher, F., Pin, J.‐P., Amalric, M. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence that modulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 with a new agonist reverses experimental parkinsonism. FASEB J. 23, 3619–3628 (2009). www.fasebj.org

Targeting Group III Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Produces Complex Behavioral Effects in Rodent Models of Parkinson's Disease

Drugs activating group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) represent therapeutic alternatives to l-DOPA (l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) for the treatment of Parkinsons disease (PD). Their presynaptic location at GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses within basal ganglia nuclei provide a critical target to reduce abnormal activities associated with PD. The effects of selective group III mGluR agonists (1S,3R,4S)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3,4-tricarboxylic acid (ACPT-I) and l-(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (l-AP4) infused into the globus pallidus (GP) or the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) were thus studied in rat models of PD. Bilateral infusions of ACPT-I (1, 2.5, and 5 nmol/μl) into the GP fully reverse the severe akinetic deficits produced by 6-hydroxydopamine nigrostriatal dopamine lesions in a reaction-time task without affecting the performance of controls. Similar results were observed after l-AP4 (1 nmol) or picrotoxin, a GABAA receptor antagonist, infused into the GP. In addition, intrapallidal ACPT-I counteracts haloperidol-induced catalepsy. This effect is reversed by concomitant administration of a selective group III receptor antagonist (RS)-α-cyclopropyl-4-phosphonophenylglycine. In contrast, ACPT-I (0.05, 0.1, and 0.25 nmol) infusions into the SNr enhance the lesion-induced akinetic deficits in control and lesioned rats and do not reverse haloperidol-induced catalepsy. l-AP4 (0.05 nmol) and picrotoxin in the SNr produce the same effects. Together, these results show that activation of group III mGluRs in the GP provides benefits in parkinsonian rats, presumably by modulating GABAergic neurotransmission. The opposite effects produced by group III mGluR activation in the SNr, also observed with a selective mGluR8 agonist, support the use of subtype-selective group III mGluR agonists as a potential antiparkinsonian strategy.

Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibit hyperalgesia in animal models of inflammation and neuropathic pain

&NA; Glutamate plays a key role in modulation of nociceptive processing. This excitatory amino acid exerts its action through two distinct types of receptors, ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Eight mGluRs have been identified and divided in three groups based on their sequence similarity, pharmacology and G‐protein coupling. While the role of group I and II mGluRs is now well established, little is known about the part played by group III mGluRs in pain. In this work, we studied comparatively the involvement of spinal group III mGluR in modulation of acute, inflammatory and neuropathic pain. While intrathecal injection of ACPT‐I, a selective group III mGluR agonist, failed to induce any change in vocalization thresholds of healthy animals submitted to mechanical or thermal stimuli, it dose‐dependently inhibited the nociceptive behavior of rats submitted to the formalin test and the mechanical hyperalgesia associated with different animal models of inflammatory (carrageenan‐treated and monoarthritic rats) or neuropathic pain (mononeuropathic and vincristine‐treated rats). Similar effects were also observed following intrathecal injection of PHCCC, a positive allosteric modulator of mGlu4. Antihyperalgesia induced by ACPT‐I was blocked either by LY341495, a nonselective antagonist of mGluR, by MAP4, a selective group III antagonist. This study provide new evidences supporting the role of spinal group III mGluRs in the modulation of pain perception in different pathological pain states of various etiologies but not in normal conditions. It more particularly highlights the specific involvement of mGlu4 in this process and may be a useful therapeutic approach to chronic pain treatment.

Molecular Determinants of Ligand Selectivity in a Vertebrate Odorant Receptor

The identification of the chemical structure of an odorant by the vertebrate olfactory system is thought to occur through the combinatorial activity from multiple receptors, each tuned to recognize different chemical features. What are the molecular determinants underlying the selectivity of individual odorant receptors for their cognate ligands? To address this question, we performed molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis on the ligand-binding region of two orthologous amino acid odorant receptors belonging to the “C family” of G-protein-coupled receptors in goldfish and zebrafish. We identified the critical ligand-receptor interactions that afford ligand binding as well as selectivity for different amino acids. Moreover, predictions regarding binding pocket structure allowed us to alter, in a predictable manner, the receptor preferences for different ligands. These results reveal how this class of odorant receptor has evolved to accommodate ligands of varying chemical structure and further illuminate the molecular principles underlying ligand recognition and selectivity in this family of chemosensory receptors.

Amino acid recognition by Venus flytrap domains is encoded in an 8-residue motif†

A motif foramino acid recognition by proteins or domains of the periplasmic binding protein‐like I superfamily has been identified. An initial pattern of 5 residues was based on a multiple sequence alignment of selected proteins of that fold family and on common structural features observed in the crystal structure of some members of the family [leucine isoleucine valine binding protein (LIVBP), leucine binding protein (LBP), and metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 (mGlu1R) amino terminal domain)]. This pattern was used against the PIR‐NREF sequence database and further refined to retrieve all sequences of proteins that belong to the family and eliminate those that do not belong to it. A motif of 8 residues was finally selected to build up the general signature. A total of 232 sequences were retrieved. They were found to belong to only three families of proteins: bacterial periplasmic binding proteins (PBP, 71 sequences), family 3 (or C) of G‐protein coupled receptor (GPCR) (146 sequences), and plant putative ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluR, 15 sequences). PBPs are known to adopt a bilobate structure also named Venus flytrap domain, or LIVBP domain in the present case. Family 3/C GPCRs are also known to hold such a domain. However, for plant iGluRs, it was previously detected by classical similarity searches but not specifically described. Thus plant iGluRs carry two Venus flytrap domains, one that binds glutamate and an additional one that would be a modulatory LIVBP domain. In some cases, the modulator binding to that domain would be an amino acid.

A novel selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 agonist reveals new possibilities for developing subtype selective ligands with therapeutic potential

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors are promising targets to treat numerous brain disorders. So far, allosteric modulators are the only subtype selective ligands, but pure agonists still have strong therapeutic potential. Here, we aimed at investigating the possibility of developing subtype‐selective agonists by extending the glutamate‐like structure to hit a nonconsensus binding area. We report the properties of the first mGlu4‐selective orthosteric agonist, derived from a virtual screening hit, LSP4‐2022 using cell‐based assays with recombinant mGlu receptors [EC50: 0.11±0.02, 11.6±1.9, 29.2±4.2 μM (n>19) in calcium assays on mGlu4, mGlu7, and mGlu8 receptors, respectively, with no activity at the group I and ‐II mGlu receptors at 100 μM]. LSP4‐2022 inhibits neurotransmission in cerebellar slices from wild‐type but not mGlu4 receptor‐knockout mice. In vivo, it possesses antiparkinsonian properties after central or systemic administration in a haloperidol‐induced catalepsy test, revealing its ability to cross the blood‐brain barrier. Site‐directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling was used to identify the LSP4‐2022 binding site, revealing interaction with both the glutamate binding site and a variable pocket responsible for selectivity. These data reveal new approaches for developing selective, hydrophilic, and brain‐penetrant mGlu receptor agonists, offering new possibilities to design original bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential.—Goudet, C., Vilar, B., Courtiol, T., Deltheil, T., Bessiron, T., Brabet, I., Oueslati, N., Rigault, D., Bertrand, H.‐O., McLean, H., Daniel, H., Amalric, M., Acher, F., Pin, J.‐P. A novel selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 agonist reveals new possibilities for developing subtype‐selective ligands with therapeutic potential. FASEB J. 26, 1682‐1693 (2012). www.fasebj.org