Francis J. Sullivan
National University of Ireland, Galway
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Francis J. Sullivan.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2005
James L. Gulley; Philip M. Arlen; Anne Bastian; Steven Morin; Jennifer L. Marte; Patricia Beetham; Kwong-Yok Tsang; Junko Yokokawa; James W. Hodge; Cynthia Ménard; Kevin Camphausen; C. Norman Coleman; Francis J. Sullivan; Seth M. Steinberg; Jeffrey Schlom; William L. Dahut
Purpose: Many patients with clinically localized prostate cancer develop biochemical failure despite excellent local therapy perhaps due to occult metastatic disease. One potential solution is the utilization of a well-tolerated systemic therapy (e.g., vaccine) in concert with local therapy. Experimental Design: We present a randomized phase II clinical trial designed to determine if a poxviral vaccine encoding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can induce a PSA-specific T-cell response when combined with radiotherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Thirty patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio into vaccine plus radiotherapy or radiotherapy-only arms. Those patients in the combination arm received a “priming” vaccine with recombinant vaccinia (rV) PSA plus r V containing the T-cell costimulatory molecule B7.1 (rV-B7.1) followed by monthly booster vaccines with recombinant fowlpox PSA. The vaccines were given with local granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and low-dose systemic interleukin-2. Standard external beam radiation therapy was given between the fourth and the sixth vaccinations. Results: Seventeen of 19 patients in the combination arm completed all eight vaccinations and 13 of these 17 patients had increases in PSA-specific T cells of at least 3-fold versus no detectable increases in the radiotherapy-only arm (P < 0.0005). There was also evidence of de novo generation of T cells to well-described prostate-associated antigens not found in the vaccine, providing indirect evidence of immune-mediated tumor killing. The vaccine was well tolerated. Conclusion: This vaccine regimen can be safely given in patients undergoing radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer, with the majority of patients generating a PSA-specific cellular immune response to vaccine.
Carcinogenesis | 2013
Amy J. Burke; Francis J. Sullivan; Francis J. Giles; Sharon A. Glynn
Nitric oxide (NO) is a short-lived, pleiotropic molecule that affects numerous critical functions in the body. Presently, there are markedly conflicting findings in the literature regarding NO and its role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. NO has been shown to have dichotomous effects on cellular proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion, angiogenesis and many other important processes in cancer biology. It has been shown to be both pro- and antitumorigenic, depending on the concentration and the tumor microenvironment in question. NO is generated by three isoforms of NO synthase (NOS) that are widely expressed and sometimes upregulated in human tumors. Due to its vast array of physiological functions, it presents a huge challenge to researchers to discover its true potential in cancer biology and consequently, its use in anticancer therapies. In this study, we review the current knowledge in this area, with an emphasis placed on NO modulation as an anticancer therapy, focusing on NO-donating drugs and NOS inhibitors.
European Urology | 2015
Neil E. Martin; Laura Massey; Caleb Stowell; Chris H. Bangma; Alberto Briganti; Anna Bill-Axelson; Michael L. Blute; James Catto; Ronald C. Chen; Anthony V. D'Amico; Günter Feick; John M. Fitzpatrick; Steven J. Frank; Michael Froehner; Mark Frydenberg; Adam Glaser; Markus Graefen; Daniel A. Hamstra; Adam S. Kibel; Nancy P. Mendenhall; Kim Moretti; Jacob Ramon; Ian Roos; Howard M. Sandler; Francis J. Sullivan; David A. Swanson; Ashutosh Tewari; Andrew J. Vickers; Thomas Wiegel; Hartwig Huland
BACKGROUND Value-based health care has been proposed as a unifying force to drive improved outcomes and cost containment. OBJECTIVE To develop a standard set of multidimensional patient-centered health outcomes for tracking, comparing, and improving localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatment value. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We convened an international working group of patients, registry experts, urologists, and radiation oncologists to review existing data and practices. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The group defined a recommended standard set representing who should be tracked, what should be measured and at what time points, and what data are necessary to make meaningful comparisons. Using a modified Delphi method over a series of teleconferences, the group reached consensus for the Standard Set. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS We recommend that the Standard Set apply to men with newly diagnosed localized PCa treated with active surveillance, surgery, radiation, or other methods. The Standard Set includes acute toxicities occurring within 6 mo of treatment as well as patient-reported outcomes tracked regularly out to 10 yr. Patient-reported domains of urinary incontinence and irritation, bowel symptoms, sexual symptoms, and hormonal symptoms are included, and the recommended measurement tool is the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form. Disease control outcomes include overall, cause-specific, metastasis-free, and biochemical relapse-free survival. Baseline clinical, pathologic, and comorbidity information is included to improve the interpretability of comparisons. CONCLUSIONS We have defined a simple, easily implemented set of outcomes that we believe should be measured in all men with localized PCa as a crucial first step in improving the value of care. PATIENT SUMMARY Measuring, reporting, and comparing identical outcomes across treatments and treatment centers will provide patients and providers with information to make informed treatment decisions. We defined a set of outcomes that we recommend being tracked for every man being treated for localized prostate cancer.
Free Radical Biology and Medicine | 1999
Stephen M. Hahn; Francis J. Sullivan; Anne Marie DeLuca; John D Bacher; James Liebmann; Murali C. Krishna; Deborah Coffin; James B. Mitchell
Reactive oxygen species play critical roles in a number of physiologic and pathologic processes. Nitroxides are stable free radical compounds that possess superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetic activity and have been shown to protect against the toxicity of reactive oxygen species in vitro and in vivo. Tempol, a cell-permeable hydrophilic nitroxide, protects against oxidative stress and also is an in vitro and in vivo radioprotector. In the course of evaluating the pharmacology and toxicity of the nitroxides, Tempol and another nitroxide, 3-carbamoyl-PROXYL (3-CP), were administered intravenously in various concentrations to miniature swine. Tempol caused dose-related hypotension accompanied by reflex tachycardia and increased skin temperature. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring with Swan Ganz catheterization (SGC) confirmed the potent vasodilative effect of Tempol. However, 3-CP had no effect on porcine blood pressure. The hemodynamic effects of Tempol and 3-CP are discussed in the context of differential catalytic rate constants for superoxide disumation that may impact systemic nitric oxide (NO) levels and lead to vasodilation. These findings are consistent with a role for the superoxide ion in the modulation of blood pressure and have potential implications for the systemic use of nitroxides.
Free Radical Biology and Medicine | 1997
Stephen M. Hahn; Francis J. Sullivan; Anne Marie DeLuca; C.Murali Krishna; Nancy Wersto; David Venzon; Angelo Russo; James B. Mitchell
Tempol, a stable nitroxide free radical compound, is an in vitro and in vivo radioprotector. Previous studies have shown that Tempol protects C3H mice against whole-body radiation-induced bone marrow failure. In this study, the radioprotection of tumor tissue was evaluated. RIF-1 tumor cells were implanted in female C3H mice 10 d prior to radiation. Groups of mice were injected intraperitoneally with Tempol (275 mg/kg) or PBS followed 10 min later by a single dose of radiation to the tumor bed. Tumor growth curves generated after 10 and 33.3 Gy doses of radiation showed no difference in growth between the Tempol- and PBS-treated animals. A full radiation dose-response experiment revealed a tumor control dose in 50% of the animals in 30 d (TCD(50/30)) value of 36.7 Gy for Tempol-treated mice and 41.8 Gy for saline-treated mice suggesting no protection of the RIF-1 tumor by Tempol. Tumor pharmacokinetics were done to determine why Tempol differentially protected bone marrow and not tumor cells. Differential reduction of Tempol in the RIF-1 tumor and bone marrow was evaluated with EPR spectroscopy 10, 20, and 30 min after injection. Bioreduction of Tempol to its corresponding hydroxylamine (which is not a radioprotector) occurred to a greater extent in RIF-1 tumor cells compared to bone marrow. We conclude that the differences in radioprotection may result from enhanced intratumor bioreduction of Tempol to its nonradioprotective hydroxylamine analogue. The nitroxides as a class of compounds may provide a means to exploit the redox differences between normal tissues and tumors.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1994
Francis J. Sullivan; Laurie L. Herscher; John A. Cook; Judy L. Smith; Seth M. Steinberg; Alan H. Epstein; Edward H. Oldfield; Thomas Goffman; Timothy J. Kinsella; James B. Mitchell; Eli Glatstein
PURPOSE We report the outcome of a Phase II study of a cohort of patients with high-grade glioma treated with accelerated hyperfractionated radiation and the radiation sensitizer, iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1988 and December 1990, 39 consecutive patients with high-grade glioma were enrolled and treated on a Phase II protocol including hyperfractionated radiation and IdUrd. Thirty-two patients were male and seven were female. Age range was 19 to 71 years with a median age of 38 years. IdUrd (1000 mg/m2 per day) was administered in two separate 14-day courses, the first during the initial radiation field and the second during the final cone-down field. All patients were treated consistently with partial brain technique and received 1.5 Gy/fraction twice daily to a mean total dose of 71.25 Gy (range 66-72 Gy excluding one patient who did not complete treatment). The initial field was treated to 45 Gy followed by a cone-down field covering the tumor volume plus a 1-cm margin to the final dose. Patients were assessed for acute and long-term morbidity and followed for outcome. Two patients had biopsies during the course of treatment. Flow cytometry and high performance liquid chromatography was used to evaluate the labeling index and the percent replacement of IdUrd in the biopsy specimen. RESULTS Thirty-eight of 39 patients completed therapy. One patient died on treatment at 48 Gy and is included in the survival analysis. No patient was lost to follow-up. Twenty-one patients had Grade 3 (anaplastic astrocytoma) tumors and 18 patients had Grade 4 (glioblastoma multiforme). Median survival for the entire cohort was 23 months. For the glioblastoma multiforme patients, median survival was 15 months. The median survival of the anaplastic astrocytoma patients has not yet been reached. In the patients assessed, the range of IdUrd tumor cell incorporation was only 0-2.4%. CONCLUSION Accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy with IdUrd was administered with acceptable acute toxicity. The major acute side effects of mucositis and thrombocytopenia were related to IdUrd infusion and were dose-dependent. There were no unacceptable acute toxicities referable to the radiation as delivered. With a median potential follow-up of 51 months, the actuarial median survival of the glioblastoma multiforme patients is comparable with the best previously published reports. The outcome of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma compares very favorably with even the most aggressive multi-modality approaches in the recent literature with a minimum of acute morbidity.
Molecular Cancer | 2017
Sarah M. Ridge; Francis J. Sullivan; Sharon A. Glynn
Tumour progression is dependent on the interaction between tumour cells and cells of the surrounding microenvironment. The tumour is a dynamic milieu consisting of various cell types such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts, cells of the immune system and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). MSCs are multipotent stromal cells that are known to reside in various areas such as the bone marrow, fat and dental pulp. MSCs have been found to migrate towards inflammatory sites and studies have shown that they also migrate towards and incorporate into the tumour. The key question is how they interact there. MSCs may interact with tumour cells through paracrine signalling. On the other hand, MSCs have the capacity to differentiate to various cell types such as osteocytes, chondrocytes and adipocytes and it is possible that MSCs differentiate at the site of the tumour. More recently it has been shown that cross-talk between tumour cells and MSCs has been shown to increase metastatic potential and promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. This review will focus on the role of MSCs in tumour development at various stages of progression from growth of the primary tumour to the establishment of distant metastasis.
International Journal of Cancer | 2015
Ronan F. Downey; Francis J. Sullivan; Feng Wang-Johanning; Stefan Ambs; Francis J. Giles; Sharon A. Glynn
Harbored as relics of ancient germline infections, human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) now constitute up to 8% of our genome. A proportion of this sequence has been co‐opted for molecular and cellular processes, beneficial to human physiology, such as the fusogenic activity of the envelope protein, a vital component of placentogenesis. However, the discovery of high levels of HERV‐K mRNA and protein and even virions in a wide array of cancers has revealed that HERV‐K may be playing a more sinister role—a role as an etiological agent in cancer itself. Whether the presence of this retroviral material is simply an epiphenomenon, or an actual causative factor, is a hotly debated topic. This review will summarize the current state of knowledge regarding HERV‐K and cancer and attempt to outline the potential mechanisms by which HERV‐K could be involved in the onset and promotion of carcinogenesis.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters | 2008
Allen A. Thomas; J. De Meese; Y. Le Huerou; Steven Armen Boyd; Todd Romoff; Steven S. Gonzales; Indrani W. Gunawardana; Tomas Kaplan; Francis J. Sullivan; Kevin Ronald Condroski; Joseph P. Lyssikatos; Thomas Daniel Aicher; Josh Ballard; Bryan Bernat; Walter E. DeWolf; May Han; Christine Lemieux; Darin Smith; Solly Weiler; S. Kirk Wright; Guy Vigers; Barb Brandhuber
Inhibition of the thiamine-utilizing enzyme transketolase (TK) has been linked with diminished tumor cell proliferation. Most thiamine antagonists have a permanent positive charge on the B-ring, and it has been suggested that this charge is required for diphosphorylation by thiamine pyrophosphokinase (TPPK) and binding to TK. We sought to make neutral thiazolium replacements that would be substrates for TPPK, while not necessarily needing thiamine transporters (ThTr1 and ThTr2) for cell penetration. The synthesis, SAR, and structure-based rationale for highly potent non-thiazolium TK antagonists are presented.
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry | 2016
James F. Blake; Michael Burkard; Jocelyn Chan; Huifen Chen; Kang-Jye Chou; Dolores Díaz; Danette Dudley; John J. Gaudino; Stephen E. Gould; Jonas Grina; Thomas Hunsaker; Lichuan Liu; Matthew Martinson; David Moreno; Lars Mueller; Christine Orr; Patricia Pacheco; Ann Qin; Kevin Rasor; Li Ren; Kirk Robarge; Sheerin Shahidi-Latham; Jeffrey Stults; Francis J. Sullivan; Weiru Wang; JianPing Yin; Aihe Zhou; Marcia Belvin; Mark Merchant; John Moffat
The extracellular signal-regulated kinases ERK1/2 represent an essential node within the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling cascade that is commonly activated by oncogenic mutations in BRAF or RAS or by upstream oncogenic signaling. While targeting upstream nodes with RAF and MEK inhibitors has proven effective clinically, resistance frequently develops through reactivation of the pathway. Simultaneous targeting of multiple nodes in the pathway, such as MEK and ERK, offers the prospect of enhanced efficacy as well as reduced potential for acquired resistance. Described herein is the discovery and characterization of GDC-0994 (22), an orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor selective for ERK kinase activity.